Abstract
The Blockchain offers considerable potential for approaching political risks in modern societies. It can make a large number of structures much more democratic—and not just much more efficient than the established structures, but also for promoting citizens’ self-determination and counteracting disenchantment with politics. In addition to the technological challenges, however, there are hurdles here that are primarily owed to the motivations of the decision-makers. Many politicians are therefore still hesitant in their support of the Blockchain. For example, it shifts power from a centralized hierarchy to decentralized and flat structures. This is not necessarily in the interest of the respective leaders, since—in a functioning democracy—we assume that the elected representatives represent and assert the interests of the population in the best possible way. But, irrespective of the degree of democratic participation—up to and including liquid democracy—the Blockchain can already provide a far-reaching spectrum of advantages for the political process that can increase political confidence and make the system much more efficient and transparent.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aldaz-Caroll, E. (2018/2). Can cryptocurrencies and blockchain help fight corruption? https://www.brookings.edu/blog/future-development/2018/02/01/can-cryptocurrencies-and-blockchain-help-fight-corruption/. Accessed November 26, 2018.
Braun, A. (2018). Trends 2018: Logistics—The age of enlightenment https://www.creativeconstruction.de/lp/trends2018/logistics-the-age-of-enlightenment/. Accessed November 26, 2018.
Brock, T. (2017/11). Blockchain, voting & elections: What’s the problem? https://youtu.be/L4zR6mTUPlk/. Accessed November 26, 2018.
Cillizza, C. (2018/10). Donald Trump warns people to beware of non-existent voter fraud. https://edition.cnn.com/2018/10/22/politics/donald-trump-voter-fraud/index.html. Accessed November 26, 2018.
Finley, K. (2014/5). Out in the open: An open source website that gives voters a platform to influence politicians. https://www.wired.com/2014/05/democracy-os/. Accessed November 26, 2018.
Firth, N. (2015/4). Better than a ballot box: Could digital democracy win your vote? https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22630180-400-better-than-a-ballot-box-could-digital-democracy-win-your-vote/. Accessed November 26, 2018.
Freeguard, G. (2015/2). Public trust in public servants—In six graphs. https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/blog/public-trust-public-servants-%E2%80%93-six-graphs. Accessed November 26, 2018.
Houser, K. (2018/3). Sierra Leone just held the world’s first blockchain-powered election. https://futurism.com/sierra-leone-worlds-first-blockchain-powered-election/. Accessed November 26, 2018.
IMF. (2016/5). Corruption: Costs and mitigating strategies. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/sdn/2016/sdn1605.pdf. Accessed November 26, 2018.
Jacomet, N. (2017/1). Democracy earth, the promise of a safe and independent online voting system. https://medium.com/open-source-politics/democracy-earth-the-promise-of-a-safe-independant-online-voting-system-37366935db5e. Accessed November 26, 2018.
Mallwitz, G. (2018/3). Berliner Senat will Tegel-Volksentscheid nicht umsetzen. https://www.morgenpost.de/berlin/article213858169/Berliner-Senat-will-Tegel-Volksentscheid-nicht-umsetzen.html. Accessed November 26, 2018.
Nave, K. (2017/12). Democracy 2.0: How blockchain technology is unveiling a new type of democracy. https://www.delltechnologies.com/en-us/perspectives/democracy-2-0-how-blockchain-technology-is-unveiling-a-new-type-of-democracy/. Accessed November 26, 2018.
Oliver, J. (2017/4). Gerrymandering: Last week tonight with John Oliver. https://youtu.be/A-4dIImaodQ. Accessed November 26, 2018.
Orkutt, M. (2018/11). Blockchain smart contracts are finally good for something in the real world. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/612443/blockchain-smart-contracts-can-finally-have-a-real-world-impact/. Accessed November 26, 2018.
Pew Research Center. (2017/12). Public trust in government: 1958-201.7 http://www.people-press.org/2017/12/14/public-trust-in-government-1958-2017/. Accessed November 26, 2018.
Pew Research Center. (2017/10). Many unhappy with current political system. http://www.pewglobal.org/2017/10/16/many-unhappy-with-current-political-system/. Accessed November 26, 2018.
Stewart, I. (2010/4). Electoral dysfunction: Why democracy is always unfair. https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20627581-400-electoral-dysfunction-why-democracy-is-always-unfair/. Accessed November 26, 2018.
The Economist. (2016/7). Not-so-clever contracts. https://www.economist.com/business/2016/07/28/not-so-clever-contracts. Accessed November 26, 2018.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Braun, A. (2020). Blockchain—The Savior of Democracy?. In: Feldner, D. (eds) Redesigning Organizations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27957-8_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27957-8_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27956-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27957-8
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)