Abstract
Recent evolutionary approaches to the understanding of lithic variability take us back to long-standing issues in lithic studies to do with the claimed contrast between style and function and the Binford-Bordes debate of the 1960s concerning the factors that affect inter-assemblage variation. In fact, the style and function contrast is an unhelpful one, not least when considering the question of convergence. Taking the definition of style as ‘a way of doing’, all functions are carried out in locally specific ways that have a transmission history, although the extent to which the history of the attributes relevant to the function have been subject to random drift and innovation patterns, as opposed to selection, will vary. Moreover, in a subtractive technology like lithics the extent to which a transmission signal will be visible in an attribute like the angle of a cutting edge is unclear. The contrasting view is that, in the case of lithics, functional requirements will always call into existence the technical innovations to satisfy them, which in any case are not that difficult to find. The paper addresses these and related issues with reference to previous work by Shennan and colleagues on the use of material culture to identify within and between group variation, the extent to which isolation-by-distance in space and time can account for the similarities and differences between assemblages, and the role of phylogenetic methods.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Angelbeck, B., & Cameron, I. (2014). The Faustian bargain of technological change: Evaluating the socioeconomic effects of the bow and arrow transition in the Coast Salish past. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 36, 93–109.
Bentley, R. A., Hahn, M. W., & Shennan, S. J. (2004). Random drift and culture change. Proceedings of the Royal Society Biological Sciences, 271, 1443–1450.
Binford, L. R. (1962). Archaeology as anthropology. American Antiquity, 28, 217–225.
Binford, L. R. (1965). Archaeological systematics and the study of culture process. American Antiquity, 31, 203–210.
Binford, L. R. (1973). Interassemblage variability-the Mousterian and the ‘functional’ argument. In C. Renfrew (Ed.), The explanation of culture change (pp. 227–254). London: Duckworth.
Binford, L. R. (1978). Nunamiut ethnoarchaeology. New York: Academic Press.
Binford, L. R. (2001). Constructing frames of reference. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Binford, L. R., & Binford, S. R. (1966). A preliminary analysis of functional variability in the Mousterian of the Levallois Facies. American Anthropologist, 68, 238–295.
Blitz, J. H. (1988). Adoption of the bow in prehistoric North America. North American Archaeology, 9, 123–145.
Bordes, F. (1973). On the chronology and contemporaneity of different Palaeolithic cultures in France. In C. Renfrew (Ed.), The explanation of culture change (pp. 217–226). London: Duckworth.
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Boyd, R., Borgerhoff-Mulder, M., Durham, W. H., & Richerson, P. J. (1997). Are cultural phylogenies possible? In P. Weingart, S. D. Mitchell, P. J. Richerson, & S. Maasen (Eds.), Human by nature (pp. 355–386). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Carr, C. (1995). A unified middle-range theory of artefact design. In C. Carr & J. Neitzel (Eds.), Style, society and person: Archaeological and ethnological perspectives (pp. 171–258). New York: Plenum.
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., & Feldman, M. W. (1981). Cultural transmission and evolution: A quantitative approach. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Clarkson, C., Hiscock, P., Mackay, A., & Shipton, C. (2018). Small, sharp and standardized: Global convergence in backed-microlith technology. In M. O’Brien, B. Buchanan, & M. I. Eren (Eds.), Convergent evolution in stone tool technology (pp. 175–200). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Delagnes, A., & Rendu, W. (2011). Shifts in Neandertal mobility, technology and subsistence strategies in western France. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38, 1771–1783.
Derex, M., & Boyd, R. (2015). The foundations of the human cultural niche. Nature Communications, 6, 8398.
Dunnell, R. C. (1978). Style and function: A fundamental dichotomy. American Antiquity, 43, 192–202.
Eerkens, J. W., & Lipo, C. P. (2005). Cultural transmission, copying errors, and the generation of variation in material culture in the archaeological record. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 24, 316–334.
Enquist, M., Ghirlanda, S., & Eriksson, K. (2011). Modelling the evolution and diversity of cumulative culture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Biological Sciences, 366, 412–423.
Eren, M., Buchanan, B., & O’Brien, M. (2018). Why convergence should be a potential hypothesis for the emergence and occurrence of stone-tool form and production processes: An illustration using replication. In M. O’Brien, B. Buchanan, & M. I. Eren (Eds.), Convergent evolution in stone tool technology (pp. 61–72). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Fu, Q., Posth, C., Hajdinjak, M., Petr, M., Mallick, S., Fernandes, D., et al. (2016). The genetic history of Ice Age Europe. Nature, 534, 200–205.
Grant, P. R., & Grant, B. R. (2002). Unpredictable evolution in a 30-year study of Darwin’s finches. Science, 296, 707–711.
Gray, R. D., & Jordan, F. M. (2000). Language trees support the express-train sequence of Austronesian expansion. Nature, 405, 1052–1055.
Hames, R. B., & Vickers, W. T. (1982). Optimal diet breadth theory as a model to explain variability in Amazonian hunting. American Ethnologist, 9, 358–378.
Hajdinjak, M., Fu, Q., Hubner, A., Petr, M., Mafessoni, F., Grote, S., et al. (2018). Reconstructing the genetic history of late Neanderthals. Nature, 555, 652–656.
Hamilton, M., & Walker, R. (2018). A stochastic density-dependent model of long-term population dynamics in hunter-gatherer populations. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 19, 85–102.
Harvey, P., & Pagel, M. (1991). The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Henrich, J. (2004). Demography and cultural evolution: How adaptive cultural processes can produce maladaptive losses: The Tasmanian case. American Antiquity, 69, 197–214.
Holdaway, S., & Douglass, M. (2012). A twenty-first century archaeology of stone artifacts. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 19, 101–131.
Holden, C., & Mace, R. (2003). Spread of cattle led to the loss of matrilineal descent in Africa: A coevolutionary analysis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 270, 2425–2433.
Key, A. J., & Lycett, S. J. (2017). Influence of handaxe size and shape on cutting efficiency: A large-scale experiment and morphometric analysis. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 24, 514–541.
Kristiansen, K., Allentoft, M., Frei, K. M., Iversen, R., Johannsen, N., Kroonen, G., et al. (2017). Re-theorising mobility and the formation of culture and language among the Corded Ware Culture in Europe. Antiquity, 91, 334–347.
Lipo, C., O’Brien, M., Collard, M., & Shennan, S. (Eds.). (2006). Mapping our ancestors. New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction.
Lycett, S. J., & von Cramon-Taubadel, N. (2015). Toward a “quantitative genetic” approach to lithic variation. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 22, 646–675.
Lycett, S. J., Schillinger, K., Eren, M. I., von Cramon-Taubadel, N., & Mesoudi, A. (2016). Factors affecting Acheulean handaxe variation: Experimental insights, microevolutionary processes, and macroevolutionary outcomes. Quaternary International, 411, 386–401.
Mace, R., & Pagel, M. (1994). The comparative method in anthropology. Current Anthropology, 35, 549–564.
Moore, M. W. (2013). Simple stone flaking in Australasia: Patterns and implications. Quaternary International, 285, 140–149.
O’Brien, M., Buchanan, B., & Eren, M. I. (Eds.). (2018). Convergent evolution in stone tool technology. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Powell, A., Shennan, S. J., & Thomas, M. G. (2009). Late Pleistocene demography and the appearance of modern human behavior. Science, 324, 1298–1301.
Premo, L. S., & Kuhn, S. L. (2010). Modeling effects of local extinctions on culture change and diversity in the Paleolithic. PLoS ONE, 5, e15582. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015582.
Prüfer, K., Racimo, F., Patterson, N., Jay, F., Sankararaman, S., Sawyer, S., et al. (2014). The complete genome sequence of a Neanderthal from the Altai Mountains. Nature, 505, 43–49.
Prüfer, K., de Filippo, C., Grote, S., Mafessoni, F., Korlević, P., Hajdinjak, M., et al. (2017). A high-coverage Neandertal genome from Vindija Cave in Croatia. Science, 358, 655–658.
Renfrew, C. (1973). Before civilization: The radiocarbon revolution and prehistoric Europe. London: Jonathan Cape.
Sackett, J. R. (1982). Approaches to style in lithic analysis. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 1, 59–112.
Sackett, J. R. (1985). Style and ethnicity in the Kalahari: A reply to Wiessner. American Antiquity, 50, 154–159.
Scerri, E. M. L., Thomas, M. G., Manica, A., Gunz, P., Stock, J. T., Stringer, C., et al. (2018). Did our species evolve in subdivided populations across Africa, and why does it matter? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 33, 582–594.
Schillinger, K., Mesoudi, A., & Lycett, S. J. (2014). Copying error and the cultural evolution of “additive” versus “reductive” material traditions: An experimental assessment. American Antiquity, 79, 128–143.
Shea, J. J. (2017). Stone tools in human evolution: Behavioral differences among technological primates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shennan, S. J. (2001). Demography and cultural innovation: A model and some implications for the emergence of modern human culture. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 11, 5–16.
Shennan, S. J. (2011). Descent with modification and the archaeological record. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 366, 1070–1079.
Shennan, S. J., Crema, E., & Kerig, T. (2015). Isolation-by-distance, homophily, and “core” vs. “package” cultural evolution models in prehistoric Europe. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36, 103–109.
Shennan, S., & Steele, J. (1999). Cultural learning in hominids: A behavioural ecological approach. In H. Box & K. Gibson (Eds.), Mammalian social learning. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London (Vol. 70, pp. 367–388). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shott, M. (2008). Lower Palaeolithic industries, time, and the meaning of assemblage variation. In S. Holdaway & L. Wandsnider (Eds.), Time in archaeology: Time perspectivism revisited (pp. 46–60). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
Sikora, M., Seguin-Orlando, A., Sousa, V. C., Albrechtsen, A., Korneliussen, T., Ko, A., et al. (2017). Ancient genomes show social and reproductive behavior of early Upper Palaeolithic foragers. Science, 358, 659–662.
Tennie, C., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Ratcheting up the ratchet: On the evolution of cumulative culture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 2405–2415.
Tostevin, G. B. (2012). Seeing lithics: A middle-range theory for testing for cultural transmission in the Pleistocene. Oxford: Oxbow.
Wargo, M. C. (2009). The Bordes-Binford debate: Transatlantic interpretative traditions in Palaeolithic archaeology. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas at Arlington.
Wiessner, P. (1983). Style and social information in Kalahari San projectile points. American Antiquity, 48, 253–276.
Wiessner, P. (1985). Style or isochrestic variation? A reply to Sackett. American Antiquity, 50, 160–166.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shennan, S. (2020). Style, Function and Cultural Transmission. In: Groucutt, H. (eds) Culture History and Convergent Evolution. Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46126-3_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46126-3_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-46125-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-46126-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)