Skip to main content

A Machine Learning Assistant for Choosing Operators and Tuning Their Parameters in Image Processing Tasks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence and Industrial Applications (A2IA 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1193))

Abstract

Operator choosing and parameter tuning in image processing tasks is still to be a challenging problem to achieve good results. This paper discusses the formulation of a solution combining both machine learning and multi-agent system to help users to choose best operators and attribute appropriate values to their parameters in image processing applications. The aspect of cooperative learning makes this solution faster and outperforms one agent learning. The empirical study shows that our solution is effective on finding the optimal vision operators and their parameters’ values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Haralick, R.M., Shanmugan, K., Dinstein, I.: Textural featuresfor image classification. IEEE Trans. Sys. Man Cyber. 3(6), 610−621 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Qaffou, I., Sadgal, M., Elfazziki,A.: A multi-agents architecture to learn vision operators and their parameters. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Iss. (IJCSI) 9(3), 140 (May 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Benchikhi, L., et al.: A novel adaptive discrete cuckoo search algorithm for parameter optimization in computer vision. Intel. Art 20(60), 51–71 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nickolay, B., Schneider, B., Jacob,S.: Parameter optimization of an image processing system using evolutionary algorithms. CAIP, pp. 637–644 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Taylor, G.W.: Areinforcement learning framework for parameter control in computer vision applications. In: Proceedings of the First Canadian Conference on Computer and Robot Vision (CRV'04), IEEE (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sahba, F., Tizhoosh, H.R., Salama, M.: Application of reinforcement learning for segmentation of transrectal ultrasound images. BMC Medical Imaging (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nikos Vlassis.: A concise introduction to multiagent systems and distributed artificial intelligence. Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, 1st edition (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sutton, R.S., Barto A.G.: Reinforcement learning: an introduction. Adaptive computation and machine learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Watkins, C.J.C.H.: Learning from delayed rewards. PhD thesis, Cambridge University (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Manju, S., Punithavalli, M.: An analysis of QLearning algorithms with strategies of reward functions. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng 3(2), 814–820 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Watkins, C.J.C.H., Dayan, P.: Q-learning. Mach. Learn 8, 279–292 (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Claus, C., Boutilier, C.: The dynamics of reinforcement learning in cooperative multiagent systems. In: Proceedings of the Fifteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, p. 746–752 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Matignon, L., Laurent, G.J., Le Fort-Piat, N.: Hysteretic q-learning: an algorithm for decentralized reinforcement learning in cooperative multi-agent teams. In: Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 64–69, San Diego, CA, USA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Swets, J.A.: Signal detection theory and roc analysis in psychology and diagnostics. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Chabrier, S., Laurent, H., Rosenberger, C., Zhang,Y.J.: Supervised evaluation of synthetic and real contour segmentation results. European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Issam Qaffou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Qaffou, I. (2021). A Machine Learning Assistant for Choosing Operators and Tuning Their Parameters in Image Processing Tasks. In: Masrour, T., Cherrafi, A., El Hassani, I. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and Industrial Applications. A2IA 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1193. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51186-9_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics