Abstract
What are the interfaces between migration, social protection and gender? In this chapter, we approach this issue from critical standpoints on gender relations and transnational dynamics. First, we introduce the feminist critique that calls into question the nationalist and masculinist assumptions that characterise the agenda that conceived welfare regimes as “national worlds.” Esping-Andersen’s framework highlights the relationships between states and markets, relegating the family (and therefore women) to a subsidiary level in the welfare provision and neglecting the importance of the internationalisation of productive and reproductive work. Then, we present the research agenda on transnational social protection (TSP) that emerged from the necessity to understand the new forms of production and (re)distribution of social protection. Finally, from the perspectives on migration and the gendered nature of the labour markets, the circulation of care and the intersectionality of inequalities, we argue that TSP takes the form of a gendered quest, insofar it is only made possible through the continuous, reflexive and risky (often sacrificial) action of women involved in transnational strategies of social protection.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alicea, M. (1997). “A Chambered Nautilus”: The contradictory nature of Puerto Rican women’s role in the social construction of a transnational com-munity. Gender and Society, II(5), 597–626.
Amelina, A. (2017). Transnationalizing inequalities in Europe: Sociocultural boundaries, assemblages and regimes of intersection. London: Routledge.
Avato, J., Koettl, J., & Sabates-Wheeler, R. (2010). Social security regimes, global estimates, and good practices: The status of social protection for international migrants. World Development, 38(4), 455–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.10.003.
Baldassar, L., & Merla, L. (Eds.). (2014). Transnational families, migration and the circulation of care: Understanding mobility and absence in family life. New York and London: Routledge.
Bilecen, B., & Barglowski, K. (2015). On the assemblages of informal and formal transnational social protection. Population, Space and Place, 21(3), 203–214.
Bilecen, B., Barglowski, K., Faist, T., & Kofman, E. (2019). Gendered dynamics of transnational social protection. Comparative Migration Studies, 7(47), 1–14.
Boccagni, P. (2016). Searching for well-being in care work migration: Constructions, practices and displacements among immigrant women in Italy. Social Politics, 23(2), 284–306. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxv031.
Bryceson, D., & Vuorela, U. (Eds.). (2002). The transnational family: New European frontiers and global networks. Oxford: Berg.
Castellani, S., & Martín-Díaz, E. (2019). Re-writing the domestic role: Transnational migrants’ households between informal and formal social protection in Ecuador and in Spain. Comparative Migration Studies, 7(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-018-0108-0.
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299.
Dankyi, E., Mazzucato, V., & Manuh, T. (2017). Reciprocity in global social protection: Providing care for migrants’ children. Oxford Development Studies, 45(1), 80–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2015.1124078.
De Guchteneire, P., & Pécoud, A. (2009). Introduction: The UN convention on migrant workers’ rights. In R. Cholewinski, P. De Guchteneire, & A. Pecoud (Eds.), Migration and human rights: The United Nations convention on migrant workers’ rights (pp. 1–44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511811272.001.
Erel, U., & Lutz, H. (2012). Gender and transnationalism. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 19(4), 409–412; 409–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506812461466.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. https://doi.org/10.2307/2073705.
Faist, T., & Gerdes, J. (2008). Dual citizenship in an age of mobility. Transatlantic Council on Migration, 63(1), 1–21.
Fingarova, J. (2019). Agency in transnational social protection: Practices of migrant families between Bulgaria and Germany. Berlin: Frank & Timme.
Franzoni, J. (2008). Domesticar la incertidumbre en América Latina: mercado laboral, política social y familias. San José: Editorial UCR.
Franzoni, J. M., & Voorend, K. (2009). ¿Es posible (des) encadenar la desigualdad de género en América latina? Documentos de Trabajo (Fundación Carolina), 32, 143–152.
Gómez, C. G. G. (2019). Social protection on the move: A transnational exploration of Nicaraguan migrant women’s engagement with social protection in Spain and Nicaragua (Working Paper, No. 648). International Institute of Social Studies.
Gornick, J. C., Meyers, M. K., & Ross, K. E. (1997). Supporting the employment of mothers: Policy variation across fourteen welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy, 7(1), 45–70.
Gough, I., & Wood, G. (2004). Insecurity and welfare regimes in Asia, Africa and Latin America: Social policy in development contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gubaray, C. G. (2019). Social protection on the move: A transnational exploration of Nicaraguan migrant women’s engagement with social protection in Spain and Nicaragua (Working Paper, No. 48). The Haye: Institute of Social Studies.
Hondagneu-Sotelo, P., & Avila, E. (1997). I’m here, but I’m there’ the meanings of Latina transnational motherhood. Gender and Society, 11(5), 548–571.
Hujo, K., & Piper, N. (2010). South-South migration implications for social policy and development. New York: Plagrave Macmillan.
Kilkey, M., & Bradshaw, J. (1999). Lone mothers, economic well-being, and policies. In D. Sainsbury (Ed.), Gender and welfare state regimes (pp. 147–184). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kilkey, M., & Merla, L. (2014). Situating transnational families’ caregiving arrangements: The role of institutional contexts. Global Networks, 14(2), 210–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12034.
Lacroix, T. (2014). Conceptualizing transnational engagements: A structure and agency perspective on (hometown) transnationalism. International Migration Review, 48(3), 643–679.
Lafleur, J.-M., & Lizin, O. (2015). Transnational health insurance schemes: A new avenue for Congolese immigrants in Belgium to care for their relatives’ health from abroad? Following the Flows: Transnational Approaches to Intangible Remittances, 3/2015(3). Retrieved from http://seminars.wcfia.harvard.edu/files/tsi/files/3-lafleur2015_tsiworkingpaper.pdf.
Lafleur, J., & Vivas-Romero, M. (2018). Combining transnational and intersectional approaches to immigrants’ social protection: The case of Andean families’ access to health. Comparative Migration Studies, 6(14), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-018-0073-7.
Landolt, P., & Da, W. (2005). The spatially ruptured practices of migrant families: A comparison of immigrants from El Salvador and the People’s Republic of China. Current Sociology, 53(4), 625–653. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392105052719.
Levitt, P., Viterna, J., Mueller, A., & Lloyd, C. (2017). Transnational social protection: Setting the agenda. Oxford Development Studies, 45(1), 2–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2016.1239702.
Lewis, J. (1992). Gender and the development of welfare regimes. Journal of European Social Policy, 2(3), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/095892879200200301.
Lewis, J. (1997). Gender and welfare regimes: Further thoughts. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 4(2), 160–177. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/4.2.160.
Lister, R. (1997). Citizenship: Towards a feminist synthesis. Feminist Review, 57(1), 28–48.
Mahler, S. J., & Pessar, P. (2006). Gender matters: Ethnographers bring gender from the periphery toward the core. International Migration Review, 40(1), 27–63.
Mahler, S. J., Chaudhuri, M., & Patil, V. (2015). Scaling intersectionality: Advancing feminist analysis of transnational families. Sex Roles, 73(3), 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0506-9.
Mccall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture, 30(3), 1771–1800.
Merla, L., & Baldassar, L. (2016). Concluding reflections: ‘Care circulation’ in an increasingly mobile world: Further thoughts. Papers: Revista de Sociologia, 101(2), 275–284. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers.2268.
O’Connor, J. S. (1993). Gender, class and citizenship in the comparative analysis of welfare state regimes: Theoretical and methodological issues. British Journal of Sociology, 44(3), 501–518.
Orloff, A. S. (1993). Gender and the social rights of citizenship: The comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare states. American Sociological Review, 58(3), 303–328.
Parella, S., & Speroni, T. (2018). Las perspectivas transnacionales para el análisis de la protección social en contextos migratorios. Autoctonía Revista de Ciencias Sociales e Historia, 2(1), 37–46.
Parreñas, R. S. (2001). Servants of globalization: Women, migration and domestic work. Redwood City: Standford University Press.
Paul, R. (2017). Welfare without borders: Unpacking the bases of transnational social protection for international migrants. Oxford Development Studies, 45(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2016.1271868.
Righard, E., & Boccagni, P. (2015). Mapping the theoretical foundations of the social work–migration nexus. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 13(3), 229–244.
Sabates-Wheeler, R., & Feldman, R. (2011). Migration and social protection: Claiming social rights beyond borders. London: Springer.
Sabates-Wheeler, R., Koettl, J., & Avato, J. (2011). Social security for migrants: A global overview of portability arrangements. In R. Sabates-Wheeler & R. Feldman (Eds.), Migration and social protection: Claiming social rights beyond borders (pp. 91–116). London: Springer.
Sainsbury, D. (Ed.). (1997). Gendering welfare states. London: Sage.
Sainsbury, D. (1999). Gender and welfare state regimes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sainsbury, D. (2006). Immigrants’ social rights in comparative perspective: Welfare regimes, forms in immigration and immigration policy regimes. Journal of European Social Policy, 16(3), 229–244.
Serra Mingot, E. (2019). The gendered burden of transnational care-receiving: Sudanese families across The Netherlands, the UK and Sudan. Gender, Place & Culture, 27(4), 546–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369x.2019.1611546.
Serra Mingot, E., & Mazzucato, V. (2018). Moving for a ‘better welfare’? The case of transnational Sudanese families. Global Networks, 19(2), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12224.
Speroni, T. (2017). It is not only about access: Transnational Bolivian families in Barcelona and their meanings of social protection. RIEM, 7(3), 74–103.
Speroni, T. (2019). Desencajes y Bricolajes de la Protección Social: Las familias Transnacionales Bolivianas en Barcelona y São Paulo. Doctoral thesis. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona—UAB; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul—UFRGS.
Thimm, V., & Chaudhuri, M. (2019, February 24). Migration as mobility? An intersectional approach. Applied Mobilities, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/23800127.2019.1573780.
Trifiletti, R. (1999). Southern European welfare regimes and the worsening position of women. Journal of European Social Policy, 9(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/095892879900900103.
Wimmer, A., & Glick Schiller, N. (2002). Methodological nationalism and beyond: Nation-state building, migration and the social sciences. Global Networks, 2(4), 301–334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0374.000.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Parella, S., Speroni, T. (2021). Social Protection, Gender and International Migrations: From National Worlds to Transnational Quests. In: Mora, C., Piper, N. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Gender and Migration. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63347-9_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63347-9_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-63346-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-63347-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)