Skip to main content

Maneuver and Parameter Interventions in Automated Driving to Enhance User Satisfaction: A Kano Method Application

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2023 – Late Breaking Papers (HCII 2023)

Abstract

This paper investigates participants’ perceptions and preferences regarding different cooperative intervention features for automated driving with level 2 driving automation. The experiment conducted involved 40 participants. A Kano questionnaire and a semi-standardized interview were employed to collect participants’ feedback on features for interventions in different maneuvers (e.g., initiating a lane change) and parameter settings (e.g., changing target speed). The results revealed a positive influence of most features on user satisfaction. Certain features were rated as essential requirements, while others were perceived as exciting additions. The response distributions show a high variance, indicating the existence of multiple user groups with different needs. The interviews conducted subsequently to the experiment provide qualitative insights, emphasizing the significance of implementation and the varying relevance between different maneuver and parameter interventions regarding satisfaction. The findings contribute to the design of experience-oriented human-machine interfaces (HMIs) in automated driving, highlighting the importance of cooperative features. The results can be used to prioritize the integration of distinct features. Future research should consider larger and more diverse samples to further enhance generalizability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. SAE International: Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to On-Road Motor Vehicle Automated Driving Systems. J3016. SAE International, USA (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Steckhan, L., Spiessl, W., Quetschlich, N., Bengler, K.: Beyond SAE J3016: new design spaces for human-centered driving automation. In: Krömker, H. (ed.) HCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems. 4th International Conference, MobiTAS 2022, Held as Part of the 24th HCI International Conference, HCII, 2022, vol. 13335, pp. 416–434. Springer, Heidelberg (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04987-3_28

  3. Flemisch, F.O., Bengler, K., Bubb, H., Winner, H., Bruder, R.: Towards cooperative guidance and control of highly automated vehicles: H-mode and conduct-by-wire. Ergonomics (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2013.869355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Franz, B., Kauer, M., Bruder, R., Geyer, S.: pieDrive - a new driver-vehicle interaction concept for maneuver-based driving. In: 2012 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium Workshops (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Walch, M., Sieber, T., Hock, P., Baumann, M., Weber, M.: Towards cooperative driving. In: Green, P., Boll, S., Burnett, G., Gabbard, J., Osswald, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, USA, pp. 261–268. ACM Press (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/3003715.3005458

  6. Donges, E.: Driver behavior models. In: Winner, H., Hakuli, S., Lotz, F., Singer, C. (eds.) Handbook of driver assistance systems, pp. 19–33. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12352-3_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Franz, B., Kauer, M., Geyer, S., Hakuli, S.: Conduct-by-Wire. In: Winner, H., Hakuli, S., Lotz, F., Singer, C. (eds.) Handbuch Fahrerassistenzsysteme. A, pp. 1111–1121. Springer, Wiesbaden (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05734-3_59

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Schreiber, M., Kauer, M., Bruder, R.: Conduct by wire - maneuver catalog for semi-autonomous vehicle guidance. In: IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium 2009, China, pp. 1279–1284. IEEE (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2009.5164468

  9. Schreiber, M., Kauer, M., Schlesinger, D., Hakuli, S., Bruder, R.: Verification of a maneuver catalog for a maneuver-based vehicle guidance system. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Turkey, pp. 3683–3689. IEEE (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.2010.5641862

  10. Walch, M., Woide, M., Mühl, K., Baumann, M., Weber, M.: Cooperative overtaking. In: Proceedings, 11th International ACM Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Netherlands, pp. 144–155. ACM Press (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3342197.3344531

  11. Kano, N., Seraku, N., Takahashi, F., Tsuji, S.-I.: Attractive quality and must-be quality. J. Jpn. Soc. Qual. Control (1984). https://doi.org/10.20684/quality.14.2_147

  12. Löfgren, M., Witell, L.: Two decades of using kano's theory of attractive quality: a literature review. Qual. Manag. J. (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2008.11918056

  13. Berger, C., et al.: Kano's methods for understanding customer-defined quality, vol. 2, pp. 3–36 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shahin, A., Pourhamidi, M., Antony, J., Hyun Park, S.: Typology of Kano models: a critical review of literature and proposition of a revised model. Int. J. Qual. Reliabil. Manag. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1108/02656711311299863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang, C.-C.: The refined Kano’s model and its application. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360500235850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mikulić, J., Prebežac, D.: A critical review of techniques for classifying quality attributes in the Kano model. Manag. Serv. Qual. Int. J. (2011). https://doi.org/10.1108/09604521111100243

  17. Madzík, P.: Increasing accuracy of the Kano model – a case study. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2016.1194197

  18. Materla, T., Cudney, E.A., Antony, J.: The application of Kano model in the healthcare industry: a systematic literature review. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2017.1328980

  19. Mikulić, J.: The Kano model–a review of its application in marketing research from 1984 to 2006. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference Marketing Theory Challenges in Transitional Societies, pp. 87–96 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pandey, A., Sahu, R., Joshi, Y.: Kano model application in the tourism industry: a systematic literature review. J. Qual. Assur. Hosp. Tour. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/1528008X.2020.1839995

  21. Chen, M.-C., Hsu, C.-L., Huang, C.-H.: Applying the Kano model to investigate the quality of transportation services at mega events. J. Retail. Cons. Serv. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102442

  22. Dominici, G., Roblek, V., Abbate, T., Tani, M.: Click and drive. Bus. Process. Manag. J. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-05-2015-0076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kohli, A., Singh, R.: An assessment of customers’ satisfaction for emerging technologies in passenger cars using Kano model. XJM (2021). https://doi.org/10.1108/XJM-08-2020-0103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Albers, D., Grabbe, N., Forster, Y., Naujoks, F., Keinath, A., Bengler, K.: (Don’t) talk to me! application of the kano method for speech outputs in conditionally automated driving. in: human factors in transportation. In: 13th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2022). AHFE International (2022). https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1002484

  25. Shin, J.-G., Heo, I.-S., Yae, J.-H., Kim, S.-H.: Kano model of autonomous driving user acceptance according to driver characteristics: a survey study. Transport. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2022.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Steckhan, L., Spiessl, W., Bengler, K.: Evaluation of user interfaces for cooperation between driver and automated driving system. In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (2023). (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hölzing, J.A.: Die Kano-Theorie der Kundenzufriedenheitsmessung. Eine theoretische und empirische Überprüfung. Gabler (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sauerwein, E.: Das Kano-Modell der Kundenzufriedenheit. Reliabilität und Validität einer Methode zur Klassifizierung von Produkteigenschaften. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fong, D.: Using the self-stated importance questionnaire to interpret Kano questionnaire results. Center Qual. Manag. J. 5, 21–24 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Özkan, T., Lajunen, T., Chliaoutakis, J.E., Parker, D., Summala, H.: Cross-cultural differences in driving behaviours: a comparison of six countries. Transport. Res. Part F: Traff. Psychol. Behav. (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2006.01.002

  31. Hergeth, S., Lorenz, L., Krems, J.F., Toenert, L.: Effects of take-over requests and cultural background on automation trust in highly automated driving. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design: Driving Assessment 2015, pp. 331–337 (2015). https://doi.org/10.17077/drivingassessment.1591

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank all those involved in the implementation of the experiment for their support.

Funding

This work was funded by the BMW Group.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorenz Steckhan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Steckhan, L., Spiessl, W., Bengler, K. (2023). Maneuver and Parameter Interventions in Automated Driving to Enhance User Satisfaction: A Kano Method Application. In: Duffy, V.G., Krömker, H., A. Streitz, N., Konomi, S. (eds) HCI International 2023 – Late Breaking Papers. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14057. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48047-8_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48047-8_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-48046-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-48047-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics