Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Relevance of Biosensor in Climate Smart Organic Agriculture and Their Role in Environmental Sustainability: What Has Been Done and What We Need to Do?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Biosensors in Agriculture: Recent Trends and Future Perspectives

Part of the book series: Concepts and Strategies in Plant Sciences ((CSPS))

Abstract

The application of climate smart agriculture (CSA) procedure has been recognized as a significant part in offering resolutions to the challenging issues of climate change (CC) and its extenuation for agricultural and environmental sustainability (AES). Moreover, it has been highlighted that several agricultural activities in several countries could be linked to the high amount of greenhouse gas emissions. The application of CSA technologies would play a significant role in the aspect of capacity building, skill and managerial future adoptions as well as intelligent management of natural resources for AES. Numerous biosensors and biosensing technologies (BSTs) like nanoparticles (NPs) and polymers along with their enormous benefits are presently being applied globally for resolving most of the challenging issues in AES. Nevertheless, it is important to integrate multi-faceted procedures for AES, so as to effectively apply biosensors that could conceivably be employed for various applications particularly in the area of CSA for AES. Hence, this chapter provides an assessment of BSTs and their wide-ranging benefits in CSA along with their role in AES. The restrictions confronted by some of the projecting BSTs particularly in relationship with CSA will be emphasized, and as well offer suitable recommendations for the improvement in AES.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abe K, Yoshida W, Ikebukuro K (2014) Electrochemical biosensors using aptamers for theranostics. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 140:183–202

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Abegunde VO, Sibanda M, Obi A (2019) The dynamics of climate change adaptation in Sub-Saharan Africa: a review of climate-smart agriculture among small-scale farmers. Climate 7:132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adesina O, Anzai IA, Avalos JL, Barstow B (2017) Embracing biological solutions to the sustainable energy challenge. Chem 2:20–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Adetunji CO, Oloke JK, Phazang P, Sarin NB (2020) Influence of eco-friendly phytotoxic metabolites from lasiodiplodia pseudotheobromae C1136 on physiological, biochemical, and ultrastructural changes on tested weeds. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07677-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adetunji CO, Adejumo IO, Oloke JK, Akpor OB (2018a) Production of phytotoxic metabolites with bioherbicidal activities from lasiodiplodia pseudotheobromae produced on different agricultural wastes using solid-state fermentation. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Sci 42(3):1163–1175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adetunji CO, Oloke JK, Mishra P, Oluyori AP, Jolly RS, Bello OM (2018b) Mellein, a dihydroisocoumarin with bioherbicidal Activity from a new strain of lasiodiplodia pseudotheobromae C1136. Beni-Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjbas.2018.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adetunji CO, Oloke JK, Prasad G (2018c) Effect of carbon-to-nitrogen ratio on eco-friendly mycoherbicide activity from lasiodiplodia pseudotheobromae C1136 for sustainable weeds management in organic agriculture. Environ Dev Sustain 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Adetunji CO, Oloke JK, Bello OM, Pradeep M, Jolly RS (2019) Isolation, structural elucidation and bioherbicidal activity of an eco-friendly bioactive 2-(hydroxymethyl) phenol, from pseudomonas aeruginosa (C1501) and its ecotoxicological evaluation on soil. Environ Technol Innov 13:304–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akrofi-Atitianti F, Speranza CI, Louis Bockel L, Asare R (2018) Assessing climate smart agriculture and its determinants of practice in Ghana: a case of the cocoa production system. Land 7:30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alavanja MCR, Dosemeci M, Samanic C, Lubin J, Lynch CF, Knott C, Barker J, Hoppin JA, Sandler DP, Coble J, Thomas K, Blair A (2004) Pesticides and lung cancer risk in the agricultural health study cohort. Am J Epidemiol 160(9):876–885

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amaro F, Turkewitz AP, Martin-Gonzalez A, Gutierrez JC (2014) Functional GFP metallothionein fusion protein from Tetrahymena thermophila: a potential whole-cell biosensor for monitoring heavy metal pollution and a cell model to study metallothionein overproduction effects. Biometals 27(1):195–205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Amine A, El Harrad L, Arduini F, Moscone D, Palleschi G (2014) Analytical aspects of enzyme reversible inhibition. Talanta 118:368–374

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Antonacci A, Arduini F, Moscone D, Palleschi G, Scognamiglio V (2016) Commercially available (bio)sensors in the agrifood sector. In: Comprehensive analytical Chemistry. Elsevier: Amsterdam, the Netherlands, pp 74, 315–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Antwi-Agyei P, Dougill AJ, Stringer LC (2014) Barriers to climate change adaptation in Sub-Sahara Africa: evidence from Northeast Ghana and systematic literature review. Clim Dev 7:297–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arduini F, Amine A (2014) Biosensors based on enzyme inhibition. In: Gu MB, Kim H (eds), Biosensors based on aptamers and enzymes. Berlin, pp 299–326, ISSN: 0724-6145

    Google Scholar 

  • Arlett JL, Myers EB, Roukes ML (2011) Comparative advantages of mechanical biosensors. Nat Nanotechnol 6:203–215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arora N (2013) Recent advances in biosensors technology: a review. Octa J Biosci 1(2):147–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagal-Kestwal D, Karve MS, Kakade B, Pillai VK (2008) Invertase inhibition based electrochemical sensor for the detection of heavy metal ions in aqueous system: application of ultra-microelectrode to enhance sucrose biosensor’s sensitivity. Biosens Bioelectron 24(4):657–664

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bahadır EB, Sezgintürk MK (2015) Applications of commercial biosensors in clinical, food, environmental, and biothreat/biowarfare analyses. Anal Biochem 478:107–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bandodkar AJ, Wang J (2014) Non-invasive wearable electrochemical sensors: a review. Trends Biotechnol 32:363–371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borgmann S, Schulte A, Neugebauer S, Schuhmann W (2011) Amperometric biosensors. In: Alkire RC, Kolb DM, Lipkowski J (eds), Advances in electrochemical science and engineering: Bioelectrochemistry, 13, Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA

    Google Scholar 

  • Citartan M, Gopinath SC, Tominaga J, Tang TH (2013) Label-free methods of reporting biomolecular interactions by optical biosensors. Analyst 138:3576–3592

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark LC Jr, Lyons C (1962) Electrode systems for continuous monitoring in cardiovascular surgery. Ann N Y Acad Sci 102:29–45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Criswell JT, Campbell J, Luper C (2013) Toxicity of pesticides. Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service, EPP-7457

    Google Scholar 

  • Dias AD, Kingsley DM, Corr DT (2014) Recent advances in bioprinting and applications for biosensing. Biosensors (Basel) 4:111–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta N, Ranjan S, Mundekkad D, Ramalingam C, Shanker R, Kumar A (2015) Nanotechnology in agro-food: from field to plate. Food Res Int 69:381–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duhan JS, Kumar R, Kumar N, Kaur P, Nehra K, Duhan S (2017) Nanotechnology: the new perspective in precision agriculture. Biotechnol Rep 15:11–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Said WA, Abdelshakour M, Choi JH, Choi JW (2020) Application of conducting polymer nanostructures to electrochemical biosensors. Molecules 25(307):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Fracchiolla NS, Artuso S, Cortelezzi A (2013) Biosensors in clinical practice: focus on oncohematology. Sensors (Basel) 13:6423–6447

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fanen T, Olalekan A (2014) Assessing the role of climate-smart agriculture in combating climate change, desertification and improving rural livelihood in Northern Nigeria. Afr J Agric Res 9:1180–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken D, Mach K, Mastrandrea M, Bilir T, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC et al. (2014) IPCC: climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, pp 1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO (2015) Climate smart agriculture sourcebook. Italy, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraceto LF, Grillo R, Medeiros DAG, Scognamiglio V, Rea G, Bartolucci C (2016) Nanotechnology in agriculture: which innovation potential does it have? Front. Environ Sci, 4:20

    Google Scholar 

  • Gammoudi I, Raimbault V, Tarbague H, Morote F, Grauby-Heywang C, Othmane A, Kalfat R, Moynet D, Rebiere D, Dejous C, Cohen-Bouhacina T (2014) Enhanced bio-inspired microsensor based on microfluidic/bacterial/love wave hybrid structure for continuous control of heavy metals toxicity in liquid medium. Sens Actuators B 198:278–284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garnett T (2013) Food sustainability: problems, perspectives and solutions. Proc Nutr Soc 72:29–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ghica ME, Carvalho RC, Amine A, Brett CMA (2013) Glucose oxidase enzyme inhibition sensors for heavy metals at carbon film electrodes modified with cobalt and copper hexacyanoferrate. Sensd Actuators, B 178:270–278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Givaudan N, Binet F, Bot BL, Wiegand C (2014) Earthworm tolerance to residual agricultural pesticide contamination: field and experimental assessment of detoxification capabilities. Environ Pollut 192:9–18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grabowska I, Malecka K, Jarocka U, Radecki J, Radecka H (2014) Electrochemical biosensors for detection of avian influenza virus—current status and future trends. Acta Biochim Pol 61:471–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • He HZ, Leung KH, Yang H, Chan DSH, Leung CH, Zhou J, Bourdoncle A, Mergny JL, Ma DL (2013) Label-free detection of sub-nanomolar lead (II) ions in aqueous solution using a metal-based luminescent switch-on probe. Biosens Bioelectron 41:871–874

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herndon JM, Whiteside M (2019) Further evidence that particulate pollution is the principal cause of global warming: humanitarian considerations. J Geogr Environ Earth Sci Int 21(1):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Karimi V, Karami E, Keshavarz M (2018) Climate change and agriculture: impacts and adaptive responses in Iran. J Integr Agric 17(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Imani S, de Araujo WR, Warchall J, Valdes-Ramirez G, Paixao TR, Mercier PP, Wang J (2015a) Wearable salivary uric acid mouthguard biosensor with integrated wireless electronics. Biosens Bioelectron 74:1061–1068

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kim M, Lim JW, Kim HJ, Lee SK, Lee SJ, Kim T (2015b) Chemostat-like microfluidic platform for highly sensitive detection of heavy metal ions using microbial biosensors. Biosens Bioelectron 65:257–264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar H, Rani R (2013) Development of biosensors for the detection of biological warfare agents: its issues and challenges. Sci Prog 96:294–308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kunzelmann S, Solscheid C, Webb MR (2014) Fluorescent bio-sensors: design and application to motor proteins. Exp Suppl 105:25–47

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon SJ, Bard AJ (2012) DNA analysis by application of Pt nanoparticle electrochemical amplification with single label response. J Am Chem Soc 134:10777–10779.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawal AT, Adeloju SB (2012) Progress and recent advances in fabrication and utilization of hypoxanthine biosensors for meat and fish quality assessment: a review. Talanta 100:217–228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Zhou X, Ding W, Guo S, Wu N (2013) Fluorescent aptamer-functionalized graphene oxide biosensor for label-free detection of Mercury (II). Biosens Bioelectron 41:889–893

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Long F, Zhu A, Shi H (2013a) Recent advances in optical biosensors for environmental monitoring and early warning. Sensors (Basel) 13:13928–13948

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Long F, Zhu A, Shi H, Wang H, Liu J (2013b) Rapid on-site/in-situ detection of heavy metal ions in environmental water using a structure-switching DNA optical biosensor. Sci Rep 3:2308

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Marrazza G (2014) Piezoelectric biosensors for organophosphate and carbamate pesticides: a review. Biosensors (Basel) 4:301–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzei F, Antiochia R, Botre F, Favero G, Tortolini C (2014) Affinity-based biosensors in sport medicine and doping control analysis. Bioanalysis 6:225–245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neethirajan S, Ragavan V, Weng X, Rohit Chand R (2018) Biosensors for sustainable food engineering: challenges and perspectives. Biosensors 8:23

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nwankwo W, Olayinka SA, Ukhurebor KE (2020a) Green computing policies and regulations: a necessity? Int J Sci Technol Res 9(1):4378–4383

    Google Scholar 

  • Nwankwo W, Olayinka AS, Ukhurebor KE (2020b) Nanoinformatics: why design of projects on nanomedicine development and clinical applications may fail? In: Proceeding of the 2020 international conference in Mathematics, Computer Engineering and Computer Science (ICMCECS), Lagos, Nigeria, IEEE Xplore, pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Nwankwo W, Ukhurebor KE (2019) An x-ray of connectivity between climate change and particulate pollutions. J Adv Res Dyn Control Syst 11(8) Special Issue, 3002–3011

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldach L, Zhang J (2014) Genetically encoded fluorescent biosensors for live-cell visualization of protein phosphorylation. Chem Biol 21:186–197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Peng F, Su Y, Zhong Y, Fan C, Lee ST, He Y (2014) Silicon nanomaterials platform for bioimaging, biosensing, and cancer therapy. Acc Chem Res 47:612–623

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad R, Bhattacharyya A, Nguyen QD (2017) Nanotechnology in sustainable agriculture: recent developments, challenges, and perspectives. Front Microbiol 8:1014

    Google Scholar 

  • Pundir CS, Chauhan N (2012) Acetylcholinesterase inhibition-based biosensors for pesticide determination: a review. Anal Biochem 429:19–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Randriamampita C, Lellouch AC (2014) Imaging early signalling events in T lymphocytes with fluorescent biosensors. Biotechnol J 9:203–212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes De Corcuera JI, Cavalieri JR (2003) Prototype instruments for laboratory and on-line measurement of lipoxygenase activity. Food Sci Technol Int 9(1):5–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Mozaz S, Alda MJ, Marco MP (2005) Biosensors for environmental monitoring: a global perspective. Talanta 65(2):291–297

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salek-Maghsoud A, Vakhshiteh F, Torabia R, Hassani S, Ganjali MR, Norouzi P, Hosseini M, Abdollahi M (2018) Recent advances in biosensor technology in assessment of early diabetes biomarkers. Biosens Bioelectron 99:122–135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sang S, Wang Y, Feng Q, Wei Y, Ji J, Zhang W (2015) Progress of new label-free techniques for biosensors: a review. Crit Rev Biotechnol 15:1–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scheller FW, Yarman A, Bachmann T, Hirsch T, Kubick S, Renneberg R, Schumacher S, Wollenberger U, Teller C, Bier FF (2014) Future of biosensors: a personal view. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 140:1–28

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sbartai A, Namour P, Errachid A, Krejci J, Sejnohova R, Renaud L, Hamlaoui ML, Loir A-S, Garrelie F, Donnet C, Soder H, Audouard E, Granier J, Jaffrezic-Renault N (2012) Electrochemical boron-doped diamond film microcells micromachined with femtosecond laser: application to the determination of water framework directive metals. Anal Chem 84(11):4805–4811

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Senthilkumaran B (2015) Pesticide- and sex steroid analogue-induced endocrine disruption differentially targets hypothalamo-hypophyseal-gonadal system during gametogenesis in teleosts—a review. Gen Comp Endocrinol 219:136–142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shen MY, Li BR, Li YK (2014) Silicon nanowire field-effect-transistor based biosensors: from sensitive to ultra-sensitive. Biosens Bioelectron 60:101–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun JZ, Peter KG, Si RW, Zhai DD, Liao ZH, Sun DZ, Zheng T, Yong YC (2015) Microbial fuel cell-based biosensors for environmental monitoring: a review. Water Sci Technol 71:801–809

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turner AP (2013) Biosensors: sense and sensibility. Chem Soc Rev 42:3184–3196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turner APF, Karube I, Wilson GS (1987) Biosensors fundamentals and applications. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderroost M, Ragaert P, Devlieghere F, De Meulenaer B (2014) Intelligent food packaging: the next generation. Trends Food Sci Technol 39:47–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ukhurebor KE (2020) The role of biosensor in climate smart organic agriculture towards agricultural and environmental sustainability. In: Meena RS (ed) Agrometeorology, IntechOpen, London, UK. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93150

  • Ukhurebor KE, Abiodun IC (2018) Variation in annual rainfall data of forty years (1978-2017) for South-South, Nigeria. J Appl Sci Environ Manage 22(4):511–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Ukhurebor KE, Azi SO, Aigbe UO, Onyancha RB, Emegha JO (2020a) Analysing the uncertainties between reanalysis meteorological data and ground measured meteorological data. Measurement 165:108110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ukhurebor KE, Aigbe UO, Olayinka AS, Nwankwo W, Emegha JO (2020b) Climatic change and pesticides usage: a brief review of their implicative relationship. Assumption Univ eJournal Interdisc Res 5(1):44–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Ukhurebor KE, Azi SO (2019) Review of methodology to obtain parameters for radio wave propagation at low altitudes from meteorological data: new results for Auchi area in Edo State, Nigeria. J King Saud Univ—Sci 31(4): 1445–1451

    Google Scholar 

  • Ukhurebor KE, Nwankwo W (2020) Estimation of the refractivity gradient from measured essential climate variables in Iyamho-Auchi, Edo State, South-South Region of Nigeria. Indonesian J Electr Eng Comput Sci 19(1):276–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ukhurebor KE, Olayinka SA, Nwankwo W, Alhasan C (2019) Evaluation of the effects of some weather variables on UHF and VHF receivers within Benin City, South-South region of Nigeria. J Phys IOP Conf Ser 1299:012052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ukhurebor KE, Umukoro OJ (2018) Influence of meteorological variables on UHF radio signal: recent findings for EBS, Benin City, South-South, Nigeria. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 173:012017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma N, Bhardwaj A (2015) Biosensor technology for pesticides—a review. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 175:3093–3119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vigneshvar S, Sudhakumari CC, Senthilkumaran B, Prakash H (2016) Recent advances in biosensor technology for potential applications—an overview. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 4(11):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Poon GM, Wilson WD (2015) Quantitative investigation of protein-nucleic acid interactions by biosensor surface plasmon resonance. Methods Mol Biol 1334:313–332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Liu M, Wang X, Wu Z, Yang L, Xia S, Chen L, Zhao J (2013) p-Benzoquinone-mediated amperometric biosensor developed with Psychrobacter sp. for toxicity testing of heavy metals. Biosens Bioelectron 41:557–562

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wong LS, Wong CS (2015) A new method for heavy and aluminium detection using biopolymer- based optical biosensor. IEEE Sens J 15(1):471–475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yada RY (2015) Improving and tailoring enzymes for food quality and functionality, 1st edn. Elsevier Science, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan H, Tang N, Jairo GA, Chakravarty S, Blake DA, Chen RT (2016) High-sensitivity high-throughput chip-based biosensor array for multiplexed detection of heavy metals. Proc. In: Frontiers in biological detection: from Nanosensors to systems VIII, 972501–972508, United States, Proceedings of SPIE

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Shi Y, Lan F, Pan Y, Lin Y, Lv J, Zhu Z, Jiang Q, Gqing C (2014) Detection of single-digit foodborne pathogens with the naked eye using carbon nanotubebased multiple cycle signal amplification. Chem Commun 50(15):1848–1850

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang P, Zhao X, Ji Y, Ouyang Z, Wen X, Li J, Su Z, Wei G (2015) Electrospinning graphene quantum dots into a nanofibrous membrane for dual-purpose fluorescent and electrochemical biosensors. J Mater Chem B 3:2487–2496

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Climatic/Environmental/Telecommunication Unit, Department of Physics, Edo University Iyamho, P.M.B. 04, Auchi, 312101, Edo State, Nigeria

    Kingsley Eghonghon Ukhurebor

  2. Applied Microbiology, Biotechnology and Nanotechnology Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Edo University Iyamho, P.M.B. 04, Auchi, 312101, Edo State, Nigeria

    Charles Oluwaseun Adetunji

Authors
  1. Kingsley Eghonghon Ukhurebor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Charles Oluwaseun Adetunji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kingsley Eghonghon Ukhurebor .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Amity Institute of Nanotechnology, Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India

    Ramesh Namdeo Pudake

  2. Amity Institute of Nanotechnology, Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India

    Utkarsh Jain

  3. Department of Atomic Energy, ICAR - National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi, Delhi, India

    Chittaranjan Kole

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ukhurebor, K.E., Adetunji, C.O. (2021). Relevance of Biosensor in Climate Smart Organic Agriculture and Their Role in Environmental Sustainability: What Has Been Done and What We Need to Do? . In: Pudake, R.N., Jain, U., Kole, C. (eds) Biosensors in Agriculture: Recent Trends and Future Perspectives. Concepts and Strategies in Plant Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66165-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation