Abstract
Industry 4.0 promises huge effects on industrial performance, once critical equipment is equipped with sensors and interconnected, and big data sets and digital twins are established that allows for advanced data analytics using machine learning, cognitive computing, and information visualization techniques. Maintenance is an area of industrial activities that would greatly benefit from the implementation of Industry 4.0. But how far has the digital transformation progress come? In 2018, an interview study was performed with 14 representatives within the maintenance ecosystem during the Nordic maintenance fare held in Gothenburg. A similar study was performed at the fare held in 2022, in which 22 actors representing system providers, computerized maintenance management suppliers, researchers, and educators participated. The aim of the studies was to get a broad view on maintenance in the digital era, covering topics like enabling technologies, challenges as well as opportunities. This paper reports on the similarities and differences in results from the two interview studies and draws conclusions on the progress and directions of the digitalization in maintenance. The findings suggest that the progress is rather slow. Data management and decision-making capabilities forms the basis for digitalization of maintenance. The focus on sensor technology has somewhat been reduced, while the prediction was that it would have increased. Instead, the ability to communicate and share information is stressed. Advanced analytical capabilities are foreseen to have a breakthrough in five years’ time, as well as technologies for data gathering and communication. The challenges are mainly the same, i.e., related to competence, leadership, and strategy. This suggests that, to enable the digital transformation, we should focus on the formulation of appropriate business cases and initiation of pilot studies, supporting the implementation process and involving all people in the change, and securing the competence and skills by training, education, and recruitment of young people to maintenance positions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Kans M, Campos J, Salonen A, Bengtsson M (2017) The thinking industry: an approach for gaining highest advantage of digitalisation within maintenance. J Maint Eng 2:147–158
Bengtsson M (2008) Supporting implementation of condition based maintenance: highlighting the interplay between technical constituents and human and organizational factors. Int J Technol Hum Interact 4(1):49–75
Weyer S, Schmitt M, Ohmer M, Gorecky D (2015) Towards industry 4.0-standardization as the crucial challenge for highly modular, multi-vendor production systems. IFAC PapersOnLine 48:579–584
Sanders A, Elangeswaran C, Wulfsberg J (2016) Industry 4.0 functions as enablers for lean manufacturing. J Indust Eng Manag 9(3):811–833
Lasi H, Fettke P, Kemper H-G, Feld T, Hoffmann M (2014) Industry 4.0. Bus Inf Syst Eng 6:239–242
Kans M, Galar D, Thaduri A (2016) Maintenance 4.0 in railway transportation industry. In: Proceedings of the 10th world congress on engineering asset management, pp 317–331
Lu Y (2017) Industry 4.0: a survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. J Ind Inf Integr 6:1–10
Huber R, Oberländer AM, Faisst U (2022) Disentangling capabilities for industry 4.0-an information systems capability perspective. Inf Syst Front. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10260-x
Hofmann E, Rusch M (2017) Industry 4.0 and the current status as well as future prospects on logistics. Comput Ind 89(1):23–34
Marcucci G, Antomarioni S, Ciarapica FE, Bevilacqua M (2022) The impact of operations and IT-related Industry 4.0 key technologies on organizational resilience. Prod Plan Control 33(15):1417–1431
Mosterman P, Zander J (2016) Industry 4.0 as a cyber-physical system study. Softw Syst Model 15(1):17–29
Alcácer V, Cruz-Machado V (2019) Scanning the industry 4.0: a literature review on technologies for manufacturing systems. Eng Sci Technol Int J 22(3):899–919
Tecuci G (2012) Artificial intelligence. WIREs Compute Stat 4:168–180
Moret-Bonillo V (2018) Emerging technologies in artificial intelligence: quantum rule-based systems. Prog Artif Intell 7(2):155–166
O’Leary DE (2013) Artificial intelligence and big data. IEEE Intell Syst 28(2):96–99
Juuso EK (2018) Smart adaptive big data analysis with advanced deep learning. Open Eng 8(1):403–416
Pye A (2014) The internet of things connecting the unconnected. Eng Technol 9(11):64–70
Penna R, Amaral M, Espíndola D, Botelho S, Duarte N, Pereira CE, Zuccolotto M, Morosini Frazzon E (2014) Visualization tool for cyber-physical maintenance systems. In: Proceedings of 12th IEEE international conference on industrial informatics (INDIN), pp 566–571
Rikalovic A, Suzic N, Bajic B, Piuri V (2022) Industry 4.0 implementation challenges and opportunities: a technological perspective. IEEE Syst J Syst J 16(2):2797–2810
Underhållsmässan (2023). https://en.underhall.se/, visited 2023–03–01
May G, Stahl B (2017) The significance of organizational change management for sustainable competitiveness in manufacturing: exploring the firm archetypes. Int J Prod Res 55(15):4450–4465
Kans M (2018) IT governance from the operational perspective: a study of IT governance strategies applied within maintenance management. Int J Serv Technol Manage 24:263–288
Jacobsen DI, Thorsvik J (2008) Hur moderna organisationer fungerar. Lund, Studentlitteratur AB
Campos J, Kans M, Salonen A (2021) A project management methodology to achieve successful digitalization in maintenance organizations. Int J COMADEM 24(1):3–9
Kans M, Ingwald A (2016) A framework for business model development for reaching service management 4.0. J Maint Eng 1:398–407
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank all participants in the study for sharing valuable knowledge, insights, and thoughts.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kans, M. (2024). Are We There Yet?—Looking at the Progress of Digitalization in Maintenance Based on Interview Studies Within the Swedish Maintenance Ecosystem. In: Kumar, U., Karim, R., Galar, D., Kour, R. (eds) International Congress and Workshop on Industrial AI and eMaintenance 2023. IAI 2023. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39619-9_41
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39619-9_41
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-39618-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-39619-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)