Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

The Perfect Sleeve Gastrectomy pp 79–90Cite as

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Technical Systematization for a Safe Procedure

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most commonly performed bariatric procedure in the world, accounting for more than 50% of all bariatric procedures (Ponce J, DeMaria EJ, Nguyen NT, Surg Obes Relat Dis 12:1637–1639, 2016). LSG is a safe and effective primary bariatric procedure with durable weight loss. We believe LSG should not be called “easy” and should be performed only by surgeons trained in bariatric surgery. The highlights of a safer SG systematization are based in minimum 36Fr bougie calibration, starting 2–5 cm from the pylorus, keeping about 1 cm distance from esophagus and using some kind of staple line reinforcement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ponce J, DeMaria EJ, Nguyen NT, et al. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery estimation of bariatric surgery procedures in 2015 and surgeon workforce in the United States. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(9):1637–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tretbar LL, Taylor TL, Sifer EC. Weight reduction. Gastric plication for morbid obesity. J Kans Med Soc. 1976;77(11):488–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Johnston D, Dachtler J, Sue-Ling HM, et al. The magenstrasse and mill operation for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2003;13(1):10–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Marceau P, Biron S, St Georges R, et al. Biliopancreatic diversion with gastrectomy as surgical treatment of morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 1991;1:381–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hess DS, Hess DW. Biliopancreatic Diversion with a duodenal switch. Obes Surg. 1998;8:267–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ren CJ, Patterson E, Gagner M. Early results of laparoscopic bilio-pancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: a case series of 40 consecutive patients. Obes Surg. 2000;10:514–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim WW, Gagner M, Kini S, et al. Laparoscopic vs. open biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: a comparative study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003;7:552–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chu CA, Gagner M, Quinn T, et al. Two-stage laparoscopic bilio-pancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: an alternative approach to super-super morbid obesity. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:S069.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Regan JP, Inabnet WB, Gagner M, et al. Early experience with two stage laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as an alternative in the super-super obese patient. Obes Surg. 2003;13:861–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Alexandrou A, Felekouras E, Giannopoulos A, et al. What is the actual fate of super-morbid-obese patients who undergo laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as the first step of a two-stage weight-reduction operative strategy? Obes Surg. 2012;22(10):1623–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gomberwalla A, Lutfi R. Early outcomes of helicobacter pylori and its treatment after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Bariatr Surg Pract Patient Care. 2015;10(1):12–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Berch BR, Torquati A, Lutfi RE, et al. Experience with the optical access trocar for safe and rapid entry in the performance of laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2006;20(8):1238–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Himpens J, Dobbeleir J, Peeters J. Long-term results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for obesity. Ann Surg. 2010;252(2):319–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Laffin M, Chau J, Gill RS, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy and gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Obes. 2013;7:741097.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Silecchia G, De Angelis F, Rizzello M, et al. Residual fundus or neofundus after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: is fundectomy safe and effective as revision surgery? Surg Endosc. 2015;29(19):2899–903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Noel P, Nedelcu M, Nocca D, et al. Revised sleeve gastrectomy: another option for weight loss failure after sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2013;28(4):1096–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Parikh M, Gagner M, Heacock L, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: does bougie size affect mean %EWL? Short-term outcomes. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4(4):528–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Afaneh C, Costa R, Pomp A, et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial assessing the efficacy of omentopexy during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in reducing postoperative gastrointestinal symptoms. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(1):41–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rosenthal R. International sleeve gastrectomy expert panel consensus statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of >12,000 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(1):8–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Parikh M, Issa R, McCrillis A, et al. Surgical strategies that may decrease leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 9991 cases. Ann Surg. 2013;257(2):231–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Berger E, Clements R, Morton J, et al. The impact of different surgical techniques on outcomes in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomies: the first report from the metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program (MBSAQIP). Ann Surg. 2016;264(3):464–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sethi M, Zagzag J, Patel K, et al. Intraoperative leak testing has no correlation with leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:883–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bingham J, Kaufman J, Hata K, et al. A multicenter study of routine versus selective intraoperative leak testing for sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(9):1469–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Alaedeen D, Madan A, Ro C, et al. Intraoperative endoscopy and leaks after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Am Surg. 2009;75(6):485–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Terterov D, Leung P, Twells L, et al. The usefulness and costs of routine contrast studies after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for detecting staple line leaks. Can J Surg. 2017;60(5):335–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Caron M, Hould FS, Lescelleru O, et al. Long-term nutritional impact of sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(10):1664–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bohdjalian A, Langer FB, Shakeri-Leidenmuhler S, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy as sole and definitive bariatric procedure: 5-year results for weight loss and ghrelin. Obes Surg. 2010;20:535–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Saif T, Strain GW, Dakin G, Gagner M, Costa R, Pomp A. Evaluation of nutrient status after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy 1, 3 and 5 years after surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8:542–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Benaiges D, Goday A, Ramon JM, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic gastric bypass are equally effective for reduction of cardiovascular risk in severely obese patients at one year of follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7:575–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Leyba J, Aulestia S, Llopis S. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for the treatment of morbid obesity: a prospective study of 117 patients. Obes Surg. 2011;21:212–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nocca D, Guillaume F, Noel P, et al. Impact of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic gastric bypass on HbA1c blood level and pharmacological treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in severe or morbidly obese patients: results of a multicenter prospective study at 1 year. Updated Position Statement on Sleeve Gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;2:21026.

    Google Scholar 

  32. O’Keefe K, Kemmeter P, Kemmeter K. Bariatric surgery outcomes in patients aged 65 years and older at an American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery center of excellence. Obes Surg. 2010;20:1199–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kafri N, Valfer R, Nativ O, et al. Health behavior, food tolerance, and satisfaction after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7:82–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Alley J, Fenton S, Harnisch M, et al. Quality of life after sleeve gastrectomy and adjustable gastric banding. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8:31–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Brunault P, Jacobi D, Leger J, et al. Observations regarding “quality of life” and “comfort with food” after bariatric surgery: comparison between laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2011;21:1225–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. D’Hondt M, Vanneste S, Pottel H, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a single-stage procedure for the treatment of morbid obesity and the resulting quality of life, resolution of comorbidities, food tolerance, and 6-year weight loss. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:2498–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Nedelcu M, Manos T, Cotirlet A, et al. Outcome of leaks after sleeve gastrectomy based on a new algorithm addressing leak size and gastric stenosis. Obes Surg. 2015;25(3):559–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Perez M, Brunaud L, Kedaifa S, et al. Does anatomy explain the origin of a leak after sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2014;24(10):1717–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Warner D, Sasse K. Technical details of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leading to lowered leak rate: discussion of 1070 consecutive cases. Minim Invasive Surg. 2017:4367059.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Aurora A, Khaitan L, Saber A. Sleeve gastrectomy and the risk of leak: a systematic analysis of 4,888 patients. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(6):1509–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Dakwar A, Assalia A, Khamaysi I, et al. Late complication of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Case Rep Gastrointest Med. 2013:13153.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zundel N, Hernandez J, Galvao Neto MG, et al. Strictures after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percut Tech. 2010;20:154–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Carter P, LeBlanc K, Hausmann M, et al. Association between gastroesophageal reflux disease and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7(5):569–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. DuPree C, Blair K, Steele S, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in patients with preexisting gastroesophageal reflux disease: a national analysis. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(4):328–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Lutfi R, Palermo M, Cadiere GB. Global bariatric surgery. USA: Springer; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Franco JV, Ruiz PA, Palermo M, Gagner M. A review of studies comparing three laparoscopic procedures in bariatric surgery: sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2011;21(9):1458–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Mariano P, Mariano G, Michel G. Laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery. Novel techniques, extending the limits. Berlin, Germany: AMOLCA; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Diagnomed, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Mariano Palermo

  2. Bariatric Surgery, Gastro Obeso Center, Sao Paulo, Brazil

    Almino Ramos Cardoso

  3. Department of Surgery, Sacré-Coeur Hospital, Montréal, QC, Canada

    Michel Gagner

Authors
  1. Mariano Palermo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Almino Ramos Cardoso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michel Gagner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Sacré-Coeur Hospital, Montréal, QC, Canada

    Michel Gagner

  2. Bariatric Surgery, Gastro Obeso Center, Sao Paulo, Brazil

    Almino Ramos Cardoso

  3. Diagnomed, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Mariano Palermo

  4. Emirates Specialty Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

    Patrick Noel

  5. CHU Montpellier, Saint Gely du Fesc, France

    David Nocca

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Palermo, M., Cardoso, A.R., Gagner, M. (2020). Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Technical Systematization for a Safe Procedure. In: Gagner, M., Cardoso, A., Palermo, M., Noel, P., Nocca, D. (eds) The Perfect Sleeve Gastrectomy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28936-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28936-2_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28935-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28936-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation