Abstract
Identifying individual driving strategies often relies on theoretical task models, arbitrary group divisions, or somewhat untransparent evaluations by instructors. We propose using cluster analysis as an exploratory, data-driven approach to categorize drivers based on their driving and scanning behavior. Therefore, we analyzed a combination of variables regarding longitudinal vehicle guidance, lateral vehicle guidance, and gaze behavior when approaching an intersection. Data stemmed from a driving simulator study including drivers with normal vision, simulated, and pathological visual field loss. They performed 32 intersections that varied concerning complexity and the availability of an auditory scanning assistant. The total sample comprised 2145 data points. K-means on two dimensions of a prior Principal Component Analysis yielded the best results with two clusters that can be interpreted as high acter and low acter, referring to the extent and earliness of gaze shifts as well as the duration of the intersection approach. These two strategy clusters were rated based on performance criteria to check the effectiveness of these strategies for the different driver groups and situations. While high acters were more frequent under complex conditions, this strategy failed more frequently in these cases. Future developments for this promising approach to cluster strategies in driving-related areas are discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Plavsic, M.: Analysis and Modeling of Driver Behavior for Assistance Systems at Road Intersections [Dissertation]. Technical University of Munich, Munich (2010)
Richard, C.M., Campbell, J.L., Brown, J.L.: Task analysis of intersection driving scenarios: Information processing bottlenecks: No. FHWA-HRT-06–033 (2006)
Biebl, B., Kacianka, S., Unni, A., Trende, A., Rieger, J.W., Lüdtke, A., et al.: A causal model of intersection-related collisions for drivers with and without visual field loss. In: Stephanidis, C., (eds). HCI International 2021 - Late Breaking Papers: HCI Applications in Health, Transport, and Industry. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 219–234 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90966-6_16
Bauer, M.J., Adler, G., Kuskowski, M.A., Rottunda, S.: The influence of age and gender on the driving patterns of older adults. J. Women Aging 15, 3–16 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1300/J074v15n04_02
Son, J., Reimer, B., Mehler, B., Pohlmeyer, A.E., Godfrey, K.M., Orszulak, J., et al.: Age and cross-cultural comparison of drivers’ cognitive workload and performance in simulated urban driving, pp. 1976–3832 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-010-0065-6
Hardiess, G., Papageorgiou, E., Schiefer, U., Mallot, H.A.: Functional compensation of visual field deficits in hemianopic patients under the influence of different task demands. Vision. Res. 50, 1158–1172 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2010.04.004
Papageorgiou, E., Hardiess, G., Mallot, H.A., Schiefer, U.: Gaze patterns predicting successful collision avoidance in patients with homonymous visual field defects. Vision. Res. 65, 25–37 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2012.06.004
Kasneci, E., et al.: Driving with binocular visual field loss? A study on a supervised on-road parcours with simultaneous eye and head tracking. PLoS ONE 9, e87470 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087470
Tant, M., Cornelissen, F.W., Kooijman, A.C., Brouwer, W.H.: Hemianopic visual field defects elicit hemianopic scanning. Vision. Res. 42, 1339–1348 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00044-5
Coeckelbergh, T.R.M., Brouwer, W.H., Cornelissen, F.W., van Wolffelaar, P., Kooijman, A.C.: The effect of visual field defects on driving performance: a driving simulator study. Arch. Ophthalmol. 120, 1509–1516 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.120.11.1509
Kübler, T.C., Kasneci, E., Rosenstiel, W., Aehling, K., Heister, M., Nagel, K., et al.: Driving with homonymous visual field defects: driving performance and compensatory gaze movements. J. Eye Mov. Res. 8(5), 1–11 (2015). https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.8.5.5
Biebl, B., Arcidiacono, E., Kacianka, S., Rieger, J.W., Bengler, K.: Opportunities and limitations of a gaze-contingent display to simulate visual field loss in driving simulator studies. Front. Neuroergonomics 3, 916169 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnrgo.2022.916169
Bowers, A.R.: Driving with homonymous visual field loss: a review of the literature. Clin. Exp. Optom. 99, 402–418 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/cxo.12425
Patterson, G., Howard, C., Hepworth, L., Rowe, F.: The impact of visual field loss on driving skills: a systematic narrative review. Br. Ir. Orthopt. J. 15, 53–63 (2019). https://doi.org/10.22599/bioj.129
Cohen, J.: Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences: Academic Press (2013)
Wang, X., Wang, H.: Driving behavior clustering for hazardous material transportation based on genetic fuzzy C-means algorithm. IEEE Access 8, 11289–11296 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2964648
Ni, D., Guo, F., Zhou, Y., Shi, C.: Determination of risk perception of drivers using fuzzy-clustering analysis for road safety. IEEE Access 8, 125501–125512 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3007151
Zheng, Y., Wang, J., Li, X., Yu, C., Kodaka, K., Li, K.: Driving risk assessment using cluster analysis based on naturalistic driving data. In: IEEE, pp. 2584–2589
de Zepeda, M.V.N., Meng, F., Su, J., Zeng, X.-J., Wang, Q.: Dynamic clustering analysis for driving styles identification. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 97, 104096 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2020.104096
Hill, C., Elefteriadou, L., Kondyli, A.: Exploratory analysis of lane changing on freeways based on driver behavior. J. Transp. Eng. 141, 4014090 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000758
Shirmohammadi, H., Hadadi, F., Saeedian, M.: Clustering analysis of drivers based on behavioral characteristics regarding road safety. Int. J. Civ. Eng. 17, 1327–1340 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-018-00390-2
Chen, K.-T., Chen, H.-Y.W.: Driving style clustering using naturalistic driving data. Transp. Res. Rec. 2673, 176–88 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119845360
Belyadi, H., Haghighat, A.: Machine Learning Guide for Oil and Gas Using Python: A Step-by-Step Breakdown with Data, Algorithms, Codes, and Applications: Gulf Professional Publishing (2021)
Jenjiwattanakul, T., Sano, K.: Effect of waiting time on the gap acceptance behavior of u-turning vehicles at midblock median openings. In: Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, p. 314. https://doi.org/10.11175/eastpro.2011.0.314.0
Cooper, P.J., Zheng, Y.: Turning gap acceptance decision-making: the impact of driver distraction. J. Safety Res. 33, 321–335 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4375(02)00029-4
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) under grant no. BE4532/15–1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Biebl, B., Bengler, K. (2024). The Real Sorting Hat – Identifying Driving and Scanning Strategies in Urban Intersections with Cluster Analysis. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S., Salvendy, G. (eds) HCI International 2023 – Late Breaking Posters. HCII 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1958. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49215-0_47
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49215-0_47
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-49214-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-49215-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)