Skip to main content

Hope and Despair (Thomas Aquinas, Summa theologiae, Part I-II, Question 40, Article 3)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Animal Minds in Medieval Latin Philosophy

Part of the book series: Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind ((SHPM,volume 27))

  • 290 Accesses

Abstract

In Summa theologiae I-II.40.3, Thomas Aquinas discusses whether nonhuman animals possess the emotion of hope (spes) and despair (desperatio). According to his division of emotions, humans have hope when they try to attain a good that is absent but attainable. Despair, by contrast, is felt when one longs for something that is absent and unattainable. The question now is whether nonhuman animals also have such feelings. Aquinas introduces ordinary observations of animal behaviour that support the ascription of an emotion such as hope to nonhuman animals. A dog, for instance, seems to hope that it can catch a hare. Otherwise, it would not even try to catch it. Still, the question is whether hoping for something requires a notion of future states or events (namely, those states and events we hope for), and if so, whether animals are endowed with this kind of cognitive prerequisite. Contrary to his answer to the question of enjoyment in nonhuman animals, Aquinas does not introduce a terminological distinction between perfect and imperfect types of such emotions. Rather, he distinguishes between the ways in which they are sensed by humans and nonhuman animals. This finally allows him to justify the ascription of hope and despair to nonhuman animals without neglecting the fact that they have a different nature in such animals than they have in rational beings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For Aquinas’ division of emotions, see King (1998) and (2012).

  2. 2.

    For an analysis of this passage, see Hünemörder (1988), 203f.; Roberts (1992), 294; Loughlin (2001), 52–54; Miner (2009), 218f.; Perler (2012), 81, and (2018), 41; Köhler (2014), 214; Davids (2017), 210f.; Oelze (2018), 183–188.

  3. 3.

    John of Damascus, De fide orthodoxa, c. 43, ed. Buytaert (1955), 158.

  4. 4.

    This distinction is not found in book VI but V; see Aristotle, Metaphysica V.12, 1019b22–34.

  5. 5.

    Augustine, De Genesi ad litteram IX.14.25, ed. Migne (1887), 402.

  6. 6.

    Romans 8:24.

  7. 7.

    On this appetite see Chap. 17.

  8. 8.

    E.g. ST I-II.1.2.

  9. 9.

    I.e. God.

  10. 10.

    See, for instance, Aristotle, Metaphysica V.12, 1019a15–33.

Bibliography

Primary Sources

  • Aristotle. (1957). Metaphysica (W. Jaeger, Ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Augustine. (1887). De Genesi ad litteram libri XII (J.-P. Migne, Ed.) (Patrologia Latina 34, 245–486). Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • John of Damascus. (1955). De fide orthodoxa: Versions of Burgundius and Cerbanus (E. M. Buytaert, Ed.). St. Bonaventure: The Franciscan Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas Aquinas. (1891). Prima secundae Summae theologiae, qq. 1–70 (Opera omnia 6). Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas Aquinas. (1965). Summa theologiae, Vol. 21: Fear and anger (1a2ae. 40–48) (J. P. Reid, Trans.). London: Blackfriars.

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Sources

  • Davids, T. (2017). Anthropologische Differenz und animalische Konvenienz: Tierphilosophie bei Thomas von Aquin. Leiden/Boston: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hünemörder, C. (1988). Thomas von Aquin und die Tiere. In A. Zimmermann & C. Kopp (Eds.), Thomas von Aquin: Werk und Wirkung im Licht neuerer Forschungen (pp. 379–392). Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, P. (1998). Aquinas on the passions. In S. MacDonald & E. Stump (Eds.), Aquinas’s moral theory: Essays in Honor of Norman Kretzmann (pp. 101–132). Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, P. (2012). Emotions. In B. Davies & E. Stump (Eds.), The Oxford handbook to Aquinas (pp. 209–226). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Köhler, T. W. (2014). Homo animal nobilissimum: Konturen des spezifisch Menschlichen in der naturphilosophischen Aristoteleskommentierung des dreizehnten Jahrhunderts, Teilband 2.1 und 2.2. 2 vols. Leiden/Boston: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughlin, S. (2001). Similarities and differences between human and animal emotion in Aquinas’s thought. The Thomist, 65, 45–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miner, R. (2009). Thomas Aquinas on the passions: A study of Summa theologiae 1a2ae 22–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oelze, A. (2018). Animal rationality: Later medieval theories 1250–1350. Leiden/Boston: Brill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Perler, D. (2012). Die kognitive Struktur von Hoffnung: Zwei mittelalterliche Erklärungsmodelle. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 60(1), 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perler, D. (2018). Feelings transformed: Philosophical theories of the emotions, 1270–1670 (T. Crawford, Trans.). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. C. (1992). Thomas Aquinas on the morality of emotions. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 9(3), 287–305.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Oelze, A. (2021). Hope and Despair (Thomas Aquinas, Summa theologiae, Part I-II, Question 40, Article 3). In: Animal Minds in Medieval Latin Philosophy. Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind, vol 27. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67012-2_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics