Abstract
In recent years, plant phenomics community has adopted Semantic Web technologies in order to harmonise heterogeneous, multi-scale and multi-source datasets. Semantic Web provides inference services for representing logic relationships in an unambiguous, homogeneous and clean manner, which enhances data harmonisation. However, mathematical relationships involving numerical attributes are poorly formalised, despite the fact that they are supported for a theoretical and well-defined structure. For instance, whilst unit ontologies (e.g. UO, OM, QUDT) provide relationships and annotations to perform unit conversion, they are not effectively used for automating the integration of heterogeneous measurements. Here we propose an ontological framework for representing mathematical equations supporting the automatised use of inference services, metadata, domain ontologies, and the internal structure of mathematical equations. This approach is evaluated using two plant phenomics case studies involving the calculation of unit conversions and thermal time.
Supported by INRAE and #DigitAg. This work was supported by the French National Research Agency under the Investments for the Future Program, referred as ANR-16-CONV-0004
Category: Early Stage Ph.D. Topic: Deductive Reasoning, Neuro-symbolic reasoning, Inductive Reasoning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Beck, H., Morgan, K., Jung, Y., Grunwald, S., Kwon, H.y., Wu, J.: Ontology-based simulation in agricultural systems modeling. Agric. Syst. 103(7), 463–477 (2010)
Bischof, S., Harth, A., Kämpgen, B., Polleres, A., Schneider, P.: Enriching integrated statistical open city data by combining equational knowledge and missing value imputation. J. Web Seman. 48, 22–47 (2018)
Bischof, S., Polleres, A.: RDFS with attribute equations via SPARQL rewriting. In: Cimiano, P., Corcho, O., Presutti, V., Hollink, L., Rudolph, S. (eds.) ESWC 2013. LNCS, vol. 7882, pp. 335–350. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38288-8_23
Consortium, W.W.W., et al.: Sparql 1.1 overview (2013)
De Meester, B., Dimou, A., Verborgh, R., Mannens, E.: An ontology to semantically declare and describe functions. In: Sack, H., Rizzo, G., Steinmetz, N., Mladenić, D., Auer, S., Lange, C. (eds.) ESWC 2016. LNCS, vol. 9989, pp. 46–49. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47602-5_10
DuCharme, B.: Learning SPARQL: Querying and Updating with SPARQL 1.1. O’Reilly Media, Inc., Sebastopol (2013)
Gkoutos, G.V., Schofield, P.N., Hoehndorf, R.: The units ontology: a tool for integrating units of measurement in science. Database 2012, bas03 (2012)
Hodgson, R., Keller, P.J., Hodges, J., Spivak, J.: Qudt-quantities, units, dimensions and data types ontologies. USA Available http://qudt. org March 156 (2014)
Hogan, A., Reutter, J.L., Soto, A.: In-database graph analytics with recursive SPARQL. In: Pan, J.Z., Tamma, V., d’Amato, C., Janowicz, K., Fu, B., Polleres, A., Seneviratne, O., Kagal, L. (eds.) ISWC 2020. LNCS, vol. 12506, pp. 511–528. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62419-4_29
Martín-Recuerda, F., Walther, D., Eisinger, S., Moore, G., Andersen, P., Opdahl, P.-O., Hella, L.: Revisiting ontologies of units of measure for harmonising quantity values – a use case. In: Janowicz, K., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2020. LNCS, vol. 12507, pp. 551–567. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62466-8_34
Neveu, P., et al.: Dealing with multi-source and multi-scale information in plant phenomics: the ontology-driven phenotyping hybrid information system. New Phytol. 221(1), 588–601 (2019)
Parent, B., Turc, O., Gibon, Y., Stitt, M., Tardieu, F.: Modelling temperature-compensated physiological rates, based on the co-ordination of responses to temperature of developmental processes. J. Exp. Bot. 61(8), 2057–2069 (2010)
Parsia, B., Smith, M.: Quantities in Owl. Clark & Parsia LLC, Washington, DC (2008)
dos Reis, M.G., Ribeiro, A.: Conversion factors and general equations applied in agricultural and forest meteorology. Agrometeoros 27(2), 227–258 (2020)
Rijgersberg, H., Top, J., Wielinga, B.: Towards conceptual representation and invocation of scientific computations. Int. J. Seman. Comput. 6(04), 447–489 (2012)
Rijgersberg, H., Van Assem, M., Top, J.: Ontology of units of measure and related concepts. Semant. Web 4(1), 3–13 (2013)
Tardieu, F., Cabrera-Bosquet, L., Pridmore, T., Bennett, M.: Plant phenomics, from sensors to knowledge. Curr. Biol. 27(15), R770–R783 (2017)
Wilkinson, M.D., et al.: The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 3(1), 1–9 (2016)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Vargas-Rojas, F. (2021). Ontological Formalisation of Mathematical Equations for Phenomic Data Exploitation. In: Verborgh, R., et al. The Semantic Web: ESWC 2021 Satellite Events. ESWC 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12739. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80418-3_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80418-3_30
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80417-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80418-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)