Skip to main content

Action Research and Teacher Development: MA Students’ Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Classroom-oriented Research

Part of the book series: Second Language Learning and Teaching ((SLLT))

Abstract

Action research (AR) is a professional development option for L2 teachers that fits well into the paradigm of the teacher as a reflective and inquiring practitioner, a learner-centered curriculum, teacher autonomy, and life-long teacher professional education. Utilized by practitioners to identify and solve problems in their own educational settings, it has the potential to improve the processes of learning and teaching, as well as enhance teachers’ ability to reflect upon their own practices, and contribute to their professional development. The current study examined the opinions expressed by 51 MA students who were at the same time EFL teachers about their experience of conducting AR as part of the requirements of their MA course. The results indicated that the students positively evaluated the effects of AR projects on the development of their teaching and research skills. The participants were able to list a number of benefits that the experience had for their learners and for themselves as teachers. Although some problems and difficulties connected with the process of conducting research were also voiced, a generally positive picture emerged of AR as a teacher development option.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allwright, D. and K. M. Bailey. 1991. Focus on the language classroom: An introduction to classroom research for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atay, D. 2008. Teacher research for professional development. ELT Journal 62: 139–147. (doi:10.1093/elt/ccl053).

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, S. 1998. Data-based teacher development. ELT Journal 52: 273–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, S. 2007. Research engagement in English language teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education 23: 731–747. (doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.03.012).

  • Borg, S. 2009. English language teachers’ conceptions of research. Applied Linguistics 30: 358–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, S. 2010. Language teacher research engagement. Language Teaching 43: 391–429. (doi:10.1017/S0261444810000170).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, A. 2005a. Action research: An evolving paradigm? Language Teaching 38: 57–74. (doi:10.1017/S0261444805002661).

  • Burns, A. 2005b. Action research. In Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, ed. E. Hinkel, 241–256. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, A. 2007. Action research in ELT: Contributions and future directions. In The international handbook of english language teaching. Volume 2, eds. J. Cummins and C. Davison, 987–1002. Norwell, MA: Springer Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, A. 2009. Action research and second language teacher education. In Cambridge guide to second language teacher education, eds. A. Burns and J. C. Richards, 289–297. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, A. 2010a. Doing action research in english language teaching. A Guide for practitioners. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, A. 2010b.  Action research: What’s in it for teachers and institutions? International House Journal 29: 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, A. 2011. Action research in the field of second language teaching and learning. In Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning. Volume 2, ed. E. Hinkel, 237–254. New York,  NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, J. 2009. Reflective practice. In Cambridge guide to second language teacher education, eds. A. Burns and J. C. Richards, 298–307. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, A., L. Shi and S. So. 1997. Learning to do research on language teaching and learning: graduate apprenticeships. System 25: 425–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z. 2007. Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J. 1991. Action research for educational change. Milton Keynes, Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrance, E. 2000. Action research. Providence, RI: Northeast and Islands Regional Educational Laboratory at Brown University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabryś-Barker, D. 2011. Introducing classroom research in the foreign language classroom. In Action research in teacher development: An overview of research methodology, ed. D. Gabryś-Barker, 11-24. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, X. and A. Wai Kwan Chow. 2011. Primary school English teachers’ research engagement. ELT Journal (advance access). (doi:10.1093/elt/ccr046).

  • Harley, K. 1989. Teacher-owned professional development: the action research model. Language Arts Journal of Michigan 5. (http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/lajm/vol5/iss1/2).

  • Johnson, K. E. 2009. Second language teacher education. A sociocultural perspective. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, B. and S. Irujo. 2001. Introduction: Voices from the field. In Research and practice in language teacher education: Voices from the field. Selected papers from the first international conference on language teacher education (CARLA Working Paper #19), eds. B. Johnston and S. Irujo, 1–13. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition. (http://www.carla.umn.edu/resources/working-papers/).

  • Legutke, K. M. and M. Schocker–v. Ditfurth. 2001. Redesigning FL teacher development: A European perspective. In Research and practice in language teacher education: Voices from the field. Selected papers from the first international conference on language teacher education (CARLA Working Paper #19), eds. B. Johnston and S. Irujo, 119–132. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition. (http://www.carla.umn.edu/resources/working-papers/).

  • McIntosh, P. 2010. Action research and reflective practice. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, S. L. 2009. Second language classroom research. In Cambridge guide to second language teacher education, eds. A. Burns and J. C. Richards, 281–288. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNiff, J. and J. Whitehead. 2006. All you need to know about action research. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, L. S. 2009. Action research in teaching and learning. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunan, D. 1992. Research methods in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philips, D. K. and K. Carr. 2010. Becoming a teacher through action research: Process, context, and self-study. (second edition). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J. C. and C. Lockhart. 1996. Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J. C. and T. Farrell. 2005. Professional development for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, C. and W. Qiang. 1996. Action research in language teacher education. ELT Journal 52: 254–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, M. J. 1998. Action research for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt, M. 2011. Teachers researching their own practice. ELT Journal 65: 417–425. (doi:10.1093/elt/ccq074).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aleksandra Wach .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

The questionnaire used in the study

MA Research Projects: Students’ Reflections

Dear MA Students, each of you has recently conducted a study within your MA project. Now I would like to ask you to share your opinions and reflections on the usefulness of doing such research for your professional development as teachers.

Please answer the following set of closed-ended questions. Mark the answers that best reflect your views.

1. Are you a teacher? ……………..

2. How long have you worked as a teacher? …………..

3. Before you joined the seminar, had you ever conducted research before?

  1. a.

    yes (when and why? ………………………)

  2. b.

    no

4. Before you joined the seminar, had you ever heard about conducting research as a way of improving teachers’ skills and abilities?

  1. a.

    yes

  2. b.

    no

5. Are you glad that you had to conduct research for your MA paper?

  1. a.

    yes, definitely

  2. b.

    rather yes

  3. c.

    it’s hard to say

  4. d.

    no

  5. e.

    other answers: ……………………………

6. Do you think your students benefitted or will benefit from your conducting the research?

  1. a.

    yes, definitely

  2. b.

    rather yes

  3. c.

    it’s hard to say

  4. d.

    no

  5. e.

    other answers: ……………………………

7. Do you think you will ever conduct action research again, even if you don’t have to?

  1. a.

    yes, definitely

  2. b.

    rather yes

  3. c.

    it’s hard to say

  4. d.

    no

  5. e.

    other answers: ……………………………

8. Do you think that conducting classroom-based research should constitute a regular part of every teacher’s job?

  1. a.

    yes, definitely

  2. b.

    rather yes

  3. c.

    it’s hard to say

  4. d.

    no

  5. e.

    other answers: ……………………………

When answering the following open-ended questions, please share your honest opinions and personal reflections concerning your experience. Any comments will be deeply appreciated.

1. What did you like most in conducting the research?

2. What did you find the most difficult?

3. Was there anything in the course of the study that surprised you?

4. What did you learn from the experience of conducting the research?

5. Do you think this experience has contributed to your professional development as a teacher? Please justify your answer.

6. If you have any further reflections concerning your experience of conducting the research, please provide them here:

Sample core questions asked in the interviews

  • Generally, was doing the research an enjoyable experience for you?

  • Generally, was it a useful experience? In what way?

  • What would you say about it to another teacher who has never conducted research? Is it worth doing? Is it worth the effort?

  • In what ways has it enriched you? Do you think you might be a better teacher thanks to the experience of conducting this research?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wach, A. (2014). Action Research and Teacher Development: MA Students’ Perspective. In: Pawlak, M., Bielak, J., Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. (eds) Classroom-oriented Research. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00188-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics