Abstract
This paper investigates participants’ perceptions and preferences regarding different cooperative intervention features for automated driving with level 2 driving automation. The experiment conducted involved 40 participants. A Kano questionnaire and a semi-standardized interview were employed to collect participants’ feedback on features for interventions in different maneuvers (e.g., initiating a lane change) and parameter settings (e.g., changing target speed). The results revealed a positive influence of most features on user satisfaction. Certain features were rated as essential requirements, while others were perceived as exciting additions. The response distributions show a high variance, indicating the existence of multiple user groups with different needs. The interviews conducted subsequently to the experiment provide qualitative insights, emphasizing the significance of implementation and the varying relevance between different maneuver and parameter interventions regarding satisfaction. The findings contribute to the design of experience-oriented human-machine interfaces (HMIs) in automated driving, highlighting the importance of cooperative features. The results can be used to prioritize the integration of distinct features. Future research should consider larger and more diverse samples to further enhance generalizability.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
SAE International: Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to On-Road Motor Vehicle Automated Driving Systems. J3016. SAE International, USA (2021)
Steckhan, L., Spiessl, W., Quetschlich, N., Bengler, K.: Beyond SAE J3016: new design spaces for human-centered driving automation. In: Krömker, H. (ed.) HCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems. 4th International Conference, MobiTAS 2022, Held as Part of the 24th HCI International Conference, HCII, 2022, vol. 13335, pp. 416–434. Springer, Heidelberg (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04987-3_28
Flemisch, F.O., Bengler, K., Bubb, H., Winner, H., Bruder, R.: Towards cooperative guidance and control of highly automated vehicles: H-mode and conduct-by-wire. Ergonomics (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2013.869355
Franz, B., Kauer, M., Bruder, R., Geyer, S.: pieDrive - a new driver-vehicle interaction concept for maneuver-based driving. In: 2012 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium Workshops (2012)
Walch, M., Sieber, T., Hock, P., Baumann, M., Weber, M.: Towards cooperative driving. In: Green, P., Boll, S., Burnett, G., Gabbard, J., Osswald, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, USA, pp. 261–268. ACM Press (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/3003715.3005458
Donges, E.: Driver behavior models. In: Winner, H., Hakuli, S., Lotz, F., Singer, C. (eds.) Handbook of driver assistance systems, pp. 19–33. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12352-3_2
Franz, B., Kauer, M., Geyer, S., Hakuli, S.: Conduct-by-Wire. In: Winner, H., Hakuli, S., Lotz, F., Singer, C. (eds.) Handbuch Fahrerassistenzsysteme. A, pp. 1111–1121. Springer, Wiesbaden (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05734-3_59
Schreiber, M., Kauer, M., Bruder, R.: Conduct by wire - maneuver catalog for semi-autonomous vehicle guidance. In: IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium 2009, China, pp. 1279–1284. IEEE (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2009.5164468
Schreiber, M., Kauer, M., Schlesinger, D., Hakuli, S., Bruder, R.: Verification of a maneuver catalog for a maneuver-based vehicle guidance system. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Turkey, pp. 3683–3689. IEEE (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.2010.5641862
Walch, M., Woide, M., Mühl, K., Baumann, M., Weber, M.: Cooperative overtaking. In: Proceedings, 11th International ACM Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Netherlands, pp. 144–155. ACM Press (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3342197.3344531
Kano, N., Seraku, N., Takahashi, F., Tsuji, S.-I.: Attractive quality and must-be quality. J. Jpn. Soc. Qual. Control (1984). https://doi.org/10.20684/quality.14.2_147
Löfgren, M., Witell, L.: Two decades of using kano's theory of attractive quality: a literature review. Qual. Manag. J. (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2008.11918056
Berger, C., et al.: Kano's methods for understanding customer-defined quality, vol. 2, pp. 3–36 (1993)
Shahin, A., Pourhamidi, M., Antony, J., Hyun Park, S.: Typology of Kano models: a critical review of literature and proposition of a revised model. Int. J. Qual. Reliabil. Manag. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1108/02656711311299863
Yang, C.-C.: The refined Kano’s model and its application. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360500235850
Mikulić, J., Prebežac, D.: A critical review of techniques for classifying quality attributes in the Kano model. Manag. Serv. Qual. Int. J. (2011). https://doi.org/10.1108/09604521111100243
Madzík, P.: Increasing accuracy of the Kano model – a case study. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2016.1194197
Materla, T., Cudney, E.A., Antony, J.: The application of Kano model in the healthcare industry: a systematic literature review. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2017.1328980
Mikulić, J.: The Kano model–a review of its application in marketing research from 1984 to 2006. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference Marketing Theory Challenges in Transitional Societies, pp. 87–96 (2007)
Pandey, A., Sahu, R., Joshi, Y.: Kano model application in the tourism industry: a systematic literature review. J. Qual. Assur. Hosp. Tour. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/1528008X.2020.1839995
Chen, M.-C., Hsu, C.-L., Huang, C.-H.: Applying the Kano model to investigate the quality of transportation services at mega events. J. Retail. Cons. Serv. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102442
Dominici, G., Roblek, V., Abbate, T., Tani, M.: Click and drive. Bus. Process. Manag. J. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-05-2015-0076
Kohli, A., Singh, R.: An assessment of customers’ satisfaction for emerging technologies in passenger cars using Kano model. XJM (2021). https://doi.org/10.1108/XJM-08-2020-0103
Albers, D., Grabbe, N., Forster, Y., Naujoks, F., Keinath, A., Bengler, K.: (Don’t) talk to me! application of the kano method for speech outputs in conditionally automated driving. in: human factors in transportation. In: 13th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2022). AHFE International (2022). https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1002484
Shin, J.-G., Heo, I.-S., Yae, J.-H., Kim, S.-H.: Kano model of autonomous driving user acceptance according to driver characteristics: a survey study. Transport. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2022.10.002
Steckhan, L., Spiessl, W., Bengler, K.: Evaluation of user interfaces for cooperation between driver and automated driving system. In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (2023). (in press)
Hölzing, J.A.: Die Kano-Theorie der Kundenzufriedenheitsmessung. Eine theoretische und empirische Überprüfung. Gabler (2008)
Sauerwein, E.: Das Kano-Modell der Kundenzufriedenheit. Reliabilität und Validität einer Methode zur Klassifizierung von Produkteigenschaften. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH (2020)
Fong, D.: Using the self-stated importance questionnaire to interpret Kano questionnaire results. Center Qual. Manag. J. 5, 21–24 (1996)
Özkan, T., Lajunen, T., Chliaoutakis, J.E., Parker, D., Summala, H.: Cross-cultural differences in driving behaviours: a comparison of six countries. Transport. Res. Part F: Traff. Psychol. Behav. (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2006.01.002
Hergeth, S., Lorenz, L., Krems, J.F., Toenert, L.: Effects of take-over requests and cultural background on automation trust in highly automated driving. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design: Driving Assessment 2015, pp. 331–337 (2015). https://doi.org/10.17077/drivingassessment.1591
Acknowledgments
We thank all those involved in the implementation of the experiment for their support.
Funding
This work was funded by the BMW Group.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Steckhan, L., Spiessl, W., Bengler, K. (2023). Maneuver and Parameter Interventions in Automated Driving to Enhance User Satisfaction: A Kano Method Application. In: Duffy, V.G., Krömker, H., A. Streitz, N., Konomi, S. (eds) HCI International 2023 – Late Breaking Papers. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14057. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48047-8_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48047-8_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-48046-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-48047-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)