Skip to main content

Altruistic Autonomy: Beating Congestion on Shared Roads

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algorithmic Foundations of Robotics XIII (WAFR 2018)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics ((SPAR,volume 14))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Traffic congestion has large economic and social costs. The introduction of autonomous vehicles can potentially reduce this congestion, both by increasing network throughput and by enabling a social planner to incentivize users of autonomous vehicles to take longer routes that can alleviate congestion on more direct roads. We formalize these effects of altruistic autonomy on roads shared between human drivers and autonomous vehicles. In this work, we develop a formal model of road congestion on shared roads based on the fundamental diagram of traffic. We consider a network of parallel roads and provide algorithms that compute optimal equilibria that are robust to additional unforeseen demand. We further plan for optimal routings when users have varying degrees of altruism. We find that even with arbitrarily small altruism, total latency can be unboundedly better than without altruism, and that the best selfish equilibrium can be unboundedly better than the worst selfish equilibrium. We validate our theoretical results through microscopic traffic simulations and show average latency decrease of a factor of 4 from worst-case selfish equilibrium to the optimal equilibrium when autonomous vehicles are altruistic.

E. Bıyık and D. A. Lazar—First two authors contributed equally and are listed in alphabetical order.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Due to space constraints, we defer all proofs to this paper’s extended version [14].

  2. 2.

    Though congested flow may be unstable, it can be stabilized with a small number of autonomous vehicles [7], adding an additional constraint to later optimizations.

  3. 3.

    This is similar to the notion of epsilon-approximate Nash Equilibrium [31], but with populations playing strategies that bring them within some factor of the best strategy available to them, with each population having a different factor.

  4. 4.

    An animated version can be found at http://youtu.be/Hy2S6zbL6Z0 with realistic numerical values for densities, headways, car lengths, speeds, etc.

References

  1. Askari, A., Farias, D.A., et al.: Effect of adaptive and cooperative adaptive cruise control on throughput of signalized arterials. In: IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lioris, J., Pedarsani, R., et al.: Platoons of connected vehicles can double throughput in urban roads. Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 77, 292–305 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Motie, M., Savla, K.: Throughput analysis of a horizontal traffic queue under safe car following models. In: IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Adler, A., Miculescu, D., Karaman, S.: Optimal policies for platooning and ride sharing in autonomy-enabled transportation. In: Workshop on Algorithmic Foundations of Robotics (WAFR) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lazar, D., Chandrasekher, K., Pedarsani, R., Sadigh, D.: Maximizing road capacity using cars that influence people. In: IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. IEEE (2018, accepted)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wu, C., Kreidieh, A., Vinitsky, E., Bayen, A.M.: Emergent behaviors in mixed-autonomy traffic. In: Conference on Robot Learning, pp. 398–407 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wu, C., Bayen, A.M., Mehta, A.: Stabilizing traffic with autonomous vehicles. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 1–7. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cui, S., Seibold, B., Stern, R., Work, D.B.: Stabilizing traffic flow via a single autonomous vehicle: possibilities and limitations. In: IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stern, R.E., et al.: Dissipation of stop-and-go waves via control of autonomous vehicles: field experiments. Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 89, 205–221 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Merugu, D., Prabhakar, B.S., Rama, N.: An incentive mechanism for decongesting the roads: a pilot program in Bangalore. In: Proceedings of ACM NetEcon Workshop. Citeseer (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pluntke, C., Prabhakar, B.: INSINC: a platform for managing peak demand in public transit. JOURNEYS Land Transp. Authority Acad. Singapore (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nie, Y.M., Yin, Y.: Managing rush hour travel choices with tradable credit scheme. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 50, 1–19 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Daganzo, C.F.: The cell transmission model: a dynamic representation of highway traffic consistent with the hydrodynamic theory. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 28, 269–287 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bıyık, E., Lazar, D.A., Pedarsani, R., Sadigh, D.: Altruistic autonomy: beating congestion on shared roads. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.11978 (2018)

  15. Hearn, D.W., Lawphongpanich, S., Nguyen, S.: Convex programming formulations of the asymmetric traffic assignment problem. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 18, 357–365 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Dafermos, S.C.: The traffic assignment problem for multiclass-user transportation networks. Transp. Sci. 6(1), 73–87 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Florian, M., Hearn, D.: Network equilibrium models and algorithms. In: Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, vol. 8, pp. 485–550 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dafermos, S.: Traffic equilibrium and variational inequalities. Transp. Sci. 14(1), 42–54 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Roughgarden, T.: Stackelberg scheduling strategies. SIAM J. Comput. 33(2), 332–350 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Bonifaci, V., Harks, T., Schäfer, G.: Stackelberg routing in arbitrary networks. Math. Oper. Res. 35(2), 330–346 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Swamy, C.: The effectiveness of Stackelberg strategies and tolls for network congestion games. ACM Trans. Algorithms (TALG) 8, 1–19 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Roughgarden, T., Tardos, É.: How bad is selfish routing? J. ACM (JACM) 49(2), 236–259 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Correa, J.R., Schulz, A.S., Stier-Moses, N.E.: A geometric approach to the price of anarchy in nonatomic congestion games. Games Econ. Behav. 64, 457–469 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Perakis, G.: The “price of anarchy” under nonlinear and asymmetric costs. Math. Oper. Res. 32(3), 614–628 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Lazar, D.A., Coogan, S., Pedarsani, R.: Routing for traffic networks with mixed autonomy. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.01283 (2018)

  26. Daganzo, C.F.: A continuum theory of traffic dynamics for freeways with special lanes. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 31, 83–102 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang, H., Jin, W.: Kinematic wave traffic flow model for mixed traffic. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1802, 197–204 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Logghe, S., Immers, L.: Heterogeneous traffic flow modelling with the LWR model using passenger-car equivalents. In: 10th World Congress on ITS (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fan, S., Work, D.B.: A heterogeneous multiclass traffic flow model with creeping. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 75(2), 813–835 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Krichene, W., Reilly, J.D., Amin, S., Bayen, A.M.: Stackelberg routing on parallel transportation networks. In: Handbook of Dynamic Game Theory (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nisan, N., Roughgarden, T., Tardos, E., Vazirani, V.V.: Algorithmic Game Theory. Cambridge University Press, New York (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Gonzaga, C.C.: Path-following methods for linear programming. SIAM Rev. 34(2), 167–224 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Krajzewicz, D., Erdmann, J., Behrisch, M., Bieker, L.: Recent development and applications of sumo-simulation of urban mobility. Int. J. Adv. Syst. Meas. 5, 128–132 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Krauß, S., Wagner, P., Gawron, C.: Metastable states in a microscopic model of traffic flow. Phys. Rev. E 55(5), 5597 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Grant, M., Boyd, S.: CVX: Matlab software for disciplined convex programming, version 2.1, March 2014. http://cvxr.com/cvx

  36. Grant, M., Boyd, S.: Graph implementations for nonsmooth convex programs. In: Blondel, V.D., Boyd, S.P., Kimura, H. (eds.) Recent Advances in Learning and Control. Springer, London (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Treiber, M., Hennecke, A., Helbing, D.: Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations. Phys. Rev. E 62(2), 2000 (1805)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Toyota Research Institute (“TRI”) provided funds to assist the authors with their research but this article solely reflects the opinions and conclusions of its authors and not TRI or any other Toyota entity. This work was also supported by NSF grant CCF-1755808 and UC Office of the President grant LFR-18-548175.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Erdem Bıyık or Daniel A. Lazar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bıyık, E., Lazar, D.A., Pedarsani, R., Sadigh, D. (2020). Altruistic Autonomy: Beating Congestion on Shared Roads. In: Morales, M., Tapia, L., Sánchez-Ante, G., Hutchinson, S. (eds) Algorithmic Foundations of Robotics XIII. WAFR 2018. Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics, vol 14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44051-0_51

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics