Skip to main content

A Typology of Municipalities’ Roles and Expected User’s Roles in Open Government Data Release and Reuse

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Electronic Government (EGOV 2021)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to identify the roles municipalities take when engaging in Open Government Data (OGD) and the expectations of user’s roles they imply. According to the output delivered, the user can relate to data or data-based solutions. OGD is data released by public organisations to enhance government transparency, innovation, and participation. The realization of those benefits involves different roles, from providing data, developing solutions, to using them for a certain purpose. However, the definition of the municipalities’ and users’ roles in that context is unclear, which can impact the realization of the OGD benefits. This study uses Role Theory’s concepts as an analytical lens, following the Design Science Research approach to create a typology. We conducted a hermeneutic literature review, identified, and analysed 52 papers, to build a typology of the municipalities’ roles based on the goals, tasks, output delivered, and the expected users’ roles they generate. It results in seven classes of roles coming in pairs. We tested the typology on empirical cases: the 28 Belgian and 158 Swedish municipalities engaged in OGD. Five role pairs were encountered in the empirical cases, and two occurred only in previous literature. The typology can help municipalities to understand how their role choice calls for a certain type of users that cannot be generalized as a “citizen”. Role Theory opens new perspectives of research to understand their interdependence and raises fundamental role-related questions that should be given the same importance as technical and technological challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.europeandataportal.eu/en/dashboard/2020.

References

  1. Attard, J., Orlandi, F., Scerri, S., Auer, S.: A systematic review of open government data initiatives. Gov. Inf. Q. 32, 399–418 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Charalabidis, Y., Zuiderwijk, A., Alexopoulos, C., Janssen, M., Lampoltshammer, T., Ferro, E.: The open data landscape. In: The World of Open Data. PAIT, vol. 28, pp. 1–9. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90850-2_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Berends, J., Carrara, W., Vollers, H.: Analytical Report 6: Open Data in Cities 2. , Luxembourg (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berends, J., Carrara, W., Engbers, W., Vollers, H.: Re-Using Open Data: A Study on Companies Transforming Open Data into Economic & Societal Value (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stoker, G.: Public value management: a new narrative for networked governance? Am. Rev. Public Adm. 36, 41–57 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vigoda, E.: From responsiveness to collaboration: governance, citizens, and the next generation of public administration. Public Adm. Rev. 62, 527–540 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carrara, W., Chan, W.S., Fischer, S., van Steenbergen, E.: Capgemini Institute, European Commission: Creating Value Through Open Data: Study on the Impact of Re-Use of Public Data Resources (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mergel, I., Kleibrink, A., Sörvik, J.: Open data outcomes: U.S. cities between product and process innovation. Gov. Inf. Q. 35, 622–632 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pereira, G.V., Macadar, M.A., Luciano, E.M., Testa, M.G.: Delivering public value through open government data initiatives in a smart city context. Inf. Syst. Front. 19(2), 213–229 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9673-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mesquita, M.A., Luciano, E.M., Rafael, M., Wiedenhöft, G.C.: Discussing the twofold role of government - provider and user - in the open government data ecosystem. In: EGov-CEDEM-EPart Conference Proceedings. Linköping (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Safarov, I., Meijer, A., Grimmelikhuijsen, S.: Utilization of open government data: a systematic literature review of types, conditions, effects and users. Inf. Polity. 22, 1–24 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Abella, A., Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M., De-Pablos-Heredero, C.: The process of open data publication and reuse. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 70, 296–300 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sieber, R.E., Johnson, P.A.: Civic open data at a crossroads: dominant models and current challenges. Gov. Inf. Q. 32, 308–315 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lassinantti, J.: Re-use of public sector open data. Int. J. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 1, 1–29 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dawes, S.S., Vidiasova, L., Parkhimovich, O.: Planning and designing open government data programs: an ecosystem approach. Gov. Inf. Q. 33, 15–27 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Harrison, T.M., et al.: Open government and e-government: democratic challenges from a public value perspective. Inf. Polity. 17, 83–97 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Noveck, B.S.: Wiki government: How technology can make government better, democracy stronger, and citizens more powerful. , Washington DC (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Biddle, B.: Recent developments in role theory. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 12, 67–92 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Anderson, H., Havila, V., Andersen, P., Halinen, A.: Position and role-conceptualizing dynamics in business networks. Scand. J. Manag. 14, 167–186 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ashforth, B.E.: Role Transitions in Organizational Life: An Identity-Based Perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nyström, A.G., Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., Kortelainen, M.: Actor roles and role patterns influencing innovation in living labs. Ind. Mark. Manag. 43, 483–495 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Herrmann, T., Jahnke, I., Loser, K.U.: The Role Concept as a Basis for Designing Community Systems. In: Francoise, D., Rose, D., Carla Sand Manuel, Z. (eds.) Cooperative Systems Design Scenar, pp. 163–178, IOS, Amsterdam (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Heikkinen, M.T., Mainela, T., Still, J., Tähtinen, J.: Roles for managing in mobile service development nets. Ind. Mark. Manag. 36, 909–925 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kahn, R.L., Wolfe, D.M., Quinn, R.P., Snoek, J.D., Rosenthal, R.A.: Organizational Stress: Studies in Role Conflict and Ambiguity. John Wiley, New York (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Miles, R.H.: Role-set configuration as a predictor of role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Sociometry 40, 21 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24, 45–77 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nickerson, R.C., Varshney, U., Muntermann, J.: A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 22, 336–359 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Boell, S.K., Cecez-Kecmanovic, D.: A hermeneutic approach for conducting literature reviews and literature searches. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 34, 257–286 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hsieh, H.-F., Shannon, S.E.: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual. Health Res. 15, 1277–1288 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Agrawal, D., Kettinger, W.J., Zhang, C.: The openness challenge: why some cities take it on and others don’t. In: Twentieth Americas Conference on Information Systems, pp. 1–7. Savannah (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ruijer, E., Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Meijer, A.: Open data for democracy: developing a theoretical framework for open data use. Gov. Inf. Q. 34, 45–52 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Conradie, P., Mulder, I., Choenni, S.: Rotterdam open data: exploring the release of public sector information through co-creation. In: 2012 18th International ICE Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation, pp. 1–10. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Toots, M., et al.: A framework for data-driven public service co-production. In: Janssen, M., et al. (eds.) EGOV 2017. LNCS, vol. 10428, pp. 264–275. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64677-0_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Ham, J., Koo, Y., Lee, J.: Provision and usage of open government data: strategic transformation paths. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 119, 1841–1858 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Attard, J., Orlandi, F., Auer, S.: Data driven governments: creating value through open government data. In: Hameurlain, A., et al. (eds.) Transactions on Large-Scale Data-and Knowledge-Centered Systems XXVII, pp. 84–110. Springer, Berlin (2016)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Attard, J., Orlandi, F., Auer, S.: Value creation on open government data. In:Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Science March, 2016, pp. 2605–2614 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Abella, A., Ortiz-de-urbina-criado, M., De-pablos-heredero, C.: A model for the analysis of data-driven innovation and value generation in smart cities ’ ecosystems. Cities 64, 47–53 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Khayyat, M., Bannister, F.: Towards a model for facilitating and enabling co-creation using open government data. Inf. Polity. 22, 211–231 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Foulonneau, M., Martin, S., Turki, S.: How open data are turned into services? In: Snene, M., Leonard, M. (eds.) IESS 2014. LNBIP, vol. 169, pp. 31–39. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04810-9_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Sangiambut, S., Sieber, R.: The civic open data and crowdsourcing app ecosystem: actors, materials, and interventions. URISA J. 28, 49–62 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  41. van Loenen, B.: Towards a user-oriented open data strategy. In: van Loenen, B., Vancauwenberghe, G., Crompvoets, J. (eds.) Open Data Exposed. Information technology and Law Series, vol. 30, pp. 33–53.T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-261-3_3

  42. Barns, S.: Smart cities and urban data platforms: designing interfaces for smart governance. City, Cult. Soc. 12, 5–12 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Matheus, R., Janssen, M., Maheshwari, D.: Data science empowering the public: data-driven dashboards for transparent and accountable decision-making in smart cities. Gov. Inf. Q. 37, 101284 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Bakici, T., Almirall, E., Wareham, J.: A smart city initiative: the case of Barcelona. J. Knowl. Econ. 4, 135–148 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Gupta, A., Panagiotopoulos, P., Bowen, F.: An orchestration approach to smart city data ecosystems. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 153, 119929 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Cordella, A., Paletti, A.: Government as a platform, orchestration, and public value creation: the Italian case. Gov. Inf. Q. 36, 101409 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Linders, D.: From e-government to we-government: defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Gov. Inf. Q. 29, 446–454 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., Van De Kaa, G., Poulis, K.: The wicked problem of commercial value creation in open data ecosystems: policy guidelines for governments. Inf. Polity. 21, 223–236 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was performed with financial support by the FEDER and the Walloon Region (H2020), as part of the project “Wal-e-cities”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisabeth Gebka .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gebka, E., Castiaux, A. (2021). A Typology of Municipalities’ Roles and Expected User’s Roles in Open Government Data Release and Reuse. In: Scholl, H.J., Gil-Garcia, J.R., Janssen, M., Kalampokis, E., Lindgren, I., Rodríguez Bolívar, M.P. (eds) Electronic Government. EGOV 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12850. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84789-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84789-0_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-84788-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-84789-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics