Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Police Engagement in Multidisciplinary Team Approaches to Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Science Informed Policing

Abstract

Over the past two decades law enforcement has been given new mandates to identify and respond to the commercial sexual exploitation of children (CSEC). While CSEC has been identified as an important community safety issue and the negative impacts on young people are well documented, it has proven to be difficult for the police to identify young people who are at risk of victimization and challenging to develop the trust necessary to gather information needed to support investigations, arrest perpetrators, and provide safety to child victims. In response to these challenges, law enforcement is increasingly partnering with child welfare and service provider stakeholders to improve responses to CSEC in local communities. This chapter describes the problem of CSEC and outlines key aspects of a multidisciplinary team approach to the problem. Using qualitative interview data from participants in six multidisciplinary teams in Massachusetts dedicated to responding to CSEC, we discuss key benefits and challenges to a multidisciplinary team approach to CSEC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andretta, J. R., Woodland, M. H., Watkins, K. M., & Barnes, M. E. (2016). Towards the discreet identification of Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children (CSEC) victims and individualized interventions: Science to practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 22(3), 260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aron, L., Zweig, J., & Newmark, L. (2006). Comprehensive services for survivors of human trafficking: Findings from clients in three communities. Retrieved from Justice Policy Center at Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai, Y., Wells, R., & Hillemeier, M. M. (2009). Coordination between child welfare agencies and mental health service providers, children’s service use, and outcomes. Child Abuse & Neglect, 33(6), 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.10.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, L. (2001). Patterns of interaction in multidisciplinary child protection teams in New Jersey. Child Abuse & Neglect, 25(1), 65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjelland, H. F. (2017). Identifying human trafficking in Norway: A register-based study of cases, outcomes and police practices. European Journal of Criminology, 14(5), 522–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bracewell, T. E. (2018). Multidisciplinary team involvement and prosecutorial decisions in child sexual abuse cases. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 35(6), 567–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, A. (2005). Legal Outcomes as Effectiveness Research of Forensic Interviewing at the Child Advocacy Center of East Alabama (CACEA). Master of Science, Auburn University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brink, F. W., Thackeray, J. D., Bridge, J. A., Letson, M. M., & Scribano, P. V. (2015). Child advocacy center multidisciplinary team decision and its association to child protective services outcomes. Child Abuse & Neglect, 46, 174–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bross, D. C., Ballo, N., & Korfmacher, J. (2000). Client evaluation of a consultation team on crimes against children. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24(1), 71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Justice Assistance. (n.d.). Office of Justice Programs. Retrieved from https://www.bja.gov/default.aspx

  • Cheung, M., & Brandes, B. J. (2011). Enhancing treatment outcomes for male adolescents with sexual behavior problems: Interactions and interventions. Journal of Family Violence, 26(5), 387–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J. (2018). Structural, organizational, and interpersonal factors influencing interprofessional collaboration on sexual assault response teams. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(17), 2682–2703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516628809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J., Sprang, G., Lee, R., & Cohen, J. (2016). The trauma of commercial sexual exploitation of youth: A comparison of CSE victims to sexual abuse victims in a clinical sample. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(1), 122–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, T. P., Finkelhor, D., & Ormrod, R. (2005). Police involvement in child protective services investigations: Literature review and secondary data analysis. Child Maltreatment, 10(3), 224–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, T. P., Jones, L. M., Walsh, W. A., Simone, M., & Kolko, D. (2007). Child forensic interviewing in Children’s Advocacy Centers: Empirical data on a practice model. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31(10), 1031–1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decker, S. H., Greene, J. R., Webb, V., Rojek, J., McDevitt, J., Bynum, T., et al. (2005). Safety and security at special events: The case of the Salt Lake City Olympic games. Security Journal, 18(4), 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinsmore, J. (1992–1993). A safety net of bridges: Interagency coordination on child abuse investigations. Part I. National Center for Prosecution of Child Abuse Update, 5–6(12–1), 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. M., Iritani, B. J., & Hallfors, D. D. (2006). Prevalence and correlates of exchanging sex for drugs or money among adolescents in the United States. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 82(5), 354–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, R., & Edelman, P. (2014). Blueprint: A multidisciplinary approach to the domestic sex trafficking of girls. Retrieved from Washington, DC: Center on Poverty and Inequality, Georgetown Law School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faller, K. C., & Palusci, V. J. (2007). Children’s advocacy centers: Do they lead to positive case outcomes? Child Abuse & Neglect, 31(10), 1021–1029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, A., Dank, M., de Vries, I., Kafafian, M., Hughes, A., & Lockwood, S. (2019). Failing victims? Challenges of the police response to human trafficking. Criminology & Public Policy. 18 3: 649-673

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, A., McDevitt, J., & Fahy, S. (2010). Where are all the victims? Understanding the determinants of official identification of human trafficking incidents. Criminology & Public Policy, 9(2), 201–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, A., Owens, C., & McDevitt, J. (2014). New laws but few cases: Understanding the challenges to the investigation and prosecution of human trafficking cases. Crime, Law and Social Change, 61(2), 139–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, A., & Pfeffer, R. (2014). How police find cases of human trafficking: Cultural blinders and organizational barriers. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 653, 46–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, A., Pfeffer, R., & Bright, K. (2015). Police perceptions of human trafficking. Journal of Crime and Justice, 38(3), 315–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, J.-Y., Fetzer, S., Chen, Y.-W., Yeh, L., & Huang, M.-C. (2010). Multidisciplinary collaboration reporting child abuse: A grounded theory study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47(12), 1483–1490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, G. E., Jr., Poland, J. E., Bross, D. C., & Krugman, R. D. (1988). The child protective service worker: A profile of needs, attitudes, and utilization of professional resources. Child Abuse & Neglect, 12(4), 481–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldbeck, L., Laib-Koehnemund, A., & Fegert, J. M. (2007). A randomized controlled trial of consensus-based child abuse case management. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31(9), 919–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J., & Griffin, E. (1993). The use of a physician-social worker team in the evaluation of child sexual abuse. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 2(2), 85–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grubb, D., & Bennett, K. (2012). The readiness of local law enforcement to engage in US anti-trafficking efforts: An assessment of human trafficking training and awareness of local, county, and state law enforcement agencies in the state of Georgia. Police Practice and Research, 13(6), 487–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, J. L., & Bromfield, L. (2017). Better together? A review of evidence for multi-disciplinary teams responding to physical and sexual child abuse. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 1524838017697268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochstadt, N. J., & Harwicke, N. J. (1985). How effective is the multidisciplinary approach? A follow-up study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 9(3), 365–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlburt, M. S., Leslie, L. K., Landsverk, J., Barth, R. P., Burns, B. J., Gibbons, R. D., et al. (2004). Contextual predictors of mental health service use among children open to child welfare. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61(12), 1217–1224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICAC. (2017). Internet crimes against children task force program. Retrieved from https://www.icactaskforce.org/Pages/About%20Us.aspx

  • ILO. (2017). 2017 global estimates of child labour and modern slavery – Americas regional brief. Retrieved from Geneva: International Labor Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, N. (2017). Police officer understandings of human trafficking and awareness of anti-trafficking measures. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 40(2), 291–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, M. (2001). Child sexual abuse and the multidisciplinary team approach: Contradictions in practice. Childhood, 8(2), 231–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joa, D., & Edelson, M. G. (2004). Legal outcomes for children who have been sexually abused: The impact of child abuse assessment center evaluations. Child Maltreatment, 9(3), 263–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. B. (2013). A qualitative study of communication among child advocacy multidisciplinary team members using a web-based case tracking system. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 31(4), 355–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L. M., Cross, T. P., Walsh, W. A., & Simone, M. (2007). Do Children’s Advocacy Centers improve families’ experiences of child sexual abuse investigations? Child Abuse & Neglect, 31(10), 1069–1085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justice for Victims of Trafficking Act of 2015, Pub. L. No. 114-22, 129 Stat. 227 Stat. 129 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolbo, J. R., & Strong, E. (1997). Multidisciplinary team approaches to the investigation and resolution of child abuse and neglect: A national survey. Child Maltreatment, 2(1), 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lalayants, M. (2013). Multidisciplinary collaboration in child protective clinical consultations: Perceptions of best practices. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 7(3), 253–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lalayants, M., & Epstein, I. (2005). Evaluating multidisciplinary child abuse and neglect teams: A research agenda. Child Welfare, 84(4), 433–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalayants, M., Epstein, I., & Adamy, D. (2011). Multidisciplinary consultation in child protection: A clinical data-mining evaluation. International Journal of Social Welfare, 20(2), 156–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landers, M., McGrath, K., Johnson, M. H., Armstrong, M. I., & Dollard, N. (2017). Baseline characteristics of dependent youth who have been commercially sexually exploited: Findings from a specialized treatment program. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 26(6), 692–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le, P. D., Ryan, N., Rosenstock, Y., & Goldmann, E. (2018). Health issues associated with commercial sexual exploitation and sex trafficking of children in the United States: A systematic review. Behavioral Medicine, 44(3), 219–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love, H., Hussemann, J., Yu, L., McCoy, E., & Owens, C. (2018). Justice in their own words: Perceptions and experiences of (in) justice among human trafficking survivors. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, E. R., & Katz, C. M. (2002). Community policing, loose coupling, and sensemaking in American police agencies. Justice Quarterly, 19(3), 503–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A., & Rubin, D. (2009). The contribution of children’s advocacy centers to felony prosecutions of child sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 33(1), 12–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, P., Jacobs, C., Bunn, A., & Bifulco, A. (2007). Multi-agency working: Implications for an early-intervention social work team. Child & Family Social Work, 12(2), 143–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, B. S., Dannenfelser, P. L., & Pendleton, D. (2005). Child abuse investigations: Reasons for using child advocacy centers and suggestions for improvement. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 22(2), 165–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton, P. J., Mulcahy, T. M., & Martin, S. E. (2008). Finding victims of human trafficking. Retrieved from NORC: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, J. E., Li, W., Givens, A., & Leibowitz, G. S. (2017). Domestic minor sex trafficking among adjudicated male youth: Prevalence and links to treatment. Children and Youth Services Review, 82, 392–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, Pub. L. No. 105-119, 111 Stat. 2440 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). (n.d.). Office of Justice Programs. Retrieved from https://www.ojjdp.gov/

  • Olson, D. E., Albertson, S., Brees, J., Cobb, A., Feliciano, L., Juergens, R., Ramker, G. F., & Bauer, R. (2002). New approaches and techniques for examining and evaluating multi-jurisdictional drug task forces in Illinois. Chicago, IL: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onyskiw, J. E., Harrison, M. J., Spady, D., & McConnan, L. (1999). Formative evaluation of a collaborative community-based child abuse prevention project. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23(11), 1069–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pence, D., & Wilson, C. (1994). Team investigation of child sexual abuse: The uneasy alliance (Vol. 6). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Preventing Sex Trafficking and Strengthening Families Act of 2014, Pub. L. No. 113-183, 128 Stat. 1919 Stat. (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, J. A., Baglivio, M. T., Piquero, A. R., Greenwald, M. A., & Epps, N. (2017). Human trafficking of minors and childhood adversity in Florida. American Journal of Public Health, 107(2), 306–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruhstaller, T., Roe, H., Thürlimann, B., & Nicoll, J. J. (2006). The multidisciplinary meeting: An indispensable aid to communication between different specialities. European Journal of Cancer, 42(15), 2459–2462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. (1998). Organizations: Natural, rational and open. London: Prentice-Hall International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shared Hope. (2016). Protected innocence challenge toolkit. Retrieved from Vancouver, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skaff, L. F. (1988). Child maltreatment coordinating committees for effective service delivery. Child Welfare, 67(3), 217–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. W., Witte, T. H., & Fricker-Elhai, A. E. (2006). Service outcomes in physical and sexual abuse cases: A comparison of child advocacy center-based and standard services. Child Maltreatment, 11(4), 354–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. M. (2011). Case studies of multidisciplinary child abuse case review teams and their leaders in children’s advocacy centers in Pennsylvania. Ph.D. doctoral dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global database, Ann Arbor, MI. (3453625).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjaden, P., & Anhalt, J. (1994). The impact of joint law enforcement-child protective services investigations in child maltreatment cases. Retrieved from Denver: Center for Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, G. C. (1997). Evaluating the interdisciplinary team approach to child sexual abuse investigation: A retrospective chart review comparing multi-agency and interdisciplinary investigatory approaches. (PhD), New York University, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global database. Ann Arbor: New York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act (TVPA) of 2000, Pub. L. No. 106-386, 114 Stat. 1464S (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Twomey, M. S., Jackson, G., Li, H., Marino, T., Melchior, L. A., Randolph, J. F., et al. (2010). The successes and challenges of seven multidisciplinary teams. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 22(3–4), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/08946566.2010.490144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Justice (USDJ). Providing Resources, Officers, and Technology to Eradicate Cyber Threats to Our Children Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110–401, 122 Stat. 4229 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Justice (USDJ). (2010). The national strategy for child exploitation prevention and interdiction. Retrieved from Washington, DC: http://toolkit.heatwatch.org/policy/files/USDOJ_2010__National_Strategy_to_Prevent_CSEC.pdf

  • Varma, S., Gillespie, S., McCracken, C., & Greenbaum, V. J. (2015). Characteristics of child commercial sexual exploitation and sex trafficking victims presenting for medical care in the United States. Child Abuse & Neglect, 44, 98–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfteich, P., & Loggins, B. (2007). Evaluation of the children’s advocacy center model: Efficiency, legal and revictimization outcomes. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 24(4), 333–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-007-0087-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA

    Amy Farrell, Candence Wills & Carlande Nicolas

Authors
  1. Amy Farrell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Candence Wills
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carlande Nicolas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy Farrell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Criminology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA

    Bryanna Fox

  2. Department of Criminology, University of South Florida-St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg, FL, USA

    Joan A. Reid

  3. College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA

    Anthony J. Masys

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Farrell, A., Wills, C., Nicolas, C. (2020). Police Engagement in Multidisciplinary Team Approaches to Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children. In: Fox, B., Reid, J., Masys, A. (eds) Science Informed Policing. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41287-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41287-6_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41286-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41287-6

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation