Abstract
Cities across the world are actively exploring the circular economy concept, a key urban planning and design approach for the green transition, simultaneously enabling greater energy and material efficiency and lower pollution, as well as job creation, social inclusion, human health, and well-being. The city can be viewed as a complex socio-ecological system, in which infrastructures and urban forms have co-evolved along with sociocultural practices and the lifestyles of urbanites. Circular design and systemic thinking have not yet been incorporated into the planning and design of the urban built environment, and this limit has progressively created vulnerabilities and risks. Among the various urban resources, available land is often scarce, as it is natural landscape. Consequently, it is particularly important that vacant public space is re-functionalized and brownfield sites are restored. Equally, green infrastructure—urban forests, green roofs, green walls, permeable pavements, and constructed wetlands—provides critical ecosystem services (supporting, provisioning, regulating, and cultural services) at different scales: building, district, city, and region. Green elements and systems in the urban built environment regulate climate, air, and water quality; enable nutrient and water cycling and soil formation; provide space for growing food and for recreation. Using a mixed methods approach, including a literature review and case study analysis, the research identifies several opportunities and challenges to integrated circular actions, “nexus solutions” across various urban challenges, i.e., sociocultural, economic and financial, regulatory, political, institutional, ecological, environmental, and technological. The study then focuses on critical dilemmas faced when implementing nexus solutions. Providing an overview of selected international initiatives, the contribution, leveraging on an extensive interdisciplinary research, aims at showcasing how districts and cities are advancing the circular economy concept in practice. Evidence provided by projects and case studies—such as: Freshkills Park, a landfill reclamation project on Staten Island, in New York City; Royal Seaport, a major urban regeneration project in Stockholm; and Buiksloterham, a neighborhood and an urban living lab in Amsterdam North—are provided, aiming at testing and validating circularity at different scales. The outcomes of the conducted study identify in particular the impacts, both positive (benefits) and negative (trade-offs) of incorporating circularity into the urban planning and design processes, as well as how these can be assessed in order to stir robust systemic change in the long term.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andreucci MB (2017) Progettare Green Infrastructure. Tecnologie, valori e strumenti per la resilienza urbana. Wolters Kluwer, Milano, Italy
Andreucci MB (2019) Progettare l’involucro urbano. Casi studio di progettazione tecnologica ambientale. Wolters Kluwer, Milano, Italy
C40 and Climate KIC (2018) Municipality-led circular economy case studies. Available at https://www.climate-kic.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/circular-cities.pdf
Camaren P, Swilling M (2012) Sustainable resource efficient cities: making it happens. UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya
Croci E, Lucchitta B (2018) Introduction to special session nature-based solutions (NBSs) for urban resilience. Econ Policy Energy Environ 2:2–4
Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2015) Delivering the circular economy—a toolkit for policymakers. Available at https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/publications/EllenMacArthurFoundation__PolicymakerToolkit.pdf
Ellen MacArthur Foundation and Arup (2018) The circular economy opportunity for urban and industrial innovation in China. Available at https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/publications/chinareport
Ellen Macarthur Foundation and Arup (2019) Circular economy in cities. Project guide. Available at https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/CE-in-Cities-Project-Guide_Mar19.pdf
European Commission (2015) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM (2015) 614 final Closing the loop—an EU action plan for the circular economy. Brussels 2.12.2105. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52015DC0614
Freshkills Park: Site History (n.d.) Retrieved on March, 2019 from the New York City Department of Parks and Recreation web site. Available at https://www.nycgovparks.org/park-features/freshkills-park/about-the-site#tabTop
Huang H, Cai J, Gao X, Winarti A, Johani J (2017) Stockholm royal seaport. Thriving sustainable community. Available at https://www.academia.edu/19900873/Stockholm_Royal_Seaport_Redevelopment_Masterplan
Gladek E (Metabolic), van Odijk S (Metabolic), Theuws P (DELVA Landscape Architects), Herder S (Studioninedots) (2014) Circular Buiksloterham—transitioning Amsterdam to a circular city. Available at https://buiksloterham.nl/engine/download/blob/gebiedsplatform/69870/2015/28/CircularBuiksloterham_ENG_Executive_Summary_05_03_2015.pdf?app=gebiedsplatformandclass=9096andid=64andfield=69870
Trash Timeline (n.d.) Retrieved on March 30, 2019 from the BFI Waste Services of Salinas web site https://www.bfi-salinas.com/kids_trash_timeline-printer.cfm
Harnik P, Taylor M, Welle B (2006) From dumps to destinations: the conversion of landfills to parks. Places, 18(1):83–88. Available at https://places.designobserver.com/press/pdf/From_Dumps_to__417.pdf
Marin J, De Meulder B (2018) Interpreting circularity. Circular city representations concealing transition drivers. Sustainability 10(5):1310. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051310
OECD (2019) Regional statistics and indicators. Available at https://www.oecd.org/governance/regional-policy/regionalstatisticsandindicators.htm
Royal Seaport (2018) Sustainability report (2018). Available at https://www.stockholmroyalseaport.com
Sachs J, Schmidt-Traub G, Kroll C, Lafortune G, Fuller G (2019) Sustainable development report 2019. Bertelsmann Stiftung and Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN), New York
Science for Environment Policy (2018) Indicators for sustainable cities. In-depth Report 12. Produced for the European Commission DG Environment by the Science Communication Unit, UWE, Bristol. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/science-environment-policy
SDSN and Telos (2019) The 2019 SDG index and dashboards report for European cities (prototype version). Available at https://s3.amazonaws.com/sustainabledevelopment.report/2019/2019_sdg_index_euro_cities.pdf
Seto K, Güneralp B, Hutyra L (2012) Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:16083–16088
Schumacher EF (1973) Small is beautiful. A study of economics as if people matter. Blond and Briggs, London, UK
Sustainable Development Solutions Network (2019) Available at https://www.unsdsn.org/cities
Trucost PLC (2013) Natural capital at risk: the top 100 externalities of business. Available at www.trucost.com
UNEP (2017) UN environment annual report. Available at https://www.unenvironment.org/annualreport/2017/index.php
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2019) World urbanization prospects: the 2018 revision (ST/ESA/SER.A/420). New York, United Nations
URBACT (2016) Driving change for better cities. Available at https://urbact.eu/
Urban Agenda for the EU, Circular Economy Action Plan (2018)
Acknowledgments
Conceptualization, MBA; Methodology and case study development, MBA; Writing—original draft, MBA; Writing—review and editing, MBA, EC; Funding, MBA. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Andreucci, M.B., Croci, E. (2021). Assessing Integrated Circular Actions as Nexus Solutions Across Different Urban Challenges: Evidence Toward a City-Sensitive Circular Economy. In: Bisello, A., Vettorato, D., Haarstad, H., Borsboom-van Beurden, J. (eds) Smart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions. SSPCR 2019. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57332-4_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57332-4_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57331-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57332-4
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)