Skip to main content

Scalable Neural Architecture Search for 3D Medical Image Segmentation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2019 (MICCAI 2019)

Abstract

In this paper, a neural architecture search (NAS) framework is proposed for 3D medical image segmentation, to automatically optimize a neural architecture from a large design space. Our NAS framework searches the structure of each layer including neural connectivities and operation types in both of the encoder and decoder. Since optimizing over a large discrete architecture space is difficult due to high-resolution 3D medical images, a novel stochastic sampling algorithm based on a continuous relaxation is also proposed for scalable gradient based optimization. On the 3D medical image segmentation tasks with a benchmark dataset, an automatically designed architecture by the proposed NAS framework outperforms the human-designed 3D U-Net, and moreover this optimized architecture is well suited to be transferred for different tasks.

S. Kim, I. Kim and S. Lim—Contributed equally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the decoder, before used as one of inputs of the current cell, an output of the last previous cell is summed with an output of the encoder cell at the same level.

  2. 2.

    We set the annealing schedule as \(\tau = \max (0.001, \exp (-0.025t))\).

  3. 3.

    We tried sampling one operation at a time, but the performance was not improved because of the use of high bias architecture and insufficient architecture variation (exploration) especially in the early stage of training.

  4. 4.

    https://github.com/MIC-DKFZ/nnUNet.

  5. 5.

    DARTS [6] requires approximately 4 times more GPU memory in comparison to the SCNAS during architecture search with the same number of channels.

References

  1. Çiçek, Ö., Abdulkadir, A., Lienkamp, S.S., Brox, T., Ronneberger, O.: 3D U-Net: learning dense volumetric segmentation from sparse annotation. In: Ourselin, S., Joskowicz, L., Sabuncu, M.R., Unal, G., Wells, W. (eds.) MICCAI 2016. LNCS, vol. 9901, pp. 424–432. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46723-8_49

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Isensee, F., et al.: nnU-Net: self-adapting framework for u-net-based medical image segmentation (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jaccard, P.: The distribution of the flora in the alpine zone. New Phytol. 11(2), 37–50 (1912)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jang, E., Gu, S., Poole, B.: Categorical reparameterization with gumbel-softmax. In: ICLR (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kayalibay, B., Jensen, G., van der Smagt, P.: CNN-based segmentation of medical imaging data. CoRR abs/1701.03056 (2017). http://arxiv.org/abs/1701.03056

  6. Liu, H., Simonyan, K., Yang, Y.: Darts: differentiable architecture search. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.09055 (2018)

  7. Mortazi, A., Bagci, U.: Automatically designing CNN architectures for medical image segmentation. In: Shi, Y., Suk, H.-I., Liu, M. (eds.) MLMI 2018. LNCS, vol. 11046, pp. 98–106. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00919-9_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Naceur, M.B., Saouli, R., Akil, M., Kachouri, R.: Fully automatic brain tumor segmentation using end-to-end incremental deep neural networks in MRI images. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 166, 39–49 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Oktay, O., et al.: Attention U-Net: learning where to look for the pancreas. In: MIDL (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pham, H., Guan, M.Y., Zoph, B., Le, Q.V., Dean, J.: Efficient neural architecture search via parameter sharing. In: ICML (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Veit, A., Belongie, S.: Convolutional networks with adaptive inference graphs. In: Ferrari, V., Hebert, M., Sminchisescu, C., Weiss, Y. (eds.) ECCV 2018. LNCS, vol. 11205, pp. 3–18. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01246-5_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Wichrowska, O., et al.: Learned optimizers that scale and generalize. In: ICML (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Xie, S., Zheng, H., Liu, C., Lin, L.: SNAS: stochastic neural architecture search. In: ICLR (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yu, L., Yang, X., Chen, H., Qin, J., Heng, P.A.: Volumetric ConvNets with mixed residual connections for automated prostate segmentation from 3D MR images. In: AAAI (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yuan, Y., Chao, M., Lo, Y.C.: Automatic skin lesion segmentation using deep fully convolutional networks with Jaccard distance. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 36(9), 1876–1886 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zoph, B., Vasudevan, V., Shlens, J., Le, Q.V.: Learning transferable architectures for scalable image recognition. In: CVPR (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We thank the Kakao Brain Cloud team for supporting to efficiently use GPU clusters for large-scale experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sungwoong Kim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kim, S. et al. (2019). Scalable Neural Architecture Search for 3D Medical Image Segmentation. In: Shen, D., et al. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2019. MICCAI 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11766. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32248-9_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32248-9_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32247-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32248-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics