Skip to main content

Style, Function and Cultural Transmission

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Culture History and Convergent Evolution

Part of the book series: Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology ((VERT))

Abstract

Recent evolutionary approaches to the understanding of lithic variability take us back to long-standing issues in lithic studies to do with the claimed contrast between style and function and the Binford-Bordes debate of the 1960s concerning the factors that affect inter-assemblage variation. In fact, the style and function contrast is an unhelpful one, not least when considering the question of convergence. Taking the definition of style as ‘a way of doing’, all functions are carried out in locally specific ways that have a transmission history, although the extent to which the history of the attributes relevant to the function have been subject to random drift and innovation patterns, as opposed to selection, will vary. Moreover, in a subtractive technology like lithics the extent to which a transmission signal will be visible in an attribute like the angle of a cutting edge is unclear. The contrasting view is that, in the case of lithics, functional requirements will always call into existence the technical innovations to satisfy them, which in any case are not that difficult to find. The paper addresses these and related issues with reference to previous work by Shennan and colleagues on the use of material culture to identify within and between group variation, the extent to which isolation-by-distance in space and time can account for the similarities and differences between assemblages, and the role of phylogenetic methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Angelbeck, B., & Cameron, I. (2014). The Faustian bargain of technological change: Evaluating the socioeconomic effects of the bow and arrow transition in the Coast Salish past. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 36, 93–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, R. A., Hahn, M. W., & Shennan, S. J. (2004). Random drift and culture change. Proceedings of the Royal Society Biological Sciences, 271, 1443–1450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L. R. (1962). Archaeology as anthropology. American Antiquity, 28, 217–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L. R. (1965). Archaeological systematics and the study of culture process. American Antiquity, 31, 203–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L. R. (1973). Interassemblage variability-the Mousterian and the ‘functional’ argument. In C. Renfrew (Ed.), The explanation of culture change (pp. 227–254). London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L. R. (1978). Nunamiut ethnoarchaeology. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L. R. (2001). Constructing frames of reference. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L. R., & Binford, S. R. (1966). A preliminary analysis of functional variability in the Mousterian of the Levallois Facies. American Anthropologist, 68, 238–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blitz, J. H. (1988). Adoption of the bow in prehistoric North America. North American Archaeology, 9, 123–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordes, F. (1973). On the chronology and contemporaneity of different Palaeolithic cultures in France. In C. Renfrew (Ed.), The explanation of culture change (pp. 217–226). London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R., Borgerhoff-Mulder, M., Durham, W. H., & Richerson, P. J. (1997). Are cultural phylogenies possible? In P. Weingart, S. D. Mitchell, P. J. Richerson, & S. Maasen (Eds.), Human by nature (pp. 355–386). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, C. (1995). A unified middle-range theory of artefact design. In C. Carr & J. Neitzel (Eds.), Style, society and person: Archaeological and ethnological perspectives (pp. 171–258). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., & Feldman, M. W. (1981). Cultural transmission and evolution: A quantitative approach. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, C., Hiscock, P., Mackay, A., & Shipton, C. (2018). Small, sharp and standardized: Global convergence in backed-microlith technology. In M. O’Brien, B. Buchanan, & M. I. Eren (Eds.), Convergent evolution in stone tool technology (pp. 175–200). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delagnes, A., & Rendu, W. (2011). Shifts in Neandertal mobility, technology and subsistence strategies in western France. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38, 1771–1783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derex, M., & Boyd, R. (2015). The foundations of the human cultural niche. Nature Communications, 6, 8398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnell, R. C. (1978). Style and function: A fundamental dichotomy. American Antiquity, 43, 192–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eerkens, J. W., & Lipo, C. P. (2005). Cultural transmission, copying errors, and the generation of variation in material culture in the archaeological record. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 24, 316–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enquist, M., Ghirlanda, S., & Eriksson, K. (2011). Modelling the evolution and diversity of cumulative culture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Biological Sciences, 366, 412–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eren, M., Buchanan, B., & O’Brien, M. (2018). Why convergence should be a potential hypothesis for the emergence and occurrence of stone-tool form and production processes: An illustration using replication. In M. O’Brien, B. Buchanan, & M. I. Eren (Eds.), Convergent evolution in stone tool technology (pp. 61–72). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu, Q., Posth, C., Hajdinjak, M., Petr, M., Mallick, S., Fernandes, D., et al. (2016). The genetic history of Ice Age Europe. Nature, 534, 200–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, P. R., & Grant, B. R. (2002). Unpredictable evolution in a 30-year study of Darwin’s finches. Science, 296, 707–711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. D., & Jordan, F. M. (2000). Language trees support the express-train sequence of Austronesian expansion. Nature, 405, 1052–1055.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hames, R. B., & Vickers, W. T. (1982). Optimal diet breadth theory as a model to explain variability in Amazonian hunting. American Ethnologist, 9, 358–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajdinjak, M., Fu, Q., Hubner, A., Petr, M., Mafessoni, F., Grote, S., et al. (2018). Reconstructing the genetic history of late Neanderthals. Nature, 555, 652–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, M., & Walker, R. (2018). A stochastic density-dependent model of long-term population dynamics in hunter-gatherer populations. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 19, 85–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, P., & Pagel, M. (1991). The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J. (2004). Demography and cultural evolution: How adaptive cultural processes can produce maladaptive losses: The Tasmanian case. American Antiquity, 69, 197–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdaway, S., & Douglass, M. (2012). A twenty-first century archaeology of stone artifacts. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 19, 101–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden, C., & Mace, R. (2003). Spread of cattle led to the loss of matrilineal descent in Africa: A coevolutionary analysis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 270, 2425–2433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Key, A. J., & Lycett, S. J. (2017). Influence of handaxe size and shape on cutting efficiency: A large-scale experiment and morphometric analysis. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 24, 514–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristiansen, K., Allentoft, M., Frei, K. M., Iversen, R., Johannsen, N., Kroonen, G., et al. (2017). Re-theorising mobility and the formation of culture and language among the Corded Ware Culture in Europe. Antiquity, 91, 334–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipo, C., O’Brien, M., Collard, M., & Shennan, S. (Eds.). (2006). Mapping our ancestors. New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lycett, S. J., & von Cramon-Taubadel, N. (2015). Toward a “quantitative genetic” approach to lithic variation. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 22, 646–675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lycett, S. J., Schillinger, K., Eren, M. I., von Cramon-Taubadel, N., & Mesoudi, A. (2016). Factors affecting Acheulean handaxe variation: Experimental insights, microevolutionary processes, and macroevolutionary outcomes. Quaternary International, 411, 386–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mace, R., & Pagel, M. (1994). The comparative method in anthropology. Current Anthropology, 35, 549–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. W. (2013). Simple stone flaking in Australasia: Patterns and implications. Quaternary International, 285, 140–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M., Buchanan, B., & Eren, M. I. (Eds.). (2018). Convergent evolution in stone tool technology. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, A., Shennan, S. J., & Thomas, M. G. (2009). Late Pleistocene demography and the appearance of modern human behavior. Science, 324, 1298–1301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Premo, L. S., & Kuhn, S. L. (2010). Modeling effects of local extinctions on culture change and diversity in the Paleolithic. PLoS ONE, 5, e15582. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prüfer, K., Racimo, F., Patterson, N., Jay, F., Sankararaman, S., Sawyer, S., et al. (2014). The complete genome sequence of a Neanderthal from the Altai Mountains. Nature, 505, 43–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prüfer, K., de Filippo, C., Grote, S., Mafessoni, F., Korlević, P., Hajdinjak, M., et al. (2017). A high-coverage Neandertal genome from Vindija Cave in Croatia. Science, 358, 655–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renfrew, C. (1973). Before civilization: The radiocarbon revolution and prehistoric Europe. London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, J. R. (1982). Approaches to style in lithic analysis. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 1, 59–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, J. R. (1985). Style and ethnicity in the Kalahari: A reply to Wiessner. American Antiquity, 50, 154–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scerri, E. M. L., Thomas, M. G., Manica, A., Gunz, P., Stock, J. T., Stringer, C., et al. (2018). Did our species evolve in subdivided populations across Africa, and why does it matter? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 33, 582–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schillinger, K., Mesoudi, A., & Lycett, S. J. (2014). Copying error and the cultural evolution of “additive” versus “reductive” material traditions: An experimental assessment. American Antiquity, 79, 128–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. J. (2017). Stone tools in human evolution: Behavioral differences among technological primates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shennan, S. J. (2001). Demography and cultural innovation: A model and some implications for the emergence of modern human culture. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 11, 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shennan, S. J. (2011). Descent with modification and the archaeological record. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 366, 1070–1079.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shennan, S. J., Crema, E., & Kerig, T. (2015). Isolation-by-distance, homophily, and “core” vs. “package” cultural evolution models in prehistoric Europe. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36, 103–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shennan, S., & Steele, J. (1999). Cultural learning in hominids: A behavioural ecological approach. In H. Box & K. Gibson (Eds.), Mammalian social learning. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London (Vol. 70, pp. 367–388). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shott, M. (2008). Lower Palaeolithic industries, time, and the meaning of assemblage variation. In S. Holdaway & L. Wandsnider (Eds.), Time in archaeology: Time perspectivism revisited (pp. 46–60). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikora, M., Seguin-Orlando, A., Sousa, V. C., Albrechtsen, A., Korneliussen, T., Ko, A., et al. (2017). Ancient genomes show social and reproductive behavior of early Upper Palaeolithic foragers. Science, 358, 659–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennie, C., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Ratcheting up the ratchet: On the evolution of cumulative culture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 2405–2415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tostevin, G. B. (2012). Seeing lithics: A middle-range theory for testing for cultural transmission in the Pleistocene. Oxford: Oxbow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wargo, M. C. (2009). The Bordes-Binford debate: Transatlantic interpretative traditions in Palaeolithic archaeology. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas at Arlington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiessner, P. (1983). Style and social information in Kalahari San projectile points. American Antiquity, 48, 253–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiessner, P. (1985). Style or isochrestic variation? A reply to Sackett. American Antiquity, 50, 160–166.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shennan, S. (2020). Style, Function and Cultural Transmission. In: Groucutt, H. (eds) Culture History and Convergent Evolution. Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46126-3_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics