Skip to main content

Cost-Benefit Analysis and Ecological Discounting

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
New Metropolitan Perspectives (NMP 2020)

Abstract

The discounting of costs and benefits is a critical operation when projects, plans and programmes with long-term extra-financial effects need to be assessed. Therefore, the aim of the paper is first to show the potential deriving from the use of specific procedures to discount the environmental impact of the investment, then to define a probabilistic model for the estimate of the “ecological” Declining Discount Rate and “economic” Declining Discount Rate. The implementation of the model to the data of the Italian economy returns an ecological discount rate lower than the economic one. This means giving more weight to environmental externalities rather than strictly financial repercussions. This has a clear impact on the decision-making process for projects with intergenerational environmental implications.

The contribution to this paper is the result of the joint work of both authors, to which the paper has to be attributed in equal parts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gollier, C.: Ecological discounting. J. Econ. Theory 145, 812–829 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2009.10.001

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Battisti, F., Campo, O: A methodology for determining the profitability index of real estate initiatives involving public-private partnerships, A case study: the integrated intervention programs in Rome. Sustainability 11(5), 1371 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051371

  3. D’Alpaos, C., Marella, G.: Urban planning and option values. Appl. Math. Sci. 8(157–160), 7845–7864 (2014). https://doi.org/10.12988/ams.2014.49744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Morano, P., Tajani, F.: Estimative analysis of a segment of the bare ownership market of residential property. In: Murgante, B., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2013: 13th International Conference, vol. 7974, pp. 433–443. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39649-6_31

  5. Nesticò, A., He, S., De Mare, G., Benintendi, R., Maselli, G.: The ALARP principle in the cost-benefit analysis for the acceptability of investment risk. Sustainability 10(12), 4668 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nesticò, A., Maselli, G.: Intergenerational discounting in the economic evaluation of projects. In: Calabrò, F., Della Spina, L., Bevilacqua, C. (eds.) New Metropolitan Perspectives. ISHT 2018. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol. 101, pp. 260–268, Springer, Cham (2019). https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92102-0_28

  7. Newell, R.G., Pizer, W.A.: Discounting the distant future: how much do uncertain rates increase valuations? J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 46(1), 52–71 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-0696(02)00031-1

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Arrow, K.J., Maureen, L., Cropper, C.G., Groom B., Heal, G.M., Newell, R.G., Nordhaus, W.D.: How should benefits and costs be discounted in an intergenerational context? the views of an expert panel. In: Resources for the Future Discussion Paper, pp. 12–53 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2199511

  9. Weitzman, M.: On the environmental discount rate. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 26(2), 200–209 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1994.1012

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Weitzman, M.: Why the far-distant future should be discounted at its lowest possible rate. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 36(3), 201–208 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1998.1052

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Weitzman, M.: Gamma discounting. Am. Econ. Rev. 91(1), 261–271 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.1.260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Henderson, N., Langford, I.: Cross-disciplinary evidence for hyperbolic social discount rates. Manag. Sci. 44(11), 1493–1500 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.11.1493

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Nesticò, A., Maselli, G.: Estimating the declining discount rate in the economic evaluation of projects in the energy and water sectors. In: Frontiers in Water-Energy-Nexus – Solutions, Advanced Technologies and Best Practices for Environmental Sustainability, Springer Nature, Heidelberg (2018). https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13068-8_4

  14. Cropper, M.L., Laibson D.: The implications of hyperbolic discounting for project evaluation. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series 1943, Washington, DC (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gollier, C.: Pricing the Planet’s Future: The Economics of Discounting in an Uncertain World. Princeton University Press, New Jersey (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Weikard, H.P., Zhu, X.: Discounting and environmental quality: when should dual rates be used? Econ. Model. 22, 868–878 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2005.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Müller, F.G.: The discounting confusion: an ecological economics perspective. Economía 36(71), 57–74 (2013). ISSN 0254-4415

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nesticò, A., Maselli, G.: Declining discount rate estimate in the long-term economic evaluation of environmental projects. J. Environ. Account. Manag. 8(1), 93–110 (2020). https://doi.org/10.5890/JEAM.2020.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dasgupta, A., Pearce, D.: Cost-Benefit Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan, London (1972)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Pearce, D., Ulph, D.: A social discount rate for United Kingdom. In: Pearce, D. (ed.) Environmental Economics: Essays in Ecological Economics and Sustainable Development, pp. 268–285. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Evans, D.J., Kula, E.: Social discount rates and welfare weights for public investment decisions under budgetary restrictions: the case of cyprus. In: VIII Milan European Economic Workshop, University of Milan, Working Paper 19 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stern, N.: Welfare weights and the elasticity of marginal utility of income. In: Artis, M., Norbay, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Association of University Teachers of Economics, Blackwell, Oxford (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cowell, F.A. Karen A.G.: Welfare Weights. STICERD Research Paper No. 20. London School of Economics, London (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hoel, M., Sterner, T.: Discounting and relative prices. Clim. Change 84(265–280), 2007 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-007-9255-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sterner, T., Persson, M.: An even sterner report: introducing relative prices into the discounting debate. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 2(1), 71–76 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rem024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nesticò, A., Maselli, G.: Sustainability indicators for the economic evaluation of tourism investments on islands. J. Clean. Prod. 248, 119217 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nesticò, A., Moffa, R.: Economic analysis and operational research tools for estimating productivity levels in off-site construction [Analisi economiche e strumenti di Ricerca Operativa per la stima dei livelli di produttività nell’edilizia off-site]. Valori e Valutazioni 20, 107–126 (2018). ISSN: 2036-2404

    Google Scholar 

  28. Calabrò, F., Tramontana, C., Cassalia, G., Rizzuto, M.C.: Economic sustainability in the management of archaeological sites: the case of bova marina (Reggio Calabria, Italy). In: Calabrò, F., Della Spina, L., Bevilacqua, C., (eds.) New Metropolitan Perspectives, ISHT 2018. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies 101, 288–297. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92102-0_31

  29. Troisi, R., Alfano, G.: Towns as safety organizational fields: an institutional framework in times of emergency. Sustainability 11(24), 7025 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Della Spina, L.: A multi-level integrated approach to designing complex urban scenarios in support of strategic planning and urban regeneration. In: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol. 100, pp. 226–237. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92099-3_27

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Nesticò .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nesticò, A., Maselli, G. (2021). Cost-Benefit Analysis and Ecological Discounting. In: Bevilacqua, C., Calabrò, F., Della Spina, L. (eds) New Metropolitan Perspectives. NMP 2020. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 178. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48279-4_42

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics