Abstract
The aim of this chapter is to present the purpose of the book, and explain the importance of including socioscientific issues in education. In this chapter we aim to discuss the importance of socioscientific education, especially in connection with responsible citizenship and relevance of science, and present the chapters.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Achieve. (2013). The next generation science standards (pp. 1–3). Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org/
Aikenhead, G. S. (2006). Science education for everyday life: evidence-based practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Alsop, S., & Bencze, L. (2012). In search of activist pedagogies in SMTE. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 12(4), 394–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2012.732256.
Bencze, L., & Carter, L. (2011). Globalizing students acting for the common good. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 648–669.
European Commission. (2004). Europe needs more scientists (pp. 1–24). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
European Commission. (2015). Science education for responsible citizenship (pp. 1–88). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Evagorou, M. (2011). Discussing a socioscientific issue in a primary school classroom: The case of using a technology-supported environment in formal and nonformal settings. In Socio-scientific issues in the classroom (Vol. 39, pp. 133–159). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1159-4_8.
Evagorou, M., Albe, V., Angelides, P., Couso, D., Chirlesan, G., Evans, R. H.,... Nielsen, J. A. (2014a). Preparing preservice science teachers to teach socioscientific (SSI) argumentation. Science Teacher Education, 69, 39–47.
Evagorou, M., Guven, D., & Mugaloglu, E. (2014b). Preparing elementary and secondary pre-service teachers for everyday science. Science Education International, 25(1), 68–78.
Evagorou, M., & Puig, B. (2017). Engaging elementary school pre-service teachers in modeling a socioscientific issue as a way to help them appreciate the social aspects of science. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(2), 113–123.
Forbes, C. T., & Davis, E. A. (2007). Exploring preservice elementary teachers’ critique and adaptation of science curriculum materials in respect to socioscientific issues. Science & Education, 17(8–9), 829–854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9080-z.
Kolstø, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85(3), 291–310.
Lee, Y. C., & Grace, M. (2012). Students’ reasoning and decision making about a socioscientific issue: A cross-context comparison. Science Education, 96(5), 787–807. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21021.
Levinson, R. (2006). Towards a theoretical framework for teaching controversial socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 28(10), 1201–1224. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600560753.
Owen, R., Macnaghten, P., & Stilgoe, J. (2012). Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy, 39(6), 751–760. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs093.
Patronis, T., Potari, D., & Spiliotopoulou, V. (1999). Students’ argumentation in decision-making on a socio-scientific issue: Implications for teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 21(7), 745–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290408.
Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729–780). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sadler, T. D. (2004). Moral sensitivity and its contribution to the resolution of socio-scientific issues. Journal of Moral Education, 33(3), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724042000733091.
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20042.
Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in Socioscientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9030-9.
Sampson, V., Simon, S., Amos, R., & Evagorou, M. (2011). Metalogue: Engaging students in scientific and socio-scientific argumentation. In Socio-scientific issues in the classroom (Vol. 39, pp. 193–199). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1159-4_11.
Shoulders, C., & Myers, B. (2013). Socioscientific issues-based instruction: An investigation of agriscience students’ content knowledge based on student variables. Journal of Agricultural Education, 54(3), 140–156. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2013.03140.
Simonneaux, L. (2014). From promoting the techno-sciences to activism – A variety of objectives involved in the teaching of SSIs. In L. Bencze & S. Alsop (Eds.), Activist science and technology education (pp. 99–111). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Simonneaux, L., & Simonneaux, J. (2008). Socio-scientific reasoning influenced by identities. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4(3), 705–711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9145-6.
Sjöström, J., & Eilks, I. (2018). Reconsidering different visions of scientific literacy and science education based on the concept of Bildung. In Y. Dori, Z. Mevarech, & D. Baker (Eds.), Cognition, metacognition, and culture in STEM education. Innovations in science education and technology (Vol. 24). Cham: Springer.
Stuckey, M., Hofstein, A., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Eilks, I. (2013). The meaning of “relevance” in science education and its implications for the science curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 49(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.802463.
Tidemand, S., & Nielsen, J. A. (2016). The role of socioscientific issues in biology teaching: From the perspective of teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 39(1), 44–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1264644.
Topcu, M. S., Sadler, T. D., & Yilmaz Tuzun, O. (2010). Preservice science teachers’ informal reasoning about socioscientific issues: The influence of issue context. International Journal of Science Education, 32(18), 2475–2495. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903524779.
Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Socioscientific issues as a curriculum emphasis. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on Science Education (pp. 697–726). New York/Oxfordshire: Routledge.
Zeidler, D. L., Osborne, J., Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Monk, M. (2003). The role of argument during discourse about socioscientific issues. In The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education (pp. 97–116). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4996-X_6.
Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048.
Zeidler, D. L., Berkowitz, M. W., & Bennett, K. (2014). Thinking (scientifically) responsibly: The cultivation of character in a global science education community. In Assessing schools for generation R (responsibility) (Vol. 41, pp. 83–99). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2748-9_7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Evagorou, M., Dillon, J. (2020). Introduction: Socio-scientific Issues as Promoting Responsible Citizenship and the Relevance of Science. In: Evagorou, M., Nielsen, J.A., Dillon, J. (eds) Science Teacher Education for Responsible Citizenship. Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education, vol 52. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40229-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40229-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-40228-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-40229-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)