Skip to main content

Human-Robot Teams: A Review

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Robotics (ICSR 2020)

Abstract

Research on human-robots teams (HRTs) as teams in which humans and robots work together is an emerging interdisciplinary field that still has white spots that are only slowly being considered by researchers. This review aims to provide an overview over different viewpoints towards HRTs and to synchronize extant definitions. We review extant conceptual and empirical research on HRTs and categorize it following an input-process-output model for teams. After systematically examining what research already knows about HRTs, we identify areas that require further research to gain a deeper understanding of HRTs and discuss proposals for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hoffman, G., Breazeal, C.: Collaboration in human-robot teams. In: AIAA 1st Intelligent Systems Technical Conference (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dell Technologies, Realizing 2030: A Divided Vision of the Future (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burke, J., Murphy, R.: Human-robot interaction in USAR technical search: two heads are better than one. In: RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yazdani, F., Brieber, B., Beetz, M.: Cognition-enabled robot control for mixed human-robot rescue teams. In: Menegatti, E., Michael, N., Berns, K., Yamaguchi, H. (eds.) Intelligent Autonomous Systems 13. AISC, vol. 302, pp. 1357–1369. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08338-4_98

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Bluethmann, W., et al.: Robonaut: a robot designed to work with humans in space. Auton. Robots 14(2–3), 179–197 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fong, T., et al.: The peer-to-peer human-robot interaction project. In: Space 2005 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stock, R.: Drivers of team performance: what do we know and what have we still to learn? Schmalenbach Bus. Rev. 5(3), 274–306 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sellner, B., et al.: Coordinated multiagent teams and sliding autonomy for large-scale assembly. Proc. IEEE 94(7), 1425–1444 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gombolay, M.C., Gutierrez, R.A., Clarke, S.G., Sturla, G.F., Shah, J.A.: Decision-making authority, team efficiency and human worker satisfaction in mixed human–robot teams. Auton. Robots 39(3), 293–312 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-015-9457-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Harriott, C.E., Zhang, T., Adams, J.A.: Evaluating the applicability of current models of workload to peer-based human-robot teams. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-robot Interaction (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Groom, V., Nass, C.: Can robots be teammates?: Benchmarks in human–robot teams. Int. Stud. 8(3), 483–500 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gladstein, D.L.: Groups in context: a model of task group effectiveness. Adm. Sci. Q. 29, 499–517 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Barrick, M.R., et al.: Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. J. Appl. Psychol. 83(3), 377 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fong, T., et al.: A preliminary study of peer-to-peer human-robot interaction. In: 2006 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. IEEE (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chita-Tegmark, M., Lohani, M., Scheutz, M.: Gender effects in perceptions of robots and humans with varying emotional intelligence. In: 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bartneck, C., Reichenbach, J., Carpenter, J.: Use of praise and punishment in human-robot collaborative teams. In: ROMAN 2006-The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Arnold, T., Scheutz, M.: Observing robot touch in context: how does touch and attitude affect perceptions of a robot’s social qualities? In: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. Chicago, IL, USA. ACM (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hiatt, L.M., Harrison, A.M., Trafton, J.G.: Accommodating human variability in human-robot teams through theory of mind. In: Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, N., Pynadath, D.V., Hill, S.G.: The impact of pomdp-generated explanations on trust and performance in human-robot teams. In: Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Correia, F., et al.: Exploring prosociality in human-robot teams. In: 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kelly, R., Watts, L.: Slow but likeable? Inefficient robots as caring team members. In: Robots in Groups and Teams: A CSCW 2017 Workshop (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Burke, J., et al.: Toward developing HRI metrics for teams: pilot testing in the field. In: Workshop on Metrics for Human-Robot Interaction, 3rd Ann. Conf. Human-Robot Interaction (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pina, P., et al.: Identifying generalizable metric classes to evaluate human-robot teams. In: Workshop on Metrics for Human-Robot Interaction, 3rd Ann. Conf. Human-Robot Interaction (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dias, M.B., et al.: Sliding autonomy for peer-to-peer human-robot teams (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Goodrich, M.A., et al.: Managing autonomy in robot teams: observations from four experiments. In: 2nd Annual Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). Arlington, VA, USA. IEEE (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Musić, S., Hirche, S.: Control sharing in human-robot team interaction. Ann. Rev. Control 44, 342–354 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang, J., Lewis, M.: Human control for cooperating robot teams. In: 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wang, H., Lewis, M., Chien, S.-Y.: Teams organization and performance analysis in autonomous human-robot teams. In: Proceedings of the 10th Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems Workshop (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wynne, K.T., Lyons, J.B.: An integrative model of autonomous agent teammate-likeness. Theor. Issues in Ergon. Sci. 19(3), 353–374 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Barnes, M.J., Chen, J.Y.C., Jentsch, F., Redden, E.S.: Designing effective soldier-robot teams in complex environments: training, interfaces, and individual differences. In: Harris, D. (ed.) EPCE 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6781, pp. 484–493. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21741-8_51

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Mingyue Ma, L., Fong, T., Micire, M.J., Kim, Y.K., Feigh, K.: Human-robot teaming: concepts and components for design. In: Hutter, M., Siegwart, R. (eds.) Field and Service Robotics. SPAR, vol. 5, pp. 649–663. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67361-5_42

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Tang, F., Parker, L.E.: Peer-to-peer human-robot teaming through reconfigurable schemas. In: AAAI Spring Symposium: To Boldly Go Where No Human-Robot Team Has Gone Before (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  33. You, S., Robert, L.: Subgroup formation in human-robot teams. In: Fortieth International Conference on Information Systems. Munich (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Howard, A.M., Cruz, G.: Adapting human leadership approaches for role allocation in human-robot navigation scenarios. In: 2006 World Automation Congress. IEEE (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  35. You, S., Robert Jr, L.P.: Human-robot similarity and willingness to work with a robotic co-worker. In: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. Chicago, IL, USA. ACM (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Gladden, M.E.: The social robot as ‘Charismatic Leader’: a phenomenology of human submission to nonhuman power. In: Robophilosophy (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kwon, M., et al.: Influencing leading and following in human-robot teams. In: Proceedings of Robotics: Science Systems (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Samani, H.A., Koh, Jeffrey T.K.V., Saadatian, E., Polydorou, D.: Towards robotics leadership: an analysis of leadership characteristics and the roles robots will inherit in future human society. In: Pan, J.-S., Chen, S.-M., Nguyen, N.T. (eds.) ACIIDS 2012. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7197, pp. 158–165. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28490-8_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Samani, H., Cheok, A.: From human-robot relationship to robot-based leadership. In: 4th International Conference on Human System Interaction, HSI 2011 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Reed, K.B., Peshkin, M.A.: Physical collaboration of human-human and human-robot teams. IEEE Trans. Haptics 1(2), 108–120 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. You, S., Robert, L.: Trusting robots in teams: examining the impacts of trusting robots on team performance and satisfaction. In: 52th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Bradshaw, J.M., et al.: From tools to teammates: joint activity in human-agent-robot teams. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCD 2009. LNCS, vol. 5619, pp. 935–944. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02806-9_107

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  43. You, S., Robert, L.: Teaming up with robots: an IMOI (inputs-mediators-outputs-inputs) framework of human-robot teamwork. Int. J. Robot. Eng. 2(3) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Alboul, L., Saez-Pons, J., Penders, J.: Mixed human-robot team navigation in the GUARDIANS project. In: 2008 IEEE International Workshop on Safety, Security and Rescue Robotics. IEEE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bradshaw, J.M., et al.: Human-agent-robot teamwork. IEEE Intell. Syst. 27(2), 8–13 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Laengle, T., Hoeniger, T., Zhu, L.: Cooperation in human-robot-teams. In: ICI&C’1997 Proceedings of the International Conference on Informatics and Control. St. Petersburg, Russia. IEEE (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Liu, C., Tomizuka, M.: Modeling and controller design of cooperative robots in workspace sharing human-robot assembly teams. In: 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Nikolaidis, S., Shah, J.: Human-robot teaming using shared mental models. In: ACM/IEEE HRI (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Nikolaidis, S., Shah, J.: Human-robot cross-training: computational formulation, modeling and evaluation of a human team training strategy. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Riedelbauch, D., Henrich, D.: Coordinating flexible human-robot teams by local world state observation. In: 2017 26th IEEE international symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Scheggi, S., Aggravi, M., Prattichizzo, D.: Cooperative navigation for mixed human–robot teams using haptic feedback. IEEE Trans. Hum.-Mach. Syst. 47(4), 462–473 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Shah, J., et al.: Improved human-robot team performance using chaski, a human-inspired plan execution system. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Gombolay, M.C., Huang, C., Shah, J.: Coordination of human-robot teaming with human task preferences. In: 2015 AAAI Fall Symposium Series (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Kantor, G., et al.: Distributed search and rescue with robot and sensor teams. In: Field and Service Robotics: Recent Advances in Research and Applications, Yuta, S.I. et al., Editors. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 529–538 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Jung, M.F., et al.: Engaging robots: easing complex human-robot teamwork using back channeling. In: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Bozcuoglu, A.K., et al.: Reasoning on communication between agents in a human-robot rescue team. In: Towards Intelligent Social Robots-Current Advances in Cognitive Robotics. Seoul (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Jung, M.F., Martelaro, N., Hinds, P.J.: Using robots to moderate team conflict: the case of repairing violations. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Breazeal, C., et al.: Effects of nonverbal communication on efficiency and robustness in human-robot teamwork. In: 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Kruijff, G.-J., Janicek, M., Zender, H.: Situated communication for joint activity in human-robot teams. IEEE Intell. Syst. 2, 27–35 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Kruijff, G.-J.M., et al.: Designing, developing, and deploying systems to support human–robot teams in disaster response. Adv. Robot. 28(23), 1547–1570 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Kruijff-Korbayová, I., et al.: TRADR project: long-term human-robot teaming for robot assisted disaster response. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz 29(2), 193–201 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-015-0352-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Marge, M., et al.: Exploring spoken dialog interaction in human-robot teams. In: Proceedings of Robots, Games, and Research: Success Stories in USA, RSim IROS Workshop, St. Louis, MO, USA. Citeseer (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Fiore, S.M., et al.: Human-robot teams collaborating socially, organizationally, and culturally. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Bruemmer, D.J., Walton, M.C.: Collaborative tools for mixed teams of humans and robots. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Multi-Robot Systems (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  65. Yi, D., Goodrich, M.: Supporting task-oriented collaboration in human-robot teams using semantic-based path planning. SPIE Defense + Security, Vol. 9084. SPIE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Breazeal, C., et al.: Working collaboratively with humanoid robots. In: 4th IEEE/RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, 2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  67. Bruemmer, D.J., Marble, J.L., Dudenhoeffer, D.D.: Mutual initiative in human-machine teams. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 7th Conference on Human Factors and Power Plants. IEEE (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  68. Marble, J.L., Bruemmer, D.J., Few, D.A.: Lessons learned from usability tests with a collaborative cognitive workspace for human-robot teams. In: 2003 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. IEEE (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Kennedy, W.G., et al.: Spatial representation and reasoning for human-robot collaboration. In: AAAI (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  70. Iqbal, T., Gonzales, M.J., Riek, L.D.: Joint action perception to enable fluent human-robot teamwork. In: 2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  71. Burke, J., Murphy, R.: RSVP: an investigation of remote shared visual presence as common ground for human-robot teams. In: 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  72. Hoffman, G., Breazeal, C.: Effects of anticipatory action on human-robot teamwork efficiency, fluency, and perception of team. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 1–8. Association for Computing Machinery. Arlington, Virginia, USA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  73. Koppula, H.S., Jain, A., Saxena, A.: Anticipatory planning for human-robot teams. In: Experimental Robotics. Springer (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  74. Richert, A., et al.: Robotic workmates: hybrid human-robot-teams in the industry 4.0. In: 11th International Conference on e-Learning (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  75. You, S., Robert, L.: Emotional attachment, performance, and viability in teams collaborating with embodied physical action (EPA) robots. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 19(5), 377–407 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  76. Marble, J.L., et al.: Evaluation of supervisory vs. peer-peer interaction with human-robot teams. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. IEEE (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  77. Ososky, S., et al.: Building appropriate trust in human-robot teams. In: 2013 AAAI Spring Symposium Series (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  78. Freedy, A., et al.: Measurement of trust in human-robot collaboration. In: 2007 International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems. IEEE (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  79. Wang, N., Pynadath, D.V., Hill, S.G.: Trust calibration within a human-robot team: Comparing automatically generated explanations. In: 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  80. Phillips, E., et al.: Human-animal teams as an analog for future human-robot teams. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. SAGE Publications (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  81. Phillips, E., et al.: Human-animal teams as an analog for future human-robot teams: influencing design and fostering trust. J. Hum.-Robot Interact. 5(1), 100–125 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Arnold, H.J.: Moderator variables: a clarification of conceptual, analytic, and psychometric issues. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 29(2), 143–174 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Robert, L.: Motivational theory of human robot teamwork. Int. Robot. Autom. J. 4(4), 248–251 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  84. Wang, N., et al.: Is it my looks? or something i said? the impact of explanations, embodiment, and expectations on trust and performance in human-robot teams. In: Persuasive Technology. Springer International Publishing, Waterloo, ON, Canada (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  85. Arnold, T., Scheutz, M.: Beyond moral dilemmas: exploring the ethical landscape in HRI. In: 2017 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  86. Tamburrini, G.: Robot ethics: a view from the philosophy of science. Ethics Robot. 11–22 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  87. Kirby, R., Forlizzi, J., Simmons, R.: Affective social robots. Robot. Auton. Syst. 58(3), 322–332 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. van Doorn, J., et al.: Domo Arigato Mr. Roboto: emergence of automated social presence in organizational frontlines and customers’ service experiences. J. Serv. Res. 20(1), 43–58 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Ivanov, S.H., Webster, C., Berezina, K.: Adoption of robots and service automation by tourism and hospitality companies. Revista Turismo Desenvolvimento 27(28), 1501–1517 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franziska Doris Wolf .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wolf, F.D., Stock-Homburg, R. (2020). Human-Robot Teams: A Review. In: Wagner, A.R., et al. Social Robotics. ICSR 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12483. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62056-1_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62056-1_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-62055-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-62056-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics