Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Optimization Algorithms and Tools Applied in Agreements Negotiation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing (3PGCIC 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 96))

  • 1512 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper we introduce new mechanisms of dispute resolution as a helping tool in legal procedures for lawyers, mediators and judges with the objective to reach an agreement between the parties; in some situations. The primary objectives are the following: to apply algorithmic mechanisms to the solution of certain national and cross-border civil matters, including matrimonial regimes, successions and trusts, commercial law and consumer law, facilitating the agreement process among the parties; to demonstrate the efficacy of an algorithmic approach and apply it into the allocation of goods, or the resolution of issues, in disputes, leading the parties to a friendly solution before or during the trial comparison. We will focus on the algorithms used for resolving disputes that involve a division of goods between agents, e.g. inheritance, divorces and company law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Sections 2, 3, 4 and 5 are to be attributed to all authors; Sect. 1 in particular is to be attributed to Marco Giacalone.

References

  1. Russell, S., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A modern approach, 3rd edn. (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Audiconsum. CREA Project. https://www.adiconsum.it/al-tuo-fianco/iniziative/crea-conflict-resolution-with-equitative-algorithms/. Accessed 02 Feb 2019

  3. CREA: CREA Project. http://www.crea-project.eu. Accessed 02 Feb 2019

  4. CREA: Commission, European. Grant Agreement number - 766463 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kumar, V.: Algorithms for constraint-satisfaction problems: a survey. AI Mag. 13(1), 32 (1992)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Pazner, E.A., Schmeidler, D.: Egalitarian equivalent allocations: a new concept of economic equity. Q. J. Econ. 92, 671–687 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nash, J.F.: The Bargaining Problem. Econometrica 18, 155–162 (1950)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Bogomolnaia, A., Moulin, H., Sandomirskiy, F., Yanovskaya, E.: Competitive division of a mixed manna. Econometrica 85, 1847–1871 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Buchanan, B.G., Headrick, T.E.: Some speculation about artificial intelligence and legal reasoning. Stan. Law Rev. 23, 40–62 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. AI vs Lawyer: LawGeex, February 2018. https://www.lawgeex.com/resources/aivslawyer/

  11. European Commission: Effective justice the 2018 EU Justice Scoreboard. https://ec.europa.eu

  12. Chianese, A., Marulli, F., Piccialli, F.: Cultural heritage and social pulse: a semantic approach for CH sensitivity discovery in social media data. In: IEEE Tenth International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC), pp. 459–464 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Amato, F., Moscato, V., Picariello, A., Piccialli, F., Sperlí, G.: Centrality in heterogeneous social networks for lurkers detection: an approach based on hypergraphs. Concurrency Comput.: Pract. Exp. 30(3), e4188 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hussain, S., Keung, J., Khan, A.A., Ahmad, A., Cuomo, S., Piccialli, F., Jeon, G., Akhunzada, A.: Implications of deep learning for the automation of design patterns organization. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 117, 256–266 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Coppolino, L., D’Antonio, S., Mazzeo, G., Romano, L., Sgaglione, L.: Exploiting new CPU extensions for secure exchange of eHealth data at the EU level. In: 14th European Dependable Computing Conference (EDCC), pp. 17–24, Iasi (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/edcc.2018.00015 (2018)

  16. Luigi, C., D’Antonio, S., Mazzeo, G., Luigi, R.: A comparative analysis of emerging approaches for securing Java software with Intel SGX. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 97, 620–633 (2019). ISSN 0167-739X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.03.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mazzeo, G., Coppolino, L., D’Antonio, S., Mazzariello, C., Romano, L.: SIL2 assessment of an active/standby COTS-based safety-related system. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 176, 125–134 (2018). ISSN 0951- 8320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.04.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cilardo, A., Barbareschi, M., Mazzeo, A.: Secure distribution infrastructure for hardware digital contents. IET Comput. Digit. Tech. 8(6), 300–310 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Amelino, D., Barbareschi, M., Cilardo, A.: An IP core remote anonymous activation protocol. IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. 6(2), 258–268 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cilardo, A., et al.: An FPGA-based key-store for improving the dependability of security services. In: 10th IEEE International Workshop on Object-Oriented Real-Time Dependable Systems. IEEE (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Amato, F., Moscato, F., Moscato, V., Colace, F.: Improving security in cloud by formal modeling of IaaS resources. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 87, 754–764 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.08.016. Elsevier B.V

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Di Lorenzo, G., Mazzocca, N., Moscato, F., Vittorini, V.: Towards semantics driven generation of executable web services compositions. J. Softw. 2(5), 1–15 (2007). https://doi.org/10.4304/jsw.5.1.1-15

  23. Moscato, F., Aversa, R., Di Martino, B., Rak, M., Venticinque, S., Petcu, D.: An ontology for the cloud in mOSAIC. In: Cloud Computing: Methodology, Systems, and Applications, pp. 467–485 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1201/b11149

  24. Aversa, R., Di Martino, B., Moscato, F.: Critical systems verification in MetaMORP (h) OSY. In: Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics, LNCS, vol. 8696, pp. 119–129. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10557-4_15

    Google Scholar 

  25. Albanese, M., Erbacher, R.F., Jajodia, S., Molinaro, C., Persia, F., Picariello, A., Subrahmanian, V.S.: Recognizing unexplained behavior in network traffic. In: Network Science and Cybersecurity, pp. 39–62. Springer, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Amato, F., Cozzolino, G., Moscato, V., Moscato, F.: Analyse digital forensic evidences through a semantic-based methodology and NLP techniques. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 98, 297–307 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cozzolino, G.: Using semantic tools to represent data extracted from mobile devices. In: Proceedings - 2018 19th International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration for Data Science, IRI 2018, vol. 8424755, pp. 530–536. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper has been produced with the financial support of the Justice Programme of the European Union, 766463 CREA. The contents of this report are the sole responsibility of the authors and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Commission.

figure a

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Naples “Federico II”, via Claudio 21, 80125, Naples, Italy

    Alessandra Amato, Flora Amato & Giovanni Cozzolino

  2. Vrije Universiteit Brussel & LSTS, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 4B304, 21050, Brussels, Belgium

    Marco Giacalone

  3. University of Naples “Federico II”, via Porta di Massa, 1, 80133, Naples, Italy

    Francesco Romeo

Authors
  1. Alessandra Amato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Flora Amato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Giovanni Cozzolino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marco Giacalone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Francesco Romeo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Cozzolino .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information and Communication Engineering, Fukuoka Institute of Technology, Fukuoka, Japan

    Leonard Barolli

  2. University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium

    Peter Hellinckx

  3. Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand

    Juggapong Natwichai

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Amato, A., Amato, F., Cozzolino, G., Giacalone, M., Romeo, F. (2020). Optimization Algorithms and Tools Applied in Agreements Negotiation. In: Barolli, L., Hellinckx, P., Natwichai, J. (eds) Advances on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing. 3PGCIC 2019. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 96. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33509-0_51

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33509-0_51

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33508-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33509-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation