Abstract
This chapter provides evidence that scientists’ use of models are central to their research. Two scientists – a microbiologist working with bacteria and a perinatal physiologist working on sheep fetuses were asked how they used their models in science. These conversations provided illustrative data to show that models and modeling were centre stage when scientists were designing their research and thinking about the whole scientific enterprise. It was apparent that these scientists routinely used models both for theory building, and in their scientific practice as a research tool. Furthermore their knowledge of the multiplicity of roles for models was evident when they discussed how they routinely adapted their models as the context changed alongside the questions being asked. It is argued that reading these narratives could provide the reader with an insight into the messiness, creativity and complexity of the scientific process and give a deeper insight into scientific research rather than attempting to analyse and assess a scientist’s modeling competence.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adúriz-Bravo, A. (2013). A ‘semantic’ view of scientific models for science education. Science & Education, 22, 1593–1611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-011-9431-7
Bennet, L. (2017). Sex, drugs and rock and roll: Tales from preterm fetal life. Journal of Physiology, 595(6), 1865–1881.
Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods (2nd ed.). Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitiative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Coll, R. K., France, B., & Taylor, I. (2005). The role of models/and analogies in science education: Implications from research. International Journal of Science Education, 27(2), 183–198.
Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inqury. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2–14.
Dalton, J. P., Uy, B., Okuda, K. S., Hall, C. J., Denny, W. A., Crosier, P. S., et al. (2017). Screening of anti-mycobacterial compounds in a naturally infected zebrafish larvae model. Journal Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 72(2), 421–427.
France, B. (2010). Narrative interrogation. Constructing parallel stories. In S. Rodrigues (Ed.), Using analytical frameworks for classroom research (pp. 90–108). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. OX14 4RN.
Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C. J., & Elmer, R. (2000). Positioning models in science education. In J. K. Gilbert & C. K. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education (pp. 3–17). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Grosslight, L., Unger, C., & Jay, E. (1991). Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 799–822.
Hodson, D. (2014). Learning science, learning about science, doing science: Different goals demand different learning methods. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2534–2553.
Kind, P., & Osborne, J. (2017). Styles of scientific reasoning: A cultural rationale for science education? Science Education, 101(1), 8–31.
Krell, M., Upmeier zu Belzen, A., & Krüger, D. (2014). Students’ level of understanding models and modeling in biology: Global or aspect-dependent. Research in Science Education, 44, 109–132.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Oh, P. S., & Oh, S. J. (2011). What teachers of science need to know about models: An overview. International Journal of Science Education, 33(8), 1109–1130.
Olsson, E. J. (2015). Goal, rationality in science and technology. An epistemological perspective. In S. O. Hansson (Ed.), The role of technology in science: Philosophical perspectives, Philosophy of Egnineeering and technology, 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9762-7_9
Rosenbluet, A., & Weiner, N. (1945). The role of models in science. Philosophy of Science, 12(4), 316–321. http://www.jstor/stable/184253
Schwartz, R., & Lederman, N. (2008). What scientists say: Scientists’ views of nature of science and relation to science context. International Journal of Science Education, 30(6), 727–771.
Upmeier zu Belzen, A., & Krüger, D. (2010). Modellkompetenz im Biologieunterricht. Struktur und Entwicklung. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 16, 41–57. http://www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/zfdn/pdf/16_Upmeier.pdf
Van der Valk, T., Van Driel, J. H., & De Vos, W. (2007). Common characteristics of models in present-day scientific practice. Research in Science Education, 37, 469–488.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
France, B. (2019). Illuminating Scientists’ Modeling Competence. In: Upmeier zu Belzen, A., Krüger, D., van Driel, J. (eds) Towards a Competence-Based View on Models and Modeling in Science Education. Models and Modeling in Science Education, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30255-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30255-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30254-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30255-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)