Skip to main content

Groundwater Policy in France: From Private to Collective Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Global Issues in Water Policy ((GLOB,volume 24))

Abstract

According to 1804 French Civil Code, groundwater is considered as a private property. However, after this resource started to be intensively exploited by industries in the 1850’s, the State increasingly regulated its use. In 1935, a system of individual access and withdrawal rights, managed by the State, was established to protect deep confined aquifers which were showing signs of overexploitation. This system of use right was later on extended to unconfined shallow aquifers with the 1992 water law, mainly to protect the environment. A new management approach, based on individual volumetric entitlements, was then developed and tested in several French groundwater basins, subsequently obtaining a legal basis in the early 2000’s. The 2006 water law constitutes a clear break in French water policy. The system of individual volumetric entitlements managed by the State was cancelled and users asked to form Water Users’ Associations at the catchment level. Associations became the recipients of pooled water use entitlements, which they must share among their members using rules agreed collectively. Although this reform only applies to the agricultural sector, its represents a clear shift from a private to a common property regime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Apart from several counties, where a preliminary authorisation is required beyond a certain depth (50–80 m) pursuant to the Water Act of 8 August 1935.

  2. 2.

    Law n° 84-512 of 29th June 1984 relating to freshwater fishing and the management of fish resources. Journal Officiel de la République Française, n°30 June 1984, France, p. 2039–2045.

  3. 3.

    The 1935 Water Act was repealed and replaced by the 1992 Water Act.

  4. 4.

    The main examples are the Beauce aquifer, the Yèvre-Auron Basin (Cher county), the alluvial aquifers in the plains in Garonne-Tarn-Aveyron and Ariège, the Sud-Vendée aquifers, Vienne county, Charente county, and in the catchments located in the counties of Aisne, Aube, Somme and Sarthe.

  5. 5.

    Law n° 2006-1772 of 30th December 2006 on water and aquatic environments, Journal Officiel de la République Française, n° 303 of 31 December 2006, France, Text n° 3/175.

  6. 6.

    The volume to be abstracted is defined in the circular of 03/08/2010 and available online at: http://circulaire.legifrance.gouv.fr/pdf/2010/08/cir_31709.pdf

  7. 7.

    A reader not familiar with the French context should keep in mind that rainfed agriculture is possible over the entire French territory. An interannual variation of water allocation therefore does not systematically threaten the economic viability of farms.

  8. 8.

    This rationale is also applied in the western U.S. where the holder of a water right must use it (“beneficial use”) to avoid losing it (“use it or lose it”). Hanak & Stryjewski, 2012).

References

  • Barraque, B. (2004). Groundwater management in France: From private to common property? Managing common pool groundwater resources, an international perspective. M. Brentwood, & S. Robar, Praeger: 85–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barraqué, B. O., Laigneau, P., & Formiga-Johnsson, R. M. (2018). The rise and fall of the french agences de l’eau: From german-type subsidiarität to state control. Water Economics and Policy, 4(03), 1850013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouarfa, S., Brunel, L., Bouarfa, S., Brunel, L., Granier, J., Mailhol, J. C., et al. (2011). Evaluation en partenariat des stratégies d’irrigation en cas de restriction des prélèvements dans la nappe de Beauce (France). Cahiers agricultures, 20(1), 124–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brun, A. (2003). Aménagement et gestion des eaux en France: l’échec de la politique de l’eau face aux intérêts du monde agricole. VertigO-la revue électronique en sciences de l’environnement, 4(3). Available at: https://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/3779

  • Compte, J., Retkowsky, Y., et al. (1995). Les SDAGE, les SAGE et l’eau souterraine. Paris, France: Conseil Général des Mines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conseil Economique et Social. (1991). L’eau, gestion des ressources et protection de la qualité. Rapport présenté par M. Philippe Mangin, séances des 12 et 13 mars 1991, Paris, Direction des Journaux Officiels, brochure n° 4166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figureau, A. G., Montginoul, M., et al. (2012). Gestion quantitative de l’eau d’irrigation en France: Bilan de l’application de la loi sur l’eau et les milieux aquatiques de 2006. Orléans, BRGM. Report BRGM/RP-61626-FR: 50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazzaniga, J.-L., & Larrouy-Castéra, X. (2010). Droit de l’Eau en France entre Permanences et Mutations, Le. C. de D. 51: 899.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttinger, P. (1992). Le statut juridique des eaux souterraines. Economie Rurale, 208–209, 66–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanak, E., & Stryjewski, E. (2012). California’s water market, by the numbers: Update 2012. P. P. I. o. California. San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hébert, N., Grandmougin, B., et al. (2012). Réforme des autorisations de prélèvement dans le bassin Adour-Garonne: impacts sur l’économie agricole. Agronomie, Environnement et Sociétés, 2(2), 113–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hérivaux, C., Rinaudo, J. D., & Montginoul, M. (2019). Exploring the potential of groundwater Markets in Agriculture: Results of a participatory evaluation in five French case studies. Water Economics and Policy, 1950009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosciusko-Morizet, N., & Lamotte, H. et al. (1998). Que peut on attendre de la mise en place de quotas individuels échangeables de prélèvement sur la ressource en eau en France? L’exemple de l’agriculture irriguée. Direction de la Prévision: 1 à 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafitte, J.-J., Devos, P., et al. (2008). Les organismes uniques d’irrigation. Paris, Ministère de l’Ecologie, de l’Energie, du Développement Durable et de l’Aménagement du Territoire, Ministère de l’agriculture et de la pêche.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemoine, P., Humery, R., & Soyer, R. (1939). Les forages profonds du bassin de Paris. Paris, France: La nappe artésienne des sables verts. Mémoires du Muséuml. 700 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loubier, S., Campardon, M., et al. (2013). L’irrigation diminue-t-elle en France? Premiers enseignements du recensement agricole de 2010. Sciences, Eaux et Territoires, 11, 12–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margat, J., Pennequin, D., et Roux, J.-C. (2013). Histoire de l’hydrogéologie française (Assoc. Internat. des Hydrogéologues (AIH) and Comité Français d’Hydrogéologie (CFH), Eds.). Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. (1972). L’évolution de l’irrigation en France. Revue de géographie alpine, 60(3), 419–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Y. (1996). Rapport sur la gestion durable des eaux souterraines. Paris, France: Conseil Général des Mines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merillon, Y., & Chaperon, P. (1990). La sécheresse de 1989. La Houille Blanche, n°5, 325– 340

    Google Scholar 

  • Montginoul, M., & Rinaudo, J. (2010). Quels instruments pour gérer les prélèvements en eau souterraine? Le cas du Roussillon. Economie Rurale, 310, 40–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ollivier, J. Y. (1989). Conséquence des sécheresses de 1985 et 1986 dans le sud-ouest de la France: élaboration d’un programme de lutte. La Houille Blanche, n°. 7–8, 530–533

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit, O. (2004). La nouvelle économie des ressources et les marchés de l’eau: une perspective idéologique? VertigO-la revue électronique en sciences de l’environnement, 5(2). Available at : https://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/3608

  • Rinaudo, J.-D. (coord). (2014). Water market scenarios for southern Europe: New solutions for coping with increasing water scarcity and drought risk? Final project report. Available at https://sites.google.com/site/capandtraderesearch/final-report, IWRM Net

  • Risler, J. J, & Roux, J. C. (1993). Enquête sur l’application du décret-loi du 8 août 1935 sur la protection des eaux souterraines. Rapport R 37914. BRGM: Orléans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seguin, J.-J., & Gomez, E., et al. (2009). Les indicateurs piézométriques: un outil dans la gestion des hydrosystèmes. Orléans, BRGM/RP-58139-FR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strosser, P., & Montginoul, M. (2001). Vers des marchés de l’eau en France? Quelques éléments de réflexion. Annales des Mines, Responsabilité et Environnement, 23, 13–31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowlegdments

I warmly thank Steve Barnett, for his very detailed and useful comments on a previous version of this chapter. The contribution from Rebecca Nelson and Josselin Rouillard is also acknowledged. The research presented in this chapter has been supported by Brgm (OPTIQUANT project).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Daniel Rinaudo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rinaudo, JD. (2020). Groundwater Policy in France: From Private to Collective Management. In: Rinaudo, JD., Holley, C., Barnett, S., Montginoul, M. (eds) Sustainable Groundwater Management. Global Issues in Water Policy, vol 24. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32766-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics