Abstract
In Chap. 1, I introduce the theme of the book and delineate the content of the following chapters. One of the central themes of this book is the idea that transcendental logic and transcendental idealism go together, and that the logic of thought that is the ground of possible knowledge of objects entails epistemic humility about how the world is in itself. The humility is not a detachable add-on to the logic of possible knowledge, but follows directly from the conceivability thesis, namely the Strawsonian core idea that the self of experience and the object of experience are reciprocal elements of the same ‘limiting framework of all our thought about the world and experience of the world’, which dictates what we can conceivably know about objective reality. This shows what it means to be able to think about objects if we are able to think at all. Transcendental idealism is the framework from within which objects can be seen as in principle intelligible. It constitutes the bounds of transcendental logic.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Allais, L. (2015). Manifest Reality. Kant’s Idealism and His Realism. Oxford University Press.
Blomme, H. (2018). Over de radicaliteit van Kants theoretische filosofie. Enkele aanmerkingen bij Dennis Schultings Kant’s Radical Subjectivism. Tijdschrift voor Filosofie, 80(2), 341–353.
Conant, J. (2016). Why Kant Is Not a Kantian. Philosophical Topics, 44(1), 75–125.
Dyck, C. (2014). The Function of Derivation and the Derivation of Functions: A Review of Schulting’s Kant’s Deduction and Apperception. Studi kantiani XXVII, 69–75.
Gomes, A. (2018). Minding the Gap: Subjectivism and the Deduction. Kantian Review, 23(1), 99–109.
Howell, R. (2018). Deduction Difficulties. Kantian Review, 23(1), 111–121.
Land, T. (2018). Review of D. Schulting, Kant’s Deduction and Apperception. Explaining the Categories. Kantian Review, 23(1), 145–151.
Prichard, H. A. (1909). Kant’s Theory of Knowledge. Clarendon Press.
Quarfood, M. (2014). A Note on Schulting’s Derivation of Contingency. Studi kantiani, XXVII, 87–93.
Reich, K. (1986). Die Vollständigkeit der kantischen Urteilstafel (3rd ed.). Meiner.
Reich, K. (1992). The Completeness of Kant’s Table of Judgments, trans. J. Kneller & M. Losonsky. Stanford University Press.
Rutten, E. (2020). Contra Kant. Herwonnen ruimte voor transcendentie. Kok Kampen.
Schulting, D. (2012). Kant’s Deduction and Apperception. Explaining the Categories. Palgrave Macmillan.
Schulting, D. (2014). Kant’s Deduction From Apperception. A Reply to My Critics. Studi kantiani, XXVII, 95–118.
Schulting, D. (2017). Kant’s Radical Subjectivism. Perspectives on the Transcendental Deduction. Palgrave Macmillan.
Schulting, D. (2018). Kant’s Deduction From Apperception. An Essay on the Transcendental Deduction of the Categories (rev. ed.). De Gruyter.
Stephenson, A. (2014). A Deduction from Apperception? Studi kantiani, XXVII, 77–85.
Strawson, P. F. (1968). The Bounds of Sense, 2nd printing. Methuen.
Watt, R. (2017). Robert Watt on Dennis Schulting’s Kant’s Radical Subjectivism. Critique (November issue). https://virtualcritique.wordpress.com/2017/11/07/robert-watt-on-dennis-schultings-kants-radical-subjectivism/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schulting, D. (2022). Introduction. In: The Bounds of Transcendental Logic. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71284-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71284-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-71283-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-71284-6
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)