Skip to main content

Formulating the Temporal Causal Relationships Between Events and Their Results

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Abstract

We introduce in this paper a formalism for representing flexible temporal causal relationships between events and their effects. A formal characterization of the so-called (most) General Temporal Constraint (GTC) is formulated, which guarantees the common-sense assertion that “the beginning of the effect cannot precede the beginning of its causal event”. It is shown that there are actually in total 8 possible temporal causal relationships which satisfy the GTC. These include cases where, (1) the effect becomes true immediately after the end of the event and remains true for some time after the event; (2) the effect holds only over the same time over which the event is in progress; (3) the beginning of the effect coincides with the beginning of the event, and the effect ends before the event completes; (4) the beginning of the effect coincides with the beginning of the event, and the effect remains true for some time after the event; (5) the effect only holds over some time during the progress of the event; (6) the effect becomes true during the progress of the event and remains true until the event completes; (7) the effect becomes true during the progress of the event and remains true for some time after the event; and (8) where there is a time delay between the event and its effect. We shall demonstrate that the introduced formulation is versatile enough to subsume those existing representative formalisms in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. McCarthy, J., Situations, actions and causal laws, Stanford Artificial Intelligence Project: Memo 2, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  2. McCarthy, J., Hayes, P.: Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence, in Machine Intelligence, 4, Eds. Meltzer B. and Michie D., Edinburgh University Press, pages 463–502, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  3. McDermott, D.: A Temporal Logic for Reasoning about Processes and Plans, Cognitive Science, 6: 101–155, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Allen, J.: Maintaining Knowledge about Temporal Intervals, Communication of ACM, 26: 832–843, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Allen, J.: Towards a General Theory of Action and Time, Artificial Intelligence, 23: 123–154, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kowalski, R., Sergot, M.: A Logic-based Calculus of Events, New Generation Computing, 4: 67–95, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shoham, Y.: Temporal logics in AI: Semantical and Ontological Considerations, Artificial Intelligence, 33: 89–104, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shoham, Y.: Reasoning about Change: Time and Causation from the Standpoint of Artificial Intelligence, MIT Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Terenziani, P., Torasso, P.: Time, Action-Types, and Causation: an Integrated Analysis, Computational Intelligence, 11(3): 529–552, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lifschitz, V.: Formal theories of action, In Proceedings of the Tenth International Joint Conference on, Artificial Intelligence, pages 966–972, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sandewall, E.: Filter preferential entailment for the logic of action in almost continuous worlds. In Proceedings of the 12th International Joint Conference on, Artificial Intelligence, pages 894–899, 1989].

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schubert, L.: Monotonic Solution of the Frame Problem in the Situation Calculus: an Efficient Method for Worlds with Fully Specified Actions, in: H.E. Kyburg, R. Loui and G. Carlson, eds., Knowledge Representation and Defeasible Reasoning, pages 23–67, Kluwer Academic Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V., Rabinov, A.: What are the Limitations of the Situation Calculus? In Working Notes of AAAI Spring Symposium Series. Symposium: Logical Formalization of Commonsense Reasoning, pages 59–69, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lin, F., Shoham, Y.: Concurrent Actions in the Situation Calculus, In Proceedings of AAAI-92, pages 590–595, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pinto, J., Reiter, R.: Temporal Reasoning in Logic Programming: A Case for the Situation Calculus, In Proceedings of 10th Int. Conf. on Logic Programming, Budapest, Hungary, pages 21–24, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pinto, J., Reiter, R.: Reasoning about Time in the Situation Calculus, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 14(2–4): 251–268, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Miller, R., Shanahan, M.: Narratives in the Situation Calculus, the Journal of Logic and Computation, 4(5): 513–530, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shanahan, M.: A Circumscriptive Calculus of Events, Artificial Intelligence, 77: 29–384, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Baral, C.: Reasoning about actions: non-deterministic effects, constraints, and qualification, In Proceedings of IJCAI’95, pages 2017–2023, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Baral, C., Gelfond, M.: Reasoning about Effects of Concurrent Actions, Journal of Logic Programming, 31(1–3): 85–117, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Baral, C., Son, T., Tuan, L.: A transition function based characterization of actions with delayed and continuous effects, In Proceedings of KR’02, pages 291–302, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Allen J., Ferguson, G.: Actions and Events in Interval Temporal Logic, the Journal of Logic and Computation, 4(5): 531–579, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ma, J., Knight, B.: A Reified Temporal Logic, the Computer Journal, 39(9): 800–807, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ma, J., Knight, B.: A General Temporal Theory, the Computer Journal, 37(2): 114–123, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  25. van Benthem, J.: The Logic of Time, Kluwer Academic, Dordrech, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Galton, A.: A Critical Examination of Allen’s Theory of Action and Time, Artificial Intelligence, 42: 159–188, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vila, L.: A survey on temporal Reasoning in Artificial Intelligence. AI Communications, 7: 4–28, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ma, J., Hayes, P.: Primitive Intervals Vs Point-Based Intervals: Rivals Or Allies? the Computer Journal, 49: 32–41, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Allen J., Hayes, P.: Moments and Points in an Interval-based Temporal-based Logic, Computational Intelligence, 5: 225–238, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Ma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ma, J., Petridis, M., Knight, B. (2013). Formulating the Temporal Causal Relationships Between Events and Their Results. In: Bramer, M., Petridis, M. (eds) Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXX. SGAI 2013. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02621-3_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02621-3_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02620-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02621-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics