Skip to main content

Hierarchies of Global and Absolutely Global Metainferential Logics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Metainferential Logics

Part of the book series: Trends in Logic ((TREN,volume 61))

  • 70 Accesses

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to apply to some metainferential logics the notions of meta-validity presented in Chapter 2. First, we will explore the global\(_2\) notion (since it is a bit simpler to handle from a technical point of view), and we will show that the pure metainferential logic \(\textbf{ST }\) also recovers classical logic by substructural means, just as the \(\textbf{ST }\)-hierarchy does locally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Although in this chapter we will focus on Strong Kleene logics, all the results can be easily adapted to their Weak Kleene counterparts.

  2. 2.

    As we mentioned in Chap. 3, here we are assuming that the constant for the intermediate value is not expressible in the language. Otherwise, independently of the chosen notion for metainferential validity, \(\textbf{ST }\) and \(\textbf{CL }\) will not coincide at the inferential level. We are grateful to an anonymous reviewer for making us reflect on this point.

  3. 3.

    Here, as before, we are assuming that this logic determines the higher levels. So, for instance, the metainferences of level 2 are determined by \(\textbf{TS }\textbf{ST }/\textbf{TS }\textbf{ST }\), those of level 3 by \(\textbf{TS }\textbf{ST }\textbf{TS }\textbf{ST }/\textbf{TS }\textbf{ST }\textbf{TS }\textbf{ST }\), and so on.

  4. 4.

    We became aware of the result for \(\mathbf {TS/ST }\) after an email exchange with Chris Scambler, who first discovered it.

References

  1. Blake-Turner, C. (2020). Deationism about logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 49(3), 551–571.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ripley, D. Uncut. Manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Da RĂ©, B., Szmuc, D., & Teijeiro, P. (2022). Derivability and metainferential validity. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 51(6).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Humberstone, L. (2000). Contra-classical logics. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 78(4), 438–474.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Teijeiro, P. (2021). Strength and stability. AnĂ¡lisis FilosĂ³fico, 41(2), 337–349.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federico Pailos .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pailos, F., Da RĂ©, B. (2023). Hierarchies of Global and Absolutely Global Metainferential Logics. In: Metainferential Logics. Trends in Logic, vol 61. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44381-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics