Skip to main content

Modeling of Groundwater Level Using Artificial Neural Network Algorithm and WA-SVR Model

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Groundwater Resources Development and Planning in the Semi-Arid Region

Abstract

This chapter describes Artificial Neural Network optimization technique and Wavelet Support Vector Machine (WA-SVR) model for predicting the groundwater level in the given terrain. Ground water forecasting is significantly needed for groundwater management. The most important purpose of applying the neural network (artificial) was to extract the probability of various algorithms. Now-a-days, Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) are the most widely accepted modeling technique which can approximate the relationship (nonlinear) between input datasets and output results without considering physical processes and the corresponding equations of the system. Due to this capability, an ANN model is much faster than a physically based model which it approximates. Prediction of accurate groundwater head helps in the practical and best possible usage of the water resources. The performance of the models was evaluated by using two performance measures, the correlation coefficient (R) and Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency Index (Ef). Model accuracy has been improved using different network architectures and training algorithms. After improving the model accuracy, it has been noticed that the best results can be accomplished with a typical feedforward neural network (FFNN) trained with the Levenberg–Marquardt (LM) algorithm obtained for simulation of ground water levels. The results revealed that ANN model technique was appropriate for predicting the groundwater heads. The study conclusively confirms the ability of ANNs to give the precise estimation of the head value with fair accuracy. From the results, it has been concluded that the ANNs have simulated and predicted the water heads in the river under acceptable residuals, whereas WA-SVR model’s results are more accurate. Study concludes that wavelet decomposition-based SVR is found superior in comparison of the ANN model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad, S., & Simonovic, S. P. (2005). An artificial neural network model for generating hydrograph from hydro-meteorological parameters. Journal of Hydrology, 315(1–4), 236–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aitkenhead, M. J., & Cooper, R. J. (2008). Neural network time series prediction of environmental variables in a small upland headwater in NE Scotland. Hydrological Processes: An International Journal, 22(16), 3091–3101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anmala, J., Zhang, B., & Govindaraju, R. S. (2000). Comparison of ANNs and empirical approaches for predicting watershed runoff. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 126(3), 156–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cancelliere, A., Giuliano, G., Ancarani, A., & Rossi, G. (2002). A neural networks approach for deriving irrigation reservoir operating rules. Water Resources Management, 16(1), 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, A. J., & Whitfield, P. H. (2002). Downscaling recent streamflow conditions in British Columbia, Canada using ensemble neural network models. Journal of Hydrology, 259(1–4), 136–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulibaly, P., Anctil, F., Aravena, R., & Bobée, B. (2001). Artificial neural network modeling of water table depth fluctuations. Water Resources Research, 37(4), 885–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, S. S., Harrison, R. F., & Kennedy, R. L. (1995). Introduction to neural networks. The Lancet, 346(8982), 1075–1079.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daliakopoulos, I. N., Coulibaly, P., & Tsanis, I. K. (2005). Groundwater level forecasting using artificial neural networks. Journal of Hydrology, 309(1–4), 229–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dogan, D., Isik, S., Toluk, T., & Sandalci, M. (2007). Daily streamflow forecasting using artificial neural networks. In International Congress on River Basin Management, River Basin Flood Management (Chap. IV, pp. 448–459).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, R., & Reeves, C. M. (1964). Function minimization by conjugate gradients. Computer Journal, 7, 149–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghose, D. K., Panda, S. S., & Swain, P. C. (2010). Prediction of water table depth in western region, Orissa using BPNN and RBFN neural networks. Journal of Hydrology, 394(3-4), 296–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, M. T., & Menhaj, M. B. (1994). Training feedforward networks with the Marquardt algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 5(6), 989–993.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, M. T., Demuth, H. B., & Beale, M. (1996). Neural network design, Thomson learning. Noida: Vikas Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornik, K. (1991). Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks. Neural Networks, 4(2), 251–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M., & White, H. (1989). Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Networks, 2(5), 359–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karmokar, B. C., Mahmud, M. P., Siddiquee, M. K., Nafi, K. W., & Kar, T. S. (2012). Touchless written English characters recognition using neural network. International Journal of Computer & Organization Trends, 2(3), 80–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karunanithi, N., Grenney, W. J., Whitley, D., & Bovee, K. (1994). Neural networks for river flow prediction. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 8(2), 201–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, M. G. (1938). A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika, 30(1/2), 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, D. N., Raju, K. S., & Sathish, T. (2004). River flow forecasting using recurrent neural networks. Water Resources Management, 18(2), 143–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moharir, K., Pande, C., & Patil, S. (2017). Inverse modeling of Aquifer parameters in basaltic rock with the help of pumping test method using MODFLOW software. Geoscience Frontiers, 8, 1385–1395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moller, H. (1993). A scaled conjugate gradient algorithm for fast supervised learning. Neural Networks, 6(4), 525–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. E., & Sutcliffe, J. V. (1971). River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part 1: A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10(3), 282–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omar, P. J., Gaur, S., Dwivedi, S. B., & Dikshit, P. K. S. (2019). Groundwater modelling using an analytic element method and finite difference method: an insight into lower ganga river basin. Journal of Earth System Science 128(7), 195

    Google Scholar 

  • Omar, P. J., Gaur, S., Dwivedi, S. B., & Dikshit, P. K. S. (2020). A modular three-dimensional scenario-based numerical modelling of groundwater flow. Water Resources Management 34(6), 1913–1932.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omar P.J., Gaur S., Dwivedi S.B., & Dikshit P.K.S. (2021) Development and Application of the Integrated GIS-MODFLOW Model. In: Gupta P.K., Bharagava R.N. (eds) Fate and Transport of Subsurface Pollutants. Microorganisms for Sustainability, vol 24. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6564-9_16

  • Peters, R., Schmitz, G., & Cullmann, J. (2006). Flood routing modelling with artificial neural networks. Advances in Geosciences, 9, 131–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raman, H., & Sunilkumar, N. (1995). Multivariate modelling of water resources time series using artificial neural networks. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 40(2), 145–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riedmiller, M., & Braun, H. (1993). A direct adaptive method for faster backpropagation learning: The RPROP algorithm. In IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks (pp. 586-591).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sajikumar, N., & Thandaveswara, B. S. (1999). A non-linear rainfall–runoff model using an artificial neural network. Journal of Hydrology, 216(1–2), 32–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shivhare, N., Rahul, A. K., Omar, P. J., Chauhan, M. S., Gaur, S., Dikshit, P. K. S., & Dwivedi, S. B. (2018). Identification of critical soil erosion prone areas and prioritization of micro-watersheds using geoinformatics techniques. Ecological engineering, 121, 26–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudheer, K. P., & Jain, A. (2004). Explaining the internal behaviour of artificial neural network river flow models. Hydrological Processes, 18(4), 833–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thirumalaiah, K., & Deo, M. C. (1998). River stage forecasting using artificial neural networks. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 3(1), 26–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gaur, S., Johannet, A., Graillot, D., Omar, P.J. (2021). Modeling of Groundwater Level Using Artificial Neural Network Algorithm and WA-SVR Model. In: Pande, C.B., Moharir, K.N. (eds) Groundwater Resources Development and Planning in the Semi-Arid Region. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68124-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics