Skip to main content

Best Practice in Educational Design for Patient Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Enhancing Patient Engagement in Pulmonary Healthcare

Part of the book series: Respiratory Medicine ((RM))

Abstract

Education is a key component of patient care, with significant potential to positively impact health outcomes through patient empowerment and behavior change. Patient empowerment through education has the potential to improve knowledge, understanding, adherence, skills, and overall HRQoL through healthier behaviors. Indeed, systematic reviews for patient education as an intervention in chronic illnesses have found reduced hospitalizations and clinic visits, improved quality adjusted life years, or productivity. In an era of increasing demands while time and other resources decrease, best evidence-based practices in educational design for patient care are necessary. Proving specific patient education models are of value is important; however, this has been challenging due to the heterogeneity of interventions and populations studied. While this may appear as a concern, this should be viewed as a significant opportunity rather than a limitation, as educational design has been more rigorously evaluated in other sectors. There is an opportunity for healthcare professionals to apply some lessons from the medical education literature to their patient education. The expanding diversity of educational design options creates an exciting mandate to transform patient education. This chapter presents a discussion of educational design that comes from medical education literature, which can be generalizable to patients as long as potential literacy, culture, and physiological obstacles are kept in mind. The chapter explores how to “make a diagnosis of patient learning needs,” and formulate a “therapeutic intervention” of education that is contextualized to the patient and their individual circumstances, being culturally responsive and non-biased – an intervention that is engaging and relevant to them achieving their learning and healthcare outcomes. Finally, the concept of “formal assessment” to see if the educational therapy worked or not, and how to improve, should be part of patient “follow-up.” Practical strategies to achieve these features of patient education are presented.

The mediocre teacher tells. The good teacher explains.

The superior teacher demonstrates. The great teacher inspires.

William Arthur Ward

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. World Health Organization. Chronic diseases and health promotion. 25 Apr 2019. Available from: https://www.who.int/chp/about/integrated_cd/en/.

  2. Davis TC, et al. Improving patient understanding of prescription drug label instructions. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(1):57–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sommer AE, et al. Hospitalized patients’ knowledge of care: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2018;33(12):2210–29.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Iuga AO, McGuire MJ. Adherence and health care costs. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2014;7:35–44.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Stenberg U, et al. Health economic evaluations of patient education interventions a scoping review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns. 2018;101(6):1006–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mathew AR, et al. Assessment of Self-Management Treatment Needs Among COPD Helpline Callers. COPD. 2019;16(1):82–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/15412555.2019.1575350. eCollection 2019. PubMed PMID: 30789041; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7135910.

  7. Perez-Stable EJ, El-Toukhy S. Communicating with diverse patients: how patient and clinician factors affect disparities. Patient Educ Couns. 2018;101(12):2186–94.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Holman CK, Weed LD, Kelley SP. Improving provider use of the teach-Back method. J Nurses Prof Dev. 2019;35(1):52–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Redman BK, P.D.R.N.F., The practice of patient education: a case study approach. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Miller SM. Monitoring versus blunting styles of coping with cancer influence the information patients want and need about their disease. Implications for cancer screening and management. Cancer. 1995;76(2):167–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jackson BE, et al. Domain-specific self-efficacy is associated with measures of functional capacity and quality of life among patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014;11(3):310–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Yohannes AM, et al. Depression and anxiety in chronic heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: prevalence, relevance, clinical implications and management principles. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010;25(12):1209–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Disler RT, et al. Cognitive screening in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: patient’s perspectives. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;26:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1519046. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 30686080.

  14. Mayeaux EJ Jr, et al. Improving patient education for patients with low literacy skills. Am Fam Physician. 1996;53(1):205–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Andrianopoulos V, et al. Cognitive impairment in COPD: should cognitive evaluation be part of respiratory assessment? Breathe (Sheff). 2017;13(1):e1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dybowski C, Sehner S, Harendza S. Influence of motivation, self-efficacy and situational factors on the teaching quality of clinical educators. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):84.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Lenferink A, et al. Self-management interventions including action plans for exacerbations versus usual care in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;8:CD011682.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ashmore L, Robinson D. Learning, teaching and development: strategies for action. London: SAGE Publications; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Anderson LW, Krathwohl DR, Bloom BS. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York; San Francisco; London: Longman; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Krau SD. Creating educational objectives for patient education using the new Bloom’s taxonomy. Nurs Clin North Am. 2011;46(3):299–312, vi.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Redman BK. Measurement tools in patient education. 2nd ed. New York: Springer Pub. xii; 2003. 474 p.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lorig K, editor. Patient education : a practical approach. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2001. xvi, 246 p.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Falvo DR, editor. Effective patient education: a guide to increased compliance. 3rd ed. Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2004. xii, 388 p.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schmaltz RM, Enstrom R. Death to weak PowerPoint: strategies to create effective visual presentations. Front Psychol. 2014;5:1138.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Cameron KA. A practitioner’s guide to persuasion: an overview of 15 selected persuasion theories, models and frameworks. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;74(3):309–17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hew KF, Lo CK. Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: a meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):38.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Lenz PH, et al. Practical strategies for effective lectures. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015;12(4):561–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. White JC, et al. Wrapping things up: a qualitative analysis of the closing moments of the medical visit. Patient Educ Couns. 1997;30(2):155–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Carrier E, Reschovsky J. Expectations outpace reality: physicians’ use of care management tools for patients with chronic conditions. Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change. 2009;129:1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stossel LM, et al. Readability of patient education materials available at the point of care. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(9):1165–70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Seubert D. http://www.healthcommunications.org/improving-readability-by-design.php.

  32. Shoemaker SJ, Wolf MS, Brach C. Development of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT): a new measure of understandability and actionability for print and audiovisual patient information. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;96(3):395–403.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Weiss KD, et al. Readability analysis of online resources related to lung cancer. J Surg Res. 2016;206(1):90–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Stellefson M, et al. YouTube as a source of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patient education: a social media content analysis. Chron Respir Dis. 2014;11(2):61–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Paige SR, et al. Pinterest as a resource for health information on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a social media content analysis. Am J Health Educ. 2015;46(4):241–51.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Jaglal SB, et al. Increasing access to chronic disease self-management programs in rural and remote communities using telehealth. Telemed J E Health. 2013;19(6):467–73.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Rush KL, et al. The efficacy of telehealth delivered educational approaches for patients with chronic diseases: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2018;101(8):1310–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Folch-Ayora A, et al. Patient education during hospital admission due to exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: effects on quality of life-controlled and randomized experimental study. Patient Educ Couns. 2019;102(3):511–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Gibbs G and G.B.F.E. Unit, Learning by doing: a guide to teaching and learning methods. FEU; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kerfoot BP, et al. A team-based online game improves blood glucose control in veterans with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(9):1218–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Miller AS, Cafazzo JA, Seto E. A game plan: Gamification design principles in mHealth applications for chronic disease management. Health Informatics J. 2016;22(2):184–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458214537511. Epub 2014 Jul 1. Review.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Cain J, Piascik P. Are serious games a good strategy for pharmacy education? Am J Pharm Educ. 2015;79(4):47.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Svavarsdottir MH, Sigurethardottir AK, Steinsbekk A. How to become an expert educator: a qualitative study on the view of health professionals with experience in patient education. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:87.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Algiraigri AH. Ten tips for receiving feedback effectively in clinical practice. Med Educ Online. 2014;19:25141. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v19.25141. eCollection 2014. PubMed PMID: 25079664; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4116619.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Skiff A, Goodwin NJ, Goldstein MF. A practical approach to assessing patient learning needs. J Natl Med Assoc. 1981;73(6):533–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Hyland ME, Jones RC, Hanney KE. The lung information needs questionnaire: development, preliminary validation and findings. Respir Med. 2006;100(10):1807–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Walsh JL, Harris BH, Smith PE. Single best answer question-writing tips for clinicians. Postgrad Med J. 2017;93(1096):76–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Press VG, et al. Misuse of respiratory inhalers in hospitalized patients with asthma or COPD. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26(6):635–42.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. de Vries U, et al. Patient satisfaction with different asthma-training variants. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;70(2):266–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Fink JB. Inhalers in asthma management: is demonstration the key to compliance? Respir Care. 2005;50(5):598–600.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William Kelly .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kelly, W., Meyer, H.S., Blackstock, F. (2020). Best Practice in Educational Design for Patient Learning. In: Moy, M., Blackstock, F., Nici, L. (eds) Enhancing Patient Engagement in Pulmonary Healthcare. Respiratory Medicine. Humana, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44889-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44889-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44888-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44889-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics