Skip to main content

Shared Decision-Making and Coproduction in Surgery: The Patient Is the Cure

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Towards the Future of Surgery

Abstract

Coproduction and shared-decision making (SDM) approaches require the patient’s involvement in the clinical decisions, when more reasonable options are available. Coproduction and SDM dynamics lead to increased patient’s satisfaction and better adherence to the treatment plan. While SDM stands as a standard paradigm in elective surgery, other surgical contexts may not be ideal for SDM dynamics. Trauma and emergency surgery often represents a challenging surgical discipline, with surgeons working under high pressure and with little knowledge about the patient’s identity, previous conditions, and treatment preferences and values. Still, some emergency and trauma situations may allow SDM. Starting from a narrative review of the literature, the chapter explores the topic by reporting the results of a study conducted within the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  1. Barach P, Johnson JK. Assessing risk and preventing harm in the clinical microsystem. In: Johnson J, Sollecito WA, editors. McLaughlin & Kaluzny’s continuous quality improvement in health care. Burlington: Jones & Barlett Learning; 2020. p. 235–52.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, Straus SE, Tetroe J, Caswell W, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Heal Prof. 2006;26(1):13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Branco RM, Quental J, Ribeiro Ó. Personalised participation: an approach to involve people with dementia and their families in a participatory design project. CoDesign [Internet]. 2017;13(2):127–43. Available from:. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2017.1310903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Petersson C, Batalden P, Fritzell P, Borst S, Hedberg B. Exploring the meaning of coproduction as described by patients after spinal surgery interventions. Open Nurs J. 2019;13(1):85–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Batalden M, Batalden P, Margolis P, Seid M, Armstrong G, Opipari-arrigan L, et al. Coproduction of healthcare service. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25(7):509–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Elwyn G, Nelson E, Hager A, Price A. Coproduction: when users define quality. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020;29(9):711–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Palumbo R. Contextualizing co-production of health care: a systematic literature review. Lars Tummers prof. Yvonne Brunetto, Dr PST, editor. Int J Public Sect Manag. 2016;29(1):72–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lemire N, Souffez K, Laurendeau MC. Facilitating a knowledge Translation process. Knowledge review and facilitation tool. Quebec: Institut Publique de Santé du Quebec; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brunoro-Kadash C, Kadash N. Time to care: a patient-centered quality improvement strategy. Leadersh Health Serv. 2013;26(3):220–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dal Mas F, Garcia-Perez A, Sousa MJ, Lopes da Costa R, Cobianchi L. Knowledge Translation in the Healthcare Sector. A structured literature review. Electron J Knowl Manag. 2020;18(3):198–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Baigorri A, Villadangos J, Astrain JJ, Córdoba A. A medical knowledge management system based on expert tagging (MKMST). WIT Trans Inf Commun Technol. 2013;45:221–31.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dadich A, Abbott P, Hosseinzadeh H. Strategies to promote practice nurse capacity to deliver evidence-based care: an example from sexual healthcare. J Health Organ Manag. 2015;29(7):988–1010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Karimi J, Walter Z. Corporate entrepreneurship, disruptive business model innovation adoption, and its performance: the case of the newspaper industry. Long Range Plan. 2016;49(3):342–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cobianchi L, Dal Mas F, Massaro M, Fugazzola P, Coccolini F, Kluger Y, et al. Team dynamics in emergency surgery teams: results from a first international survey. World J Emerg Surg. 2021;16:47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. D’Andreta D, Marabelli M, Newell S, Scarbrough H, Swan J. Dominant cognitive frames and the innovative power of social networks. Organ Stud. 2016;37(3):293–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Savory C. Translating knowledge to build technological competence. Manag Decis. 2006;44(8):1052–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Radaelli G, Lettieri E, Mura M, Spiller N. Knowledge sharing and innovative work behaviour in healthcare: a micro-level investigation of direct and indirect effects. Creat Innov Manag. 2014;23(4):400–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Savory C. Building knowledge translation capability into public-sector innovation processes. Technol Anal Strateg Manag. 2009;21(2):149–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ware C, Buckwell C, Small S, Wood R. Activation of evidence: a new approach to knowledge translation and closing the clinical care gap. J Med Mark. 2008;8(2):127–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Conway A, Dowling M, Devane D. Implementing an initiative promote evidence-informed practice: part 2 - Healthcare professionals’ perspectives of the evidence rounds programme. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jull J, Petticrew M, Kristjansson E, Yoganathan M, Petkovic J, Tugwell P, et al. Engaging knowledge users in development of the CONSORT-equity 2017 reporting guideline: a qualitative study using in-depth interviews. Res Involv Engagem. 2018;4(1):34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-018-0118-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Greenwood M, Lindsay N, King J, Loewen D. Ethical spaces and places: indigenous cultural safety in British Columbia health care. Altern An Int J Indig Peoples. 2017;13(3):179–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1177180117714411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ruta F, Gallo G, Ferrara P, Terzoni S, Della Monica A, Dal Mas F, et al. Translating knowledge about organs and tissues donation using webinars. An exploratory study in Italy. Transplant Proc. 2021;53(6):1792–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ioannidis JPA. A fiasco in the making? As the coronavirus pandemic takes hold, we are making decisions without reliable data [internet]. STAT+. 2020. [cited 2020 Mar 24]. https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/17/a-fiasco-in-the-making-as-the-coronavirus-pandemic-takes-hold-we-are-making-decisions-without-reliable-data/.

  25. Biancuzzi H, Dal Mas F, Miceli L, Bednarova R. Post breast cancer coaching path: a co-production experience for women. In: Paoloni P, Lombardi R, editors. Gender studies, entrepreneurship and human capital IPAZIA 2019 springer proceedings in business and economics. Cham: Springer; 2020. p. 11–23.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dal Mas F, Biancuzzi H, Massaro M, Miceli L. Adopting a knowledge translation approach in healthcare co-production. A case study. Manag Decis. 2020;58(9):1841–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cobianchi L, Dal Mas F, Massaro M, Bednarova R, Biancuzzi H, Filisetti C, et al. Hand in hand: a multistakeholder approach for co-production of surgical care. Am J Surg. 2022;223(1):214–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Currie J, Mateer J, Weston D, Anderson E, Harding J. Implementation of a clinical governance framework to 17 combat service support brigade, Australian Army. Int J Heal Gov. 2017;22(1):15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cobianchi L, Dal Mas F, Barcellini A, Vitolo V, Facoetti A, Peloso A, et al. Knowledge translation in challenging healthcare environments: The PIOPPO experience at the National Centre of Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO Foundation). In: Garcia-Perez A, Simkin L, editors. Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Knowledge Management - ECKM2020. Coventry: Academic Conferences & Publishing International Ltd; 2020. p. 124–32.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cobianchi L, Dal Mas F, Piccolo D, Peloso A, Secundo G, Massaro M, et al. Digital transformation in healthcare. The challenges of translating knowledge in a primary research, educational and clinical Centre. In: Soliman KS, editor. International business information management conference (35th IBIMA). Seville: IBIMA; 2020. p. 6877–88.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fulop L. Leadership, clinician managers and a thing called “hybridity”. J Health Organ Manag. 2012;26:578.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi S, Rodriguez C, Croteau J, Sadeghpour A, Navali AM, Légaré F. Continuing professional education of Iranian healthcare professionals in shared decision-making: lessons learned. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mathijssen EGE, Van Den Bemt BJF, Wielsma S, Van Den Hoogen FHJ, Vriezekolk JE. Exploring healthcare professionals’ knowledge, attitudes and experiences of shared decision making in rheumatology. RMD Open. 2020;6(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Woltz S, Krijnen P, Pieterse AH, Schipper IB. Surgeons’ perspective on shared decision making in trauma surgery. A national survey. Patient Educ Couns. 2018;101(10):1748–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2018.06.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Politi MC, Saunders CH, Grabinski VF, Yen RW, Cyr AE, Durand M-A, et al. An absence of equipoise: Examining surgeons’ decision talk during encounters with women considering breast cancer surgery. PLoS One. 2021;16(12):e0260704. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260704.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Stahel PF, Cobianchi L, Dal Mas F, Paterson-Brown S, Sakakushev BE, Nguyen C, et al. The role of teamwork and non-technical skills for improving emergency surgical outcomes: an international perspective. Patient Saf Surg. 2022;16(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-022-00317-w.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Dal Mas F, Massaro M, Woltz S, Ruta F, Catena F, Fugazzola P, et al. Shared decision-making in trauma and emergency surgery settings. A literature review. In: Cerchione R, Centobelli P, editors. Proceedings of the 23rd European Conference on Knowledge Management - ECKM. Naples: Academic Conferences & Publishing International Ltd; 2022. p. 278–88.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Brown TT, Hurley VB, Rodriguez HP. Association of patient engagement strategies with utilisation and spending for musculoskeletal problems in the USA: a cross-sectional analysis of Medicare patients and physician practices. BMJ Open. 2021;11(11):e053121.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Bottle A, Parikh S, Aylin P, Loeffler M. Risk factors for early revision after total hip and knee arthroplasty: national observational study from a surgeon and population perspective. PLoS One. 2019;14(4):1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Tighe P, Buckenmaier CC, Boezaart AP, Carr DB, Clark LL, Herring AA, et al. Acute pain medicine in the United States: a status report. Pain Med (United States). 