Skip to main content

Comparative Performance Analysis of Active and Semi-active Suspensions with Road Preview Control

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Dynamics of Vehicles on Roads and Tracks (IAVSD 2019)

Abstract

The paper presents a comparative performance analysis of passive, active and semi-active suspensions with various optimal control system settings. The active suspension is controlled by a linear quadratic regulator (LQR) in combination with road preview control, while the semi-active suspension is controlled by a clipped-optimal LQR approach. The LQR cost function includes three conflicting criteria related to ride comfort, vehicle handling and suspension stroke limits. The trade-off among these three criteria is assessed by using covariance analysis, i.e. by comparing standard deviations of the criteria-reflected system outputs with respect to stochastic road profile input. Further comparative analyses are based on frequency responses of linear quarter-car model and time responses of nonlinear full-car suspension model. The analysis results show that for some not-too-soft settings, semi-active suspensions with road preview control can outperform active suspensions without road preview, while the best overall performance is achieved by using fully active suspension with road preview control. Time responses of a full-car model, obtained in an advanced simulation environment, demonstrate that controllers based on simple, quarter-car model can be successfully applied to nonlinear, full-car model for improving ride comfort and vehicle handling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hrovat, D.: Survey of advanced suspension developments and related optimal control applications. Automatica 33(10), 1781–1817 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Tomizuka, M.: Optimal linear preview control with application to vehicle suspension – revisited. ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 98(3), 309–315 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hrovat, D.: Optimal suspension performance for 2-D vehicle models. J. Sound Vib. 146(1), 93–110 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hać, A.: Optimal linear preview control of active vehicle suspension. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 21(1), 167–195 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gordon, T.J., Sharp, R.S.: On improving the performance of automotive semi-active suspension systems through road preview. J. Sound Vib. 217(1), 163–182 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tseng, H.E., Hrovat, D.: State of the art survey: active and semi-active suspension control. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 53(7), 1034–1062 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hrovat, D., Tseng, H.E., Deur, J.: Optimal vehicle suspensions: a system-level study of potential benefits and limitations. In: Lugner, P. (ed.) Vehicle Dynamics of Modern Passenger Cars. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tseng, H.E., Hedrick, J.K.: Semi-active control laws – optimal and sub-optimal. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 23, 545–569 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Giorgetti, N., Bemporad, A., Tseng, H.E., Hrovat, D.: Hybrid model predictive control application towards optimal semi-active suspension. Int. J. Control 79(5), 521–533 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Moore, J.B., Andreson, B.: Optimal Control – Linear Quadratic Methods. Prentice-Hall Inc., USA (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hedrick, J.K., Butsuen, T.: Invariant properties of automotive suspensions. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. 204, 21–27 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mastinu, G., Ploechl, M.: Road and Off-Road Vehicle System Dynamics Handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Čorić, M., Deur, J., Xu, L., Tseng, H.E., Hrovat, D.: Optimisation of active suspension control inputs for improved vehicle ride performance. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 54(7), 1004–1030 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

It is gratefully acknowledged that this work has been supported by the Ford Motor Company. In addition, the research work of 1st author has been supported by the Croatian Science Foundation through the “Young researches’ career development project – training of new doctoral students”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivan Cvok .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cvok, I., Deur, J., Eric Tseng, H., Hrovat, D. (2020). Comparative Performance Analysis of Active and Semi-active Suspensions with Road Preview Control. In: Klomp, M., Bruzelius, F., Nielsen, J., Hillemyr, A. (eds) Advances in Dynamics of Vehicles on Roads and Tracks. IAVSD 2019. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38077-9_206

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38077-9_206

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-38076-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-38077-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics