Abstract
This chapter offers a (different) way of thinking about the relationship between bodies and practice in professional education. It explores what it means to think the body in such circumstances, to think about the body, to draw the body into Thought. It begins by reviewing, specifically in the context of addressing the question of the body in professional practice, learning and education, what has come to be called practice theory and philosophy, understood as a loose assemblage of arguments and interests centred on practice as concept and primary organising principle for the social world. Schatzki’s work is an initial reference-point, as a key figure in the contemporary ‘practice turn’ in contemporary theory. Of particular interest here is the manner in which the body is mobilised in Schatzki’s self-described ‘residually humanist’ theory of practice, bearing in mind too his views on language and representation and his own measured, somewhat ambivalent engagement with Deleuze and Guattari. This is followed by a Deleuzian account of practice and the body, taking into account the primary question, ‘What can a body do?’. A final section is addressed specifically to the Early Years classroom, reading pedagogy, and the body-work of teaching.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This is not to say that such teaching isn’t already highly professionalized and increasingly understood through rich theoretical lenses. It needs to be noted here, further, that considerable work is now available addressing the value of Deleuzian perspectives in Early Childhood education more generally (e.g. Sellers 2013).
- 2.
See Watkins (2009) with regard to writing pedagogy, also in the Early Years.
- 3.
See also Meek (1982) with specific regard to ‘beginning early’: ‘Read something to the baby before he [sic] can talk. Put him [or her] on your knee with the book in front of you both’ (p. 44).
References
Anderson, B., & Harrison, P. (2012). The promise of non-representational theories. In B. Anderson & P. Harrison (Eds.), Taking-place: Non-representational theories and geography (pp. 1–34). Farnham: Ashgate.
Buchanan, I. (1997). The problem of the body in Deluze and Guattari, or, what can a body do? Body and Society, 3(3), 73–91. doi:10.1177/1357034X97003003004.
Coffey, J. (2012). Bodies, health and gender: Exploring body work practices with Deleuze (Research Report 34). Melbourne: Youth Research Centre, Melbourne Graduate School of Education, The University of Melbourne.
Colebrook, C. (2000). From radical representations to corporeal becomings: The feminist philosophy of Lloyd, Grosz and Gatens. Hypatia, 125(2), 76–93. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2000.tb00315.x.
Cutler, A., & MacKenzie, I. (2011). Bodies of learning. In L. Guillaume & J. Hughes (Eds.), Deleuze and the body (pp. 53–72). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition. London/New York: Continuum.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2009). What is philosophy? London/New York: Verso (Orig. pub. 1994.)
Green, B. (2009). The primacy of practice and the problem of representation. In B. Green (Ed.), Understanding and researching professional practice (pp. 39–54). Rotterdam: Sense.
Green, B., Cormack, P., & Patterson, A. (2013). Re-reading the reading lesson: Episodes in the history of reading pedagogy. Oxford Review of Education, 39(3), 329–344. doi: 10.1080/03054985.2013.808617.
Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 273–289. doi:10.1080/13540600902875340.
Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies: Towards a corporeal feminism. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Grosz, E. (1999). Thinking the new: Of futures yet unthought. In E. Grosz (Ed.), Becomings: Explorations in time, memory, and futures (pp. 15–28). Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.
Grumet, M. R. (1988). Bodyreading. In Bitter Milk: Women and Teaching (pp. 129–149). Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press.
Hermansen, H., & Nerland, M. (2013). Reworking practice through an AfL project: An analysis of teachers’ collaborative engagement with new assessment guidelines. British Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 187–206. doi:10.1002/berj.3037.
Hughes, J. (2011). Pity the meat? Deleuze and the body. In L. Guillaume & J. Hughes (Eds.), Deleuze and the body (pp. 1–6). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Kamler, B., Maclean, R., Reid, J. A., & Simpson, A. (1994). Shaping up nicely: The formation of schoolgirls and schoolboys in the first month of school. Report to the Gender Equity and Curriculum Reform Project. Canberra: Department of Employment, Education and Training.
Luke, A. (1992). The body literate: Discourse and inscription in early literacy training. Linguistics and Education, 4(1), 107–129. doi: 10.1016/0898-5898(92)90021-N.
MacLure, M. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 658–667. doi: 10.1080/09518398.2013.788755.
Masny, D. (2012). What is reading? A cartography of reading. In D. Masny & D. R. Cole (Eds.), Mapping multiple literacies: An introduction to Deleuzian literacy studies (pp. 69–92). London/New York: Continuum.
Massumi, B. (2002). Parables of the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham/London: Duke University Press.
Meek, M. (1982). Learning to read. London: The Bodley Head.
Moffett, J. (1991). Teaching literacy. In Coming on center: English education in evolution (pp. 39–60). Montclair: Boynton/Cook Publishers.
Piper, H., & Stronach, I. (2008). Don’t touch! The educational story of a panic. London/New York: Routledge.
Postill, J. (2008). What is practice theory? Extract (2008, October 30) from J. Postill, (2010). Introduction: Theorising media and practice. In B. Bräuchler, & J. Postill (Eds.), Theorising media and practice. Oxford/New York: Berghahn. http://johnpostill.com/2008/10/30/what-is-practice-theory/
Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263. doi:10.1177/13684310222225432.
Reckwitz, A. (2012). Affective spaces: A praxeological outlook. Rethinking History, 16(2), 241–258. doi:10.1080/13642529.2012.681193.
Reid, J. A. (2011). A practice turn for teacher education? Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(4), 293–310. doi: 10.1080/1359866X.2011.614688.
Roy, K. (2005). On sense and nonsense: Looking beyond the literacy wars. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 39(1), 99–111. doi:10.1111/j.0309-8249.2005.00422.x.
Schatzki, T. R. (1996). Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schatzki, T. R. (1999). Practiced bodies: Subjects, genders, and minds. In T. R. Schatzki & W. Natter (Eds.), The social and political body (pp. 47–77). New York/London: The Guildford Press.
Schatzki, T. R. (2001). Practice theory. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 1–14). London/New York: Routledge.
Schatzki, T. R. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park: The Pennsylvania University Press.
Schatzki, T. R. (2011). The edge of change: On the emergence, persistence, and dissolution of practices. Paper presented in the Centre for Research in Learning and Change, University of Technology Sydney.
Sellar, S., & Gale, T. (2009). Pedagogies of critique: Struggling with what and how to think. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 17(1), 103–114. doi:10.1080/14681360902742936.
Sellers, M. (2013). Young children becoming curriculum: Deleuze, te whariki and curricular understandings. London/New York: Routledge.
Semetsky, I. (2013). Learning with bodymind: Constructing the cartographies of the unthought. In D. Masny (Ed.), Cartographies of becoming in education: A Deleuze-Guattari perspective (pp. 77–91). Rotterdam: Sense.
Smith, D. W. (2012). On the nature of concepts. Parallax, 18(1), 62–73. doi:10.1080/13534645.2012.632976.
Thrift, N. (1999). Steps to an ecology of place. In J. Allen & D. Massey (Eds.), Human geography today (pp. 295–321). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Thrift, N. (2006). Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect. London: Routledge.
Vick, M. (2000). What does a teacher look like? Paedagogica Historica, 36(1), 247–263. doi:10.1080/0030923000360112.
Vick, M. J., & Martinez, C. (2011). Teachers and teaching: Subjectivity, performativity and the body. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(2), 178–192. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00552.x.
Watkins, M. (2009). Discipline and learn: Bodies, pedagogy and writing. Rotterdam: Sense.
Acknowledgements
I want to thank Dianne Mulcahy, Jennifer Sumsion, Anne Kinsella and Jo-Anne Reid for their helpful feedback on draft versions of this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Green, B. (2015). Thinking Bodies: Practice Theory, Deleuze, and Professional Education. In: Green, B., Hopwood, N. (eds) The Body in Professional Practice, Learning and Education. Professional and Practice-based Learning, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00140-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00140-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-00139-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-00140-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)