Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Social Media and the Armed Forces pp 207–225Cite as

Misinformation and Disinformation in Social Media as the Pulse of Finnish National Security

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Social media is becoming more and more of a security threat. Dissatisfaction with the content and quality of the information flow is increasing not only at a national level, but also at the level of people’s everyday lives. Social media is one of the key channels for distributing misinformation and disinformation and has also become a key instrument for influencing political activity in particular. We define misinformation as shared information which is unintentionally false, whereas disinformation refers to false information which is purposefully shared for systematic informational influencing as well as for propaganda. The post-Cold War age has created a new global power order by using information – which is increasingly shared through social media – for political purposes. Small countries like Finland have become more and more dependent on the global information flow, while at the same time increasingly being subjected to the proliferation of misinformation and disinformation. Hence, social media has become an ever-more crucial factor in terms of national security threats. At the same time, however, it is also a potential platform for creating (generalised) trust in national security by means of sharing correct information among citizens. This study focuses on the flow of misinformation and disinformation on social media in relation to armed forces and national security. In this contribution, we also address issues related to the role of generalised trust for psychological resilience and explore the European Union’s role in countering disinformation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    All statements in the following chapter are based on the interview. For an easier reading flow, in-text citations were omitted, except in case of direct quotes.

  2. 2.

    All direct quotes taken from the interview were translated into English by the authors of this contribution.

References

  • Aaltola M, Juntunen T (2018) Nordic model meets resilience – Finnish strategy for societal security. In: Sprūds A, Kuznetsov B, Aaltola M (eds) Societal security in the Baltic Sea region. Latvian Institute for Foreign Affairs, Rïga, pp 26–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramson J (2017) Trust and democracy, knight commission on trust, media, and American democracy. The Aspen Institute, July 2017 [online]. [Viewed 4 February 2020]. Available from: https://www.aspeninstitute.org/programs/communications-and-society-program/knight-commission-workshop-trust-media-american-democracy-2/

  • Agarwal N, Bandeli KK (2018) Examining strategic integration of social media platforms in disinformation campaign coordination. Def Strateg Commun 4(Spring):173–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Bäck M, Kestilä-Kekkonen E (eds) (2019) Political and social trust: pathways, trends and gaps (in Finnish). Publications of the Ministry of Finance 2019, (31)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakir V, McStay A (2018) Fake news and the economy of emotions: problems, causes, solutions. Digit Journal 6(2):154–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett L, Livingston S (2018) The disinformation order: disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. Eur J Commun 33(2):122–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg M, Johansson T (2016) Trust and safety in the segregated city: contextualizing the relationship between institutional trust, crime-related insecurity and generalized trust. Scand Polit Stud 39(4):458–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Berzins J (2018) Public hearing of the Select Committee on deliberate online falsehoods. Channelnewsasia [online]. [Viewed 27 June 2019]. Available from: https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/society-s-mental-state-a-key-battleground-for-misinformation-10045296

  • Blind PK (2006) Building trust in government in the twenty-first century: review of literature and emerging issues. UNDESA 7th Global Forum on Reinventing Government, 26–29 June 2007, Vienna. United Nations Department of Economic Social Affairs (UNDESA), New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Boda Z, Medve-Balint G (2017) How perception and personal contact matter: the individual determinants of trust in police in Hungary. Polic Soc 27(7):732–749

    Google Scholar 

  • Caliskan M, Cramers P-A (2018) What do you mean by “Hybrid Warfare”? A content analysis on the media coverage of hybrid warfare concept. Horiz Insights 1:23–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Sin SCJ, Theng YL, Lee CS (2015) Why students share misinformation on social media: motivation, gender, and study-level differences. J Acad Librariansh 41(5):583–592

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Helsinki (2018) Helsinki in the era of hybrid threats – hybrid influencing and the city, vol 22. Publications of the Central Administration, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Foreign Relations (2018) Putin’s asymmetric assault on democracy in Russia and Europe: implications for U.S. national security. United States Senate, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union (2019) Complementary efforts to enhance resilience and counter hybrid threats. Council Conclusions 10 December 2019

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Vicario M, Bessi A, Zollo F, Petroni F, Scala A, Caldarelli G, Stanley HE, Quattrociocchi W (2016) The spreading of misinformation online. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113(3):554–559

    Google Scholar 

  • DiResta R, Shaffer K, Ruppel B, Sullivan D, Matney R, Fox R, Albright J, Johnson B (2018) The tactics & tropes of the internet research agency. New Knowledge, New York. [online]. Available from: https://disinformationreport.blob.core.windows.net/disinformation-report/NewKnowledge-Disinformation-Report-Whitepaper-121718.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois E, Blank G (2018) The echo chamber is overstated: the moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. Inf Commun Soc 21(5):729–745

    Google Scholar 

  • EEAS (2019a) Countering disinformation, European External Action Services [online]. [Viewed 28 June 2019]. Available from: https://eeas.europa.eu/topics/countering-disinformation/59411/countering-disinformation_en

  • EEAS (2019b) EU-NATO cooperation – factsheets, European External Action Services [online]. [Viewed 28 June 2019]. Available from: https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-Homepage/28286/eu-nato-cooperation-factsheet_en

  • European Commission (2016) Joint framework on countering hybrid threats – a European Union response. Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council, Brussels, 6 April 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament (2015) Understanding propaganda and disinformation. At a glance November 2015. European Parliament [online]. [Viewed 15 May 2019]. Available from: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2015/571332/EPRS_ATA(2015)571332_EN.pdf

  • European Parliament (2016) EU strategic communication with the Arab world. Briefing May 2016. European Parliamentary Research Service [online]. Available from: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2016/581997/EPRS_BRI(2016)581997_EN.pdf

  • Fallis D (2014) The varieties of disinformation. In: Floridi L, Illari P (eds) The philosophy of information quality. Springer, Cham, pp 135–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07121-3_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fallis D (2015) What is disinformation? Libr Trends 63(3):401–426. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2015.0014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer JH (2003) Information: does it have to be true? Mind Mach 14(2):223–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer JH (2004) Disinformation: the use of false information. Mind Mach 14(2):231–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Flome M, Blahur A, Podavini A, Verile M (2019) Understanding citizens’ vulnerabilities to disinformation and data-driven propaganda: case study: the 2018 Italian general election, JRC technical report, European Commission, JRC116009: EUR 29741 EN. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Floridi L (2011) The philosophy of information. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Forno R (2018) Weaponized information seeks a new target in cyberspace: users’ minds. The Conversation. [Online]. [Viewed 15 May 2019]. Available from: https://theconversation-com.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/theconversation.com/amp/weaponized-information-seeks-a-new-target-in-cyberspace-users-minds-100069

  • Fukuyama F (2001) Social capital, civil society and development. Third World Q 22(1):7–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Funke D, Flamini D (2020) A guide to anti-misinformation actions around the world. Poynter. [Online]. [Viewed 10 January 2020]. Available from: https://www.poynter.org/ifcn/anti-misinformation-actions/

  • Giacometti A, Teräs J, Perjo L, Wøien M, Sigurjonsdottir H, Rinne T (2018) Regional economic and social resilience: conceptual debate and implications for Nordic regions. Discussion paper prepared for Nordic thematic group for innovative and resilient regions, January 2018, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Gripsrud J, Moe H, Molander A, Murdock G (eds) (2010) The idea of the public sphere: a reader. Lexington Books, Plymouth

    Google Scholar 

  • Guess A, Nyhan B, Reifler J (2018) Selective exposure to misinformation: evidence from the consumption of fake news during the 2016 US presidential campaign. European Research Council. [Online]. [Viewed 18 May 2019]. Available from: http://www.ask-force.org/web/Fundamentalists/Guess-Selective-Exposure-to-Misinformation-Evidence-Presidential-Campaign-2018.pdf

  • Gutierrez R (2018) Tackling disinformation in the age of social media. Available via Equal times. [Online]. [Viewed 10 January 2020. Available from: https://www.equaltimes.org/tackling-disinformation-in-the-age#.Xhqv28gzZPY

  • Håkansson P, Witmer H (2015) Social media and trust — a systematic literature review. J Bus Econ 6(3):517–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Hybrid CoE (2019) Countering disinformation: news media and legal resilience. COI Records

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlova NA, Fisher KE (2013) “Plz RT”: a social diffusion model of misinformation and disinformation for understanding human information behaviour. Inf Res 18(1):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasher A (2003) Public trust in a military force. J Mil Ethics 2(1):20–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim KS, Sin SCJ, Yoo-Lee EY (2014) Undergraduates’ use of social media as information sources. Coll Res Libr 75(4):442–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Kofman M, Migacheva K, Nichiporuk B, Radin A, Oberholtzer J (2017) Lessons from Russia’s operations in Crimea and eastern Ukraine. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar KK, Geethakumari G (2014) Detecting misinformation in online social networks using cognitive psychology. Human-centric Comput Inf Sci 4(1):14

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi M (1998) A state of trust. In: Braithwaite V, Levi M (eds) Trust & governance. Russell Sage Foundation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi M, Stoker L (2000) Political trust and trustworthiness. Annu Rev Polit Sci 3:475–507

    Google Scholar 

  • Limnéll J, Rantapelkonen J (2017) Pelottaako? Nuoret ja turvallisuuden tulevaisuus (Are you afraid? Young people and the future of safety and security). Docendo, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotti M (2018) Countering misinformation online: policies and solutions. Report from 14 November 2018. Geneva Internet Platform Digital Watch Observatory. [Online]. [Viewed 10 January 2020]. Available from: https://dig.watch/sessions/countering-misinformation-online-policies-and-solutions

  • Lyngaas S (2018) Russian disinformation ops were bigger than we thought. Cyberscoop. [Online]. [Viewed 15 May 2019]. Available from: https://www.cyberscoop.com/russian-information-operations-senate-intelligence-committee/

  • Mangat R (2018) Tweeting strategy: military social media use as strategic communication. Theses and Dissertations (Comprehensive), Wilfrid Laurier University. 2071. [Online]. [Viewed 13 May 2019]. Available from: https://scholars.wlu.ca/etd/2071

  • Munro I (2005) Information warfare in business. Strategies of control and resistance in the network society. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Nannestad P (2008) What have we learned about generalized trust, if anything? Annu Rev Polit Sci 11:413–436

    Google Scholar 

  • NATO (2010) NATO Bi-SC information operations reference book. Version 1. 05 March 2010 NATO/PfP/Unclassified Releasable to EU/NATO Partner Nations/ISAF/KFOR/OAE/OOS [online]. Available from: https://info.publicintelligence.net/NATO-IO-Reference.pdf

  • NATO (2018) Cooperating to counter hybrid threats. NATO review published on 23 November 2018 [online]. [Viewed 8 May 2019]. Available from: https://www.nato.int/docu/review/2018/Also-in-2018/cooperating-to-counter-hybrid-threats/EN/index.htm

  • Newton K (2001) Trust, social capital, civil society, and democracy. Int Polit Sci Rev 22(2):201–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton K (2007) Social and political trust. In: Dalton RJ, Klingemann HD (eds) The Oxford handbook of political behaviour. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Norri-Sederholm T, Huhtinen A-M, Paakkonen H (2018) Ensuring public safety organisations’ information flow and situation picture in hybrid environments. Int J Cyber Warf Terror 8(1):12–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Offe C (2000) Trust, democracy and justice. Theoria J Soc Polit Theo 96(December):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmertz B (2016) Europeiska Perspektiv På Förmågan Att Möta Påverkanskampanjer Från Främmande Makt – Delrapport 1. (European perspective on the ability to counter foreign power influence campaigns). Center for Asymmetric Threat Studies (CATS), Swedish National Defence College, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamment J, Agardh-Twetman H (2018) The role of communicators in countering the malicious use of social media. NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamment J, Nothhaft H, Agardh-Twetman H, Fjällhed A (2018) Countering information influence activities: the state of the art, version 1.4 (1 July 2018). Department of Strategic Communication, Lund University, Lund

    Google Scholar 

  • Peritz A (2015) Yes, the U.S. Military uses social media to target ISIS. Slate, June 11 2015. [Online]. [Viewed 12 May 2019]. Available from: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2015/06/the-u-s-military-uses-social-media-to-target-isis-stop-reminding-the-jihadis.html

  • Peterson J, Densley J (2017) Cyber violence: what do we know and where do we go from here? Aggress Violent Behav 3:193–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, RD (1993) The Prosperous Community. The American Prospect 4(13):35–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratkiewicz J, Conover M, Meiss M, Gonçalves B, Patil S, Flammini A, Menczer F (2010) Detecting and tracking the spread of astroturf memes in microblog streams. arXiv preprint arXiv, 1011.3768

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein B, Stolle D (2003) Social capital, impartiality, and the welfare state: an institutional approach. In: Hooghe M, Stolle D (eds) Generating social capital: the role of voluntary associations. Institutions and government policy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein B, Stolle D (2008) The state and social capital. Comp Polit 40(4):441–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanovich S (2017) Computational propaganda in Russia: the origins of digital misinformation. Computational Propaganda Research Project. Working paper (3)

    Google Scholar 

  • Security Strategy for Society (2017) Resolution of the Finnish government Vol 2. The Security Committee. [Online]. [Viewed 19 January 2019]. Availiable from: https://turvallisuuskomitea.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/YTS_2017_english.pdf

  • Singer PW, Brooking ET (2018) LikeWar. The weaponization of social media. An Eamon Dolan book. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith NR (2015) The EU and Russia’s conflicting regime preferences in Ukraine: assessing regime promotion strategies in the scope of the Ukraine crisis. Eur Secur 24(4):525–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Søe SO (2018) Algorithmic detection of misinformation and disinformation: Gricean perspectives. J Doc 74(2):309–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterret D, Malato D, Benz J, Kantor L, Tompson T, Rosenstiel T, Sonderman J, Loker K, Swanson E (2018) Who shared it? How Americans decide what news to trust on social media. NORC Working Paper Series: WP-2018-001

    Google Scholar 

  • Syed N (2017) Real talk about fake news: towards a better theory for platform governance. Yale Law J 127(Forum):337–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow S (1996) Making social science work across space and time: a critical reflection on Robert Putnam’s making democracy work. Am Polit Sci Rev 90(3)

    Google Scholar 

  • The Law Library of Congress (2019) Initiatives to counter fake news in selected countries. Law Library – Library of Congress. [Online]. [Viewed 10 January 2020]. Available from: https://www.loc.gov/law/help/fake-news/counter-fake-news.pdf

  • Thompson I, Lapowsky I (2018) How Russian trolls used meme warfare to divide America. Wired Security [online]. [Viewed 11 May 2019]. Available from: https://www.wired.com/story/russia-ira-propaganda-senate-report/

  • Uslaner EM (2002) The moral foundation of trust. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner EM, Brown M (2005) Inequality, trust, and civic engagement [online]. Am Polit J 33(6):868–894. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X04271903

    Google Scholar 

  • Veerasamy N, Labuschagne WA (2018) Framework for military applications of social media. Int J Cyber Warf Terror (IJCWT) 8(2):47–56. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCWT.2018040104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West DM (2017) How to combat fake news and disinformation [online]. [Viewed 11 May 2019]. Available from: https://www.brookings.edu/research/how-to-combat-fake-news-and-disinformation/

  • Woolley SC, Howard P (2017) Computational propaganda worldwide: executive summary. Working paper 11. Oxford, UK, Project on Computational Propaganda

    Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum (2014) The rapid spread of misinformation online [online]. [Viewed 8 March 2017]. Available from: http://wef.ch/GJAfq6

  • Zak PJ, Knack S (2001) Trust and growth. Econ J 111(470):295–321

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is part of a research project funded by the Academy of Finland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Leadership and Military Pedagogy, National Defence University, Helsinki, Finland

    Teija Norri–Sederholm & Aki–Mauri Huhtinen

  2. Finnish Defence Command, Helsinki, Finland

    Elisa Norvanto

  3. Faculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland

    Karoliina Talvitie–Lamberg

Authors
  1. Teija Norri–Sederholm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elisa Norvanto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Karoliina Talvitie–Lamberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Aki–Mauri Huhtinen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teija Norri–Sederholm .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Military Academy (MILAC) at ETH Zürich, Birmensdorf, Switzerland

    Eva Moehlecke de Baseggio​

  2. Military Academy (MILAC) at ETH Zürich, Birmensdorf, Switzerland

    Olivia Schneider

  3. Military Academy (MILAC) at ETH Zürich, Birmensdorf, Switzerland

    Tibor Szvircsev Tresch

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Norri–Sederholm, T., Norvanto, E., Talvitie–Lamberg, K., Huhtinen, A. (2020). Misinformation and Disinformation in Social Media as the Pulse of Finnish National Security. In: Moehlecke de Baseggio​, E., Schneider, O., Szvircsev Tresch, T. (eds) Social Media and the Armed Forces. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47511-6_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation