Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to identify the roles municipalities take when engaging in Open Government Data (OGD) and the expectations of user’s roles they imply. According to the output delivered, the user can relate to data or data-based solutions. OGD is data released by public organisations to enhance government transparency, innovation, and participation. The realization of those benefits involves different roles, from providing data, developing solutions, to using them for a certain purpose. However, the definition of the municipalities’ and users’ roles in that context is unclear, which can impact the realization of the OGD benefits. This study uses Role Theory’s concepts as an analytical lens, following the Design Science Research approach to create a typology. We conducted a hermeneutic literature review, identified, and analysed 52 papers, to build a typology of the municipalities’ roles based on the goals, tasks, output delivered, and the expected users’ roles they generate. It results in seven classes of roles coming in pairs. We tested the typology on empirical cases: the 28 Belgian and 158 Swedish municipalities engaged in OGD. Five role pairs were encountered in the empirical cases, and two occurred only in previous literature. The typology can help municipalities to understand how their role choice calls for a certain type of users that cannot be generalized as a “citizen”. Role Theory opens new perspectives of research to understand their interdependence and raises fundamental role-related questions that should be given the same importance as technical and technological challenges.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Attard, J., Orlandi, F., Scerri, S., Auer, S.: A systematic review of open government data initiatives. Gov. Inf. Q. 32, 399–418 (2015)
Charalabidis, Y., Zuiderwijk, A., Alexopoulos, C., Janssen, M., Lampoltshammer, T., Ferro, E.: The open data landscape. In: The World of Open Data. PAIT, vol. 28, pp. 1–9. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90850-2_1
Berends, J., Carrara, W., Vollers, H.: Analytical Report 6: Open Data in Cities 2. , Luxembourg (2020)
Berends, J., Carrara, W., Engbers, W., Vollers, H.: Re-Using Open Data: A Study on Companies Transforming Open Data into Economic & Societal Value (2017)
Stoker, G.: Public value management: a new narrative for networked governance? Am. Rev. Public Adm. 36, 41–57 (2006)
Vigoda, E.: From responsiveness to collaboration: governance, citizens, and the next generation of public administration. Public Adm. Rev. 62, 527–540 (2002)
Carrara, W., Chan, W.S., Fischer, S., van Steenbergen, E.: Capgemini Institute, European Commission: Creating Value Through Open Data: Study on the Impact of Re-Use of Public Data Resources (2015)
Mergel, I., Kleibrink, A., Sörvik, J.: Open data outcomes: U.S. cities between product and process innovation. Gov. Inf. Q. 35, 622–632 (2018)
Pereira, G.V., Macadar, M.A., Luciano, E.M., Testa, M.G.: Delivering public value through open government data initiatives in a smart city context. Inf. Syst. Front. 19(2), 213–229 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9673-7
Mesquita, M.A., Luciano, E.M., Rafael, M., Wiedenhöft, G.C.: Discussing the twofold role of government - provider and user - in the open government data ecosystem. In: EGov-CEDEM-EPart Conference Proceedings. Linköping (2020)
Safarov, I., Meijer, A., Grimmelikhuijsen, S.: Utilization of open government data: a systematic literature review of types, conditions, effects and users. Inf. Polity. 22, 1–24 (2017)
Abella, A., Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M., De-Pablos-Heredero, C.: The process of open data publication and reuse. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 70, 296–300 (2019)
Sieber, R.E., Johnson, P.A.: Civic open data at a crossroads: dominant models and current challenges. Gov. Inf. Q. 32, 308–315 (2015)
Lassinantti, J.: Re-use of public sector open data. Int. J. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 1, 1–29 (2019)
Dawes, S.S., Vidiasova, L., Parkhimovich, O.: Planning and designing open government data programs: an ecosystem approach. Gov. Inf. Q. 33, 15–27 (2016)
Harrison, T.M., et al.: Open government and e-government: democratic challenges from a public value perspective. Inf. Polity. 17, 83–97 (2012)
Noveck, B.S.: Wiki government: How technology can make government better, democracy stronger, and citizens more powerful. , Washington DC (2009)
Biddle, B.: Recent developments in role theory. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 12, 67–92 (1986)
Anderson, H., Havila, V., Andersen, P., Halinen, A.: Position and role-conceptualizing dynamics in business networks. Scand. J. Manag. 14, 167–186 (1998)
Ashforth, B.E.: Role Transitions in Organizational Life: An Identity-Based Perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2000)
Nyström, A.G., Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., Kortelainen, M.: Actor roles and role patterns influencing innovation in living labs. Ind. Mark. Manag. 43, 483–495 (2014)
Herrmann, T., Jahnke, I., Loser, K.U.: The Role Concept as a Basis for Designing Community Systems. In: Francoise, D., Rose, D., Carla Sand Manuel, Z. (eds.) Cooperative Systems Design Scenar, pp. 163–178, IOS, Amsterdam (2004)
Heikkinen, M.T., Mainela, T., Still, J., Tähtinen, J.: Roles for managing in mobile service development nets. Ind. Mark. Manag. 36, 909–925 (2007)
Kahn, R.L., Wolfe, D.M., Quinn, R.P., Snoek, J.D., Rosenthal, R.A.: Organizational Stress: Studies in Role Conflict and Ambiguity. John Wiley, New York (1964)
Miles, R.H.: Role-set configuration as a predictor of role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Sociometry 40, 21 (1977)
Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24, 45–77 (2014)
Nickerson, R.C., Varshney, U., Muntermann, J.: A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 22, 336–359 (2013)
Boell, S.K., Cecez-Kecmanovic, D.: A hermeneutic approach for conducting literature reviews and literature searches. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 34, 257–286 (2014)
Hsieh, H.-F., Shannon, S.E.: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual. Health Res. 15, 1277–1288 (2005)
Agrawal, D., Kettinger, W.J., Zhang, C.: The openness challenge: why some cities take it on and others don’t. In: Twentieth Americas Conference on Information Systems, pp. 1–7. Savannah (2014)
Ruijer, E., Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Meijer, A.: Open data for democracy: developing a theoretical framework for open data use. Gov. Inf. Q. 34, 45–52 (2017)
Conradie, P., Mulder, I., Choenni, S.: Rotterdam open data: exploring the release of public sector information through co-creation. In: 2012 18th International ICE Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation, pp. 1–10. IEEE (2012)
Toots, M., et al.: A framework for data-driven public service co-production. In: Janssen, M., et al. (eds.) EGOV 2017. LNCS, vol. 10428, pp. 264–275. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64677-0_22
Ham, J., Koo, Y., Lee, J.: Provision and usage of open government data: strategic transformation paths. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 119, 1841–1858 (2019)
Attard, J., Orlandi, F., Auer, S.: Data driven governments: creating value through open government data. In: Hameurlain, A., et al. (eds.) Transactions on Large-Scale Data-and Knowledge-Centered Systems XXVII, pp. 84–110. Springer, Berlin (2016)
Attard, J., Orlandi, F., Auer, S.: Value creation on open government data. In:Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Science March, 2016, pp. 2605–2614 (2016)
Abella, A., Ortiz-de-urbina-criado, M., De-pablos-heredero, C.: A model for the analysis of data-driven innovation and value generation in smart cities ’ ecosystems. Cities 64, 47–53 (2017)
Khayyat, M., Bannister, F.: Towards a model for facilitating and enabling co-creation using open government data. Inf. Polity. 22, 211–231 (2017)
Foulonneau, M., Martin, S., Turki, S.: How open data are turned into services? In: Snene, M., Leonard, M. (eds.) IESS 2014. LNBIP, vol. 169, pp. 31–39. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04810-9_3
Sangiambut, S., Sieber, R.: The civic open data and crowdsourcing app ecosystem: actors, materials, and interventions. URISA J. 28, 49–62 (2017)
van Loenen, B.: Towards a user-oriented open data strategy. In: van Loenen, B., Vancauwenberghe, G., Crompvoets, J. (eds.) Open Data Exposed. Information technology and Law Series, vol. 30, pp. 33–53.T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-261-3_3
Barns, S.: Smart cities and urban data platforms: designing interfaces for smart governance. City, Cult. Soc. 12, 5–12 (2018)
Matheus, R., Janssen, M., Maheshwari, D.: Data science empowering the public: data-driven dashboards for transparent and accountable decision-making in smart cities. Gov. Inf. Q. 37, 101284 (2018)
Bakici, T., Almirall, E., Wareham, J.: A smart city initiative: the case of Barcelona. J. Knowl. Econ. 4, 135–148 (2013)
Gupta, A., Panagiotopoulos, P., Bowen, F.: An orchestration approach to smart city data ecosystems. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 153, 119929 (2020)
Cordella, A., Paletti, A.: Government as a platform, orchestration, and public value creation: the Italian case. Gov. Inf. Q. 36, 101409 (2019)
Linders, D.: From e-government to we-government: defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Gov. Inf. Q. 29, 446–454 (2012)
Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., Van De Kaa, G., Poulis, K.: The wicked problem of commercial value creation in open data ecosystems: policy guidelines for governments. Inf. Polity. 21, 223–236 (2016)
Acknowledgements
The study was performed with financial support by the FEDER and the Walloon Region (H2020), as part of the project “Wal-e-cities”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gebka, E., Castiaux, A. (2021). A Typology of Municipalities’ Roles and Expected User’s Roles in Open Government Data Release and Reuse. In: Scholl, H.J., Gil-Garcia, J.R., Janssen, M., Kalampokis, E., Lindgren, I., Rodríguez Bolívar, M.P. (eds) Electronic Government. EGOV 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12850. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84789-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84789-0_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-84788-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-84789-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)