Abstract
The paper aims to highlight the lack of usage of knowledge-based expert systems in purchasing decisions in the context of hybrid corporate reality. We use the transdisciplinary approach in our work, which is essential to examine the problem that occurs in the reality. While reviewing publications containing the keywords “Cognitive bias” and “Supplier selection”, we focused on the methods used. The examined methods in the pooled papers are mainly based on arithmetic and rank the possibilities without considering the available expert knowledge then and there. Afterwards, we propose a solution beyond analyzing the data measured in the past; in addition, the decision-maker, their mental model, and their knowledge is considered. We assume that the effects of cognitive biases are more readily identifiable when using expert systems in considering the decision-maker’s opinions in connection with the actually applied rules in making decisions. In addition to seemingly objective solutions, in our experiment, we propose that by using past cases with known results, complex rules, which are based on the expert’s knowledge, can be simplified without changing the results of decisions in purchasing.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Mueller-Bloch, C., Kranz, J.: A Framework for Rigorously Identifying Research Gaps in Qualitative Literature Reviews (2015)
Salih, M.M., Zaidan, B.B., Zaidan, A.A., Ahmed, M.A.: Survey on fuzzy TOPSIS state-of-the-art between 2007 and 2017. Comput. Oper. Res. 104, 207–227 (2019)
Rabiee, M., Aslani, B., Rezaei, J.: A decision support system for detecting and handling biased decision-makers in multi criteria group decision-making problems. Expert Syst. Appl. 171, 114597 (2021)
Wehrle, M., Birkel, H., von der Gracht, H.A., Hartmann, E.: The impact of digitalization on the future of the PSM function managing purchasing and innovation in new product development – evidence from a Delphi study. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 28, 100732 (2022)
Zhu, Q., Ruan, Y., Liu, S., Yang, S.-B., Wang, L., Che, J.: Cross boarder electronic commerce’s new path: from literature review to AI text generation. Data Sci. Manage. (2022)
Quintana-García, C., Benavides-Chicón, C.G., Marchante-Lara, M.: Does a green supply chain improve corporate reputation? Empirical evidence from European manufacturing sectors. Ind. Mark. Manage. 92, 344–353 (2021)
Burger, M., Kessler, M., Arlinghaus, J.: Aiming for industry 4.0 maturity? The risk of higher digitalization levels in buyer-supplier relationships. Procedia CIRP 104, 1529–1534 (2021)
Belhadi, A., Kamble, S.S., Mani, V., Venkatesh, V.G., Shi, Y.: Behavioral mechanisms influencing sustainable supply chain governance decision-making from a dyadic buyer-supplier perspective. Int. J Prod. Econ. 236, 108136 (2021)
la Rocca, A., Perna, A., Snehota, I., Ciabuschi, F.: The role of supplier relationships in the development of new business ventures. Ind. Mark. Manage. 80, 149–159 (2019)
Esmaeilian, B., Behdad, S., Wang, B.: The evolution and future of manufacturing: a review. J Manuf Syst. 39, 79–100 (2016)
Kaufmann, L., Meschnig, G., Reimann, F.: Rational and intuitive decision-making in sourcing teams: effects on decision outcomes. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 20, 104–112 (2014)
Kull, T.J., Oke, A., Dooley, K.J.: Supplier selection behavior under uncertainty: contextual and cognitive effects on risk perception and choice. Decis. Sci. 45, 467–505 (2014)
Tiberius, V., Siglow, C., Sendra-García, J.: Scenarios in business and management: the current stock and research opportunities. J. Bus. Res. 121, 235–242 (2020)
Polyviou, M., Rungtusanatham, M.J., Reczek, R.W., Knemeyer, A.M.: Supplier non-retention post disruption: what role does anger play? J. Oper. Manag. 61, 1–14 (2018)
Boutselis, P., McNaught, K.: Using Bayesian Networks to forecast spares demand from equipment failures in a changing service logistics context. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 209, 325–333 (2019)
Giannoccaro, I.: Centralized vs. decentralized supply chains: the importance of decision maker’s cognitive ability and resistance to change. Ind. Market. Manage. 73, 59–69 (2018)
Deniz, N.: Cognitive biases in MCDM methods: an embedded filter proposal through sustainable supplier selection problem. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 33, 947–963 (2020)
Drakaki, M., Tzionas, P., Abeshev, K.: Investigating the influence of emotional intelligence on the supplier selection decisions with fuzzy cognitive maps. In: VEHITS 2020 – Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Vehicle Technology and Intelligent Transport Systems, pp. 681–686 (2020)
Li, S.-T., Chou, W.-C.: Power planning in ICT infrastructure: a multi-criteria operational performance evaluation approach. Omega (Westport) 49, 134–148 (2014)
Ye, J., Zhan, J., Sun, B.: A three-way decision method based on fuzzy rough set models under incomplete environments. Inf. Sci (N.Y.) 577, 22–48 (2021)
Carland, C., Goentzel, J., Montibeller, G.: Modeling the values of private sector agents in multi-echelon humanitarian supply chains. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 269, 532–543 (2018)
Ding, N., Yu, S.-H., Chu, J.-J., Chen, C., Shu, X.-Y.: A decision framework for cultural and creative products based on IF-TODIM method and group consensus reaching model. Adv. Eng. Inform. 55, 101891 (2023)
Liang, Z.-C., Yang, Y., Liao, S.-G.: Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy two-sided matching model considering level of automation. Appl. Soft Comput. 116, 108252 (2022)
Singh, A., Kumar, S.: Picture fuzzy set and quality function deployment approach based novel framework for multi-criteria group decision making method. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 104, 104395 (2021)
Li, Y.P., Liu, M., Cao, J., Wang, X.L., Zhang, N.: Multi-attribute group decision-making considering opinion dynamics. Expert Syst. Appl. 184 (2021)
Zhu, G.-N.: Design concept evaluation considering information reliability, uncertainty, and subjectivity: an integrated rough-Z-number-enhanced MCGDM methodology. Adv. Eng. Inform. 54, 101796 (2022)
Harmon, P., King, D.: Expert Systems: Artificial Intelligence in Business. John Wiley & Sons Inc., USA (1985)
Newell, A., Simon, H.A.: The logic theory machine a complex information processing system. IRE Trans. Inf. Theory. 2, 61–79 (1956)
Miller, G.A.: The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol. Rev. 63 (1956)
Baracskai, Z., Velencei, J., Dörfler, V.: Reductive reasoning. Montenegr. J. Econ. 59–66 (2005)
Schmitt-Beck, R.: Bandwagon effect. In: Mazzoleni, G. (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication, 1st ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2016)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bilinovics-Sipos, J., Horváth, A., Süle, E. (2024). Understanding Determining Factors: Purchasing Decisions. In: Silva, F.J.G., Ferreira, L.P., Sá, J.C., Pereira, M.T., Pinto, C.M.A. (eds) Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing: Establishing Bridges for More Sustainable Manufacturing Systems. FAIM 2023. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38165-2_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38165-2_30
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-38164-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-38165-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)