Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

What Is Unique in Infant Thinking About Others? Infant Social Cognition from an Evolutionary Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evolutionary Perspectives on Infancy

Part of the book series: Evolutionary Psychology ((EVOLPSYCH))

Abstract

In search of the uniquely human in social cognition, this chapter compares empirical findings on social cognition in human infants with that of our closest genetic relatives – nonhuman great apes. In the main part of the chapter, I focus on the understanding of others’ mental states such as desires (in terms of preferences), goals, intentions, and beliefs. Grasping the content of others’ thoughts is one of the most powerful tools when it comes to predicting and explaining others’ behavior. Comparing human infants, individuals who are not yet able to produce language themselves, with great apes, that also require language-reduced tasks due to species differences in communication, seems a promising way to solve the puzzle of the phylogeny of social cognition. Due to enhanced abilities in both human and nonhuman primates, I argue that the main difference between human infants’ and great apes’ social cognition does not lie in their tracking or understanding of others’ mental states, but instead in their willingness to make use of this understanding when it comes to sharing psychological states with others. Thus, what is unique in human infants’ thinking about others might be a high degree of social motivation to put their minds together with those of the individuals around them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    I use the term “implicit” to refer to measures that do not require subjects to produce a verbal – and thus deliberate response – as well as those tasks that do not present subjects with verbal test questions.

References

  • Astington, J., & Gopnik, A. (1991). Understanding desire and intention. In A. Whiten (Ed.), Natural theories of mind: The evolution, development and simulation of everyday mindreading (pp. 39–50). Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baillargeon, R., Buttelmann, D., & Southgate, V. (2018). Invited commentary: Interpreting failed replications of early false-belief findings: Methodological and theoretical considerations. Cognitive Development, 46, 112–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baillargeon, R., Scott, R. M., & He, Z. (2010). False-belief understanding in infants. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(3), 110–118.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, D. A., Baird, J. A., Saylor, M. M., & Clark, M. A. (2001). Infants parse dynamic action. Child Development, 72(3), 708–717.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barth, J., Reaux, J. E., & Povinelli, D. J. (2005). Chimpanzees’ (Pan troglodytes) use of gaze cues in object-choice tasks: Different methods yield different results. Animal Cognition, 8, 84–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Behne, T., Carpenter, M., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2005). Unwilling versus unable: Infants’ understanding of intentional action. Developmental Psychology, 41, 328–337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bellagamba, F., & Tomasello, M. (1999). Re-enacting intended acts: Comparing 12- and 18-month-olds. Infant Behavior & Development, 22(2), 277–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bering, J., Bjorklund, D. F., & Ragan, P. (2000). Deferred imitation of object-related actions in human reared juvenile chimpanzees and orangutans. Developmental Psychobiology, 36, 218–232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bjorklund, D. F., & Bering, J. M. (2003). A note on the development of deferred imitation in enculturated juvenile chimpanzees. Developmental Review, 23, 389–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjorklund, D. F., Bering, J. M., & Ragan, P. (2000). A two-year longitudinal study of deferred imitation of object manipulation in an enculturated juvenile chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus). Developmental Psychobiology, 37, 229–237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bjorklund, D. F., Yunger, J. L., Bering, J. M., & Ragan, P. (2002). The generalization of deferred imitation in enculturated chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Animal Cognition, 5, 49–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bratman, M. (1987). Intention, plans, and practical reasoning. Harvard University Press. Reprinted in 1999, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratman, M. E. (1989). Intention and personal policies. In J. E. Tomberlin (Ed.), Philosophical perspectives, Vol. 3, Philosophy of mind and action theory. Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratman, M. E. (1992). Planning and the stability of intention. Minds and Machines, 2(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bräuer, J., Kaminski, J., Riedel, J., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Making inferences about the location of hidden food: Social dog – Causal ape. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 120, 38–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buttelmann, D. (2017). Calling for careful designs for the evaluation of interactive behavioral measures on early false-belief reasoning. A commentary on Allen (2015). Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1302.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Buttelmann, D., Buttelmann, F., Carpenter, M., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2017). Great apes distinguish true from false beliefs in an interactive helping task. PLoS One, 12(4), e0173793.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Buttelmann, D., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2008a). Behavioral cues that great apes use to forage for hidden food. Animal Cognition, 11, 117–128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buttelmann, D., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2009a). Do great apes use emotional expressions to infer desires? Developmental Science, 12(5), 688–698.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buttelmann, D., Carpenter, M., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Enculturated chimpanzees imitate rationally. Developmental Science, 10(4), F31–F38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buttelmann, D., Carpenter, M., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2008b). Rational tool use and tool choice in human infants and great apes. Child Development, 79, 609–626.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buttelmann, D., Carpenter, M., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2013). Chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes, recognize successful actions, but fail to imitate them. Animal Behaviour, 86(4), 755–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buttelmann, D., Carpenter, M., Li, R., Wetzig, I., & Tomasello, M. (2021a). Knowledge-based rational imitation in 14-month-old infants. Manuscript submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttelmann, D., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2009b). Eighteen-month-old infants show false belief understanding in an active helping paradigm. Cognition, 112, 337–342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buttelmann, D., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2021b). Do 18-month-olds distinguish false belief from ignorance in an interactive helping task? Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttelmann, D., Over, H., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2014). Eighteen-month-olds understand false beliefs in an unexpected-contents task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 119, 120–126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buttelmann, D., Schütte, S., Carpenter, M., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2012). Great apes infer others’ goals based on context. Animal Cognition, 15(6), 1037–1053.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buttelmann, F., & Buttelmann, D. (2017). The influence of a bystander agent’s beliefs on children’s and adults’ decision-making process. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 153, 126–139.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buttelmann, F., Suhrke, J., & Buttelmann, D. (2015). What you get is what you believe: Eighteen-month-olds demonstrate belief understanding in an unexpected identity task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 131, 94–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Byrnit, J. (2004). Nonenculturated orangutans’ (Pongo pygmaeus) use of experimenter-given manual and facial cues in an object-choice task. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 118, 309–315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Call, J., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2005). Copying results and copying actions in the process of social learning: Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and human children (Homo sapiens). Animal Cognition, 8, 151–163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Call, J., Hare, B., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2004). ‘Unwilling’ versus ‘unable’: Chimpanzees’ understanding of human intentions. Developmental Science, 7, 488–498.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Call, J., Hare, B. H., & Tomasello, M. (1998). Chimpanzee gaze following in an object-choice task. Animal Cognition, 1, 89–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (1994). Production and comprehension of referential pointing by orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108, 307–317.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (1996). The effect of humans on the cognitive development of apes. In A. E. Russon & K. A. Bard (Eds.), Reaching into thought: The minds of the great apes (pp. 371–403). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (1998). Distinguishing intentional from accidental actions in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and human children (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 112, 192–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (1999). A nonverbal false belief task: The performance of children and great apes. Child Development, 70, 381–395.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(5), 187–192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M., Akhtar, N., & Tomasello, M. (1998). Fourteen- to 18-month-old infants differentially imitate intentional and accidental actions. Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 315–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2005). Twelve- and 18-month-olds copy actions in terms of goals. Developmental Science, 8, F13–F20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clements, W. A., & Perner, J. (1994). Implicit understanding of belief. Cognitive Development, 9(4), 377–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csibra, G., Gergely, G., Biro, S., Koos, O., & Brockbank, M. (1999). Goal attribution without agency cues: The perception of “pure reason” in infancy. Cognition, 72(3), 237–267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1859). The origin of species by means of natural selection. John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. John Murray.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fizke, E., Butterfill, S., van de Loo, L., Reindl, E., & Rakoczy, H. (2017). Are there signature limits in early theory of mind? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 162, 209–224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gellén, K., & Buttelmann, D. (2017). Fourteen-month-olds adapt their imitative behavior in the light of a model’s constraints, Child Development Research, 2017, Article ID 8080649, 11 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellén, K., & Buttelmann, D. (2021). Going beyond the observable: Physical and mental constraints on a model’s free will shape infants’ imitative behavior. Manuscript submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergely, G., Bekkering, H., & Király, I. (2002). Rational imitation in preverbal infants. Nature, 415, 755.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gergely, G., & Csibra, G. (2003). Teleological reasoning in infancy: The naı̈ve theory of rational action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 287–292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gergely, G., Nádasdy, Z., Csibra, G., & Bíró, S. (1995). Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age. Cognition, 56(2), 165–193.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, M. (1989). On social facts. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, J. (1986). The chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns in adaptation. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopnik, A., & Astington, J. W. (1988). Children’s understanding of representational change and its relation to the understanding of false belief and the appearance-reality distinction. Child Development, 59(1), 26–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gräfenhain, M., Behne, T., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Young children’s understanding of joint commitments. Developmental Psychology, 45(5), 1430–1443.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grosse Wiesmann, C., Friederici, A. D., Singer, T., & Steinbeis, N. (2017). Implicit and explicit false belief development in preschool children. Developmental Science, 20(5), e12445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamlin, J. K., Hallinan, E. V., & Woodward, A. L. (2008). Do as I do: 7-month-old infants selectively reproduce others’ goals. Developmental Science, 11(4), 487–494.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, B., Call, J., Agnetta, B., & Tomasello, M. (2000). Chimpanzees know what conspecifics do and do not see. Animal Behaviour, 59, 771–786.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, B., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2001). Do chimpanzees know what conspecifics know? Animal Behaviour, 61, 139–151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2004). Chimpanzees are more skillful in competitive than in cooperative cognitive tasks. Animal Behaviour, 68, 571–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. The American Journal of Psychology, 57(2), 243–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, E., Call, J., Hernández-Lloreda, M. V., Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Humans have evolved specialized skills of social cognition: The cultural intelligence hypothesis. Science, 317(5843), 1360–1366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, P. R. (2002). The cradle of thought. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, L. M., Spiteri, A., Lambeth, S. P., Schapiro, S. J., Horner, V., & Whiten, A. (2007). Experimental studies of traditions and underlying transmission processes in chimpanzees. Animal Behaviour, 73, 1021–1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horner, V., Whiten, A., Flynn, E., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2006). Faithful replication of foraging techniques along cultural transmission chains by chimpanzees and children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 103, 13878–13883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, D. C., Aparicio Betancourt, M., & Simon, C. E. (2015). Human temporo-parietal junction spontaneously tracks others’ beliefs: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study. Human Brain Mapping, 36, 4831–4846.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, D. C., Simon, C. E., Ting, T., & Nikolaeva, J. I. (2018). Functional organization of the temporal-parietal junction for theory of mind in preverbal infants: A nearinfrared spectroscopy study. Journal of Neuroscience, 38(18), 4264–4274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Itakura, S., Agnetta, B., Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (1999). Chimpanzees use human and conspecific social cues to locate hidden food. Developmental Science, 2, 448–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itakura, S., & Tanaka, M. (1998). Use of experimenter-given cues during object-choice tasks by chimpanzees (pan troglodytes), an orangutan (pongo pygmaeus), and human infants (homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 112(2), 119–126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaminski, J., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Chimpanzees know what others know, but not what they believe. Cognition, 109(2), 224–234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kano, F., Krupenye, C., Hirata, S., Tomonaga, M., & Call, J. (2019). Great apes use self-experience to anticipate an agent’s action in a false-belief test. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(42), 20904–20909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, B., & Liszkowski, U. (2012a). Eighteen- and 24-month-old infants correct others in anticipation of action mistakes. Developmental Science, 15, 113–122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, B., & Liszkowski, U. (2012b). 18-month-olds predict specific action mistakes through attribution of false belief, not ignorance, and intervene accordingly. Infancy, 17, 672–691.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kovács, Á. M., Téglás, E., & Endress, A. D. (2010). The social sense: Susceptibility to others’ beliefs in human infants and adults. Science, 330(6012), 1830–1834.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krachun, C., Carpenter, M., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2009). A competitive nonverbal false belief task for children and apes. Developmental Science, 12(4), 521–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00793.x.

  • Krachun, C., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2010). A new change-of-contents false belief test: Children and chimpanzees compared. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 23(2), 145–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krupenye, C., Kano, F., Hirata, S., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2016). Great apes anticipate that other individuals will act according to false beliefs. Science, 354(6308), 110–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krupenye, C., Kano, F., Hirata, S., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2017). A test of the submentalizing hypothesis: Apes’ performance in a false belief task inanimate control. Communicative & Integrative Biology, 10(4), e1343771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., & Baillargeon, R. (2005). Can a self-propelled box have a goal? Psychological reasoning in 5-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 16, 601–608.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Melis, A. P., Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Engineering cooperation in chimpanzees: Tolerance constraints on cooperation. Animal Behaviour, 72(2), 275–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meltzoff, A. N. (1995). Understanding the intentions of others: Re-enactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Developmental Psychology, 31, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menzel, E. W., Jr. (1973). Leadership and communication in young chimpanzees. In E. W. Menzel (Ed.), Precultural primate behavior (pp. 192–225). Karger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miklósi, A., & Soproni, K. (2006). A comparative analysis of animals’ understanding of the human pointing gesture. Animal Cognition, 9, 81–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D. E., & Montgomery, D. A. (1999). The influence of movement and outcome on young children’s attributions of intention. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 245–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moses, L. J., Baldwin, D. A., Rosicky, J. G., & Tidball, G. (2001). Evidence for referential understanding in the emotions domain at twelve and eighteen months. Child Development, 72(3), 718–735.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Myowa-Yamakoshi, M., & Matsuzawa, T. (2000). Imitation of intentional manipulatory actions in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 114(4), 381–391.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, C. A. (1987). The recognition of facial expressions in the first 2 years of life – Mechanisms of development. Child Development, 58(4), 889–909.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oktay-Gür, N., Schulz, A., & Rakoczy, H. (2018). Children exhibit different performance patterns in explicit and implicit theory of mind tasks. Cognition, 173, 60–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olineck, K. M., & Poulin-Dubois, D. (2005). Infants’ ability to distinguish between intentional and accidental actions and its relation to internal state language. Infancy, 8(1), 91–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Onishi, K. H., & Baillargeon, R. (2005). Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs? Science, 308, 255–258.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Parr, L. (2001). Cognitive and physiological markers of emotional awareness in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Animal Cognition, 4, 224–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parr, L. A., Hopkins, W. D., & de Waal, F. B. M. (1998). The perception of facial expressions in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Evolution of Communication, 2, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perner, J., Leekam, S. R., & Wimmer, H. (1987). Three-year-olds’ difficulty with false belief: The case for a conceptual deficit. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5(2), 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, A. T., Wellman, H. M., & Spelke, E. S. (2002). Infants’ ability to connect gaze and emotional expression to intentional action. Cognition, 85(1), 53–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Povinelli, D. J., Bering, J., & Giambrone, S. (2000). Toward a science of other minds: Escaping the argument by analogy. Cognitive Science, 24(3), 509–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(4), 515–526. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00076512.

  • Ratner, N., & Bruner, J. (1978). Games, social exchange and the acquisition of language. Journal of Child Language, 5(3), 391–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Repacholi, B. M. (1998). Infants’ use of attentional cues to identify the referent of another person’s emotional expression. Developmental Psychology, 34(5), 1017–1025.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Repacholi, B. M., & Gopnik, A. (1997). Early reasoning about desires: Evidence from 14- and 18-month-olds. Developmental Psychology, 33(1), 12–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, H. S., & Lollis, S. P. (1987). Communication within infant social games. Developmental Psychology, 23(2), 241–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saylor, M. M., Baldwin, D. A., Baird, J. A., & LaBounty, J. (2007). Infants’ on-line segmentation of dynamic human action. Journal of Cognition and Development, 8(1), 113–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schult, C. (2002). Children’s understanding of the distinction between intentions and desires. Child Development, 73(6), 1727–1747.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, C., & Buttelmann, D. (2020, September 30). Small procedural differences matter: Conceptual and direct replication attempts of the communication-intervention effect on infants’ false-belief ascriptions. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/kfgr8.

  • Schwier, C., van Maanen, C., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Rational imitation in 12-month-old infants. Infancy, 10, 303–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, R. M., & Baillargeon, R. (2017). Early false-belief understanding. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(4), 237–249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, R. M., Richman, J. C., & Baillargeon, R. (2015). Infants understand deceptive intentions to implant false beliefs about identity: New evidence for early mentalistic reasoning. Cognitive Psychology, 82, 32–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (1983). Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 70–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Senju, A., Southgate, V., Snape, C., Leonard, M., & Csibra, G. (2011). Do 18-month-olds really attribute mental states to others? A critical test. Psychological Science, 22(7), 878–880.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sodian, B., & Thoermer, C. (2004). Infants’ understanding of looking, pointing, and reaching as cues to goal-directed action. Journal of Cognition and Development, 5(3), 289–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southgate, V., Chevallier, C., & Csibra, G. (2010). Seventeen-month-olds appeal to false beliefs to interpret others’ referential communication. Developmental Science, 13(6), 907–912.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Southgate, V., Senju, A., & Csibra, G. (2007). Action anticipation through attribution of false belief by two-year-olds. Psychological Science, 18, 587–592.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Southgate, V., & Vernetti, A. (2014). Belief-based action prediction in preverbal infants. Cognition, 130, 1–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, H. (1864). The principles of biology, Vol. I. Williams & Norgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, D. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surian, L., & Geraci, A. (2012). Where will the triangle look for it? Attributing false beliefs to a geometric shape at 17 months. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30, 30–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tennie, C., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Push or pull: Emulation versus imitation in great apes and human children. Ethology, 112, 1159–1169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoermer, C., Sodian, B., Vuori, M., Perst, H., & Kristen, S. (2012). Continuity from an implicit to an explicit understanding of false belief from infancy to preschool age. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30(1), 172–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (1990). Cultural transmission in the tool use and communicatory signaling of chimpanzees. In S. T. Parker & R. K. Gibson (Eds.), “Language” and intelligence in monkeys and apes. Comparative and developmental perspectives (pp. 274–311). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (1996). Chimpanzee social cognition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 61(3), 161–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (2019). Becoming human: A theory of ontogeny. Belknap Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M., & Call, J. (1997). Primate cognition. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M., Call, J., & Gluckman, A. (1997). Comprehension of novel communicative signs by apes and human children. Child Development, 68, 1067–1080.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M., & Carpenter, M. (2005). The emergence of social cognition in three young chimpanzees. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 70(1, Serial No. 279).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M., & Carpenter, M. (2007). Shared intentionality. Developmental Science, 10(1), 121–125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 675–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M., Davis-Dasilva, M., Camak, L., & Bard, K. (1987). Observational learning of tool use by young chimpanzees. Human Evolution, 2, 175–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M., & Rakoczy, H. (2003). What makes human cognition unique? From individual to shared to collective intentionality. Centennial Essay in Mind and Language, 18, 121–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M., Savage-Rumbaugh, S., & Kruger, A. (1993). Imitative learning of actions on objects by children, chimpanzees and enculturated chimpanzees. Child Development, 64, 1688–1705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Träuble, B., Marinović, V., & Pauen, S. (2010). Early theory of mind competencies: Do infants understand others’ beliefs? Infancy, 15, 434–444.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trevarthen, C. (1979). Instincts for human understanding and for cultural cooperation: Their development in infancy. In M. von Cranach, K. Foppa, W. Lepenies, & D. Ploog (Eds.), Human ethology: Claims and limits of a new discipline. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Want, S. C., & Harris, P. L. (2001). Learning from other people’s mistakes: Causal understanding in learning to use a tool. Child Development, 72, 431–443.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warneken, F., Hare, B., Melis, A. P., Hanus, D., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Spontaneous altruism by chimpanzees and young children. PLoS Biology, 5(7), e184.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Altruistic helping in human infants and young chimpanzees. Science, 311, 1301–1303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Helping and cooperation at 14 months of age. Infancy, 11(3), 271–294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whiten, A., Horner, V., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2005). Conformity to cultural norms of tool use in chimpanzees. Nature, 437, 737–740.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whiten, A., Spiteri, A., Horner, V., Bonnie, K. E., Lambeth, S. P., Schapiro, S. J., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2007). Transmission of multiple traditions within and between chimpanzee groups. Current Biology, 17, 1038–1043.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wildman, D. E., Uddin, M., Liu, G., Grossman, L. I., & Goodman, M. (2003). Implications of natural selection in shaping 99.4% nonsynonymous DNA identity between humans and chimpanzees: Enlarging genus Homo. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(12), 7181–7188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13(1), 103–128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wobber, V., Herrmann, E., Hare, B., Wrangham, R., & Tomasello, M. (2014). Differences in the early cognitive development of children and great apes. Developmental Psychobiology, 56, 547–573.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, A. L. (1998). Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor’s reach. Cognition, 69(1), 1–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yott, J., & Poulin-Dubois, D. (2016). Are infants’ theory of mind abilities well integrated? Implicit understanding of intentions, desires, and beliefs. Journal of Cognition and Development, 17, 683–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zmyj, N., Prinz, W., & Daum, M. M. (2015). Eighteen-month-olds’ memory interference and distraction in a modified A-not-B task is not associated with their anticipatory looking in a false-belief task. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 857.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

    David Buttelmann

Authors
  1. David Buttelmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Buttelmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Human Development & Family Studies, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA

    Sybil L. Hart

  2. Department of Psychology, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA

    David F. Bjorklund

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Buttelmann, D. (2022). What Is Unique in Infant Thinking About Others? Infant Social Cognition from an Evolutionary Perspective. In: Hart, S.L., Bjorklund, D.F. (eds) Evolutionary Perspectives on Infancy. Evolutionary Psychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76000-7_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation