Abstract
Scour is one of the most widespread causes of bridge failure worldwide. The magnitude of the river flow at the bridge location is a key factor which directly affects the scour hole depth. Climate change may cause changes in the flow characteristics in a river due to changes in the precipitation patterns and catchment characteristics. In this paper, statistical analysis of the expected maximum annual flow of rivers is combined with the Monte Carlo simulation to estimate the probability of local scour failure. Climate change is assumed to manifest itself through gradual changes in the statistical characteristics of the expected maximum annual flow distributions. Results are presented from a case study using a bridge in the UK, which revealed that a time-dependent increase in the mean of the expected maximum annual flow has a more pronounced effect on scour performance as compared to an increase of its variability alone. Amongst the cases examined, however, the most adverse effect on local scour performance is observed from the simultaneous increase in both mean and variability of the expected maximum annual flow. The results also highlighted the significance of the foundation depth and local scour model parameter in relation to the changing flow characteristics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kirshen P, Ruth M, Anderson W (2008) Interdependencies of urban climate change impacts and adaptation strategies: a case study of Metropolitan Boston USA. Clim Change 86:105–122
Kumar P, Imam B (2013) Footprints of air pollution and changing environment on the sustainability of built infrastructure. Sci Total Environ 444:85–101
Meyer MD, Weigel B (2011) Climate change and transport engineering: preparing for a sustainable future. J Transp Eng 137(6):393–403
Posey J (2012) Climate change impacts on transportation in the Midwest. U.S. national climate assessment midwest technical input report, Winkler J, Andresen J, Hatfield J, Bidwell D, Brown D. Coordinators
Lehner B, Doll P, Alcamo J, Henrichs T, Kaspar F (2006) Estimating the impact of global change on flood and drought risks in Europe: a continental integrated analysis. Clim Change 75:273–299
Swiss Re (2013) Mind the risk—a global ranking of cities under treat from natural disasters. Swiss Reinsurance Company Ltd, Switzerland
Imhof D (2004) Risk assessment of existing bridge structures. PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge, U.K
Dawson RJ, Thompson D, Johns D, Gosling S, Chapman L, Darch G, Watson G, Powrie W, Bell S, Paulson K, Hughes P, Wood R (2016) UK climate change risk assessment evidence report: chapter 4, infrastructure. report prepared for the adaptation sub-committee of the committee on climate change, London
Transportation Research Board (TRB) (2008) Potential impacts of climate change on U.S. transportation. Transportation research board special report 290, committee on climate change and U.S. transportation, National Research Council, Washington D.C
JBA (2004) Scour & flood risk at railway structures. Infrastructure integrity (4) research theme: project number T112, Final Report, JBA Consulting, Rail Safety & Standards Board
Wardhana K, Hadipriono FC (2003) Analysis of recent bridge failures in the United States. J Perform Constr Facil 17(3):144–150
Imam BM, Chryssanthopoulos MK (2012) Causes and consequences of metallic bridge failures. Struct Eng Int 22(1):93–98
DEFRA (2012) The UK climate change risk assessment 2012 evidence report. Committee on climate change, London, UK
Highways Agency (2009) Climate change adaptation strategy and framework. Department for transport, UK
Network Rail (2015) A short guide to network rail. National Audit Office, UK
Booij MJ (2005) Impact of climate change on river flooding assessed with different spatial model resolutions. J Hydrol 303:176–198
Nicholls RJ (2004) Coastal flooding and wetland loss in the 21st century: changes under the SRES climate and socio-economic scenarios. Glob Environ Chang 14:69–86
UNEP (2007) Buildings and climate change: status, challenges and opportunities. United nations environment programme ISBN: 978–92–807–2795–1
Lamb R, Garside P, Pant R, Hall JW (2019) A probabilistic model of the economic risk to Britain’s railway network from bridge scour during floods. Risk Anal 39(11):2457–2478
Larsen PH, Goldsmith S, Smith O, Wilson ML, Strzepek K, Chinowsky P, Saylor B (2008) Estimating future costs for Alaska public infrastructure at risk from climate change. Glob Environ Chang 18:442–457
ICE (2009) The state of the nation: defending critical infrastructure. Institution of civil engineers, UK
Melville BW, Coleman, SE (2000) Bridge scour. Water Resources Publications, LLC
Maddison B (2012) Scour failure of bridges. Proceedings of the institution of civil Engineers—Forensic Engineering 165(1):39–52
Van Leeuwen Z, Lamb R (2014) Flood and scour related failure incidents at railway assets between 1846 and 2013. Project W13–4224, JBA Trust Limited, UK
Breusers HNC, Nicollet G, Shen HW (1977) Local scour around cylindrical piers. J Hydraul Res 15(3):211–252
Melville BW (1997) Pier and abutment scour: integrated approach. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 123(2):125–136
Richardson EV, Davis SR (2001) Evaluating scour at bridges, 4th edn. United States department of transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, USA
Sheppard DM, Melville B, Demir H (2014) Evaluation of existing equations for local scour at bridge piers. J Hydraul Eng 140(1):14–23
Briaud JL, Brandimarte L, Wang J, D’Odorico P (2007) Probability of scour depth exceedance owing to hydrologic uncertainty. Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards 1(2):77–88
Briaud JL, Gardoni P, Yao C (2014) Statistical, risk and reliability analyses of bridge scour. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 140(2):04013011
Deco A, Frangopol DM (2011) Risk assessment of highway bridges under multiple hazards. J Risk Res 14(9):1057–1089
Johnson PA (1992) Reliability-based pier scour engineering. J Hydraul Eng 118(10):1344–1358
Muzzammil M, Siddiqui NA (2009) A reliability-based assessment of bridge pier scour in non-uniform sediments. J Hydraul Res 47(3):372–380
NCHRP (2003) Design of highway bridges for extreme events. Report 489, National cooperative highway research program, Transportation Research Board, New York
Stein SM, Young GK, Trent RE, Pearson DR (1999) Prioritizing scour vulnerable bridges using risk. J Infrastruct Syst 5(3):95–101
Stewart MG, Deng X (2015) Climate impact risks and climate adaptation engineering for built infrastructure. ASCE-ASME J Risk U A 1(1):04014001
Devendiran DK, Banerjee S, Mondal A (2021) Impact of climate change on multihazard performance of river-crossing bridges: risk, resilience, and adaptation. J Perform Constr Facil 35(1):04020127
Liu L, Yang DY, Frangopol DM (2020) Network-level risk-based framework for optimal bridge adaptation management considering scour and climate change. J Infrastruct Syst 26(1):04019037
Yang DY, Frangopol DM (2019) Physics-based assessment of climate change impact on long-term regional bridge scour risk using hydrologic modeling: application to Lehigh river watershed. J Bridge Eng (ASCE) 24(11):04019099
Kay AL, Rudd AC, Fry M, Nash, Allen S (2021) Climate change impacts on peak river flows: combining national-scale hydrological modelling and probabilistic projections. Clim Risk Manag 31:100263
IPCC (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. In: Field CB, Barros V, Stocker TF, Qin D, Dokken DJ, Ebi KL, Mastrandrea MD, Mach KJ, Plattner GK, Allen SK, Tignor M, Midgley PM (eds) A special report of working Groups I and II of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY, USA
Katz RW (1993) Towards a statistical paradigm for climate change. Climate Res 2:167–175
IPCC (2013) Summary for Policymakers. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V. Midgley PM (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical basis, contribution of working Group I to the Fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, and New York, NY, USA. 2013
Osborn TJ, Hulme M, Jones PD, Basnett TA (2000) Observed trends in the daily intensity of United Kingdom precipitation. Int J Climatol 20:347–364
UKCP18, 2018. UK Climate Projections. Accessible online at: http://ukclimateprojections.metoffice.gov.uk/ /. Department for environment, food and rural affairs (Defra), Crown Copyright. UK
Prudhomme C, Kay AL, Crooks S, Reynard N (2013) Climate change and river flooding: part 2 sensitivity characterisation for British catchments and example vulnerability assessments. Clim Change 119:949–964
Arneson LA, Zevenbergen LW, Lagasse PF, Clopper, PE (2012) Evaluating scour at bridges, 5th edn. Hydraulic engineering circular no. 18 (HEC-18), FHWA-HIF-12–003, U.S. department of transportation, Federal Highway Administration, USA
Melville BW, Chiew YM (1999) Time scale for local scour at bridge piers. J Hydraul Eng 125(1):59–65
BD 97/12 (2012) The assessment of scour and other hydraulic actions at highway structures. Design manual for roads and bridges, highway structures: inspection and maintenance assessment, Vol 3, Section 4, Part 21, UK
Robson A, Reed D (1999) Statistical procedures for flood frequency estimation. Flood estimation handbook, Vol 3. Centre for ecology & hydrology, natural environment research council, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK
Merz B, Thieken AH (2005) Separating natural and epistemic uncertainty in flood frequency analysis. J Hydrol 209:114–132
Kottegoda NT, Rosso R (1997) Statistics, probability and reliability for civil and environmental engineers. McGraw-Hill
Rail Safety & Standards Board (RSSB) (2005) Safe management of railway structures—flooding and scour risk. Final Report. JBA Consulting, London
Landers MN, Mueller DS (1996) Channel scour at bridges in the United States. Report no. FHWA-RD-95–184, U.S. Department of transportation, Federal Highway Administration
Acknowledgements
The financial support (Grants EP/I00744X/1 and EP/G037612) provided by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) for this project in the UK is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Imam, B. (2022). Climate Change Impact for Bridges Subject to Flooding. In: Stewart, M.G., Rosowsky, D.V. (eds) Engineering for Extremes. Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85018-0_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85018-0_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85017-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85018-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)