2015;16(9):1806–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Thunnissen FM, Drager LD, Braak B, Drenth JPH, Van Laarhoven CJHM, Schers HJ, et al. Healthcare utilisation of patients with cholecystolithiasis in primary care: a multipractice comparative analysis. BMJ Open. 2021;11(11):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Parmar AD, Coutin MD, Vargas GM, Tamirisa NP, Sheffield KM, Riall TS. Cost-effectiveness of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus observation in older patients presenting with mild biliary disease. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(9):1616–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Heiss KF, Raval MV. Patient engagement to enhance recovery for children undergoing surgery. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2018;27(2):86–91. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2018.02.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Janssen SJ, Teunis T, Guitton TG, Ring D, Spoor AB, Chauhan A, et al. Do surgeons treat their patients like they would treat themselves? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(11):3564–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Newcomb AB, Allred C, Grove C, Newcomb H, Mohess D, Griffen MM, et al. Surgeon communication and family understanding of patient prognosis in critically ill surgical patients: a qualitative investigation informs resident training. J Surg Educ. 2019;76(6):e77–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.05.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Cobianchi L, Piccolo D, Mas FD, Agnoletti V, Ansaloni L, Balch J, et al. Surgeons ’ perspectives on artificial intelligence to support clinical decision—making in trauma and emergency contexts : results from an international survey. World J Emerg Surg. 2023:1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Cobianchi L, Dal Mas F, Agnoletti V, Ansaloni A, Biffl V, Butturini G, et al. Time for a paradigm shift in shared decision-making in trauma and emergency surgery? Results from an international survey. World J Emerg Surg. 2023;18(1):14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Osei-Frimpong K, Wilson A, Lemke F. Patient co-creation activities in healthcare service delivery at the micro level: the influence of online access to healthcare information. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2018;126:14–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Loftus TJ, Tighe PJ, Filiberto AC, Efron PA, Brakenridge SC, Mohr AM, et al. Artificial intelligence and surgical decision-making. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(2):148–58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Bertsimas D, Dunn J, Velmahos GC, Kaafarani HMA. Surgical risk is not linear: derivation and validation of a novel, user-friendly, and machine-learning-based predictive OpTimal trees in emergency surgery risk (POTTER) calculator. Ann Surg. 2018;268(4):574. https://journals.lww.com/annalsofsurgery/Fulltext/2018/10000/Surgical_Risk_Is_Not_Linear__Derivation_and.4.aspx.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Maurer LR, Bertsimas D, Bouardi HT, El Hechi M, El Moheb M, Giannoutsou K, et al. Trauma outcome predictor: an artificial intelligence interactive smartphone tool to predict outcomes in trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021;91(1):93. https://journals.lww.com/jtrauma/Fulltext/2021/07000/Trauma_outcome_predictor__An_artificial.15.aspx.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Cobianchi L, Verde JM, Loftus TJ, Piccolo D, Dal Mas F, Mascagni P, et al. Artificial intelligence and surgery: ethical dilemmas and open issues. J Am Coll Surg. 2022;235(2):268–75. https://journals.lww.com/journalacs/Fulltext/9900/Artificial_Intelligence_and_Surgery__Ethical.215.aspx.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Stanojević S, Čartolovni A. Moral distress and moral injury and their interplay as a challenge for leadership and management: the case of Croatia. J Nurs Manag. 2022;30(7):2335–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13835.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Steenbergen M, de Vries J, Arts R, Beerepoot LV, Traa MJ. Barriers and facilitators for shared decision-making in oncology inpatient practice: an explorative study of the healthcare providers’ perspective. Support Care Cancer [Internet]. 2022;30(5):3925–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-06820-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Ansaloni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cobianchi, L. et al. (2023). Shared Decision-Making and Coproduction in Surgery: The Patient Is the Cure. In: Martellucci, J., Dal Mas, F. (eds) Towards the Future of Surgery. New Paradigms in Healthcare. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47623-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47623-5_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-47622-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-47623-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics