Abstract
In this chapter, aspects of traditional teaching and learning are discussed in light of two concepts: ‘power distance’ and ‘power relations’. The underlying assumption in traditional education systems is that the communication of power by the teacher over the student is essential to the learning process. As a result, power often becomes central to the learning process rather than a means to an end. This approach to teaching and learning is associated with hierarchical educational strategies. Manifestations of this approach include curriculum design processes that do not involve student input or hierarchical relational strategies, including the use of domineering language by teachers in order to impose standards and morals on students and to meet teachers’ needs. It is argued that such traditional approaches to teaching and learning, where learners must submit to teachers and where teachers’ authority cannot be challenged, might contribute to uncivil learning environments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alt, D. (2015). Assessing the contribution of constructivist based academic learning environment to academic self-efficacy in higher education. Learning Environments Research, 18, 47–67.
Alt, D. (2017). College students’ perceived learning environment and their social media engagement in activities unrelated to class work. Instructional Science, 45, 623–643.
Alt, D., & Itzkovich, Y. (2015). Assessing the connection between students’ justice experience and perceptions of faculty incivility in higher education. Journal of Academic Ethics, 13(2), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-015-9232-8.
Alt, D., & Itzkovich, Y. (2018). The connection between perceived constructivist learning environments and faculty uncivil authoritarian behaviors. Higher Education, 77(3), 437–454.
Alt, D., & Raichel, N. (2018). Lifelong citizenship: Lifelong learning as a lever for moral and democratic values. Leiden and Boston: Brill and Sense Publishers.
Beck, R. H. (2009). The three R’s plus: What today’s schools are trying to do and why. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Chan, K. W. (2010). The role of epistemological beliefs in Hong Kong preservice teachers’ learning. Asia Pacific Education Researcher, 19, 7–24.
Chan, K. W., & Elliott, R. G. (2004). Relational analysis of personal epistemology and conceptions about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 817–831.
Cobb, P., Gresalfi, M., & Hodge, L. L. (2009). An interpretive scheme for analyzing the identities that students develop in mathematics classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(1), 40–68.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Kappa Delta Pi.
Erwin, J. C. (2004). Classroom of choice: Giving students what they need and getting what you want. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Fang, B. (2009). From distraction to engagement: Wireless devices in the classroom. Educause Quarterly, 32(4), 4–9.
French, J. R., Raven, B., & Cartwright, D. (1959). The bases of social power. Classics of Organization Theory, 7, 311–320.
Fromm, E. (1941). Escape from freedom. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., Bransford, J., Berliner, D., Cochran-Smith, M., McDonald, M. & Zeichner, K. (2005). How teachers learn and develop. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 258–289). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Horn, I. S., Nolen, S. B., & Ward, C. J. (2013). Recontextualizing practices: Situative methods for studying the development of motivation, identity and learning in and through multiple contexts over time. In M. Vauras & S. Volet (Eds.), Interpersonal regulation of learning and motivation: Methodological advances (pp. 189–204). New York: Routledge.
Jones, S. (2009). Traditional education or partnership education: Which educational approach might best prepare students for the future? MA Thesis, Communication, San Diego University.
McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1984). Power in the classroom II: Teacher and student perceptions. Communication Education, 33, 125–136.
Noddings, N. (2000). Introduction: Tomorrow’s children: A blueprint for partnership education in the 21st century. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Oral, Y. (2013). “The right things are what i expect them to do”: Negotiation of power relations in an English classroom. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 12(2), 96–115.
Pelech, J., & Pieper, G. W. (2010). The comprehensive handbook of constructivist teaching. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Peters, M. (2000). Does constructivist epistemology have a place in nurse education? Journal of Nursing Education, 39, 166–172.
Sana, F., Weston, T., & Cepeda, N. J. (2013). Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers. Computers & Education, 62, 24–31.
Schrodt, P., Witt, P. L., & Turman, P. D. (2007). Reconsidering the measurement of teacher power use in the college classroom. Communication Education, 56(3), 308–332.
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(3), 4–13.
Shirky, C. (2014). Why clay shirky banned laptops, tablets and phones from his classroom. Education Shift. Retrieved from http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2014/09/why-clay-shirky-banned-laptops-tablets-and-phones-from-his-classroom/.
Vella, J. (2008). On teaching and learning: Putting the principles and practices of dialogue education into action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Itzkovich, Y., Alt, D., Dolev, N. (2020). Learning Environments as Precursors of Academic Incivility. In: The Challenges of Academic Incivility. SpringerBriefs in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46747-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46747-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-46746-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-46747-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)