Abstract
Extensive research has been carried out for the development of learning design tools; nevertheless, their adoption by HE lecturers remains low. Sharing, guidance, and various forms of representation are the main pillars of learning design tools. However, these features do not seem to be sufficient reasons to convince lecturers to adopt these tools in daily learning design practices in HE. This is attached to the gap between learning design tools and actual learning design practice of university lecturers. Sociomateriality provides an analytical lens for unpacking complex practices for identifying the design space of digital tools for learning design without predetermined boundaries. This paper is a first step in exploring how we can follow sociomaterialty in un-packing complex learning design practices in HE to inform the development of software for learning design. It conducts a survey with one hundred ten university lecturers on their learning design practices. It analyses data through sociomaterial theory and derives a sociomaterial evaluation framework. This is used as an instrument for the analysis of seven available learning design tools. A misalignment between tools and HE lecturers’ learning design practice is revealed. Points of misalignment extend the space for what it means to design digital tools that support-learning design practices in HE, and they could be used to highlight areas for improvement to inform and strengthen further the way we design support tools for learning design.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Celik, D., Magoulas, G.D.: A review, timeline, and categorization of learning design tools. In: Chiu, D.K.W., Marenzi, I., Nanni, U., Spaniol, M., Temperini, M. (eds.) ICWL 2016. LNCS, vol. 10013, pp. 3–13. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47440-3_1
Prieto, L.P., Tchounikine, P., Asensio-Pérez, J.I., Sobreira, P., Dimitriadis, Y.: Exploring teachers’ perceptions on different CSCL script editing tools. Comput. Educ. 78, 383–396 (2014)
Dagnino, F.M., Dimitriadis, Y.A., Pozzi, F., Asensio-Pérez, J.I., Rubia-Avi, B.: Exploring teachers’ needs and the existing barriers to the adoption of learning design methods and tools: a literature survey. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 49, 998–1013 (2018)
Bennett, S., Agostinho, S., Lockyer, L.: Technology tools to support learning design: implications derived from an investigation of university teachers’ design practices. Comput. Educ. 81, 211–220 (2014)
Stark, J.S.: Planning introductory college courses: content, context and form. Instr. Sci. 28, 413–438 (2000)
Norton, L., et al.: Teachers’ beliefs and intentions concerning teaching in higher education. High. Educ. 50, 537–571 (2005)
Bennett, S.S., Agostinho, S., Lockyer, L., Kosta, L., Jones, J., Harper, B.: Understanding university teachers’ approaches to design. In: ED-MEDIA World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Chesapeake, Virginia, pp. 3631–3637 (2008)
Bennett, S., Thomas, L., Agostinho, S., Lockyer, L., Jones, J., Harper, B.: Understanding the design context for Australian university teachers: implications for the future of learning design. Learn. Media Technol. 36, 151–167 (2011)
Nguyen, G.N.H., Bower, M.: Novice teacher technology-enhanced learning design practices: the case of the silent pedagogy. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 49, 1027–1043 (2018)
Orlikowski, W.J.: Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work. Organ. Stud. 28, 1435–1448 (2007)
Barad, K.: Getting real: technoscientific practices and the materialization of reality. Differ. A J. Fem. Cult. Stud. 10, 87–128 (1998)
Orlikowski, W.J., Scott, S.V.: Sociomateriality: challenging the Separation of technology, work and organization. Acad. Manag. Ann. 2, 433–474 (2008)
Fenwick, T.: Sociomateriality and Learning: A Critical Approach. Sage, London, UK (2015)
Britain, S.: Learning design systems: current and future developments. In: Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age: Designing and Delivering E-Learning, pp. 103–104. Routledge, Oxford (2007)
Albó, L., Hernández-Leo, D.: Identifying design principles for learning design tools: the case of edCrumble. In: Pammer-Schindler, V., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Drachsler, H., Elferink, R., Scheffel, M. (eds.) EC-TEL 2018. LNCS, vol. 11082, pp. 406–411. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98572-5_31
Owusu-Oware, E., Effah, J., Boateng, R.: Biometric technology for fighting fraud in national health insurance: Ghana’s experience. In: Americas Conference on Information Systems, New Orleans, USA, pp. 1–10 (2018)
Sesay, A., Ramirez, R., Oh, O.-O.: Digital transformation in police work: a sociomaterial perspective on police body worn cameras (BWC). In: Proceedings of 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 4266–4275 (2017)
Jones, M.: A matter of life and death: exploring conceptualizations of sociomateriality in the context of critical care. MIS Q. 38, 895–925 (2017)
Doolin, B., McLeod, L.: Sociomateriality and boundary objects in information systems development. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 21, 570–586 (2012)
Amiel, T., Reeves, T.C.T.: Design-based research and educational technology: rethinking technology and the research agenda. Educ. Technol. Soc. 11, 29–40 (2008)
Creswell, J.W.: Research Design. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (2014)
Hernández-Leo, D., Chacón, J., Prieto, L.P., Asensio-Pérez, J.I., Derntl, M.: Towards an integrated learning design environment. In: Hernández-Leo, D., Ley, T., Klamma, R., Harrer, A. (eds.) EC-TEL 2013. LNCS, vol. 8095, pp. 448–453. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40814-4_37
Derntl, M.: OpenGLM : Integrating open educational resources in IMS learning design authoring. In: The Art and Science of Learning Design, pp. 157–168. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam (2015)
Villasclaras-Fernández, E., Hernández-Leo, D., Asensio-Pérez, J.I., Dimitriadis, Y.: Web collage: an implementation of support for assessment design in CSCL macro-scripts. Comput. Educ. 67, 79–97 (2013)
Britain, S.: A review of learning design: concept, specifications and tools (2004)
Boloudakis, M., Katsamani, M., Retalis, S., Georgiakakis, P.: CADMOS: a learning design tool for Moodle courses. In: Moodle Research Conference, Heraklion, Crete-Greece, pp. 25–32 (2012)
Laurillard, D., et al.: A constructionist learning environment for teachers to model learning designs. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 29, 15–30 (2013)
Emin, V., Pernin, J.-P., Aguirre, J.L.: ScenEdit: an intention-oriented authoring environnment to design learning scenarios. In: Wolpers, M., Kirschner, Paul A., Scheffel, M., Lindstaedt, S., Dimitrova, V. (eds.) EC-TEL 2010. LNCS, vol. 6383, pp. 626–631. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16020-2_65
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Celik, D., Magoulas, G.D. (2019). Challenging the Alignment of Learning Design Tools with HE Lecturers’ Learning Design Practice. In: Scheffel, M., Broisin, J., Pammer-Schindler, V., Ioannou, A., Schneider, J. (eds) Transforming Learning with Meaningful Technologies. EC-TEL 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11722. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29736-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29736-7_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29735-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29736-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)