Skip to main content

The Real Sorting Hat – Identifying Driving and Scanning Strategies in Urban Intersections with Cluster Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2023 – Late Breaking Posters (HCII 2023)

Abstract

Identifying individual driving strategies often relies on theoretical task models, arbitrary group divisions, or somewhat untransparent evaluations by instructors. We propose using cluster analysis as an exploratory, data-driven approach to categorize drivers based on their driving and scanning behavior. Therefore, we analyzed a combination of variables regarding longitudinal vehicle guidance, lateral vehicle guidance, and gaze behavior when approaching an intersection. Data stemmed from a driving simulator study including drivers with normal vision, simulated, and pathological visual field loss. They performed 32 intersections that varied concerning complexity and the availability of an auditory scanning assistant. The total sample comprised 2145 data points. K-means on two dimensions of a prior Principal Component Analysis yielded the best results with two clusters that can be interpreted as high acter and low acter, referring to the extent and earliness of gaze shifts as well as the duration of the intersection approach. These two strategy clusters were rated based on performance criteria to check the effectiveness of these strategies for the different driver groups and situations. While high acters were more frequent under complex conditions, this strategy failed more frequently in these cases. Future developments for this promising approach to cluster strategies in driving-related areas are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Plavsic, M.: Analysis and Modeling of Driver Behavior for Assistance Systems at Road Intersections [Dissertation]. Technical University of Munich, Munich (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Richard, C.M., Campbell, J.L., Brown, J.L.: Task analysis of intersection driving scenarios: Information processing bottlenecks: No. FHWA-HRT-06–033 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Biebl, B., Kacianka, S., Unni, A., Trende, A., Rieger, J.W., Lüdtke, A., et al.: A causal model of intersection-related collisions for drivers with and without visual field loss. In: Stephanidis, C., (eds). HCI International 2021 - Late Breaking Papers: HCI Applications in Health, Transport, and Industry. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 219–234 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90966-6_16

  4. Bauer, M.J., Adler, G., Kuskowski, M.A., Rottunda, S.: The influence of age and gender on the driving patterns of older adults. J. Women Aging 15, 3–16 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1300/J074v15n04_02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Son, J., Reimer, B., Mehler, B., Pohlmeyer, A.E., Godfrey, K.M., Orszulak, J., et al.: Age and cross-cultural comparison of drivers’ cognitive workload and performance in simulated urban driving, pp. 1976–3832 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-010-0065-6

  6. Hardiess, G., Papageorgiou, E., Schiefer, U., Mallot, H.A.: Functional compensation of visual field deficits in hemianopic patients under the influence of different task demands. Vision. Res. 50, 1158–1172 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2010.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Papageorgiou, E., Hardiess, G., Mallot, H.A., Schiefer, U.: Gaze patterns predicting successful collision avoidance in patients with homonymous visual field defects. Vision. Res. 65, 25–37 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2012.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kasneci, E., et al.: Driving with binocular visual field loss? A study on a supervised on-road parcours with simultaneous eye and head tracking. PLoS ONE 9, e87470 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tant, M., Cornelissen, F.W., Kooijman, A.C., Brouwer, W.H.: Hemianopic visual field defects elicit hemianopic scanning. Vision. Res. 42, 1339–1348 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00044-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Coeckelbergh, T.R.M., Brouwer, W.H., Cornelissen, F.W., van Wolffelaar, P., Kooijman, A.C.: The effect of visual field defects on driving performance: a driving simulator study. Arch. Ophthalmol. 120, 1509–1516 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.120.11.1509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kübler, T.C., Kasneci, E., Rosenstiel, W., Aehling, K., Heister, M., Nagel, K., et al.: Driving with homonymous visual field defects: driving performance and compensatory gaze movements. J. Eye Mov. Res. 8(5), 1–11 (2015). https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.8.5.5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Biebl, B., Arcidiacono, E., Kacianka, S., Rieger, J.W., Bengler, K.: Opportunities and limitations of a gaze-contingent display to simulate visual field loss in driving simulator studies. Front. Neuroergonomics 3, 916169 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnrgo.2022.916169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bowers, A.R.: Driving with homonymous visual field loss: a review of the literature. Clin. Exp. Optom. 99, 402–418 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/cxo.12425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Patterson, G., Howard, C., Hepworth, L., Rowe, F.: The impact of visual field loss on driving skills: a systematic narrative review. Br. Ir. Orthopt. J. 15, 53–63 (2019). https://doi.org/10.22599/bioj.129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cohen, J.: Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences: Academic Press (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, X., Wang, H.: Driving behavior clustering for hazardous material transportation based on genetic fuzzy C-means algorithm. IEEE Access 8, 11289–11296 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2964648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ni, D., Guo, F., Zhou, Y., Shi, C.: Determination of risk perception of drivers using fuzzy-clustering analysis for road safety. IEEE Access 8, 125501–125512 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3007151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zheng, Y., Wang, J., Li, X., Yu, C., Kodaka, K., Li, K.: Driving risk assessment using cluster analysis based on naturalistic driving data. In: IEEE, pp. 2584–2589

    Google Scholar 

  19. de Zepeda, M.V.N., Meng, F., Su, J., Zeng, X.-J., Wang, Q.: Dynamic clustering analysis for driving styles identification. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 97, 104096 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2020.104096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hill, C., Elefteriadou, L., Kondyli, A.: Exploratory analysis of lane changing on freeways based on driver behavior. J. Transp. Eng. 141, 4014090 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shirmohammadi, H., Hadadi, F., Saeedian, M.: Clustering analysis of drivers based on behavioral characteristics regarding road safety. Int. J. Civ. Eng. 17, 1327–1340 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-018-00390-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen, K.-T., Chen, H.-Y.W.: Driving style clustering using naturalistic driving data. Transp. Res. Rec. 2673, 176–88 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119845360

  23. Belyadi, H., Haghighat, A.: Machine Learning Guide for Oil and Gas Using Python: A Step-by-Step Breakdown with Data, Algorithms, Codes, and Applications: Gulf Professional Publishing (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jenjiwattanakul, T., Sano, K.: Effect of waiting time on the gap acceptance behavior of u-turning vehicles at midblock median openings. In: Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, p. 314. https://doi.org/10.11175/eastpro.2011.0.314.0

  25. Cooper, P.J., Zheng, Y.: Turning gap acceptance decision-making: the impact of driver distraction. J. Safety Res. 33, 321–335 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4375(02)00029-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) under grant no. BE4532/15–1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bianca Biebl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Biebl, B., Bengler, K. (2024). The Real Sorting Hat – Identifying Driving and Scanning Strategies in Urban Intersections with Cluster Analysis. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S., Salvendy, G. (eds) HCI International 2023 – Late Breaking Posters. HCII 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1958. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49215-0_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49215-0_47

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-49214-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-49215-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics