Skip to main content

Intersectionality and the Environment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Environmental Sociology

Abstract

Given the breadth, depth, and duration of prominent developments in intersectionality scholarship and its relevance to themes of environmental inequality, it is encouraging that intersectional analyses are becoming more widely used by environmental sociologists. Over the past several decades, rich empirical work has demonstrated the connections between social inequalities and ecological degradation, making clear the importance of analyzing environmental problems through an intersectional lens (e.g., Bullard, 1990; Mohai et al., 2009; Morello-Frosch & Lopez, 2006; Pellow, 2018). Although intersectionality research did not originally center on human-and-environment relations, in recent years, scholars have begun to weave together environmental justice and gender-and-environment frameworks to create deeply intersectional socioecological theory (Gaard, 2017; Malin & Ryder, 2018; Pellow, 2018). Taken together, this diverse body of work illustrates the myriad ways in which social location, privilege, and disadvantage intersect to create very different effects on and experiences of the natural environment within society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal, B. (1997). Bargaining and gender relations: Within and beyond the household. Feminist Economics, 3(1), 1–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Sociological Association (ASA). (2018). History of ASA sections. http://www.asanet.org/asa-communities/asa-sections/history-asa-sections

  • Anthias, F. (2013). Intersectional what? Social divisions, intersectionality and levels of analysis. Ethnicities, 13(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anzaldúa, G. E. (1987). Borderlands/La Frontera: The new mestiza. Aunt Lute Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, K. F., & McKinney, L. A. (2016). Disaster devastation in poor nations: The direct and indirect effects of gender equality, ecological losses, and development. Social Forces, 95, 355–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S. E. (2013). Our roots run deep as ironweed: Appalachian women and the fight for environmental justice. University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S. E. (2014). ‘Sacrificed so others can live conveniently’: Social inequality, environmental injustice, and the energy sacrifice zone of central Appalachia. In C. M. Renzetti & R. K. Bergen (Eds.), Understanding diversity: Celebrating difference, challenging inequality. Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S. E. (2015). Bridging activism and the academy: Exposing environmental injustices through the feminist ethnographic method of photovoice. Human Ecology Review, 21(1), 27–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S. E. (2016). Fighting king coal: The challenges to micromobilization in Central Appalachia. The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S. E., & Braun, Y. A. (2010). Coal, identity, and the gendering of environmental justice activism in central Appalachia. Gender and Society, 24(6), 794–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S. E., & York, R. (2010). Community economic identity: The coal industry and ideology construction in West Virginia. Rural Sociology, 75(1), 111–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S. E., Hullinger, A., & Brislen, L. (2015). Manipulated masculinities: Agribusiness, deskilling, and the rise of the businessman-farmer in the United States. Rural Sociology, 80(3), 285–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S. E., Fitzgerald, J., & York, R. (2019). Protecting the power to pollute: Identity co-optation, gender, and the public relations strategies of fossil fuel industries. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/23251042.2019.1624001

  • Boserup, E. (1970). Women’s role in economic development. St. Martins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P., & Ferguson, F. I. T. (1995). “Making a big stink”: Women’s work, women’s relationships, and toxic waste activism. Gender and Society, 9, 145–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, S. (2010). Call in the women. Nature, 468(7323), 502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullard, R. D. (1990). Dumping in Dixie: Race, class, and environmental quality. Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullard, R. D., Mohai, P., Saha, R., & Wright, B. (2007). Toxic Wastes and Race at Twenty: 1987–2007. A report prepared for the United Church of Christ Justice & Witness Ministries. United Church of Christ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, C., Cerecer, D. A. Q., & Bradley, M. (2010). “Dreaming of...”: Reflections on participatory action research as a feminist praxis of critical hope. Journal of Women and Social Work, 25(4), 406–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Čapek, S. M. (1993). The “environmental justice” frame: A conceptual discussion and an application. Social Problems, 40(1), 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty, J., Tobin, G. A., & Montz, B. E. (2005). Population evacuation: Assessing spatial variability in geophysical risk and social vulnerability to natural hazards. Natural Hazards Review, 6(1), 23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., & McCall, L. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs, 38(4), 785–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (2015). Intersectionality’s definitional dilemmas. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. The University of Chicago Legal Forum, 140, 139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culley, M. R., & Angelique, H. L. (2003). Women’s gendered experiences as long-term: Three Mile Island activists. Gender and Society, 17, 445–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter, S. L., Ash, K. D., & Emrich, C. T. (2016). Urban–rural differences in disaster resilience. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 106(6), 1236–1252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • d’Eaubonne, F. (1974). Le Féminisme ou la Mort. P. Horay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M. (1978). Gyn/ecology: The metaethics of radical feminism. Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. Y. (1983). Women, race, & class. Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory, 9(1), 67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempsey, S. E., Parker, P. S., & Krone, K. J. (2011). Navigating socio-spatial difference, constructing counter-space: Insights from transnational feminist praxis. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 4(3), 201–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denton, F. (2002). Climate change vulnerability, impacts, and adaptation: Why does gender matter? Gender and Development, 10(2), 10–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunaway, W. A. (2014). Bringing commodity chain analysis back to its world-systems roots: Rediscovering women s work and households. Journal of World-Systems Research, 20(1), 64–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P. R., & Ehrlich, A. H. (2013). Can a collapse of global civilization be avoided? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280(1754), 20122845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J. R., & Frickel, S. (2013). The historical nature of cities: A study of urbanization and hazardous waste accumulation. American Sociological Review, 78(4), 521–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmhirst, R. (2011). Introducing new feminist political ecologies. Geoforum, 42(2), 129–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enarson, E. (2000). Gender and natural disasters. International Labor Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). (2018). Heat island effect. Retrieved August 20, 2018, from https://www.epa.gov/heat-island

  • Epstein, B. (1995). Grassroots environmentalism and strategies for social change. New Political Science, 16(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ergas, C. (2014). Barriers to sustainability: Gendered divisions of labor in Cuban urban agriculture. In W. G. Holt (Ed.), From sustainable to resilient cities: Global concerns and urban efforts (Vol. 14). Emerald Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ergas, C., & York, R. (2012). Women’s status and carbon dioxide emissions: A quantitative cross-national analysis. Social Science Research, 41(4), 965–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality, volume 1: An introduction. Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J. (1999). Mountaintop removal in West Virginia: An environmental sacrifice zone. Organization and Environment, 12(2), 163–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaard, G. (1997). Toward a queer ecofeminism. Hypatia, 12(1), 114–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaard, G. (2015). Ecofeminism and climate change. In Women’s studies international forum (Vol. 49, pp. 20–33). Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaard, G. (2017). Critical ecofeminism. Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Go, J. (2018). Postcolonial possibilities for the sociology of race. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 4(4), 439–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, P. C. (2012). Introduction: Race, gender & class and global climate change. Race, Gender & Class, 19(1–2), 3–11. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43496857

    Google Scholar 

  • Gummerson, E., & Schneider, D. (2012). Eat, drink, man, woman: Gender, income share and household expenditure in South Africa. Social Forces, 91(3), 813–836. March 2013. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sos173.

  • Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlan, S. L., Pellow, D. N., Roberts, J. T., Bell, S. E., Holt, W. G., & Nagel, J. (2015). Climate justice and inequality. In R. E. Dunlap & R. J. Brulle (Eds.), Climate changes and society: Sociological perspectives. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, A. B. (2010). Sistah vegan: Black female vegans speak on food, identity, health, and society. Lantern Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemmati, M., & Rohr, U. (2007). A huge challenge and a narrow discourse-Ain’t no space for gender in climate change policy? Women and Environments International Magazine, 74, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holifield, R., Porter, M., & Walker, G. (2009). Introduction spaces of environmental justice: Frameworks for critical engagement. Antipode, 41(4), 591–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, E. (2018). Environmental reproductive justice: Intersections in an American Indian community impacted by environmental contamination. Environmental Sociology, 4(1), 8–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2007). Summary for policymakers In M. L. Parry, O. F. Canziani, J. P. Palutikof, P. J. van der Linden, & C. E. Hanson (Eds.), Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 7–22). Cambridge University Press. Retrieved August 12, 2010, from https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/publications_ipcc_fourth_assessment_report_synthesis_report.htm

  • Jampel, C. (2018). Intersections of disability justice, racial justice and environmental justice. Environmental Sociology, 4(1), 122–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, T. (1997). Crazy for democracy: Women in grassroots movements. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmerer, R. W. (2013). Braiding sweetgrass: Indigenous wisdom, scientific knowledge, and the teachings of plants. Milkweed Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinenberg, E. (2002). Heat wave: A social autopsy of disaster in Chicago. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, C. (1993). Women and toxic waste protest: Race, class, and gender as resources of resistance. Qualitative Sociology, 16(3), 247–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristof, N., WuDunn, S., & Wu, J. (2009). Half the sky: Turning oppression into opportunity for women worldwide. Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuletz, V. L. (1998). The tainted desert: Environmental and social ruin in the American West. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaDuke, W. (2005). Recovering the sacred: The power of naming and claiming. South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, S. (2006). Diamond: A struggle for environmental justice in Louisiana’s chemical corridor. The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, S. (2010). Sacrifice zones: The front lines of toxic chemical exposure in the United States. The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lobao, L. M., Hooks, G., & Tickamyer, A. R. (Eds.). (2007). The sociology of spatial inequality. SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucio-Villegas, E. (2016). Building knowledge democracy from the university: A case study in Spain. Action Research, 14(1), 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luft, R. E., & Ward, J. (2009). Toward an intersectionality just out of reach: Confronting challenges to intersectional practice. In V. Demos & M. T. Segal (Eds.), Perceiving gender locally, globally, and intersectionally (Advances in gender research) (Vol. 13, pp. 9–37). Emerald Group.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Maathai, W. (2010). Replenishing the earth: Spiritual values for healing ourselves and the world. Doubleday Image.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, C. A. (2013). Intersectionality as method: A note. Signs, 38(4), 1019–1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malin, S. A. (2015). The price of nuclear power: Uranium communities and environmental justice. Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malin, S. A., & DeMaster, K. T. (2016). A devil’s bargain: Rural environmental injustices and hydraulic fracturing on Pennsylvania’s farms. Journal of Rural Studies, 47-A, 278–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malin, S. A., & Ryder, S. S. (2018). Developing deeply intersectional environmental justice scholarship. Environmental Sociology, 4(1), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30(3), 1771–1800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCright, A. M. (2010). The effects of gender on climate change knowledge and concern in the American public. Population and Environment, 32(1), 66–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011). Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Global Environmental Change, 21(4), 1163–1172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGurty, E. (2009). Transforming environmentalism: Warren County, PCBs, and the origins of environmental justice. Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, L. (2014). Gender, democracy, development, and overshoot: A cross-national analysis. Population and Environment, 36(2), 193–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, L., & Austin, K. (2015). Ecological losses are infecting women: An analysis of female HIV prevalence and life expectancy in less-developed countries. Social Problems, 62(4), 529–549. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0IS05_0d9rCX3NLRDdaQ0dSSGs/view?resourcekey=0-v0YVtwtxU1BnXQMjhUxPIg

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, L. A., & Fulkerson, G. M. (2015). Gender equality and climate justice: A cross-national analysis. Social Justice Research, 28(3), 293–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mies, M. (1998). Patriarchy & Accumulation on a world scale: Women in the international division of labor. Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mies, M., & Shiva, V. (1993). Ecofeminism. Zed Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Minh-Ha, T. T. (1989). Woman, native, other: Writing postcoloniality and feminism. Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohai, P., Pellow, D., & Roberts, J. T. (2009). Environmental justice. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34, 405–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, C. T. (1984). Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Boundary 2, 12(3), 333–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, C. T. (2004). Feminism without borders: Decolonizing theory, practicing solidarity. Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montrie, C. (2018). The myth of silent spring: Rethinking the origins of American environmentalism. University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morello-Frosch, R., & Lopez, R. (2006). The riskscape and the color line: Examining the role of segregation in environmental health disparities. Environmental Resources, 102, 181–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer-Sandilands, C., & Erickson, B. (2010). Introduction: A genealogy of queer ecologies. In C. Mortimer-Sandilands & B. Erickson (Eds.), Queer ecologies: Sex, nature, politics, and desire (pp. 1–47). Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, J. (2012). Intersecting identities and global climate change. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power., 19(4), 467–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, J. (2015). Gender and climate change: Impacts, science, policy. Paradigm.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, U. (1997). Dislocating Cultures: Identities, Traditions, and Third World Feminism (1st ed.). New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer, E., & Plümper, T. (2007). The gendered nature of natural disasters: The impact of catastrophic events on the gender gap in life expectancy, 1981–2002. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97(3), 551–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nightingale, A. J. (2011). Bounding difference: Intersectionality and the material production of gender, caste, class and environment in Nepal. Geoforum, 42(2), 153–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norgaard, K., & York, R. (2005). Gender equality and state environmentalism. Gender and Society, 19(4), 506–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norgaard, K., Reed, R., & Van Horn, C. (2011). A continuing legacy: Institutional racism, hunger, and nutritional justice on the Klamath. In A. H. Alkon & J. Agyeman (Eds.), Cultivating food justice: Race, class, and sustainability. The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellow, D. N. (2014). Total liberation: The power and promise of animal rights and the radical earth movement. University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pellow, D. N. (2018). What is critical environmental justice? Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittaway, E., Bartolomei, L., & Rees, S. (2007). Gendered dimensions of the 2004 tsunami and a potential social work response in post-disaster situations. International Social Work, 50(3), 307–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, H., & Taylor, B. (2010). Recovering the commons: Democracy, place and global justice. University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resurrección, B. P. (2013). Persistent women and environment linkages in climate change and sustainable development agendas. Women’s Studies International Forum, 40, 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, J. (2018). Native knowledge: What ecologists are learning from indigenous people. Yale 360. Retrieved August 7, 2018, from https://e360.yale.edu/features/native-knowledge-what-ecologists-are-learning-from-indigenous-people

  • Roberts, J. T., & Parks, B. (2007). A climate of injustice: Global inequality, North-South politics, and climate policy. The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocheleau, D. (2015). A situated view of feminist political ecology from my networks, roots and territories. In W. Harcourt & I. Nelson (Eds.), Practicing feminist political ecologies: Moving beyond the ‘green economy’ (pp. 29–66). Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocheleau, D., Thomas-Slayter, B., & Wangari, E. (1996). Feminist political ecology: Global issues and local experiences. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roshanravan, S. (2014). Motivating coalition: Women of color and epistemic disobedience. Hypatia, 29(1), 41–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salleh, A. (2010). From metabolic rift to metabolic value: Reflections on environmental sociology and the alternative globalization movement. Organization and Environment, 23(2), 205–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandilands, C. (1994). Lavender’s green? Some thoughts on queer(y)ing environmental politics. UnderCurrents, pp. 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandilands, C. (2002). Lesbian separatist communities and the experience of nature. Organization and Environment, 15(2), 131–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schippers, M. (2016). Beyond monogamy: Polyamory and the future of polyqueer sexualities. NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmuck, H. (2002). Empowering women in Bangladesh. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. Retrieved August 20, 2018, from http://www.ifrc.org/ar/news-and-media/news-stories/asia-pacific/bangladesh/empowering-women-in-bangladesh/

  • Scott, R. K. (2010). Removing mountains: Extracting nature and identity in the Appalachian coalfields. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shandra, J. M., Shandra, C. L., & London, B. (2008). Women, non-governmental organizations, and deforestation: A cross-national study. Population and Environment, 30(1–2), 48–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiva, V. (1988). Staying alive: Women, ecology, and survival in India. Kali for Women.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiva, V. (2015). Soil not oil: Environmental justice in a time of climate crisis. North Atlantic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shriver, T. E., Cable, S., Norris, L., & Hastings, D. W. (2000). The role of collective identity in inhibiting mobilization: Solidarity and suppression in Oak Ridge. Sociological Spectrum, 20, 41–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shriver, T. E., Adams, A. E., & Einwohner, R. (2013). Motherhood and opportunities for activism before and after the Czech Velvet Revolution. Mobilization, 18(3), 267–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shriver, T. E., Adams, A. E., & Messer, C. M. (2014). Power, quiescence, and pollution: The suppression of environmental grievances. Social Currents, 1(3), 275–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, L. B. (2017). As we have always done: Indigenous freedom through radical resistance. University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (1975). Animal liberation: A new ethics for our treatment of animals. Random House Incorporated.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–316). University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinman, E. (2018). Why was Standing Rock and the #NoDAPL campaign so historic Factors affecting American Indian participation in social movement collaborations and coalitions? Ethnic and Racial Studies, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2018.1471215.

  • Stough, L. M., & Kelman, I. (2018). People with disabilities and disasters. In Handbook of disaster research (pp. 225–242). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sundström, A., & McCright, A. (2013). Examining gender differences in environmental concern across four levels of the Swedish polity. The Quality of Government Institute. Working Paper Series, 2013, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavakolian, B. (2015). Indigenous cultures: Environmental knowledge, practice, and rights. In K. Gould & T. Lewis (Eds.), Twenty lessons in environmental sociology (2nd ed., pp. 315–329). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D. (1997). Women of color, environmental justice, and ecofeminism. In K. Warren (Ed.), Ecofeminism: Women, culture, nature (pp. 38–81). Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D. (2000). The rise of the environmental justice paradigm: Injustice framing and the social construction of environmental discourses. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(4), 508–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D. (2014). Toxic communities: Environmental racism, industrial pollution, and residential mobility. New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terry, G. (2009). No climate justice without gender justice: An overview of the issues. Gender and Development, 17(1), 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Combahee River Collective. (1977). The Combahee River collective statement. Retrieved February 13, 2019, from http://circuitous.org/scraps/combahee.html

  • True, J. (2016). Gendered violence in natural disasters: Learning from New Orleans, Haiti and Christchurch. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 25(2), 78–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Program. (2007). Fighting climate change. Human development report. Retrieved July 12, 2010, from hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR_20072008_EN_Complete.pdf

  • Vickery, J. (2018). Using an intersectional approach to advance understanding of homeless persons’ vulnerability to disaster. Environmental Sociology, 4(1), 136–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickery, J., & Hunter, L. M. (2016). Native Americans: Where in environmental justice research? Society and Natural Resources, 29(1), 36–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wangari, E., Thomas-Slayter, B., & Rocheleau, D. (1996). Gendered visions for survival. In D. Rocheleau et al. (Eds.), Feminist political ecology (pp. 127–153). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, K. J. (1990). The power and the promise of ecological feminism. Environmental Ethics, 12(2), 125–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, K. (2018). Settler colonialism, ecology, and environmental injustice. Environment and Society, 9(1), 125–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohlleben, P. (2016). The hidden life of trees. Greystone.

    Google Scholar 

  • York, R., & Ergas, C. (2011). Women’s status and world-system position: An exploratory analysis. Journal of World-Systems Research, 17(1), 147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • York, R., & Longo, S. (2017). Animals in the world: A materialist approach to sociological animal studies. Journal of Sociology, 53(1), 32–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Intersectionality and feminist politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(3), 193–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina Ergas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ergas, C., McKinney, L., Bell, S.E. (2021). Intersectionality and the Environment. In: Schaefer Caniglia, B., Jorgenson, A., Malin, S.A., Peek, L., Pellow, D.N., Huang, X. (eds) Handbook of Environmental Sociology. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77712-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics