Skip to main content

Comparing Digital Platform Types in the Platform Economy

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2021)

Abstract

In the domain of the platform economy we identified two gaps in the current literature. First the lack of a shared conceptualization of digital platform types. We solve this issue with a taxonomy giving an overview of digital platform attributes, with attribute values expressing the possible variations between platforms depending on their type. These attributes and attribute values are then used in the typology giving a clear overview of all the digital platform types and how they are related to each other. The second gap is the lack of knowledge concerning the software functionalities of digital platforms. We contribute to this with a proposal of a reference ontology allowing for a better communication between developers and other stakeholders. Our envisioned ontology can be used as a common language that all platform stakeholders can understand to facilitate future research and support ontology-driven development of digital platforms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://model-a-platform.com/sample-of-existing-digital-platforms/.

  2. 2.

    http://model-a-platform.com/digital-platform-ontology-2/.

  3. 3.

    https://github.com/OntoUML/ontouml-vp-plugin.

References

  1. Kenney, M., Zysman, J.: The rise of the platform economy. Issues Sci. Technol. 32, 61–69 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ranjbari, M., Morales-Alonso, G., Carrasco-Gallego, R.: Conceptualizing the sharing economy through presenting a comprehensive framework. Sustainability 10, 2336 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Görög, G.: The definitions of sharing economy: a systematic literature review. Management 13, 175–189 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Puschmann, T., Alt, R.: Sharing economy. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 58, 93–99 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Trabucchi, D., Buganza, T.: Fostering digital platform innovation: from two to multi-sided platforms. Creat. Innov. Manage. 1, 14 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hagiu, A., Wright, J.: Multi-sided platforms. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 43, 1–32 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sutherland, W., Jarrahi, M.H.: The sharing economy and digital platforms: a review and research agenda. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 43, 328–341 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sanchez-Cartas, J.M., Leon, G.: Multi-sided platforms and markets: a literature review. SSRN Electron. J., 1–62 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Acquier, A., Daudigeos, T., Pinkse, J.: Promises and paradoxes of the sharing economy: an organizing framework. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 125, 1–10 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Evans, P.C., Gawer, A.: The rise of the platform enterprise: a global survey (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ertz, M., Durif, F., Arcand, M.: Collaborative consumption: conceptual snapshot at a buzzword. J. Entrep. Educ. 19, 1–23 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wieringa, R.: What is a platform. https://www.thevalueengineers.nl/what-is-a-platform/

  13. Yin, C., Wang, X., Rong, W., Wang, T., David, B.: A system framework for sharing economy. In: Proceedings 2018 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, CSCWD 2018, pp. 779–784 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Codagnone, C., Biagi, F., Abadie, F.: The passions and the interests: unpacking the “Sharing Economy” (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nickerson, R.C., Varshney, U., Muntermann, J.: A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 22, 336–359 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chasin, F., Hoffen, M., Cramer, M., Matzner, M.: Peer-to-peer sharing and collaborative consumption platforms: a taxonomy and a reproducible analysis. Inf. Syst. e-Bus. Manage. 16(2), 293–325 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-017-0357-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Haas, P., Blohm, I., Leimeister, J.M.: An empirical taxonomy of crowdfunding intermediaries. In: 35th International Conference on Information System “Building a Better World Through Information System”, ICIS 2014, pp. 1–18 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Etikan, I.: Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. Am. J. Theor. Appl. Stat. 5, 1 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Carvalho, V.A., Almeida, J.P.A.: Toward a well-founded theory for multi-level conceptual modeling. Softw. Syst. Model. 17(1), 205–231 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-016-0538-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Guizzardi, G.: Ontological foundations for structural conceptual models (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. OntoText: What are Ontologies? https://www.ontotext.com/knowledgehub/fundamentals/what-are-ontologies/

  22. Nardi, J.C., et al.: A commitment-based reference ontology for services. Inf. Syst. 54, 263–288 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ruy, F.B., Guizzardi, G., Falbo, R.A., Reginato, C.C., Santos, V.A.: From reference ontologies to ontology patterns and back. Data Knowl. Eng. 109, 41–69 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. de Almeida Falbo, R.: SABiO: systematic approach for building ontologies. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1301 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Guizzardi, G., Fonseca, C.M., Benevides, A.B., João Paulo, A., Almeida, D.P., Sales, T.P.: Endurant types in ontology-driven conceptual modeling: towards ontoUML 2.0. In: Trujillo, J.C., et al. (ed.) ER 2018. LNCS, vol. 11157, pp. 136–150. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00847-5_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Oh, S., Moon, J.Y.: Calling for a shared understanding of the “sharing economy”, pp. 1–5 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Täuscher, K., Laudien, S.M.: Understanding platform business models: a mixed methods study of marketplaces. Eur. Manage. J. 36(3), 319–329 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2017.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wu, L.: Understanding collaborative consumption business model: case of car sharing systems. DEStech Trans. Mater. Sci. Eng., 403–409 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Apte, U.M., Davis, M.M.: Sharing economy services: business model generation. Calif. Manage. Rev. 61, 104–131 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nguyen, S., Llosa, S.: On the difficulty to define the sharing economy and collaborative consumption–literature review and proposing a different approach with the introduction of “collaborative services.” Journée la Relat. à la Marque dans un Monde Connect., 19–25 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Frenken, K., Schor, J.: Putting the sharing economy into perspective. Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans. 23, 3–10 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mamonova, Y.: Sharing economy vs. on-demand economy: the major differences. https://ikajo.com/blog/sharing-economy-on-demand-economy-differences

  33. Acquier, A., Carbone, V., Massé, D.: How to create value(s) in the sharing economy: business models scalability, and sustainability. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 9(5), 25 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ehikioya, S.A.: A formal model of peer-to-peer digital product marketplace. Int. J. Netw. Distrib. Comput. 6, 143–154 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ritter, M., Schanz, H.: The sharing economy: a comprehensive business model framework. J. Clean. Prod. 213, 320–331 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Andersson, M., Hjalmarsson, A., Avital, M.: Peer-to-peer service sharing platforms: driving share and share alike on a mass-scale. In: Proceeding of the 34th International Conference on Information Systems, vol. 4, pp. 2964–2978 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gobble, M.A.M.: Defining the sharing economy. Res. Technol. Manag. 60, 59–61 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rochet, J., Tirole, J.: Platform competition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 1, 990–1029 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hepp, M.: GoodRelations: an ontology for describing products and services offers on the web. In: Gangemi, A., Euzenat, J. (eds.) EKAW 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5268, pp. 329–346. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87696-0_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Burtch, G., Ghose, A., Wattal, S.: An empirical examination of the antecedents and consequences of attitudes tow. Inf. Syst. Res. 24, 499–519 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kickstarter: Our mission is to help bring creative projects to life. https://www.kickstarter.com/about?ref=global-footer

  42. Tukker, A.: Eight types of product-service system: eight ways to sustainability? Exp. Suspronet. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 13, 246–260 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hafermalz, E., Boell, S.K., Elliot, S., Hovorka, D., Marjanovic, O.: Exploring dimensions of sharing economy business models enabled by IS: an Australian study. In: Australasian Conference on Information Systems, pp. 1–11 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Carvalho, V.A., Almeida, J.P.A., Fonseca, C.M., Guizzardi, G.: Extending the foundations of ontology-based conceptual modeling with a multi-level theory. In: Johannesson, P., Lee, M.L., Liddle, S.W., Opdahl, A.L., López, Ó.P. (eds.) ER 2015. LNCS, vol. 9381, pp. 119–133. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25264-3_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  45. Ruy, F.B., Reginato, C.C., Santos, V.A., Falbo, R.A., Guizzardi, G.: Ontology engineering by combining ontology patterns. In: Johannesson, P., Lee, M.L., Liddle, S.W., Opdahl, A.L., López, Ó.P. (eds.) ER 2015. LNCS, vol. 9381, pp. 173–186. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25264-3_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  46. Derave, T.: A reference architecture for customizable marketplaces. In: Guizzardi, G., Gailly, F., Maciel, R.S.P. (eds.) ER 2019. LNCS, vol. 11787, pp. 222–229. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34146-6_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Derave .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Derave, T., Prince Sales, T., Gailly, F., Poels, G. (2021). Comparing Digital Platform Types in the Platform Economy. In: La Rosa, M., Sadiq, S., Teniente, E. (eds) Advanced Information Systems Engineering. CAiSE 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12751. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79382-1_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79382-1_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-79381-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-79382-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics