Skip to main content

Quality Assurance and the Cannabis Analytical Laboratory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cannabis Laboratory Fundamentals
  • 575 Accesses

Abstract

Testing laboratories rely on a broad array of standards from sources such as regulatory bodies, analytical test methods, and materials to ensure the reliability and trueness of their test results. In the cannabis testing industry, one of the most common standards is ISO/IEC 17025. This chapter will provide a general overview of the most common laboratory standard, intent of several clauses within the standard, and discuss some of the more egregious risks to laboratories. Included will be more detailed description of a laboratory’s Quality Management System and its major components, and discussion on some of the more challenging issues common to laboratories testing cannabis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. https://www.iso.org/home.html. Accessed 15 Jul 2020

  2. https://www.ilac.org. Accessed 15 Jul 2020

  3. ISO 9001:2015 (2016) Quality management systems—requirements. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  4. https://davidson.weizmann.ac.il/en/online/sciencepanorama/straight-crooked-ruler. Accessed 15 Jul 2020

  5. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1986/06/10/challenger-disaster-blamed-on-o-rings-pressure-to-launch/6b331ca1-f544-4147-8e4e-941b7a7e47ae/. Accessed 15 Jul 2020

  6. https://instrumentationtools.com/o-ring-failure/. Accessed 15 Jul 2020

  7. https://infogalactic.com/info/Rogers_Commission_Report. Accessed 15 Jul 2020

  8. https://fortune.com/2020/02/07/hyundai-recall-2020-engine-fires/

  9. ISO/IEC 17025:2017(E) (2017) General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  10. ISO/IEC 17034:2016 (2016) General requirements for the competence of reference material producers. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  11. ISO Guide 35:2017 (2017) Reference materials—guidance for characterization and assessment of homogeneity and stability. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  12. ISO/IEC Guide 99:2007 (2007) International vocabulary of metrology—basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM). International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ellison SLR, Barwic VJ, Duguid Farrant TJ (2009) Practical statistics for the analytical chemist: a bench guide. RCS Publishing, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  14. Eurachem (2014) The fitness for purpose of analytical methods: a laboratory guide to method validation and related topics, 2nd edn

    Google Scholar 

  15. Prichard E, Barwick V (2007) Quality assurance and analytical chemistry. Wiley, West Sussex

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. ISO Guide 98:1995 (1995) Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bettencourt da Silva R, Williams A (eds) (2015) Eurachem/CITAC guide: setting and using target uncertainty in chemical measurement. Available from https://www.eurachem.org

  18. Eurachem/CITAC guide 2000: quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement

    Google Scholar 

  19. Swift JA (1995) Introduction to modern statistical quality control and management. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, FL

    Google Scholar 

  20. ILAC G8:09/2019 (2019) Guidelines on decision rules and statements of conformity. International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation, Silverwater

    Google Scholar 

  21. Decision rules and statements of conformity, Lab 48, Edition 3 Jun 2020, United Kingdom Accreditation Service (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  22. ISO/IEC 19011:2018 (2018) Guidelines for auditing management system. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  23. H.R.5484—Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, 99th Congress (1985–1986)

    Google Scholar 

  24. The Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970, Pub.L. 91-513, 84 Stat. 1236, enacted 27 Oct 1970

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Audino, S. (2021). Quality Assurance and the Cannabis Analytical Laboratory. In: Opie, S.R. (eds) Cannabis Laboratory Fundamentals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62716-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics