Skip to main content

How Workers Perceive LAEVO Exoskeleton Use in Non-cyclic Tasks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Factors and System Interactions (AHFE 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 265))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Exoskeletons are an innovation that have been increasingly explored in various fields. In fact, industries are one sector that have been investing in the studies of this new equipment to answer the unnecessary efforts made by the operators, where technical and organizational measures implemented are not enough to reduce the risk exposure to demanding working conditions. Hence, a study was conducted to understand the operator’s perceptions in the workplace regarding the use of a low back passive exoskeleton (Laevo). Ease of performing the different tasks with the use of the exoskeleton, ease of use, discomfort, perceived effort with and without the use of this equipment, acceptance, usability, and intention to use it, were the parameters assessed in this study. The exoskeleton was tested in 3 workstations, by a total of 23 workers during tasks that required trunk flexion, manual material handling or both in an automotive industry. The goal was to develop a pilot test, study the participants' perceptions and opinions, and conclude whether the exoskeletons are ready for the industrial context in non-cyclic processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ferreira, G., Gaspar, J., Fujão, C., Nunes, I.L.: Piloting the use of an upper limb passive exoskeleton in automotive industry: assessing user acceptance and intention of use. In: Nunes, I.L. (ed.) AHFE 2020. AISC, vol. 1207, pp. 342–349. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51369-6_46

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Iranzo, S., Piedrabuena, A., Iordanov, D., Martinez-Iranzo, U., Belda-Lois, J.-M.: Ergonomics assessment of passive upper-limb exoskeletons in an automotive assembly plant. Appl. Ergon. 87, 103120 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nunes, I.L.: Knowledge acquisition for the development of an upper-body work-related musculoskeletal disorders analysis tool. Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf. Serv. Ind. 17(2), 149–162 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bosch, T., van Eck, J., Knitel, K., de Looze, M.: The effects of a passive exoskeleton on muscle activity, discomfort and endurance time in forward bending work. Appl. Ergon. 54, 212–217 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baltrusch, S.J., van Dieën, J.H., Bruijn, S.M., Koopman, A.S., van Bennekom, C.A.M., Houdijk, H.: The effect of a passive trunk exoskeleton on metabolic costs during lifting and walking. Ergonomics 62, 903–916 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Amandels, S., Eyndt, H.O.H., Daenen, L., Hermans, V.: Introduction and testing of a passive exoskeleton in an industrial working environment. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds.) IEA 2018. AISC, vol. 820, pp. 387–392. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96083-8_51

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. de Vries, A., de Looze, M.: The effect of arm support exoskeletons in realistic work activities: a review study. J. Ergon. 9, 1–9 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Spada, S., Ghibaudo, L., Gilotta, S., Gastaldi, L., Cavatorta, M.P.: Investigation into the applicability of a passive upper-limb exoskeleton in automotive industry. Procedia Manuf. 11, 1255–1262 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sauro, J., Lewis, J.R.: Quantifying the User Experience: Practical Statistics for User Research. Elsevier/Morgan Kaufmann, Amsterdam (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kothgassner, O.D., Felnhofer, A., Hauk, N., Kastenhofer, E., Gomm, J., Kryspin-Exner, I.: TUI: Technology Usage Inventory. ICARUS, Vienna (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hensel, R., Keil, M.: Exoskeletons as human-centered, ergonomic assistance systems in future competitive production systems. In: International Conference on Competitive Manufacturing (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author acknowledge Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT - MCTES) for its financial support via the project UIDB/00667/2020 (UNIDEMI).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabel L. Nunes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Flor, R., Gaspar, J., Fujão, C., Nunes, I.L. (2021). How Workers Perceive LAEVO Exoskeleton Use in Non-cyclic Tasks. In: Nunes, I.L. (eds) Advances in Human Factors and System Interactions. AHFE 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 265. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79816-1_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79816-1_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-79815-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-79816-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics