Abstract
The addition of explicit, faithfully represented dynamics to diagrams that depict complex behaviours may negatively affect viewers’ information processing and prejudice their comprehension of the referent subject matter. This presentation introduces a methodological tool for identifying and characterizing likely sources of the negative consequences that can arise from an animated diagram’s dynamics. Event Unit Analysis offers a systematic way to document these sources so that they can be minimized by implementing changes in how animations are designed. This analytical methodology underlies the development of a novel animation design approach that significantly improves viewer comprehension over that obtained using conventionally designed animations. The origins of event unit analysis in the theoretical framework of the Animation Processing Model and its development as a tool for analyzing increasingly sophisticated dynamics are described. Its potential breadth of its application and opportunities for further elaboration are illustrated through two contrasting types of content.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bernay, S., Bétrancourt, M.: Does animation enhance learning? A meta-analysis. Comput. Educ. 101, 150–167 (2016)
Cutting, J.E.: Representing motion in a static image: constraints and parallels in art, science, and popular culture. Perception 31, 1165–1193 (2002)
Hegarty, M., Sims, V.K.: Individual differences in mental animation during mechanical reasoning. Mem. Cogn. 22, 411–430 (1994)
Lowe, R.K.: Animation and learning: Selective processing of information in dynamic graphics. Learn. Instr. 13, 157–176 (2003)
Lowe, R.K., Boucheix, J.-M.: Cueing complex animations: does direction of attention foster learning processes? Learn. Instr. 5, 650–663 (2011)
Boucheix, J.-M., Lowe, R.K., Putri, D.K., Groff, J.: Cueing animations: dynamic signalling aids information extraction and comprehension. Learn. Instr. 25, 71–84 (2013)
Lowe, R., Boucheix, J.-M.: Learning from animated diagrams: how are mental models built? In: Stapleton, G., Howse, J., Lee, J. (eds.) Diagrams 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5223, pp. 266–281. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87730-1_25
Rosenholtz, R.: Capacity limits and how the visual system copes with them. Electron. Imaging (Proc. Hum. Vis. Elect. Imaging) 16, 8–23 (2017)
Boucheix, J.-M., Lowe, R.K.: An eye tracking comparison of external pointing cues and internal continuous cues in learning from complex animation. Learn. Instr. 20, 123–135 (2010)
de Koning, B.B., Jarodzka, H.: Attention guidance strategies for supporting learning from dynamic visualizations. In: Lowe, R., Ploetzner, R. (eds.) Learning from Dynamic Visualization, pp. 255–278. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56204-9_11
Wolfe, J.M., Horowitz, T.S.: Five factors that guide attention in visual search. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1, 1–8 (2017)
Narayanan, N.H., Hegarty, M.: Multimedia design for communication of dynamic information. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 57, 279–315 (2002)
Lowe, R.K., Boucheix, J.-M.: Principled animation design improves comprehension of complex dynamics. Learn. Instr. 45, 72–84 (2016)
Lowe, R., Boucheix, J.-M.: Dynamic diagrams: a composition alternative. In: Cox, P., Plimmer, B., Rodgers, P. (eds.) Diagrams 2012. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7352, pp. 233–240. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31223-6_24
O’Connor, S.M., Dawson, T.J., Kram, R., Donelan, J.M.: The kangaroo’s tail propels and powers pentapedal locomotion. Biol. Let. 10, 20140381 (2014)
Kriz, S., Hegarty, M.: Top-down and bottom-up influences on learning from animations. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 65, 911–930 (2007)
Boucheix, J-M., Porte, L., Lowe, R.K.: Investigating fundamental features of complexity in animation processing. Paper to be Presented at EARLI SIG 2 Meeting, Prague, August 2020
Zacks, J.M., Speer, N.K., Swallow, K.M., Braver, T.S., Reynolds, J.R.: Event perception: a mind/brain perspective. Psychol. Bull. 133, 273–293 (2007)
Scheiter, K.: Design of effective dynamic visualizations: a struggle between the beauty and the beast? commentary on parts I and II. In: Lowe, R., Ploetzner, R. (eds.) Learning from Dynamic Visualization, pp. 233–251. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56204-9_10
McGill, G.G.: Designing instructional science visualizations in the trenches: where research meets production reality. In: Lowe, R., Ploetzner, R. (eds.) Learning from Dynamic Visualization, pp. 119–150. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56204-9_6
Acknowledgment
The authors sincerely thank David Edmonds, Veterinarian, for his expert advice regarding the biomechanics of kangaroo locomotion.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lowe, R., Boucheix, JM. (2020). Event Unit Analysis: A Methodology for Anticipating Processing Demands of Complex Animated Diagrams. In: Pietarinen, AV., Chapman, P., Bosveld-de Smet, L., Giardino, V., Corter, J., Linker, S. (eds) Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Diagrams 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12169. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54249-8_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54249-8_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-54248-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-54249-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)