Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Across the Landscape: Community-Based Partnerships for Lung Cancer Risk Reduction—From Federal Initiatives to Local Influences

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Lung Cancer Screening

  • 132 Accesses

Abstract

Community-based partnerships have already played a substantial role in mitigating the impact of tobacco-associated cancers in our communities, specifically lung cancer, through programs assigned to reduce smoking. These initiatives have offered significant progress to date and offer, still, promise in the decades ahead as we work to eliminate not just smoking-related lung cancer but smoking-related illness, in general. Not surprisingly, legislation targeting tobacco product sales and marketing; work, home, and school-based partnerships; and local community initiatives have and will continue to play an important role in eliminating the burden of lung cancer in our communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dagenais GR, Leong DP, Rangarajan S, Lanas F, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Gupta R, et al. Variations in common diseases, hospital admissions, and deaths in middle-aged adults in 21 countries from five continents (PURE): a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10226):785–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. NCI. The importance of cancer Public health research. Public health research and cancer. Frederick, MD: NCI; 2022. https://www.cancer.gov/research/areas/public-health

    Google Scholar 

  3. NCI. Age and cancer risk. Cancer causes and prevention. Frederick, MD: NCI; 2021. https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/age.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Doll R, Peto R. The causes of cancer: quantitative estimates of avoidable risks of cancer in the United States today. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1981;66(6):1192–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. CDC. What are the risk factors for lung cancer? In: Lung cancer. Atlanta: CDC; 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/lung/basic_info/risk_factors.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  6. WHO. Tobacco. Geneva: WHO; 2022. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/tobacco.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Proctor RN. Tobacco and the global lung cancer epidemic. Nat Rev Cancer. 2001;1(1):82–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yoshikawa R, Katada J. Effects of active smoking on postoperative outcomes in hospitalised patients undergoing elective surgery: a retrospective analysis of an administrative claims database in Japan. BMJ Open. 2019;9(10):e029913.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. US Department of Health and Human Services. The health consequences of smoking—50 years of progress: a report of the surgeon general. Washington DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sakuma KLK, Pierce JP, Fagan P, Nguyen-Grozavu FT, Leas EC, Messer K, et al. Racial/ethnic disparities across indicators of cigarette smoking in the era of increased tobacco control, 1992–2019. Nicotine Tob Res. 2021;23(6):909–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bonnie RJ, Lynch BS. Growing up tobacco free: preventing nicotine addiction in children and youths. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  12. La Porta M, Hagood H, Kornfeld J, Treiman K. Partnership as a means for reaching special populations: evaluating the NCI’s CIS Partnership program. J Cancer Educ. 2007;22(2):S35–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Proctor RN. The history of the discovery of the cigarette–lung cancer link: evidentiary traditions, corporate denial, global toll. Tob Control. 2012;21(2):87–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tobacco stops with me. https://stopswithme.com/history-tobacco-marketing-scary-story/.

  15. CDC. Selected laws enacted by the U.S. government regarding the regulation of tobacco sales, marketing, and use (excluding laws pertaining to agriculture or excise tax). Smoking and tobacco use. Atlanta: CDC; 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/basic_information/policy/legislation/index.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Elders MJ, Perry CL, Eriksen MP, Giovino GA. The report of the surgeon general: preventing tobacco use among young people. Am J Public Health. 1994;84(4):543–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ellis Lisa. Evidence-based strategies to reduce global tobacco use. 2021. https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/ecpe/evidence-based-strategies-to-reduce-global-tobacco-use/.

  18. Kong AY, Golden SD, Ribisl KM, Krukowski RA, Vandegrift SM, Little MA. Cheaper tobacco product prices at US air force bases compared with surrounding community areas, 2019. Tob Control. 2021;31(e2):e169–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. DeCicca P, Kenkel D, Liu F. Reservation prices: an economic analysis of cigarette purchases on Indian reservations. Natl Tax J. 2015;68(1):93–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Soulakova JN, Pack R, Ha T. Patterns and correlates of purchasing cigarettes on Indian reservations among daily smokers in the United States. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018;192:88–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Wilkinson AV, Vandewater EA, Carey FR, Spitz MR. Exposure to pro-tobacco messages and smoking status among Mexican origin youth. J Immigr Minor Health. 2014;16(3):385–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Stevens EM, Vázquez-Otero C, Li X, Arya M, Vallone D, Minsky S, et al. Tobacco messages encountered in real-time among low socio-economic position groups: a descriptive study. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cruz TB, Rose SW, Lienemann BA, Byron MJ, Meissner HI, Baezconde-Garbanati L, et al. Pro-tobacco marketing and anti-tobacco campaigns aimed at vulnerable populations: a review of the literature. Tob Induc Dis. 2019;17:17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhu J, Li J, He Y, Li N, Xu G, Yu J. The influence and interaction of exposure to pro-smoking and anti-smoking messaging on youth smoking behaviour and susceptibility. Tob Induc Dis. 2019;17:86.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Public Health Law Center. The Tobacco Industry and the Black Community. 2021. https://www.publichealthlawcenter.org/sites/default/files/resources/Tobacco-Industry-Targeting.pdf.

  26. Keller-Hamilton B, Stevens EM, Wedel AV, LaPolt DT, Miranda A, Wagener TL, Patterson JG. Associations of race and ethnicity with tobacco messaging exposures and tobacco use among bisexual and pansexual women. Prev Med Rep. 2022;25:101657.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Elser H, Hartman-Filson M, Alizaga NM, Vijayaraghavan M. Exposure to pro-and anti-tobacco messages online and off-line among people experiencing homelessness. Prev Med Rep. 2019;15:100944.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. National Center for Education Statistics. Status dropout rates. Annual reports. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics; 2022. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/coj/status-dropout-rates.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Dobbins M, DeCorby K, Manske S, Goldblatt E. Effective practices for school-based tobacco use prevention. Prev Med. 2008;46(4):289–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Thomas RE, McLellan J, Perera R. Effectiveness of school-based smoking prevention curricula: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2015;5(3):e006976.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Koplan J, Kolbe L, Eriksen M. Guidelines for school health programs to prevent tobacco use and addiction. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1994;43(2):1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hopkins DP, Razi S, Leeks KD, Kalra GP, Chattopadhyay SK, Soler RE, Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Smokefree policies to reduce tobacco use: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38(2):S275–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mudarri DH. In: The costs and benefits of smoking restrictions: an assessment of the smoke-free environment act of 1993 (HR 3434). Indoor air division 6607J, Office of Radiation and Indoor Air, US Environmental Protection Agency; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wolfenden L, Goldman S, Stacey FG, Grady A, Kingsland M, Williams CM, et al. Strategies to improve the implementation of workplace-based policies or practices targeting tobacco, alcohol, diet, physical activity and obesity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;11:CD012439.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Morgan WJ, Crain EF, Gruchalla RS, O'Connor GT, Kattan M, Evans R III, et al. Results of a home-based environmental intervention among urban children with asthma. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(11):1068–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rosen LJ, Myers V, Winickoff JP, Kott J. Effectiveness of interventions to reduce tobacco smoke pollution in homes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(12):16043–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Wilson I, Semple S, Mills LM, Ritchie D, Shaw A, O'Donnell R, et al. REFRESH—reducing families’ exposure to secondhand smoke in the home: a feasibility study. Tob Control. 2013;22(5):e8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mac Arthur GJ, Harrison S, Caldwell DM, Hickman M, Campbell R. Peer-led interventions to prevent tobacco, alcohol and/or drug use among young people aged 11–21 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction. 2016;111(3):391–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Valente TW, Hoffman BR, Ritt-Olson A, Lichtman K, Johnson CA. Effects of a social-network method for group assignment strategies on peer-led tobacco prevention programs in schools. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(11):1837–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Haines-Saah RJ, Kelly MT, Oliffe JL, Bottorff JL. Picture me Smokefree: a qualitative study using social media and digital photography to engage young adults in tobacco reduction and cessation. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(1):e4061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Williams LB, McCall A, Joshua TV, Looney SW, Tingen MS. Design of a community-based lung cancer education, prevention, and screening program. West J Nurs Res. 2019;41(8):1152–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Crosbie PA, Balata H, Evison M, Atack M, Bayliss-Brideaux V, Colligan D, et al. Implementing lung cancer screening: baseline results from a community-based ‘lung health check’ pilot in deprived areas of Manchester. Thorax. 2019;74(4):405–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Butterfoss FD, Lachance LL, Orians CE. Building allies coalitions: why formation matters. Health Promot Pract. 2006;7(2_suppl):23S–33S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Drits-Esser D, Coulter H, Mannello MC, Sunada G, Alder SC, Davis PFA, et al. The community faces model: community, university and health department partners thriving together for effective health education. Collaborations (Coral Gables). 2019;2(1):10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Ana Maria Lopez

Authors
  1. Ana Maria Lopez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Maria Lopez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Gregory C. Kane

  2. Department of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Julie A. Barta

  3. Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Ronald E. Myers

  4. Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Nathaniel R. Evans III

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lopez, A.M. (2023). Across the Landscape: Community-Based Partnerships for Lung Cancer Risk Reduction—From Federal Initiatives to Local Influences. In: Kane, G.C., Barta, J.A., Myers, R.E., Evans III, N.R. (eds) Lung Cancer Screening . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33596-9_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33596-9_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-33595-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-33596-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation