Skip to main content

Thinking Bodies: Practice Theory, Deleuze, and Professional Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Body in Professional Practice, Learning and Education

Part of the book series: Professional and Practice-based Learning ((PPBL,volume 11))

Abstract

This chapter offers a (different) way of thinking about the relationship between bodies and practice in professional education. It explores what it means to think the body in such circumstances, to think about the body, to draw the body into Thought. It begins by reviewing, specifically in the context of addressing the question of the body in professional practice, learning and education, what has come to be called practice theory and philosophy, understood as a loose assemblage of arguments and interests centred on practice as concept and primary organising principle for the social world. Schatzki’s work is an initial reference-point, as a key figure in the contemporary ‘practice turn’ in contemporary theory. Of particular interest here is the manner in which the body is mobilised in Schatzki’s self-described ‘residually humanist’ theory of practice, bearing in mind too his views on language and representation and his own measured, somewhat ambivalent engagement with Deleuze and Guattari. This is followed by a Deleuzian account of practice and the body, taking into account the primary question, ‘What can a body do?’. A final section is addressed specifically to the Early Years classroom, reading pedagogy, and the body-work of teaching.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is not to say that such teaching isn’t already highly professionalized and increasingly understood through rich theoretical lenses. It needs to be noted here, further, that considerable work is now available addressing the value of Deleuzian perspectives in Early Childhood education more generally (e.g. Sellers 2013).

  2. 2.

    See Watkins (2009) with regard to writing pedagogy, also in the Early Years.

  3. 3.

    See also Meek (1982) with specific regard to ‘beginning early’: ‘Read something to the baby before he [sic] can talk. Put him [or her] on your knee with the book in front of you both’ (p. 44).

References

  • Anderson, B., & Harrison, P. (2012). The promise of non-representational theories. In B. Anderson & P. Harrison (Eds.), Taking-place: Non-representational theories and geography (pp. 1–34). Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, I. (1997). The problem of the body in Deluze and Guattari, or, what can a body do? Body and Society, 3(3), 73–91. doi:10.1177/1357034X97003003004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffey, J. (2012). Bodies, health and gender: Exploring body work practices with Deleuze (Research Report 34). Melbourne: Youth Research Centre, Melbourne Graduate School of Education, The University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colebrook, C. (2000). From radical representations to corporeal becomings: The feminist philosophy of Lloyd, Grosz and Gatens. Hypatia, 125(2), 76–93. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2000.tb00315.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, A., & MacKenzie, I. (2011). Bodies of learning. In L. Guillaume & J. Hughes (Eds.), Deleuze and the body (pp. 53–72). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition. London/New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2009). What is philosophy? London/New York: Verso (Orig. pub. 1994.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, B. (2009). The primacy of practice and the problem of representation. In B. Green (Ed.), Understanding and researching professional practice (pp. 39–54). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, B., Cormack, P., & Patterson, A. (2013). Re-reading the reading lesson: Episodes in the history of reading pedagogy. Oxford Review of Education, 39(3), 329–344. doi: 10.1080/03054985.2013.808617.

  • Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 273–289. doi:10.1080/13540600902875340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies: Towards a corporeal feminism. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, E. (1999). Thinking the new: Of futures yet unthought. In E. Grosz (Ed.), Becomings: Explorations in time, memory, and futures (pp. 15–28). Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grumet, M. R. (1988). Bodyreading. In Bitter Milk: Women and Teaching (pp. 129–149). Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermansen, H., & Nerland, M. (2013). Reworking practice through an AfL project: An analysis of teachers’ collaborative engagement with new assessment guidelines. British Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 187–206. doi:10.1002/berj.3037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. (2011). Pity the meat? Deleuze and the body. In L. Guillaume & J. Hughes (Eds.), Deleuze and the body (pp. 1–6). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kamler, B., Maclean, R., Reid, J. A., & Simpson, A. (1994). Shaping up nicely: The formation of schoolgirls and schoolboys in the first month of school. Report to the Gender Equity and Curriculum Reform Project. Canberra: Department of Employment, Education and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A. (1992). The body literate: Discourse and inscription in early literacy training. Linguistics and Education, 4(1), 107–129. doi: 10.1016/0898-5898(92)90021-N.

  • MacLure, M. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 658–667. doi: 10.1080/09518398.2013.788755.

  • Masny, D. (2012). What is reading? A cartography of reading. In D. Masny & D. R. Cole (Eds.), Mapping multiple literacies: An introduction to Deleuzian literacy studies (pp. 69–92). London/New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massumi, B. (2002). Parables of the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham/London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meek, M. (1982). Learning to read. London: The Bodley Head.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffett, J. (1991). Teaching literacy. In Coming on center: English education in evolution (pp. 39–60). Montclair: Boynton/Cook Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper, H., & Stronach, I. (2008). Don’t touch! The educational story of a panic. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postill, J. (2008). What is practice theory? Extract (2008, October 30) from J. Postill, (2010). Introduction: Theorising media and practice. In B. Bräuchler, & J. Postill (Eds.), Theorising media and practice. Oxford/New York: Berghahn. http://johnpostill.com/2008/10/30/what-is-practice-theory/

  • Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263. doi:10.1177/13684310222225432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reckwitz, A. (2012). Affective spaces: A praxeological outlook. Rethinking History, 16(2), 241–258. doi:10.1080/13642529.2012.681193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, J. A. (2011). A practice turn for teacher education? Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(4), 293–310. doi: 10.1080/1359866X.2011.614688.

  • Roy, K. (2005). On sense and nonsense: Looking beyond the literacy wars. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 39(1), 99–111. doi:10.1111/j.0309-8249.2005.00422.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. R. (1996). Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. R. (1999). Practiced bodies: Subjects, genders, and minds. In T. R. Schatzki & W. Natter (Eds.), The social and political body (pp. 47–77). New York/London: The Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. R. (2001). Practice theory. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 1–14). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. R. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park: The Pennsylvania University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. R. (2011). The edge of change: On the emergence, persistence, and dissolution of practices. Paper presented in the Centre for Research in Learning and Change, University of Technology Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellar, S., & Gale, T. (2009). Pedagogies of critique: Struggling with what and how to think. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 17(1), 103–114. doi:10.1080/14681360902742936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellers, M. (2013). Young children becoming curriculum: Deleuze, te whariki and curricular understandings. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semetsky, I. (2013). Learning with bodymind: Constructing the cartographies of the unthought. In D. Masny (Ed.), Cartographies of becoming in education: A Deleuze-Guattari perspective (pp. 77–91). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. W. (2012). On the nature of concepts. Parallax, 18(1), 62–73. doi:10.1080/13534645.2012.632976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. (1999). Steps to an ecology of place. In J. Allen & D. Massey (Eds.), Human geography today (pp. 295–321). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. (2006). Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vick, M. (2000). What does a teacher look like? Paedagogica Historica, 36(1), 247–263. doi:10.1080/0030923000360112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vick, M. J., & Martinez, C. (2011). Teachers and teaching: Subjectivity, performativity and the body. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(2), 178–192. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00552.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, M. (2009). Discipline and learn: Bodies, pedagogy and writing. Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I want to thank Dianne Mulcahy, Jennifer Sumsion, Anne Kinsella and Jo-Anne Reid for their helpful feedback on draft versions of this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bill Green .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Green, B. (2015). Thinking Bodies: Practice Theory, Deleuze, and Professional Education. In: Green, B., Hopwood, N. (eds) The Body in Professional Practice, Learning and Education. Professional and Practice-based Learning, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00140-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics