Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Accountability of Intelligence and Law Enforcement Agencies in Information Search Activities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Electronic Participation (ePart 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12849))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 818 Accesses

Abstract

The development of technology has challenged legislation in several areas during the last decade. The increase in the amount of data and computer performance, and new software solutions such as artificial intelligence and computer linguistics based intelligent search require a reassessment of the legal barriers to their operations. On the one hand, law enforcement agencies and security services demand increasing access to these technologies to come up to the social expectations in the field of security. On the other hand, civil rights organizations require an ever-stronger oversight of law enforcement agencies and security services to avoid their possible abuse of the most advanced technologies. The paper argues that the only way to resolve this dilemma is to improve the accountability of law enforcement agencies and national security services, thereby increasing public trust. Procedural and technical methods to perform this task are examined. The corresponding EU legal framework is analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Bundesnachrichtendienst, the foreign intelligence agency of Germany.

  2. 2.

    Government Communications Headquarters, the signals intelligence service of the UK.

  3. 3.

    National Security Agency, the signals intelligence service of the USA.

  4. 4.

    Organization der ehemaligen SS Angehörigen, organization of persons formerly belonging to the SS.

References

  1. Gerny, D.: Das Nachrichtendienstgesetz auf einen Blick. https://www.nzz.ch/schweiz/abstimmung-vom-25-september-das-nachrichtendienstgesetz-auf-einen-blick-ld.111204. Accessed 21 March 2021

  2. FRA: Surveillance by intelligence services: fundamental rights safeguards and remedies in the EU, vol. 1, p. 8. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, Vienna (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Weber, R.H., Staiger, D.N.: Privacy versus security. In: Kulesza, J., Balleste, R. (eds.): Cybersecurity and Human Rights in the Age of Cybervelliance. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Born, H., Wills, A.: Overseeing Intelligence Services, A toolkit, DCAF, Geneva (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ventura, H.E., Miller, J.M., Deflem, M.: Governmentality and the war on terror: FBI project carnivore and the diffusion of disciplinary power. Crit. Criminol. 13, 55–70 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-004-6167-6. Accessed 26 May 2021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schafer, B.: Surveillance for the masses: the political and legal landscape of the UK Investigatory Powers Bill. Datenschutz Datensich 40, 592–597 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11623-016-0664-0. Accessed 26 May 2021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Meyer, D: Spy agency back in court over snooping: you’re abusing mass surveillance powers. https://www.zdnet.com/article/spy-agency-back-in-court-youre-abusing-your-mass-surveillance-powers/. Accessed 24 May 2021

  8. Rojszczak, M.: Extraterritorial bulk surveillance after the German BND act judgment. Eur. Const. Law Rev. 1–25 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019621000055

  9. Goodwin, B.: GCHQ bulk interception programme breached privacy rights, Strasbourg court rules (2021). https://www.computerweekly.com/news/252501356/GCHQ-bulk-interception-programme-breached-privacy-rights-Strasbourg-court-court-rules?utm_campaign=20210526_GCHQ+bulk+interception+programme+breached+privacy+rights%2C+Strasbourg+court+rules&utm_medium=EM&utm_source=EDA&asrc=EM_EDA_163354630

  10. Anderson, D.: Report of the Bulk Powers Review. Crown copyright, London (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kahaner, L.: Competitive Intelligence, p. 104. Touchstone-Simon & Schuster, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Quintel, T.: Connecting Personal Data of Third Country Nationals: Interoperability of EU Databases in the Light of the CJEU’s Case Law on Data Retention. University of Luxembourg Law Working Paper No. 002-2018 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schmid, G.: Report on the existence of a global system for the interception of private and commercial communications (ECHELON Interception System). 07th 11th European Parliament Session Document A5–0264/20012001. http://cryptome.org/echelon-ep-fin.htm. Accessed 25 March 2021

  14. Macaskill, E., Dance, G.: NSA Files: Decoded. http://www.theguardian.com/world/interactive/2013/nov/01/snowden-nsa-files-surveillance-revelations-decoded#section/1. Accessed 25 March 2021

  15. FRA: Surveillance by intelligence services: fundamental rights safeguards and remedies in the EU, vol. 2, European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, Vienna (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Öcalan v. Turkey. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-69022. Accessed 25 March 2021

  17. Dickinson, W.B., Mercer, C., Polsky, B.: Watergate: Chronology of a crisis, 1, p. 133, 140, 180 and 188. Congressional Quarterly Inc., Washington D.C. (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Archangelsky, A.: Murder in Moscow: Anna’s legacy. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306422016670350. Accessed 01 June 2021

  19. Lichtfield, J.: Sarkozy accused of using security service to spy on journalists. The Independent (2010). https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/sarkozy-accused-of-using-security-service-to-spy-on-journalists-2124599.htm

  20. Mordechai Vanunu gets 18 years for treason - Archive 1988 (1988). https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/mar/28/mordechai-vanunu-israel-spying-nuclear-1988

  21. Iley, C.: Valerie Plame Wilson: housewife CIA spy who was a ‘fair game’ for Bush. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/8318075/Valerie-Plame-Wilson-the-housewife-CIA-spy-who-was-fair-game-for-Bush.html. Accessed 25 March 2021

  22. Ball, J.: US and UK struck secret deal to allow NSA to ‘unmask’ Britons’ personal data. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/nov/20/us-uk-secret-deal-surveillance-personal-data. Accessed 25 March 2021

  23. Voelz, G.J.: Contractors and intelligence: the private sector in the intelligence community. https://doi.org/10.1080/08850600903143106. Accessed 01 June 2021

  24. Shorrock, T.: Spies for Hire. Simon and Schuster Paperbacks, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Caparini, M.: Controlling and overseeing intelligence services in democratic states. In: Born, H., Caparini, M. (eds.) Democratic Control of Intelligence Services. Routledge, New York (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Regulation (EC) No 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons regarding the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data and repealing Regulation (EC) No 95/46 (General Data Protection Regulation, GDPR)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons regarding the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purpose of the prevention, investigation, detection, prosecution, or enforcement of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA. (Privacy Policy, LED)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Article 29 Working Party was an advisory body made up of a representative from the data protection authority of each EU Member State, the European Data Protection Supervisor, and the European Commission. After the entering into force of the GDPR it ended its functioning

    Google Scholar 

  29. WP 258: Opinion on some key issues of the Law Enforcement Directive (EU 2016/680) adopted on 2017 November 29. https://iapp.org/media/pdf/resource_center/wp258_police_directive-11-2017.pdf. Accessed 25 March 2021

  30. Opinion 01/2014 on the WP 211 - Application of the necessity and the proportionality concepts and data protection within the law enforcement sector (2014). https://ec.europa.eu/justice/article-29/documentation/opinion-recommendation/files/2014/wp211_en.pdf. Accessed 31 May 2021

  31. FRA: Towards More Effective Policing Understanding and Preventing Discriminatory Ethnic Profiling: A Guide. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (2010). https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra_uploads/1133-Guide-ethnic-profiling_EN.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2021

  32. Weber and Saravia v Germany (2006). http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-76586. Accessed 01 June 2021

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Information Society Research Institute, National University of Public Service, Budapest, Hungary

    Pál Vadász & Zsolt Ződi

Authors
  1. Pál Vadász
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zsolt Ződi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pál Vadász .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Danube University Krems, Krems, Austria

    Noella Edelmann

  2. Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary

    Csaba Csáki

  3. University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway

    Sara Hofmann

  4. Danube University Krems, Krems, Austria

    Thomas J. Lampoltshammer

  5. University of Granada, Granada, Spain

    Laura Alcaide Muñoz

  6. Danube University Krems, Krems, Austria

    Peter Parycek

  7. University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland

    Gerhard Schwabe

  8. University of Macedonia, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Efthimios Tambouris

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Vadász, P., Ződi, Z. (2021). The Accountability of Intelligence and Law Enforcement Agencies in Information Search Activities. In: Edelmann, N., et al. Electronic Participation. ePart 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12849. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82824-0_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82824-0_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-82823-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-82824-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships

Search

Navigation