Skip to main content

Management of Malignant Polyps

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The ASCRS Textbook of Colon and Rectal Surgery
  • 3826 Accesses

Abstract

Recent advances, both in technology and technique, now allow endoscopists to successfully manage many patients with colorectal neoplasia who were previously referred for colectomy. Malignant polyps with superficial submucosal invasion can be cured with endoscopic resection, whereas surgery is reserved for those with high risk for lymph node metastasis. In this chapter, we briefly discuss colorectal cancer (CRC) carcinogenesis pathways, how to assess potentially malignant polyps for resectability, and then present a management algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Globocan 2018: cancer fact sheets – colorectal cancer. IARC. http://gco.iarc.fr/today/data.factsheets/cancers/10_8_9-Colorectum-fact-sheet.pdf.

  2. Fleming M, Ravula S, Tatischchev SF, Wang HL, et al. Colorectal carcinoma: pathologic aspects. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2013;3:153–73.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Conteduca V, Sansonno D, Russi S, et al. Precancerous colorectal lesions. Int J Oncol. 2013;43:973–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Williams JG, Pullan RD, Hill J, et al. Management of the malignant colorectal polyp: ACPGBI position statement. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(Suppl 2):1–38.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology; colon cancer (v3.2018). Available at https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/colon.pdf.

  6. Rex DK, Hassan C, Bourke MJ. The colonoscopist’s guide to the vocabulary of colorectal neoplasia: histology, morphology, and management. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86:253–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1977–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Atkin W, Morson B, Cuzick J. Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:658–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ, et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:687–96.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Keum N, Giovannucci E. Global burden of colorectal cancer: emerging trends, risk factors and prevention strategies. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;16:713–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. World Health Organization. Classification of tumours of the digestive tract. Lyon: IARC Press; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dixon MF. Gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia: Vienna revisited. Gut. 2002;51:130–1.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Salmo E, Haboubi N. Adenoma and malignant colorectal polyp: pathological considerations and clinical applications. EMJ Gastroenterol. 2018;7:92–102.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fleming M, Ravula S, Tatishchev SF, et al. Colorectal carcinoma: pathologic aspects. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2012;3:153–73.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Heitman SJ, Ronskley PE, Hilsden RJ, et al. Prevalence of adenomas and colorectal cancer in average risk individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:1272–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Crockett SD, Nagtegaal ID. Terminology, molecular features, epidemiology, and management of serrated colorectal neoplasia. Gastroenterology. 2019;157:949–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Saito S, Tajiri H, Ikegami M. Serrated polyps of the colon and rectum: endoscopic features including image enhanced endoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;7:860–71.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Fearon ER, Vogelstein B. A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell. 1990;61:759–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dow LE, O’Rourke KP, Simon J, et al. Apc restoration promotes cellular differentiation and reestablishes crypt homeostasis in colorectal cancer. Cell. 2015;161:1539–52.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Nakayama M, Oshima M. Mutant p53 in colon cancer. J Mol Cell Biol. 2019;11:267–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. O’Brien MJ, Yang S, Clebanoff JL, et al. Hyperplastic (serrated) polyps of the colorectum: relationship of CpG island methylator phenotype and K-ras mutation to location and histologic subtype. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004;28:423–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bond CE, Liu C, Kawamata F, et al. Oncogenic BRAF mutation induces DNA methylation changes in a murine model for human serrated colorectal neoplasia. Epigenetics. 2018;13:40–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Weisenberger DJ, Siegmund KD, Campman N, et al. CpG island methylator phenotype underlies sporadic microsatellite instability and is tightly associated with BRAF mutation in colorectal cancer. Nat Genet. 2006;38:787–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rex DK, Shaukat A, Wallace MB. Optimal management of malignant polyps, from endoscopic assessment and resection to decisions about surgery. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17:1428–37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Compton CC. Key issues in reporting common cancer specimens: problems in pathologic staging of colon cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006;130:318–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Moss A, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection outcomes and prediction of submucosal cancer from advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:1909–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lopez A, Bouvier AM, Jooste V, et al. Outcomes following polypectomy for malignant colorectala polyps are similar to those following surgery in the general population. Gut. 2019;68:111–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. The Paris endoscopic classification for superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58(6 suppl):S3–S43.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Endoscopic Classification Review Group. Update on the Paris classification of superficial neoplastic lesions in the digestive tract. Endoscopy. 2005;37:570–8.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Okamoto T, Tanaka S, Haruma K, et al. Clinicopathologic evaluation on colorectal laterally spreading tumor (LST). Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi. 1996;93:83–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Soetikno RM, Kaltenbach T, Rouse RV, et al. Prevalence of nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults. JAMA. 2008;299:1027–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rembacken BJ, Fujii T, Cairns A, et al. Flat and depressed colonic neoplasms: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies in the UK. Lancet. 2000;355:1211–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kudo S, Lambert R, Allen JL, et al. Nonpolypoid neoplastic lesions of the colorectal mucosa. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68(4 Suppl):S3–S47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Burgess NG, Hourigan LF, Zanati SA, et al. Risk stratification for covert invasive cancer among patients referred for colonic endoscopic mucosal resection: a large multicenter cohort. Gastroenterology. 2017;153:732–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kudo S, Hirota S, Nakajima T, et al. Colorectal tumours and pit pattern. J Clin Pathol. 1994;47:880–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Togashi K, Konishi F, Ishizuka T, et al. Efficacy of magnifying endoscopy in the differential diagnosis of neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps of the large bowel. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:1602–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tung SY, Wu CS, Su MY. Magnifying colonoscopy in differentiating neoplastic from nonneoplastic colorectal lesions. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:2628–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Konishi K, Kaneko K, Kurahashi T, et al. A comparison of magnifying and nonmagnifying colonoscopy for diagnosis of colorectal polyps: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57:48–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Draganov PV, Gotoda T, Yang D. Advanced techniques for endoscopic resection in the GI tract. 1st ed. Thorofare: Slack Incorporated; 2019. p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sano Y, Horimatsu T, Fu KI, et al. Magnifying observation of microvascular architecture of colorectal lesions using a narrow band imaging system. Dig Endosc. 2006;18:S44–51.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sano Y, Ikematsu H, Fu KI, et al. Meshed capillary vessels by use of narrow-band imaging for differential diagnosis of small colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:278–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Katagiri A, Fu KI, Sano Y, et al. Narrow band imaging with magnifying colonoscopy as a diagnostic tool for predicting the histology of early colorectal neoplasia. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;27:1269–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ikematsu H, Matsuda T, Emura F, et al. Efficacy of capillary pattern type IIIA/IIIB by magnifying narrow band imaging for estimating depth of invasion of early colorectal neoplasms. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010;10:33.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Sano Y, Tanaka S, Kudo S, et al. Narrow-band imaging (NBI) magnifying endoscopic classification of colorectal tumors proposed by the Japan NBI Expert Team. Dig Endosc. 2016;28:526–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hewett DG, Kaltenbach T, Sano Y, et al. Validation of a simple classification system for endoscopic diagnosis of small colorectal polyps using narrow-band imaging. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:599–607.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Puig I, Lopez-Ceron M, Arnau A, et al. Accuracy of the narrow-band imaging international colorectal endoscopic classification system in identification of deep invasion in colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology. 2019;156:75–87.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Haggitt RC, Glotzbach RE, Soffer EE, et al. Prognostic factors in colorectal carcinomas arising in adenomas: implications for lesions removed by endoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology. 1985;89:328–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kudo S. Endoscopic mucosal resection of flat and depressed types of early colorectal cancer. Endoscopy. 1993;25:455–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kikuchi R, Takano M, Takagi K, et al. Management of early invasive colorectal cancer. Risk of recurrence and clinical guidelines. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38:1286–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Nascimbeni R, Burgart LJ, Nivatvongs S, et al. Risk of lymph node metastasis in T1 carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:200–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kitajima K, Fujimori T, Fujii S, et al. Correlations between lymph node metastasis and depth of submucosal invasion in submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma: a Japanese collaborative study. J Gastroenterol. 2004;39:534–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ueno H, Mochizuki H, Hashiguchi Y, et al. Risk factors for an adverse outcome in early invasive colorectal carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:385–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Beaton C, Twine CP, Williams GL, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of histopathological factors influencing the risk of lymph node metastasis in early colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15:788–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Jayanna M, Burgess NG, Sing R, et al. Cost-analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection vs surgery for large laterally spreading colorectal lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14:271–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Ahlenstiel G, Hourigan LF, Brown G, et al. Actual endoscopic versus predicted surgical mortality for treatment of advanced mucosal neoplasia of the colon. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:668–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Uno Y, Munakata A. The non-lifting sign of invasive colon cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;40(4):485–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Repici A, Wallace M, Sharma P, et al. A novel submucosal injection solution for endoscopic resection of large colorectal lesions: a randomized, double-blind trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:527–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Moss SJ, Williams LF, Hourigan LF, et al. Long-term adenoma recurrence following wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection (WF-EMR) for advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia is infrequent: results and risk factors in 1000 cases from the Australian Colonic EMR (ACE) study. Gut. 2015;64:57–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Pohl H, Grimm IS, Moyet MT, et al. Clip closure prevents bleeding after endoscopic resection of large colon polyps in a randomized trial. Gastroenterology. 2019;157:977–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Khashab M, Eid E, Rusche M, et al. Incidence and predictors of “late” recurrences after endoscopic piecemeal resection of large sessile adenomas. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:344–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Klein A, Tate DJ, Jayasekeran V, et al. Thermal ablation of mucosal defect margins reduces adenoma recurrence after colonic endoscopic mucosal resection. Gastroenterology. 2019;156:604–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Benson AB 3rd, Venook AP, Cederquist L, et al. Colon cancer, version 1.2017, NCCN clinical practice guideline in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017;15:370–98.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Ono H, Kondo H, Gotoda T, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of early gastric cancer. Gut. 2001;48:225–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Nakamura M, et al. Successful outcomes of a novel endoscopic treatment for GI tumors: endoscopic submucosal dissection with a mixture of high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid, glycerin, and sugar. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:243–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Mehta N, Strong AT, Franco M, et al. Optimal injection solution for endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized controlled trial of Western solutions in a porcine model. Dig Endosc. 2018;30:347–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Miura Y, Hayashi Y, Lefor AK, et al. The pocket-creation method of ESD for gastric neoplasms. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83:457–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Yang D, Draganov PV. Gaining traction: pulley-ing your weight during endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;89:185–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Yang D, Jawaid S, Perbtani YB, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of a large rectal lesion by use of a novel tissue retractor system. VideoGIE. 2019;4:37–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Takezawa T, Hayashi Y, Shinozaki S, et al. The pocket-creation method facilitates colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;89:1045–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Taku K, Sano Y, Fu KI, et al. Iatrogenic perforation associated with therapeutic colonoscopy: a multicenter study in Japan. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;22:1409–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Lee EJ, Lee JB, Lee SH, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors – 1,000 colorectal ESD cases: one specialized institute’s experiences. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:31–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Saito Y, Uraoka Y, Yamaguchi Y, et al. A prospective, multicenter study of 1111 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:1217–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Kotzev AI, Yang D, Draganov PV. How to master endoscopic submucosal dissection in the USA. Dig Endosc. 2019;31:94–100.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Fuccio L, Hassan C, Ponchon T, et al. Clinical outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review and met-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86:74–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Yang D, Aihara H, Perbtani YB, et al. Safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal neoplasia: a multicenter North American experience. Endosc Int Open. 2019;07:E1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Moore JS, Cataldo PA, Osler T, et al. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is more effective than traditional transanal excision for resection of rectal masses. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:1026–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. de Graaf EJR, Doornebosch PG, Tetteroo GWM, et al. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is feasible for adenomas throughout the entire rectum: a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:1107–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Tsai BM, Finne CO, Nordenstam JF, et al. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery resection of rectal tumors: outcomes and recommendations. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:16–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Barendse RM, Musters GD, de Graaf EJ, et al. Randomised controlled trial of transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus endoscopic mucosal resection for large rectal adenomas (TREND Study) Gut. 2018;67:837–46.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Lee L, Burke JP, deBeche-Adams T, et al. Transanal minimally invasive surgery for local excision of benign and malignant rectal neoplasia. Outcomes from 200 consecutive cases with midterm follow up. Ann Surg. 2018;267:910–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. ASGE Technology Committee, Kethu SR, Banerjee S, Desilets D, et al. Endoscopic tattoing. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:681–5.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Matsuda T, Fukuzawa M, Uraoka T, et al. Risk of lymph node metastasis in patients with pedunculated type early invasive colorectal cancer: a retrospective multicenter study. Cancer Sci. 2011;102:1693–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Yang D, Othman M, Draganov PV. Endoscopic mucosal resection vs endoscopic submucosal dissection for Barrett’s esophagus and colorectal neoplasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17:1019–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Tanaka S, Kashida H, Saito Y, et al. JGES guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection. Dig Endosc. 2015;27:417–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Bach SP, Hill J, Monson JRT, Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM) Collaboration, et al. A predictive model for local recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2009;96:280–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Allaix ME, Arezzo A, Caldart M, et al. Endoscopic microsurgery for rectal neoplasms: experience of 300 consecutive cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:1831–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Chang HC, Huang SC, Chen JS, et al. Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in pT1 and pT2 rectal cancer: a single-institute experience in 943 patients and literature review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:2477–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Gimon TI, Dykstra MA, Chezar K, et al. Malignant colorectal polyp pathology: are we getting sufficient information to make decisions? Dis Colon Rectum. 2020;63:135–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Sharma V, Junejo MA, Mitchel PJ. Current management of malignant colorectal polyps across a regional United Kingdom cancer network. Dis Colon Rectum. 2020;63:39–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Cao Y, Liao C, Tan A, et al. Meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Endoscopy. 2009;41:751–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Niimi K, Fujishiro M, Kodashima S, et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms. Endoscopy. 2010;42:723–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Yoda Y, Ikematsu H, Matsuda T, et al. A large-scale multicenter study of long-term outcomes after endoscopic resection for submucosal invasive colorectal cancer. Endoscopy. 2013;45:718–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:844–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Hassan C, Quintero E, Dumonceau JM, et al. Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy. 2013;45:842–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Holt BA, Bourke MJ. Wide field endoscopic resection for advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia: current status and future directions. Perspect Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10(9):969–79.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Tanaka S, et al. High-magnification colonoscopy (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64(4):604–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Nivatvongs S. Surgical management of malignant colorectal polyps. Surg Clin North Am. 2002;82:959–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Mohamed M, Schofield JB. The pathology of colorectal polyps and cancers (including biopsy). Surgery. 2014;32:165–71.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dennis Yang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yang, D., Whiteford, M.H. (2022). Management of Malignant Polyps. In: Steele, S.R., Hull, T.L., Hyman, N., Maykel, J.A., Read, T.E., Whitlow, C.B. (eds) The ASCRS Textbook of Colon and Rectal Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66049-9_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66049-9_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-66048-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-66049-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics