Skip to main content

Squamous Cell Cancer: Mucosal, Nodal and Extranodal Disease

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hybrid PET/MR Neuroimaging
  • 1765 Accesses

Abstract

Head and neck cancer is the seventh most common cancer worldwide; in 2018, it caused more than 10,000 deaths in the USA (Siegel et al., CA Cancer J Clin 68:7–30, 2018). Although head and neck cancers related to tobacco are declining globally, cancers related to human papilloma virus (HPV) are increasing in younger patients, likely from oral sex exposure (Chow, N Engl J Med 382:60–72, 2020; Bray et al., CA Cancer J Clin 68:394–424, 2018; Gillison et al., J Clin Onco 33:3235–42, 2015; Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration, JAMA Oncol 3:524–48, 2017.). The progressive global burden of HPV-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is predicted to surpass cervical cancer in certain developed countries (Taberna et al., Ann Oncol 28:2386–2398, 2017, Chaturvedi et al., J Clin Oncol 31:4550–9, 2013). Accurate staging and follow-up of head and neck cancers are critical, with [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT and PET/MRI playing a vital role with their ability to determine aberrant increased levels of aerobic glycolysis in neoplastic cells (Warburg, Science 123:309–14, 1956; Higashi et al., J Nucl Med 38:1337–44, 1997). In head and neck malignancies, especially head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC),18F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MRI enhance identification of the neoplastic origin in cancers with unknown primary tumors, improve locally advance disease staging, increase nodal staging precision, and assess in posttreatment response. This chapter reviews advantages and disadvantages of PET/MRI for mucosal, nodal, and extranodal HNSCC with respect to the AJCC eighth edition of cancer staging, with a brief review of potential new PET tracers for hypoxia that hold promise for the assessment of HNSCC in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:7–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chow LQM. Head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(1):60–72. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1715715.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gillison ML, Chaturverdi AK, Anderson WF, Fakhry C. Epidemiology of human papillomavirus-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Onco. 2015;33:3235–42.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration. Global, regional and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability adjusted life years for 32 cancer groups, 1990 to 2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3:524–48.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Taberna M, Mena M, Pavon MA, Alemany L, Gillison ML, Mesia R. Human papilloma-related oropharyngeal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2017;28:2386–98.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chaturvedi AK, Anderson WF, Lortet-Tieulent J, et al. Worldwide trends in incidence rates for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(36):4550–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Warburg O. On the origin of cancer cells. Science. 1956;123:309–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Higashi T, Tamaki N, Honda T, et al. Expression of glucose transporters in human pancreatic tumors compared with increased FDG accumulation in PET study. J Nucl Med. 1997;38:1337–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hohenstein NA, Chan JW, Wu SY, Tahir P, Yom SS. Diagnosis, staging, radiation treatment, response assessment, and outcome prognostication of head and neck cancers using pet imaging: a systematic review. Pet Clin. 2020;15:65–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim SG, Friedman F, Patel S, Hagiwara M. Potential role of PET/MRI for imaging metastatic lymph nodes in head and neck Cancer. AJR. 2016;207:248–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Traylor KS, Koontz N, Mosier K. Squamous cell carcinoma: PET/CT and PET/MRI of the pretreatment and post-treatment neck. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI. 2019;40:400–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Paidpally V, Chirindel A, Lam S, et al. FDG-PET/CT imaging biomarkers in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Imaging Med. 2012;4:633–47.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Das S, Kirsch CF. Imaging of lumps and bumps in the nose: a review of sinonasal tumours. Cancer Imaging. 2005;5(1):167–77. Published 2005 Dec 9. https://doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2005.0111.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kirsch C. Oral cavity cancer. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;18(4):269–80. https://doi.org/10.1097/RMR.0b013e3181572caa.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mourad M, Jetmore T, Jategaonkar AA, Moubayed S, Moshier E, Urken ML. Epidemiological trends of head and neck cancer in the United States: a SEER population study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;75:2562–72.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. CFE K. Dellacerra. Increasing incidence and imaging in Pediatric head and neck Cancer and the role of the human papilloma virus and Epstein-Barr virus. J Pediatr Neuroradiol. 2016;05(03):221–8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sidell D, Nabili V, Lai C, Cheung G, Kirsch C, Abemayor E. Pediatric squamous cell carcinoma: case report and literature review. Laryngoscope. 2009;119(8):1538–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.20531.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kaka AS, Kumar B, Kumar P, Wakely P, Kirsch CM, et al. Highly aggressive human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal cancer: clinical, radiologic, and pathologic characteristics. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013;116(3):327–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2013.04.011.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. IARC. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Monograph. 2007;89:223–76.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bravo IG, Felez-Sanchez M. Papillomaviruses: viral evolution, cancer and evolutionary medicine. Evol Med Public Health. 2015;2015(1):32–51.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kostareli E, Holzinger D, Hess J. New concepts for translational head and neck oncology: lessons from HPV-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas. Front Oncol. 2012;2:36.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kriemer AR, Clifford GM, Boyle P, Fransceschi S. Human papillomavirus types in head and neck squamous cell cancers worldwide: a systematic review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2005;14(2):467–75.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ndiaye C, Mena M, Alemany L, et al. HPV DNA, E6/E7 mRNA, and p16INKa detection in head and neck cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(12):1319–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Castellasague X, Alemany L, Quer M, et al. HPV involvement in head and neck cancers: comprehensive assessment of biomarkers in 3680 patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016;108(6):djv403.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jordan RCm Kubgeb NW, Perez-Ordonez B, et al. Validation of methods for oropharyngeal cancer HPV status determination in US cooperative group trials. Am J Surg Path. 2012;36(7):945–54.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ng M, Freeman MK, Fleming TD, et al. Smoking prevalence and cigarette consumption in 187 countries, 1980-2012. JAMA. 2014;311(2):183–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chaturvedi AK, Engels EA, Pfeiffer RM, et al. Human papillomavirus and rising oropharyngeal cancer incidence in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4294–301.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Chesson HW, Dunne EF, Hariri S, Markowitz LE. The estimated lifetime probability of acquiring human papillomavirus in the United States. Sex Transm Dis. 2014;41:660–4.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Porceddu SV, Milne R, Brown E, et al. Validation of the ICON-S staging for HPV-associated oropharyngeal carcinoma using a pre-defined treatment policy. Oral Oncol. 2017;66:81–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, et al. The eighth edition AJCC cancer staging manual: continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:93–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lydiatt WM, Patel SG, O’Sullivan B, et al. Head and neck cancers: major changes in the American joint committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:122–37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Differding S, Hanin FX, Gregoire V. PET imaging biomarkers in head and neck cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:613–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zheng E, Khariwala SS. Do all patients with head and neck Cancer require a positron emission tomography scan at diagnosis? Laryngoscope. 2019;129(3):537–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Goel R, Moore W, Sumer B, Khan S, Sher D, Subramaniam RM. Clinical practice in PET/CT for the management of head and neck squamous cell cancer. Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209:289–303.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Huang SH, Chien CY, Lin WC, Fang FM, Wang PW, et al. A comparative study of fused FDG PET/MRI, PET/CT, MRI and CT imaging for assessing surrounding tissue invasion of advanced buccal squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Nucl Med. 2011;36:518–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Loeffelbein DJ, Souvatzoglou M, Wankerl V, et al. Diagnostic value of retrospective PET-MRI fusion in head-and-neck cancer. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:846.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Szyszko TA, Coo GJR. PET/CT and PET/MRI in head and neck malignancy. Clin Radiol. 2018;73:60–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Samolyk-Kogaczewska N, Sierko E, Dziemianczyk-Pakiela D, Nowaszewska KB, Lukasik M, Reszec J. Usefulness of hybrid PET/MRI in clinical evaluation of head and neck Cancer patients. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(2):511.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Roh JL, Park JP, Kim JS, et al. 18F fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with negative neck palpation findings: a prospective study. Radiology. 2014;271(1):153–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Bochtler T, Löffler H, Krämer A. Diagnosis and management of metastatic neoplasms with unknown primary. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2018;35(3):199–206.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ryan JF, Motz KM, Rooper LM, et al. The impact of a stepwise approach to primary tumor detection in squamous cell carcinoma of the neck with unknown primary. Laryngoscope. 2019;129(7):1610–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Rusthoven KE, Koshy M, Paulino AC. The role of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in cervical lymph node metastases from an unknown primary tumor. Cancer. 2004;101(11):2641–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Johansen J, Buus S, Loft A, et al. Prospective study of 18FDG-PET in the detection and management of patients with lymph node metastases to the neck from an unknown primary tumor. Results from the DAHANCA-13 study. Head Neck. 2008;30(4):471–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Rudmik L, Lau HY, Matthews TW, et al. Clinical utility of PET/CT in the evaluation of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with an unknown primary: a prospective clinical trial. Head Neck. 2011;33(7):935–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Lee JR, Kim JS, Roh JL, et al. Detection of occult primary tumors in patients with cervical metastases of unknown primary tumors: comparison of (18)F FDG PET/CT with contrast-enhanced CT or CT/MR imaging-prospective study. Radiology. 2015;274(3):764–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Roh JL, Yeo NK, Kim JS, et al. Utility of 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in the preoperative staging of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2007;43(9):887–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Seitz O, Chambron-Pinho N, Middendorp M, et al. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/CT to evaluate tumor, nodal disease, and gross tumor volume of oropharyngeal and oral cavity cancer: comparison with MR imaging and validation with surgical specimen. Neuroradiology. 2009;51(10):677–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kanda T, Kitajima K, Suenaga Y, et al. Value of retrospective image fusion of 18F-FDG PET and MRI for preoperative staging of head and neck cancer: comparison with PET/CT and contrast-enhanced neck MRI. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82(11):2005–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Nguyen A, Luginbuhl A, Cognetti D, et al. Effectiveness of PET/CT in the preoperative evaluation of neck disease. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(1):159–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Park JT, Roh JL, Kim JS, et al. (18)F FDG PET/CT versus CT/MR imaging and the prognostic value of contralateral neck metastases in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Radiology. 2016;279(2):481–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Chan SC, Yeh CH, Yen TC, et al. Clinical utility of simultaneous whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MRI as a single-step imaging modality in the staging of primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45(8):1297–308.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Baek CH, Chung MK, Son YI, et al. Tumor volume assessment by 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with oral cavity cancer with dental artifacts on CT or MR images. J Nucl Med. 2008;49(9):1422–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Samołyk-Kogaczewska N, Sierko E, Zuzda K, et al. PET/MRI-guided GTV delineation during radiotherapy planning in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. PET/MRT-gesteuerte GTV-Abgrenzung während der Bestrahlungsplanung bei Patienten mit Plattenepithelkarzinom der Zunge. Strahlenther Onkol. 2019;195(9):780–91.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Traylor KS, Koontz N, Mosier K. Squamous cell carcinoma: PET/CT and PET/MRI of the pretreatment and post-treatment neck. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2019;40(5):400–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Diehn FE, Michalak GJ, DeLone DR, et al. CT dental artifact: comparison of an iterative metal artifact reduction technique with weighted filtered back-projection. Acta Radiol Open. 2017;6(11):2058460117743279.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Tantiwongkosi B, Yu F, Kanard A, Miller FR. Role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in pre and post treatment evaluation in head and neck carcinoma. World J Radiol. 2014;6(5):177–91.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Kirsch CFE, Schmalfuss IM. Practical tips for MR imaging of perineural tumor spread. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2018;26(1):85–100.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Queiroz MA, Huellner MW. PET/MR in cancers of the head and neck. Semin Nucl Med. 2015;45(3):248–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Kim ES, Yoon DY, Moon JY, et al. Detection of loco-regional recurrence in malignant head and neck tumors: a comparison of CT, MRI, and FDG PET-CT. Acta Radiol. 2019;60(2):186–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Hyare H, Wisco JJ, Alusi G, Cohen M, Nabili E, Abemayor E, Kirsch CFE. The anatomy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma spread through the pharyngobasilar fascia to the trigeminal mandibular nerve on 1.5 T MRI. Surg Radiol Anat. 2010;32(10):937–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Orman G, Tran BH, Desai N, Meoded A, Kralik S, Smith V, Hicks J, Kirsch C, Huisman TG. Neuroimaging characteristics of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in children [published online ahead of print, 2020 Aug 30]. J Neuroimaging. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1111/jon.12780, https://doi.org/10.1111/jon.12780.

  63. Mohandas A, Marcus C, Kang H, Truong MT, Subramaniam RM. FDG PET/CT in the management of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;203(2):W146–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Glastonbury CM, Mukherji SK, O'Sullivan B, Lydiatt WM. Setting the stage for 2018: how the changes in the american joint committee on cancer/union for international cancer control Cancer staging manual eighth edition impact radiologists. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017;38(12):2231–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Joo YH, Yoo IR, Cho KJ, Park JO, Nam IC, Kim MS. Extracapsular spread in hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: diagnostic value of FDG PET/CT. Head Neck. 2013;35(12):1771–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Eckel HE, Bradley PJ. Natural history of treated and untreated hypopharyngeal cancer. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;83:27–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Piazza C, Paderno A, Ravanelli M, Pessina C. Clinical and radiological evaluation of hypopharyngeal carcinoma. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;83:35–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Wakasaki T, Omori H, Sueyoshi S, Rikimaru F, Toh S, Taguchi K, Higaki Y, Morita M, Masuda M. A case of peritoneal metastasis during treatment for hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Surg Oncol. 2016;14(1):265.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. de la Torre S, Moragas M, Durany D, Soler M, García JR, Lomeña F. Secuencia diagnóstica de RM y PET/TC en un caso de metástasis óseas por carcinoma escamoso de hipofaringe [Diagnostic sequence of MRI and PET/CT in a case of bone metastases by hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma]. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol. 2012;31(2):101–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Iyer S, Sanghvi V, Lala M. Atypical distant metastases from hypopharyngeal cancer. Indian J Cancer. 2002;39(2):66–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Bhatia PL, Mathur RL, Jain HK. Multiple osseous metastases in hypopharyngeal carcinoma. J Laryngol Otol. 1973;87(1):89–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Eckel HE, Bradley PJ. Future perspectives in Hypopharyngeal Cancer care. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;83:167–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Wycliffe ND, Grover RS, Kim PD, Simental A Jr. Hypopharyngeal cancer. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;18(4):243–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Ng SH, Lin CY, Chan SC, et al. Clinical utility of multimodality imaging with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, diffusion-weighted MRI, and 18F-FDG PET/CT for the prediction of neck control in oropharyngeal or hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with chemoradiation. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e115933.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Wong CK, Chan SC, Ng SH, Hsieh CH, Cheng NM, Yen TC, Liao CT. Textural features on 18F-FDG PET/CT and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for predicting treatment response and survival of patients with hypopharyngeal carcinoma. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(33):e16608.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:7–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Baelga J. Why the epidermal growth factor receptor? The rational for cancer therapy. Oncologist. 2002;7(suppl 4):2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Steuer CE, El-Deiry M, Parks JR, Higgins KA, Saba NF. An update on larynx cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:31–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Plaxton NA, Brandon DC, Corey AS, Harrison CE, Karagulle Kendi AT, Halkar RK, Barron BJ. Characteristics and limitations of FDG PET/CT for imaging of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a comprehensive review of anatomy, metastatic pathways, and image findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;205(5):W519–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Fleming AJ Jr, Smith SP Jr, Paul CM, et al. Impact of [18F]-2-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography on previously untreated head and neck cancer patients. Laryngoscope. 2007;117:1173–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Bruine de Bruin L, Bollineni VR, Wachters JE, Schuuring E, van Hemel BM, van der Wal JE, Slagter-Menkema L, de Bock GH, Steenbakkers RJ, Langendijk JA, Pruim J, van der Laan BF, Halmos GB. Assessment of hypoxic subvolumes in laryngeal cancer with (18)F-fluoroazomycinarabinoside ((18)F-FAZA)-PET/CT scanning and immunohistochemistry. Radiother Oncol. 2015;117(1):106–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Kitajima K, Suenaga Y, Kanda T, Miyawaki D, Yoshida K, Ejima Y, Sasaki R, Komatsu H, Saito M, Otsuki N, Nibu K, Kiyota N, Minamikawa T, Sugimura K. Prognostic value of FDG PET imaging in patients with laryngeal cancer. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e96999.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. de Bree R, van der Putten L, van Tinteren H, Wedman J, Oyen WJ, Janssen LM, van den Brekel MW, Comans EF, Pruim J, Takes RP, Hobbelink MG, Valdés Olmos R, van der Laan BF, Boers M, Hoekstra OS, Leemans CR. Effectiveness of an (18)F-FDG-PET based strategy to optimize the diagnostic trajectory of suspected recurrent laryngeal carcinoma after radiotherapy: the RELAPS multicenter randomized trial. Radiother Oncol. 2016;118(2):251–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Rohde M, Nielsen AL, Johansen J, Sørensen JA, Nguyen N, Diaz A, Nielsen MK, Asmussen JT, Christiansen JM, Gerke O, Thomassen A, Alavi A, Høilund-Carlsen PF, Godballe C. Head-to-head comparison of chest X-ray/head and neck MRI, chest CT/head and neck MRI, and 18F-FDG PET/CT for detection of distant metastases and synchronous cancer in oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal cancer. J Nucl Med. 2017;58(12):1919–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Fukui MB, Blodgett TM, Snyderman CH, Johnson JJ, Myers EN, Townsend DW, Meltzer CC. Combined PET-CT in the head and neck: part 2. Diagnostic uses and pitfalls of oncologic imaging. Radiographics. 2005;25(4):913–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Purohit BS, Ailianou A, Dulguerov N, Becker CD, Ratib O, Becker M. FDG-PET/CT pitfalls in oncological head and neck imaging. Insights Imaging. 2014;5(5):585–602.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Loevner LA, Kim AK, Mikityansky I. PET/CT-MR imaging in head and neck cancer including pitfalls and physiologic variations. PET Clin. 2008;3(3):335–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Zimmer LA, Snyderman C, Fukui MB, Blodgett T, McCook B, Townsend DW, Meltzer CC. The use of combined PET/CT for localizing recurrent head and neck cancer: the Pittsburgh experience. Ear Nose Throat J. 2005;84(2):104. 106, 108-10

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Jabour BA, Choi Y, Hoh CK, et al. Extracranial head and neck: PET imaging with 2-[F-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose and MR imaging correlation. Radiology. 1993;186:27–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Jackson RS, Schlarman TC, Hubble WL, Osman MM. Prevalence and patterns of physiologic muscle uptake detected with whole-body 18F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med Technol. 2006;34(1):29–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Kirsch CF, Suh JD, Lufkin RB, Canalis RF. False-positive positron-emission tomography-CT of a Teflon granuloma in the parapharyngeal space occurring after treatment for a patulous eustachian tube. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28(7):1371–2.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Ho L, Seto J, Ngo V, Vuu H, Wassef H. Cosmetic-related changes on 18F-FDG PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med. 2012;37(6):e150–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Manca G, Vanzi E, Rubello D, Giammarile F, Grassetto G, Wong KK, Perkins AC, Colletti PM, Volterrani D. (18)F-FDG PET/CT quantification in head and neck squamous cell cancer: principles, technical issues and clinical applications. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:1360–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Wong KH, Panek R, Welsh L, Mcquaid D, Dunlop A, Riddell A, Murray I, Du Y, Chua S, Koh DM, Bhide S, Nutting C, Oyen WJ, et al. The predictive value of early assessment after 1 cycle of induction chemotherapy with 18F-FDG PET/CT and diffusion-weighted MRI for response to radical chemoradiotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:1843–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Liu Z, Cao Y, Diao W, Cheng Y, Jia Z, Peng X. Radiomics-based prediction of survival in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma based on pre- and post-treatment 18F-PET/CT. Aging (Albany NY). 2020;12:14593–619.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Peng H, Dong D, Fang MJ, Li L, Tang LL, Chen L, Li WF, Mao YP, Fan W, Liu LZ, Tian L, Lin AH, Sun Y, et al. Prognostic value of deep learning PET/CT-based radiomics: potential role for future individual induction chemotherapy in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25:4271–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Löck S, Linge A, Seidlitz A, Bandurska-Luque A, Nowak A, Gudziol V, Buchholz F, Aust DE, Baretton GB, Zöphel K, Steinbach J, Kotzerke J, Overgaard J, Zips D, Krause M, Baumann M, Troost EGC. Repeat FMISO-PET imaging weakly correlates with hypoxia-associated gene expressions for locally advanced HNSCC treated by primary radiochemotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2019;135:43–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Ebbesen SD, Graves CR, Mogensen MB. Production of synthetic fuels by co-electrolysis of steam and carbon dioxide. Int J Green Energy. 2009;6:646–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Zegers CM, Van Elmpt W, Szardenings K, Kolb H, Waxman A, Subramaniam RM, Moon DH, Brunetti JC, Srinivas SM, Lambin P, et al. Repeatability of hypoxia PET imaging using [18F]HX4 in lung and head and neck cancer patients: a prospective multicenter trial. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:1840–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. Bettts HM, O'Connor RA, Christian JA, Vinayakamoorthy V, Foweraker K, Pascoe AC, Perkins AC. Hypoxia imaging with [18F]HX4 PET in squamous cell head and neck cancers: a pilot study for integration into treatment planning. Nucl Med Commun. 2019;40(1):73–8.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Zegers CM, van Elmpt W, Hoebers FJ, Troost EG, Öllers MC, Mottaghy FM, Lambin P. Imaging of tumour hypoxia and metabolism in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Acta Oncol. 2015;54(9):1378–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Löck S, Perrin R, Seidlitz A, Bandurska-Luque A, Zschaeck S, Zöphel K, Krause M, Steinbach J, Kotzerke J, Zips D, Troost EGC, Baumann M. Residual tumour hypoxia in head-and-neck cancer patients undergoing primary radiochemotherapy, final results of a prospective trial on repeat FMISO-PET imaging. Radiother Oncol. 2017;124(3):533–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Rühle A, Grosu AL, Wiedenmann N, Mix M, Stoian R, Niedermann G, Baltas D, Werner M, Weber WA, Kayser G, Nicolay NH. Hypoxia dynamics on FMISO-PET in combination with PD-1/PD-L1 expression has an impact on the clinical outcome of patients with head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma undergoing Chemoradiation. Theranostics. 2020;10(20):9395–406.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. Sanduleanu S, Wiel AMAV, Lieverse RIY, Marcus D, Ibrahim A, Primakov S, Wu G, Theys J, Yaromina A, Dubois LJ, Lambin P. Hypoxia PET imaging with [18F]-HX4-a promising next-generation tracer. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(5):1322.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kirsch, C.F.E. (2022). Squamous Cell Cancer: Mucosal, Nodal and Extranodal Disease. In: Franceschi, A.M., Franceschi, D. (eds) Hybrid PET/MR Neuroimaging. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82367-2_56

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82367-2_56

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-82366-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-82367-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics