Summary
Patients with chronic back and leg pain (CBLP) suffer from a disabling spinal condition of multifactorial origin and are often resistant to medical therapy. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a minimally invasive option for treatment of chronic pain in these patients, which involves placement of epidural electrodes close to the midline of the spinal cord. SCS was originally introduced and used for decades with a single electrode. The development of fully implantable dual channel pulse generators connected to dual multicontact electrodes has given pain clinicians a more versatile tool to treat axial low back pain accompanied by radicular neuropathic pain with irregular and asymmetric distribution, a feature which is found in most CBLP patients. It has been hypothesized that using dual electrodes may improve long term outcome for CBLP patients compared with single electrodes. Current evidence however does not lend strong support to this assumption. Given the high cost of treatments for CBLP and of SCS itself, there is an urgent need for highquality evidence for the effectiveness of dual electrode SCS in relieving pain and=or improving function in patients with CBLP.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barolat G (2000) Spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain management. Arch Med Res 31: 258–262
Burchiel KJ, Anderson VC, Brown FD, Fessler RG, Friedman WA, Pelofsky S, Weiner RL, Oakley J, Shatin D (1996) Prospective, multicenter study of spinal cord stimulation for relief of chronic back and extremity pain. Spine 21: 2786–2794
Burton AK, Tillotson KM, Main CJ, Hollis S (1995) Psychosocial predictors of outcome in acute and subchronic low back trouble. Spine 20: 722–728
Cherkin DC, Deyo RA, Loeser JD, Bush T, Waddell G (1994) An international comparison of back surgery rates. Spine 19: 1201–1206
Dario A, Fortini G, Bertollo D, Bacuzzi A, Grizzetti C, Cuffari S (2001) Treatment of failed back surgery syndrome. Neuromodulation 4: 105–110
Devulder J, De Laat M, Rolly G (1998) Dual channel electrostimulation in pain. Acta Neurol Belg 98: 195–198
Krames E (1999) Spinal cord stimulation: indications, mechanism of action, and efficacy. Curr Rev Pain 3: 419–426
Kumar K, Malik S, Demeria D (2002) Treatment of chronic pain with spinal cord stimulation versus alternative therapies: costeffectiveness analysis. Neurosurgery 51: 106–116
Mailis-Gagnon A, Furlan AD, Sandoval JA, Taylor R (2004) Spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3: CD003783
Melzack R, Wall PD (1965) Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science 150: 971–979
North RB, Ewend MG, Lawton MT, Piantadosi S (1991) Spinal cord stimulation for chronic, intractable pain: superiority of “multi-channel” devices. Pain 44: 119–130
North RB, Kidd DH, Farrokhi F, Piantadosi SA (2005) Spinal cord stimulation versus repeated lumbosacral spine surgery for chronic pain: a randomized, controlled trial. Neurosurgery 56: 98–107
North RB, Kidd DH, Olin J, Sieracki JM, Farrokhi F, Petrucci L, Cutchis PN (2005) Spinal cord stimulation for axial low back pain: a prospective, controlled trial comparing dual with single percutaneous electrodes. Spine 30: 1412–1418
North RB, Kidd DH, Piantadosi SA (1995) Spinal cord stimulation versus reoperation for failed back surgery syndrome: a prospective randomized study design. Acta Neurochir [Suppl] 64: 106–108
North RB, Wetzel FT (2002) Spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain of spinal origin: a valuable long-term solution. Spine 27: 2584–2592
Onesti ST (2004) Failed back syndrome. Neurologist 10: 259–264
Pearce JM (2000) Aspects of the failed back syndrome: role of litigation. Spinal Cord 38: 63–70
Phillips FM, Cunningham B (2002) Managing chronic pain of spinal origin after lumbar surgery: the role of decompressive surgery. Spine 27: 2547–2554
Heidecke V, Rainov NG, Burkert W (2000) Hardware failures in spinal cord stimulation for failed back surgery syndrome. Neuromodulation 3: 27–30
Rutten S, Komp M, Godolias G (2002) Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) using an 8-pole electrode and double-electrode system as minimally invasive therapy of the post-discotomy and post-fusion syndrome — prospective study results in 34 patients. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 140: 626–631
Slipman CW, Shin CH, Patel RK, Isaac Z, Huston CW, Lipetz JS, Lenrow DA, Braverman DL, Vresilovic EJ Jr (2002) Etiologies of failed back surgery syndrome. Pain Med 3: 200–217
Taylor RS, Taylor RJ, Van Buyten JP, Buchser E, North R, Bayliss S (2004) The cost effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of pain: a systematic review of the literature. J Pain Symptom Manage 27: 370–378
Taylor RS, Van Buyten JP, Buchser E (2005) Spinal cord stimulation for chronic back and leg pain and failed back surgery syndrome: a systematic review and analysis of prognostic factors. Spine 30: 152–160
Turner JA, Loeser JD, Bell KG (1995) Spinal cord stimulation for chronic low back pain: a systematic literature synthesis. Neurosurgery 37: 1088–1096
Turner JA, Loeser JD, Deyo RA, Sanders SB (2004) Spinal cord stimulation for patients with failed back surgery syndrome or complex regional pain syndrome: a systematic review of effectiveness and complications. Pain 108: 137–147
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rainov, N.G., Demmel, W., Heidecke, V. (2007). Dual electrode spinal cord stimulation in chronic leg and back pain. In: Sakas, D.E., Simpson, B.A., Krames, E.S. (eds) Operative Neuromodulation. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplements, vol 97/1. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-33079-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-33079-1_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna
Print ISBN: 978-3-211-33078-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-211-33079-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)