Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How to Study and Understand Socioeconomic Inequalities in Health

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Solidarity and Social Justice in Contemporary Societies

Abstract

Socioeconomic position (SEP) is a major fault line in contemporary societies that plays an important role in many aspects of people’s life chances, including their health. In this chapter, approaches and challenges to studying and understanding SEP and the impact of socioeconomic inequalities on health and society are discussed. Various explanations for socioeconomic inequalities are presented with an emphasis on the importance of considering factors at multiple levels, including cultural, psychosocial, material, behavioural, and environmental factors. Special attention is given to the influence of SEP-related stereotypes on solidarity and policymakers’ willingness to implement certain policies. This chapter discusses the complexity involved in measuring and explaining socioeconomic inequalities in health and how individual and structural approaches to address these inequalities can impact social justice.

Andrea Mudd and Sanne Verra share first authorship of this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adler, N. E., Boyce, W. T., Chesney, M. A., Folkman, S., & Syme, S. L. (1993). Socioeconomic inequalities in health. No easy solution. JAMA, 269(24), 3140–3145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bambra, C., Riordan, R., Ford, J., & Matthews, F. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic and health inequalities. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 74(11), 964–968. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2020-214401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartley, M. (2004). Health inequality: An introduction to theories, concepts and methods. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, G. R., & Scheim, A. I. (2019). Methods for analytic intercategorical intersectionality in quantitative research: Discrimination as a mediator of health inequalities. Social Science & Medicine, 226, 236–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.12.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendix, R. (1974). Inequality and Social Structure: A Comparison of Marx and Weber. American Sociological Review, 39(2). https://doi.org/10.2307/2094228

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, 241–258. Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowleg, L. (2012). The problem with the phrase women and minorities: Intersectionality – An important theoretical framework for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 102(7), 1267–1273. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broeders, D., Das, J., Jennissen, R., Tiemeijer, W., & de Visser, M. (2018). Van verschil naar potentieel. Een realistisch perspectief op de sociaaleconomische gezondheidsverschillen. Wetenschappelijke Raad voor Regeringsbeleid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruni, L., & Stanca, L. (2006). Income aspirations, television and happiness: Evidence from the world values survey. Kyklos, 59(2), 209–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. (2020). Gezonde levensverwachting; onderwijsniveau; 2011/2014–2015/2018. Retrieved, 24 July 2021, from https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/cijfers/detail/83780NED.

  • Chanana, K. (1993). Accessing higher education: The dilemma of schooling women, minorities, scheduled castes and scheduled tribes in contemporary India. Higher Education, 26, 69–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01575107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cookson, R., Propper, C., Asaria, M., & Raine, R. (2016). Socio-Economic Inequalities in Health Care in England. Fiscal Studies, 37(3-4), 371–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2016.12109

  • Cozzarelli, C., Wilkinson, A. V., & Tagler, M. J. (2001). Attitudes toward the poor and attributions for poverty. Journal of Social Issues, 57(2), 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curran, D. (2016). Thinking with Bourdieu, Marx, and Weber to analyse contemporary inequalities and class. In Risk, power, and inequality in the 21st Century, 63–82. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137495570_4

  • Diez Roux, A. V. (1998). Bringing context back into epidemiology: Variables and fallacies in multilevel analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 88(2), 216–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diez Roux, A. V. (2011). Complex systems thinking and current impasses in health disparities research. American Journal of Public Health, 101, 1627–1634. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duijster, D., Oude Groeniger, J., van der Heijden, G. J. M. G., & van Lenthe, F. J. (2018). Material, behavioural, cultural and psychosocial factors in the explanation of socioeconomic inequalities in oral health. European Journal of Public Health, 28(4), 590–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durante, F., Bearns, C., & Fiske, S. T. (2017). Poor but warm, rich but cold (and competent): Social classes in the stereotype content model. Journal of Social Issues, 73(1), 138–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durante, F., & Fiske, S. T. (2017). How social-class stereotypes maintain inequality. Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geyer, S., Hemström, Ö., Peter, R., & Vågerö, D. (2006). Education, income, and occupational class cannot be used interchangeably in social epidemiology. Empirical evidence against a common practice. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 60, 804–810. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.041319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godziewski, C. (2020). Is ‘health in all policies’ everybody’s responsibility? Discourses of multistakeholderism and the lifestyle drift phenomenon. Critical Policy Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2020.1795699

  • Gore, D., & Kothari, A. (2012). Social determinants of health in Canada: Are healthy living initiatives there yet? A policy analysis. International Journal for Equity in Health, 11(41). https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-11-41

  • Kim, H., Callan, M. J., Gheorghiu, A. I., & Matthews, W. J. (2016). Social comparison, personal relative deprivation, and materialism. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12176

  • Krieger, N. (2001). A glossary for social epidemiology. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 55, 693–700. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.55.10.693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuipers, G., & van den Haak, M. (2014). De cultuurkloof? Cultuurverschillen en sociale afstand in Nederland. Gescheiden werelden? Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macintyre, S., Maciver, S., & Sooman, A. (1993). Area, class and health: Should we be focusing on places or people? Journal of Social Policy, 22(2), 213–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenbach, J. P. (2019). Health inequalities: Persistence and change in European welfare states. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenbach, J. P., Bopp, M., Deboosere, P., Kovacs, K., Leinsalu, M., Martikainen, P., Menvielle, G., Regidor, E., & de Gelder, R. (2017). Determinants of the magnitude of socioeconomic inequalities in mortality: A study of 17 European countries. Health & Place, 47, 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenbach, J. P., Stirbu, I., Roskam, A.-J. R., Schaap, M. M., Menvielle, G., Leinsalu, M., & Kunst, A. (2008). Socioeconomic inequalities in health in 22 European countries. The New England Journal of Medicine, 358, 2468–2481. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa0707519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLean, L., Edwards, N., Garrard, M., Sims-Jones, N., Clinton, K., & Ashley, L. (2009). Obesity, stigma and public health planning. Health Promotion International, 24(1), 88–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dan041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1893). Wage-labour and capital. Translated by Joynes, J. L. Twentieth Century Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGill, R., Anwar, E., Orton, L., Bromley, H., Lloyd-Williams, F., O’Flaherty, M., Taylor-Robinson, D., Guzman-Castillo, M., Gillespie, D., Moreira, P., Allen, K., Hyseni, L., Calder, N., Petticrew, M., White, M., Whitehead, M., & Capewell, S. (2015). Are interventions to promote healthy eating equally effective for all? Systematic review of socioeconomic inequalities in impact. BMC Public Health, 15(457). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1781-7

  • Melkas, T. (2013). Health in all policies as a priority in Finnish health policy: A case study on national health policy development partnerships. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 41(11, Suppl), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494812472296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mijs, J. J. B. (2018). Inequality is a problem of inference: How people solve the social puzzle of unequal outcomes. Societies, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/soc8030064

  • Mossakowski, K. N. (2014). Social causation and social selection. In The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of health, illness, behavior, and society (1st ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penner, L. A., Phelan, S. M., Earnshaw, V., Albrecht, T. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2018, January 15). Patient stigma, medical interactions, and health care disparities: A selective review. The Oxford Handbook of Stigma, Discrimination, and Health. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190243470.013.12

  • Popay, J., Whitehead, M., & Hunter, D. J. (2010). Injustice is killing people on a large scale – But what is to be done about it? Journal of Public Health, 32(2), 148–149. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdq029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragusa, J. M. (2014). Socioeconomic stereotypes: Explaining variation in preferences for taxing the rich. American Politics Research, 43(2), 327–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X14539547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, P. (1990). Social Class and Stratification. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203129715

  • Savage, M., Devine, F., Cunningham, N., Taylor, M., Li, Y., Hjellbrekke, J., Le Roux, B., Friedman, S., & Miles, A. (2013). A new model of social class? Findings from the BBC’s great British class survey experiment. Sociology, 47(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038513481128

  • Stronks, K., van de Mheen, H. D., Looman, C. W., & Mackenback, J. P. (1997). Cultural, material, and psychosocial correlates of the socioeconomic gradient in smoking behavior among adults. Preventive Medicine, 26(5, Pt. 1), 754–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Kleef, G. A., & Cheng, J. T. (2020). Power, status, and hierarchy: Current trends and future challenges. Current Opinion in Psychology, 33, iv–xiii.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volker, B., Andriessen, I., & Posthumus, H. (2014). Gesloten werelden? Sociale contacten tussen lager- en hogeropgeleiden. In Gescheiden werelden? Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, I., & Pettigrew, T. F. (1984). Relative deprivation theory: An overview and conceptual critique. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 301–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, O., & Fullagar, S. (2019). Lifestyle drift and the phenomenon of ‘citizen shift’ in contemporary UK health policy. Sociology of Health & Illness, 41(1), 20–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Andrea Mudd, Sanne Verra, Michèlle Bal & Carlijn Kamphuis

Authors
  1. Andrea Mudd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sanne Verra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michèlle Bal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Carlijn Kamphuis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Mudd .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Interdisciplinary Social Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Mara A. Yerkes

  2. Department of Interdisciplinary Social Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Michèlle Bal

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mudd, A., Verra, S., Bal, M., Kamphuis, C. (2022). How to Study and Understand Socioeconomic Inequalities in Health. In: Yerkes, M.A., Bal, M. (eds) Solidarity and Social Justice in Contemporary Societies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93795-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93795-9_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-93794-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-93795-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation