Skip to main content

Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) for Enhancing Absorptive Capacity (ACAP) in Pursuit of High-Quality, Affordable and Equitable Healthcare

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Shaping High Quality, Affordable and Equitable Healthcare

Part of the book series: Organizational Behaviour in Healthcare ((OBHC))

  • 161 Accesses

Abstract

We set out the potential for PPIE to act as a co-ordination capability, enhancing the capacity of organisations to mobilise knowledge for service development and delivery of high-quality, affordable and equitable healthcare. While organisations commonly have systems in place to acquire and assimilate information from patients and the public, those systems only support the development of potential ACAP. PPIE will only act as a co-ordination capability when the knowledge acquired and assimilated is subsequently transformed and exploited, developing realised ACAP. This relies on formalised systems of involvement at all stages of knowledge translation in decision-making processes and the development of organisational cultures, which prioritise diverse and meaningful PPIE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alford, J. (1998). A public management road less travelled: Clients as co-producers of public services. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 57(4), 128–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baggott, R. (2005). A funny thing happened on the way to the forum? Reforming patient and public involvement in the NHS in England. Public Administration, 83(3), 533–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, M. (1999). Users as citizens: Collective action and the local governance of welfare. Social Policy & Administration, 33(1), 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, M., Newman, J., Knops, A., & Sullivan, H. (2003). Constituting ‘the public’ in public participation. Public Administration, 81(2), 379–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beresford, P. (2019). Public participation in health and social care: Exploring the co-production of knowledge. Frontiers in Sociology, 3, 41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berta, W., Teare, G. F., Gilbart, E., Ginsburg, L. S., Lemieux-Charles, L., & Davis, D. (2010). Spanning the know–do gap: Understanding knowledge application and capacity in long-term care homes. Social Science & Medicine, 70, 1326–1334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan, G., & Wistow, G. (2006). Publics, patients, citizens, consumers? Power and decision making in primary health care. Public Administration, 84(3), 583–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church, J., Saunders, D., Wanke, M., Pong, R., Spooner, C., & Dorgan, M. (2002). Citizen participation in health decision-making: Past experience and future prospects. Journal of Public Health Policy, 23(1), 12–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. M., & Evans, R. (2002). The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science, 32(2), 235–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, A. (2011). Engaging patients in healthcare. McGraw Hill/Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crilly, T., Jashapara, A., & Ferlie, E. (2010). Research utilisation and knowledge mobilisation: A scoping review of the literature. National Institute for Health Resarch Service Delivery and Organisation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft, C., & Currie, G. (2020). Realizing policy aspirations of voluntary sector involvement in integrated care provision: Insights from the English National Health Service. Health Policy, 124(5), 549–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croft, C., Currie, G., & Staniszewska, S. (2016). Moving from rational to normative ideologies of control over public involvement: A case of continued managerial dominance. Social Science & Medicine, 162, 124–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie, G., Croft, C., Chen, Y., Kiefer, T., Staniszewska, S. & Lilford, R. J. (2018). The capacity of health service commissioners to use evidence: a case study. Health Services and Delivery Research, 6(12).

    Google Scholar 

  • DoH. (2010). Equity and excellence: Liberating the NHS. HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • DoH. (2011a). Developing clinical commissioning groups: Towards authorisation. HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • DoH. (2011b). Guidance for Clinical Commissioning Groups. HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Enany, N., Currie, G., & Lockett, A. (2013). A paradox in healthcare service development: Professionalization of service users. Social Science & Medicine, 80, 24–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzsimmons, T. W., & Callan, V. J. (2020). The diversity gap in leadership: What are we missing in current theorizing? The Leadership Quarterly, 31(4), 101347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, G., Skelcher, C., Spencer, E., Jas, P., & Walshe, K. (2009). Absorptive capacity in a non-market environment. Public Management Review, 12(1), 77–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hotho, J. J., Becker-Ritterspach, F., & Saka-Helmhout, A. (2012). Enriching absorptive capacity through social interaction. British Journal of Management, 23(3), 383–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, B. (2014). Public and patient engagement in commissioning in the English NHS: An idea whose time has come? Public Management Review, 17(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litva, A., Coast, J., Donovan, J., Eyles, J., Shepherd, M., & Tacchi, J. (2002). ‘The public is too subjective’: Public involvement at different levels of health-care decision making. Social Science & Medicine, 54, 1825–1837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, G. P. (2008). ‘Ordinary people only’: Knowledge, representativeness, and the publics of public participation in healthcare. Sociology of Health & Illness, 30(1), 35–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, G. P., & Finn, R. (2011). Patients as team members: Opportunities, challenges and paradoxes of including patients in multi-professional healthcare teams. Sociology of Health & Illness, 33(7), 1050–1065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazanderani, F., O’Neill, B., & Powell, J. (2013). “People power” or “pester power”? YouTube as a forum for the generation of evidence and patient advocacy. Patient Education and Counseling, 93(3), 420–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mockford, C., Staniszewska, S., Griffiths, F., & Herron-Marx, S. (2012). The impact of patient and public involvement on UK NHS health care: A systematic review. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 24(1), 28–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabatchi, T., Sancino, A., & Sicilia, M. (2017). Varieties of participation in public services: The who, when, and what of coproduction. Public Administration Review, 77(5), 766–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NHS England. (2013). Towards commissioning excellence: Developing a strategy for commissioning support services. NHS England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, D., Manley, C., Weaver, T., Crawford, M. J., & Fulop, N. (2004). Patients or partners? Case studies of user involvement in the planning and delivery of adult mental health services in London. Social Science & Medicine, 58(10), 1973–1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Den Bosch, F., Volberda, H., & de Boer, M. (1999). Coevolution of firm absorptive capacity and knowledge environment: Organizational forms and combinative capabilities. Organization Science, 10(5), 551–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. N., Kang, S.-C., & Johnson, J. (2016). (Co)-contamination as the dark side of co-production: Public value failures in co-production processes. Public Management Review, 18(5), 692–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, O., Sarre, S., Papoulias, S. C., Knowles, S., Robert, G., Beresford, P., Rose, D., Carr, S., Kaur, M., & Palmer, V. J. (2020). Lost in the shadows: Reflections on the dark side of co-production. Health Research Policy and Systems, 18, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charlotte Croft .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Croft, C., Currie, G., Kiefer, T. (2023). Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) for Enhancing Absorptive Capacity (ACAP) in Pursuit of High-Quality, Affordable and Equitable Healthcare. In: Burgess, N., Currie, G. (eds) Shaping High Quality, Affordable and Equitable Healthcare. Organizational Behaviour in Healthcare. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24212-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24212-0_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-24211-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-24212-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics