Abstract
We describe, critique, and develop the status anxiety hypothesis of income inequality. According to the status anxiety hypothesis, income inequality reduces well-being by increasing how much people care about social status and social comparison. We identify three limitations of the status anxiety approach. The first is a frequent failure to distinguish between a social rank hypothesis according to which income inequality increases social status concerns about all aspects of life, and a material rank hypothesis according to which income inequality increases concerns particularly with material aspects of life such as income and wealth. The second is the absence of a clear association between income inequality and some measures of well-being, and the third concern is the absence of a clear explanation for why income inequality increases status anxiety. We suggest that progress can be made by developing more specific process models motivated by the judgment and decision-making literature and by empirical evidence for the assumption that people are concerned with their relative ranked position compared to others.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aldrovandi, S., Wood, A. M., & Brown, G. D. A. (2013). Sentencing, severity, and social norms: A rank-based model of contextual influence on judgments of crimes and punishments. Acta Psychologica, 144(3), 538–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.09.007
Aldrovandi, S., Wood, A. M., Maltby, J., & Brown, G. D. A. (2015). Students’ concern about indebtedness: A rank based social norms account. Studies in Higher Education, 40(7), 1307–1327. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.881349
Anderson, C., Hildreth, J. A. D., & Howland, L. (2015). Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature. Psychological Bulletin, 141(3), 574–601. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038781
Bowles, S., & Park, Y. (2005). Emulation, inequality, and work hours: Was Thorsten Veblen right? Economic Journal, 115(507), 397–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2005.01042.x
Boyce, C. J., Brown, G. D. A., & Moore, S. C. (2010). Money and happiness: Rank of income, not income, affects life satisfaction. Psychological Science, 21, 471–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610362671
Bozdag, E., Gao, Q., Houben, G. J., & Warnier, M. (2014). Does offline political segregation affect the filter bubble? An empirical analysis of information diversity for Dutch and Turkish Twitter users. Computers in Human Behaviour, 41, 405–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.028
Brown, G. D. A., Gardner, J., Oswald, A. J., & Qian, J. (2008). Does wage rank affect employees’ well-being? Industrial Relations, 47(3), 355–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-232X.2008.00525.x
Brown, G. D. A., Gathergood, J., & Weber, J. (2017). Relative rank and life satisfaction: Evidence from US households. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2912892
Brown, G. D. A., Quispe-Torreblanca, E. G., Boyce, C. J., & Wood, A. M. (2017). Inequality, well-being, and social rank: Income increases buy more life satisfaction in more equal countries. Unpublished manuscript.
Bursztyn, L., Ferman, B., Fiorin, S., Kanz, M., & Rao, G. (2018). Status goods: Experimental evidence from platinum credit cards. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(3), 1561–1595.
Buttrick, N. R., Heintzelman, S. J., & Oishi, S. (2017). Inequality and well-being. Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.016
Buttrick, N. R., & Oishi, S. (2017). The psychological consequences of income inequality. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(3), e12304. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12304
Christen, M., & Morgan, R. M. (2005). Keeping up with the Joneses: Analyzing the effect of income inequality on consumer borrowing. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 3, 145–173.
Chrisler, J. C., Fung, K. T., Lopez, A. M., & Gorman, J. A. (2013). Suffering by comparison: Twitter users’ reactions to the Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show. Body Image, 10(4), 648–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2013.05.001
Dittmar, H., Bond, R., Hurst, M., & Kasser, T. (2014). The relationship between materialism and personal well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(5), 879–924. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037409
Dufner, M., Gebauer, J. E., Sedikides, C., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2018). Self-enhancement and psychological adjustment: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23(1), 2019
Frank, R. H. (2010). Luxury fever: Weighing the cost of excess. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Gilbert, P., & Allan, S. (1998). The role of defeat and entrapment (arrested flight) in depression: An exploration of an evolutionary view. Psychological Medicine, 28(3), 585–598. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291798006710
Hounkpatin, H. O., Wood, A. M., Brown, G. D. A., & Dunn, G. (2015). Why does income relate to depressive symptoms? Testing the income rank hypothesis longitudinally. Social Indicators Research, 124(2), 637–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0795-3
Kasser, T. (2002). The high price of materialism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kelley, J., & Evans, M. D. R. (2017a). Societal Inequality and individual subjective well-being: Results from 68 societies and over 200,000 individuals, 1981–2008. Social Science Research, 62, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.04.020
Kelley, J., & Evans, M. D. R. (2017b). The new income inequality and well-being paradigm: Inequality has no effect on happiness in rich nations and normal times, varied effects in extraordinary circumstances, increases happiness in poor nations, and interacts with individuals’ perceptions, att. Social Science Research, 62, 39–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.12.007
Lansley, S. (2011). The cost of inequality: Three decades of the super-rich and the economy. London, UK: Gibson Square.
Maltby, J., Wood, A. M., Vlaev, I., Taylor, M. J., & Brown, G. D. A. (2012). Contextual effects on the perceived health benefits of exercise: The exercise rank hypothesis. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 34(6), 828–841.
Marmot, M. (2015). The health gap. London: Bloomsbury.
McCann, S. J. H. (2014). Happy twitter tweets are more likely in American states with lower levels of resident neuroticism. Psychological Reports, 114(3), 891–895. https://doi.org/10.2466/21.09.PR0.114k25w1
McCarty, N., Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2006). Polarized America: The dance of political ideology and unequal riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mishra, S., Hing, L. S. S., & Lalumière, M. L. (2015). Inequality and risk-taking. Evolutionary Psychology, 13(3), 147470491559629. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704915596295
Mujcic, R., & Oswald, A. J. (2018). Is envy harmful to a society’s psychological health and wellbeing? A longitudinal study of 18,000 adults. Social Science & Medicine, 198, 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.12.030
Neville, L. (2012). Do economic equality and generalized trust inhibit academic dishonesty? Evidence from state-level search-engine queries. Psychological Science, 23(4), 339–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611435980
Oishi, S., Kesebir, S., & Diener, E. (2011). Income inequality and happiness. Psychological Science, 22(9), 1095–1100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417262
Payne, B. K., Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L., & Hannay, J. W. (2017). Economic inequality increases risk taking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(18), 4643–4648. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616453114
Pickett, K. E., & Wilkinson, R. G. (2015). Income inequality and health: A causal review. Social Science & Medicine, 128, 316–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.12.031
Pontusson, J. (2005). Inequality and prosperity: Social Europe vs. liberal America. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Raleigh, M. J., McGuire, M. T., Brammer, G. L., & Yuwiler, A. (1984). Social and environmental-influences on blood serotonin concentrations in monkeys. Archives of General Psychiatry, 41(4), 405–410.
Sapolsky, R. M. (2004). Social status and health in humans and other animals. Annual Review of Anthropology, 33, 393–418. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.144000
Stewart, N., Chater, N., & Brown, G. D. A. A. (2006). Decision by sampling. Cognitive Psychology, 53(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.10.003
Stiglitz, J. E. (2012). The price of inequality: How today’s divided society endangers our future. New York: WW Norton.
Taylor, P. J., Gooding, P., Wood, A. M., & Tarrier, N. (2011). The role of defeat and entrapment in depression, anxiety, and suicide. Psychological Bulletin, 137(3), 391–420. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022935
Veblen, T. (1899). The theory of the leisure class. New York: The New American Library.
Walasek, L., Bhatia, S., & Brown, G. D. A. (2018). Positional goods and the Social Rank Hypothesis: Income inequality affects online chatter about high and low status brands on Twitter. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28, 138–148.
Walasek, L., & Brown, G. D. A. (2015). Income inequality and status seeking: Searching for positional goods in unequal US states. Psychological Science, 26(4), 527–533. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614567511
Walasek, L., & Brown, G. D. A. (2016). Income inequality, income, and internet searches for status goods: A cross-national study of the association between inequality and well-being. Social Indicators Research, 129(3), 1001–1014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1158-4
Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. E. (2009). The spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better. London: Allen Lane.
Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. E. (2018). The inner level. London: Penguin.
Wisman, J. D. (2009). Household saving, class identity, and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Economic Issues, 43(1), 89–114. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624430105
Wood, A. M., Boyce, C. J., Moore, S. C., & Brown, G. D. A. (2012). An evolutionary based social rank explanation of why low income predicts mental distress: A 17 year cohort study of 30,000 people. Journal of Affective Disorders, 136(3), 882–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2011.09.014
Wood, A. M., Brown, G. D. A., & Maltby, J. (2012). Social norm influences on evaluations of the risks associated with alcohol consumption: Applying the rank-based decision by sampling model to health judgments. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 47(1), 57–62. https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agr146
Zheng, H. (2012). Do people die from income inequality of a decade ago? Social Science & Medicine, 75, 36–45.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Walasek, L., Brown, G.D.A. (2019). Income Inequality and Social Status: The Social Rank and Material Rank Hypotheses. In: Jetten, J., Peters, K. (eds) The Social Psychology of Inequality. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28855-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28856-3
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)