Skip to main content

Climate Change Impact for Bridges Subject to Flooding

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Engineering for Extremes

Part of the book series: Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering ((SPRTRCIENG))

  • 999 Accesses

Abstract

Scour is one of the most widespread causes of bridge failure worldwide. The magnitude of the river flow at the bridge location is a key factor which directly affects the scour hole depth. Climate change may cause changes in the flow characteristics in a river due to changes in the precipitation patterns and catchment characteristics. In this paper, statistical analysis of the expected maximum annual flow of rivers is combined with the Monte Carlo simulation to estimate the probability of local scour failure. Climate change is assumed to manifest itself through gradual changes in the statistical characteristics of the expected maximum annual flow distributions. Results are presented from a case study using a bridge in the UK, which revealed that a time-dependent increase in the mean of the expected maximum annual flow has a more pronounced effect on scour performance as compared to an increase of its variability alone. Amongst the cases examined, however, the most adverse effect on local scour performance is observed from the simultaneous increase in both mean and variability of the expected maximum annual flow. The results also highlighted the significance of the foundation depth and local scour model parameter in relation to the changing flow characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kirshen P, Ruth M, Anderson W (2008) Interdependencies of urban climate change impacts and adaptation strategies: a case study of Metropolitan Boston USA. Clim Change 86:105–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kumar P, Imam B (2013) Footprints of air pollution and changing environment on the sustainability of built infrastructure. Sci Total Environ 444:85–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Meyer MD, Weigel B (2011) Climate change and transport engineering: preparing for a sustainable future. J Transp Eng 137(6):393–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Posey J (2012) Climate change impacts on transportation in the Midwest. U.S. national climate assessment midwest technical input report, Winkler J, Andresen J, Hatfield J, Bidwell D, Brown D. Coordinators

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lehner B, Doll P, Alcamo J, Henrichs T, Kaspar F (2006) Estimating the impact of global change on flood and drought risks in Europe: a continental integrated analysis. Clim Change 75:273–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Swiss Re (2013) Mind the risk—a global ranking of cities under treat from natural disasters. Swiss Reinsurance Company Ltd, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  7. Imhof D (2004) Risk assessment of existing bridge structures. PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge, U.K

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dawson RJ, Thompson D, Johns D, Gosling S, Chapman L, Darch G, Watson G, Powrie W, Bell S, Paulson K, Hughes P, Wood R (2016) UK climate change risk assessment evidence report: chapter 4, infrastructure. report prepared for the adaptation sub-committee of the committee on climate change, London

    Google Scholar 

  9. Transportation Research Board (TRB) (2008) Potential impacts of climate change on U.S. transportation. Transportation research board special report 290, committee on climate change and U.S. transportation, National Research Council, Washington D.C

    Google Scholar 

  10. JBA (2004) Scour & flood risk at railway structures. Infrastructure integrity (4) research theme: project number T112, Final Report, JBA Consulting, Rail Safety & Standards Board

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wardhana K, Hadipriono FC (2003) Analysis of recent bridge failures in the United States. J Perform Constr Facil 17(3):144–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Imam BM, Chryssanthopoulos MK (2012) Causes and consequences of metallic bridge failures. Struct Eng Int 22(1):93–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. DEFRA (2012) The UK climate change risk assessment 2012 evidence report. Committee on climate change, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  14. Highways Agency (2009) Climate change adaptation strategy and framework. Department for transport, UK

    Google Scholar 

  15. Network Rail (2015) A short guide to network rail. National Audit Office, UK

    Google Scholar 

  16. Booij MJ (2005) Impact of climate change on river flooding assessed with different spatial model resolutions. J Hydrol 303:176–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nicholls RJ (2004) Coastal flooding and wetland loss in the 21st century: changes under the SRES climate and socio-economic scenarios. Glob Environ Chang 14:69–86

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. UNEP (2007) Buildings and climate change: status, challenges and opportunities. United nations environment programme ISBN: 978–92–807–2795–1

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lamb R, Garside P, Pant R, Hall JW (2019) A probabilistic model of the economic risk to Britain’s railway network from bridge scour during floods. Risk Anal 39(11):2457–2478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Larsen PH, Goldsmith S, Smith O, Wilson ML, Strzepek K, Chinowsky P, Saylor B (2008) Estimating future costs for Alaska public infrastructure at risk from climate change. Glob Environ Chang 18:442–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. ICE (2009) The state of the nation: defending critical infrastructure. Institution of civil engineers, UK

    Google Scholar 

  22. Melville BW, Coleman, SE (2000) Bridge scour. Water Resources Publications, LLC

    Google Scholar 

  23. Maddison B (2012) Scour failure of bridges. Proceedings of the institution of civil Engineers—Forensic Engineering 165(1):39–52

    Google Scholar 

  24. Van Leeuwen Z, Lamb R (2014) Flood and scour related failure incidents at railway assets between 1846 and 2013. Project W13–4224, JBA Trust Limited, UK

    Google Scholar 

  25. Breusers HNC, Nicollet G, Shen HW (1977) Local scour around cylindrical piers. J Hydraul Res 15(3):211–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Melville BW (1997) Pier and abutment scour: integrated approach. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 123(2):125–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Richardson EV, Davis SR (2001) Evaluating scour at bridges, 4th edn. United States department of transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, USA

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sheppard DM, Melville B, Demir H (2014) Evaluation of existing equations for local scour at bridge piers. J Hydraul Eng 140(1):14–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Briaud JL, Brandimarte L, Wang J, D’Odorico P (2007) Probability of scour depth exceedance owing to hydrologic uncertainty. Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards 1(2):77–88

    Google Scholar 

  30. Briaud JL, Gardoni P, Yao C (2014) Statistical, risk and reliability analyses of bridge scour. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 140(2):04013011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Deco A, Frangopol DM (2011) Risk assessment of highway bridges under multiple hazards. J Risk Res 14(9):1057–1089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Johnson PA (1992) Reliability-based pier scour engineering. J Hydraul Eng 118(10):1344–1358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Muzzammil M, Siddiqui NA (2009) A reliability-based assessment of bridge pier scour in non-uniform sediments. J Hydraul Res 47(3):372–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. NCHRP (2003) Design of highway bridges for extreme events. Report 489, National cooperative highway research program, Transportation Research Board, New York

    Google Scholar 

  35. Stein SM, Young GK, Trent RE, Pearson DR (1999) Prioritizing scour vulnerable bridges using risk. J Infrastruct Syst 5(3):95–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Stewart MG, Deng X (2015) Climate impact risks and climate adaptation engineering for built infrastructure. ASCE-ASME J Risk U A 1(1):04014001

    Google Scholar 

  37. Devendiran DK, Banerjee S, Mondal A (2021) Impact of climate change on multihazard performance of river-crossing bridges: risk, resilience, and adaptation. J Perform Constr Facil 35(1):04020127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Liu L, Yang DY, Frangopol DM (2020) Network-level risk-based framework for optimal bridge adaptation management considering scour and climate change. J Infrastruct Syst 26(1):04019037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yang DY, Frangopol DM (2019) Physics-based assessment of climate change impact on long-term regional bridge scour risk using hydrologic modeling: application to Lehigh river watershed. J Bridge Eng (ASCE) 24(11):04019099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kay AL, Rudd AC, Fry M, Nash, Allen S (2021) Climate change impacts on peak river flows: combining national-scale hydrological modelling and probabilistic projections. Clim Risk Manag 31:100263

    Google Scholar 

  41. IPCC (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. In: Field CB, Barros V, Stocker TF, Qin D, Dokken DJ, Ebi KL, Mastrandrea MD, Mach KJ, Plattner GK, Allen SK, Tignor M, Midgley PM (eds) A special report of working Groups I and II of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY, USA

    Google Scholar 

  42. Katz RW (1993) Towards a statistical paradigm for climate change. Climate Res 2:167–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. IPCC (2013) Summary for Policymakers. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V. Midgley PM (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical basis, contribution of working Group I to the Fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, and New York, NY, USA. 2013

    Google Scholar 

  44. Osborn TJ, Hulme M, Jones PD, Basnett TA (2000) Observed trends in the daily intensity of United Kingdom precipitation. Int J Climatol 20:347–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. UKCP18, 2018. UK Climate Projections. Accessible online at: http://ukclimateprojections.metoffice.gov.uk/ /. Department for environment, food and rural affairs (Defra), Crown Copyright. UK

  46. Prudhomme C, Kay AL, Crooks S, Reynard N (2013) Climate change and river flooding: part 2 sensitivity characterisation for British catchments and example vulnerability assessments. Clim Change 119:949–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Arneson LA, Zevenbergen LW, Lagasse PF, Clopper, PE (2012) Evaluating scour at bridges, 5th edn. Hydraulic engineering circular no. 18 (HEC-18), FHWA-HIF-12–003, U.S. department of transportation, Federal Highway Administration, USA

    Google Scholar 

  48. Melville BW, Chiew YM (1999) Time scale for local scour at bridge piers. J Hydraul Eng 125(1):59–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. BD 97/12 (2012) The assessment of scour and other hydraulic actions at highway structures. Design manual for roads and bridges, highway structures: inspection and maintenance assessment, Vol 3, Section 4, Part 21, UK

    Google Scholar 

  50. Robson A, Reed D (1999) Statistical procedures for flood frequency estimation. Flood estimation handbook, Vol 3. Centre for ecology & hydrology, natural environment research council, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK

    Google Scholar 

  51. Merz B, Thieken AH (2005) Separating natural and epistemic uncertainty in flood frequency analysis. J Hydrol 209:114–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Kottegoda NT, Rosso R (1997) Statistics, probability and reliability for civil and environmental engineers. McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

  53. Rail Safety & Standards Board (RSSB) (2005) Safe management of railway structures—flooding and scour risk. Final Report. JBA Consulting, London

    Google Scholar 

  54. Landers MN, Mueller DS (1996) Channel scour at bridges in the United States. Report no. FHWA-RD-95–184, U.S. Department of transportation, Federal Highway Administration

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The financial support (Grants EP/I00744X/1 and EP/G037612) provided by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) for this project in the UK is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Boulent Imam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Imam, B. (2022). Climate Change Impact for Bridges Subject to Flooding. In: Stewart, M.G., Rosowsky, D.V. (eds) Engineering for Extremes. Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85018-0_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85018-0_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85017-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85018-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics